Posts falsely claim Sudanese paramilitary announced attack on Eritrean navy
'Lt General Hemedti's news outlet, RSF, reported earlier today that Shabia navy forces and the remnants of al-Burhan's forces were buried deep in the Red Sea,' the post says.
'Shabia' refers to the Eritrean government.
Mohamed Hamdan Daglo, commonly referred to as Hemedti, is the leader of Sudan's RSF paramilitary.
Since 2023, the RSF has been fighting against the country's armed forces, led by General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan. The two military men were once allies who ousted long-serving president Omar al-Bashir in 2019 before becoming rivals in the ongoing civil war.
The post continues: 'The report, accompanied by photos and published yesterday, said that the next targets will be Asmara and the port of Massawa.'
Massawa is an Eritrean port on the Red Sea.
'The Shabia anti-piracy warships were deployed to the coastal areas to defend al-Burhan, while Lieutenant General Hemedti's RSF attacked Port Sudan with modern drones for three days in a row,' the post adds.
Eritrea has a small navy force with high-speed boats that patrol the Red Sea (archived here).
The post is accompanied by three images: the first two show plumes of dark smoke in a port setting, while the third shows a map of eastern and northern Africa.
AFP Fact Check found that the claim is being shared in a coordinated manner on Ethiopian Facebook accounts.
An overview of these accounts shows that most of them publish pro-Ethiopian government content and include the words 'breaking news', 'update', or 'media' in their names.
These include posts shared here and here .
Since the civil war began in April 2023, fighting between Sudan's regular army and the RSF has killed tens of thousands of people and displaced more than 13 million (archived here).
It is feared that the war could further destabilise the conflict-ridden Horn of Africa by involving foreign armed groups and regional powers. Egypt has backed al-Burhan, while the United Arab Emirates has backed Daglo.
Eritrea has reportedly supported al-Burhan's army by providing several military training camps, which the Eritrean government has neither denied nor confirmed (archived here). Last month, al-Burhan visited Asmara and hailed Eritrean President Isaias Afewerki's support for his country (archived here).
Amidst these developments, the RSF carried out a rare drone attack on Sudan's eastern city of Kassala, near the Eritrean border, on May 3, 2025 (archived here).
Three days later, AFP reported that RSF was accused of drone strikes on the airport, fuel depots and a power substation in the city of Port Sudan (archived here).
Meanwhile, Ethiopia's pursuit of access to the Red Sea has also led to regional tensions with Eritrea and Somalia. While Ethiopia and Somalia have fully restored their diplomatic ties following a peace agreement earlier this year, Ethiopia's rivalry with Eritrea continues (archived here).
However, contrary to the posts shared on Ethiopian social media, the RSF has not announced that it attacked Eritrean navy vessels, nor do the accompanying photos support this claim.
There have been no announcements from RSF claiming any attack against Eritrean navy vessels.
AFP Fact Check reviewed RSF's official website and established that no mention was made of any such attack (archived here).
Moreover, we found no credible reports about Eritrean navy vessels being hit in any RSF drone attacks.
AFP Fact Check conducted reverse image searches and found the original photos used in the posts.
The search results for the first image established that the original photo was captured by Reuters photographer Khalid Abdelaziz on May 6, 2025, when Port Sudan was hit by drones.
The caption reads: 'A view shows a large plume of smoke and fire rising from a fuel depot in Port Sudan, Sudan, May 6, 2025.'
The search results for the second photo revealed it was originally captured by Anadolu, a Turkish news agency, on the same date (archived here).
Its caption reads: 'Smoke rises after explosions at South Port of the city of Port Sudan, Sudan, on May 06, 2025. According to local sources, a series of loud explosions were heard in the area, followed by fires breaking out at the port.'
Reporting by AFP and other media describe fuel depots being hit but make no mention of any navy vessels being struck.
The third image shows a map of armed groups in the Sudan civil war and their alliances with foreign forces, which was published in an article by the BBC (archived here).
Despite the claims in the post, none of the images depict Eritrean navy vessels being struck.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Germany's Merz strikes sharp tone with Europe as he cozies up to Trump
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz is looking to redefine Germany's voice in Europe and build a relationship with U.S. President Donald Trump — who many of Merz's European colleagues do not see eye to eye with. The historically EU-friendly Merz, a former member of the European Parliament, now has a long list of complaints about the bloc. This has included objections to an increase in the EU's new long-term budget that was proposed last month, as well as calling the bloc out for sluggishness and complex bureaucracy. Germany was also among the louder critics of the EU-U.S. trade agreement. Merz's sharp tone is noticeable — especially in comparison to his predecessor Olaf Scholz, who generally struck a more mellow approach. But it does not necessarily mean that the German Chancellor's overall position on Europe has changed, Jörn Fleck, senior director at the Europe Center at the Atlantic Council, told CNBC. "Merz's political vita is a pro-European one, and that hasn't changed. But Merz's pro-EU politics have always been informed by and in creative tension with his traditional conservative values — a fiscal, small government, big on security conservatism," he said. The chancellor's jabs towards the EU reflect this political tension, as well as the domestic political issues Merz is battling with, Fleck said. The German leader's grievances, particularly with EU red tape, often echoes domestic voter sentiment. It's Merz' way of being sensitive to industry leaders who are advocating for less Brussels-bureaucracy, according to Sudha David-Wilp, vice president of external relations and senior fellow at The German Marshall Fund of the United States. In July, Merz told reporters during a press conference that the EU had become "too regulation-intensive" and at times "too slow to react," according to a CNBC translation. His tone will also be informed by his electorate which is "not fundamentally critical of Europe but is nevertheless conservative," said Henning Vöpel, CEO of the Centres for European Policy Network. A new German style? Merz is likely also trying to establish a "new" German tone and tweak the country's position within the EU, experts told CNBC. "After the last German government, which often abstained on important European policy issues - often referred to as the 'German vote' - he wants to claim a new leadership role for Germany and therefore take a more brisk and critical stance," Vöpel said. The Atlantic Council's Fleck shared a similar view, saying Merz is under pressure to stand his ground in instances where EU issues like fiscal plans could impact German domestic politics or become a risk to his agenda at home. "Beyond that, Merz promised a new clarity when it comes to communicating Germany's positions in Europe," he added. "For most, that clarity will be a welcome change of tone." However, while Berlin is now coming to Brussels with a new communication style, Germany's view on the bloc has not fundamentally changed according to Fleck. "His statements, the makeup of his new team, and the reportedly close dialogue with Commission President Ursula von der Leyen hardly suggest a major shift," he said. German-U.S. relationship building The sharper tone may also be serving a transatlantic purpose, according to Vöpel. "By adopting a critical tone towards the EU, Merz can appease Trump, who sees the EU as an attack on the USA," he said. Merz and Trump appear to be building a solid relationship, setting the German Chancellor apart from many of his counterparts in the EU which have not yet been able to do so. June's Merz-Trump meeting in the Oval Office was broadly seen as a quiet win for the German leader, and more recently he was one of the key instigators of U.S.-European talks ahead of Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The German Marshall Fund's David-Wilp explained that "Merz is under no illusion that Germany and Europe need the United States, because a smooth working relationship with the White House is important for the continent's stability and prosperity." Instead of looking nostalgically to the past, his priority is to continue open communication and keep the transatlantic relationship constructive, she said. Importantly, Merz also does not appear to see any conflicts or trade-offs in his pro-EU and pro-Atlanticist positions, Fleck added. "Merz seems to have found the right balance in standing his ground on priority issues and leveraging European coordination while not getting drawn into unnecessary rhetorical skirmishes with the US president," he said.
Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Senators Call for Probe Into Meta After News Report on AI Conversations With Children
Two Republican Senators on Aug. 14 called for a congressional investigation into Meta Platforms, Facebook's parent company, after a recent news media report revealed an internal policy document that allowed the company's chatbots to have 'romantic or sensual' conversations with a child. On Thursday, Reuters reported that it had viewed a Meta policy document detailing polices on chatbot behavior that permitted the technology to 'engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,' generate incorrect medical information, and assist users in arguing that black people are 'dumber than white people.'
3 hours ago
Supreme Court allows Mississippi to require age verification on social media
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court on Thursday refused for now to block enforcement of a Mississippi law aimed at regulating the use of social media by children, an issue of growing national concern. The justices rejected an emergency appeal from a tech industry group representing major platforms like Facebook, X and YouTube. NetChoice is challenging laws passed in Mississippi and other states that require social media users to verify their ages, and asked the court to keep the measure on hold while a lawsuit plays out. There were no noted dissents from the brief, unsigned order. Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote that there's a good chance NetChoice will eventually succeed in showing that the law is unconstitutional, but hadn't shown it must be blocked while the lawsuit unfolds. NetChoice argues that the Mississippi law threatens privacy rights and unconstitutionally restricts the free expression of users of all ages. A federal judge agreed and prevented the 2024 law from taking effect. But a three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in July that the law could be enforced while the lawsuit proceeds. It's the latest legal development as court challenges play out against similar laws in states across the country. Parents and even some teenagers are growing increasingly concerned about the effects of social media use on young people. Supporters of the new laws have said they are needed to help curb the explosive use of social media among young people, and what researchers say is an associated increase in depression and anxiety. Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch told the justices that age verification could help protect young people from 'sexual abuse, trafficking, physical violence, sextortion and more,' activities that Fitch noted are not protected by the First Amendment. NetChoice represents some of the country's most high-profile technology companies, including Google, which owns YouTube; Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat; and Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. NetChoice has filed similar lawsuits in Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Ohio and Utah. Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, called the decision "an unfortunate procedural delay.' 'Although we're disappointed with the Court's decision, Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence makes clear that NetChoice will ultimately succeed in defending the First Amendment — not just in this case but across all NetChoice's ID-for-Speech lawsuits," he said.
