Debate over heritage players in national squad unnecessary
KUALA LUMPUR: Youth and Sports Minister Hannah Yeoh believes that the issue concerning heritage-status players in the national football squad, raised by certain parties, should not be blown out of proportion.
She said that heritage players were also individuals with blood ties to Malaysians, thus making them eligible to don the national jersey.
'So if heritage players can strengthen the national team's performance, I see no issue with it because they are also Malaysians.
'We must support them, and this also reflects our recent struggle in Parliament to amend the Federal Constitution so that Malaysian women who give birth abroad can pass on citizenship to their children,' she said at a press conference after launching the new season of the Sepak Takraw League (STL) here today.
Previously, the Football Association of Malaysia (FAM) faced criticism for allegedly relying too heavily on heritage players and foreign expertise in shaping the Harimau Malaya squad.
Hannah said what mattered most now was to ensure the players felt at home with the local football fans backing them.
The Regent of Johor, Tunku Mahkota Ismail, also expressed dissatisfaction with the ongoing criticism aimed at efforts to advance the country's football scene, including the involvement of heritage players.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
12 minutes ago
- The Sun
Tang Jie-Ee Wei battle past indian pair in first round clash
NATIONAL mixed doubles pair Chen Tang Jie-Toh Ee Wei battled through a tough challenge to defeat India's Dhruv Kapila-Tanisha Crasto in a thrilling first-round match at the Indonesia Open 2025 today at Jakarta's Istora Senayan. The second-seeded Malaysian duo fought hard to secure a 21-11, 16-21, 21-14 victory in 59 minutes, marking their first-ever clash against the Indian pair. In a post-match audio clip shared by the Badminton World Federation (BWF), Ee Wei admitted the pair struggled to find their rhythm but stayed confident in each other's abilities. Tang Jie praised Tanisha's tenacity, describing her as a formidable opponent. 'Tanisha is tough, very aggressive and physically strong. Her aggressive play pushed us to stay consistent on the court,' he said. Tang Jie-Ee Wei will next face Denmark's Mads Vestergaard-Christine Busch, whom they previously defeated at the French Open 2023 and Japan Open 2024. The Danish pair advanced after defeating another Indian duo, Ashith Surya-Amrutha Pramuthesh, 21-15, 21-9 in another Round of 32 match.
The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Indonesia Open 2025: Tang Jie-Ee Wei battle past Indian pair in first round clash
NATIONAL mixed doubles pair Chen Tang Jie-Toh Ee Wei battled through a tough challenge to defeat India's Dhruv Kapila-Tanisha Crasto in a thrilling first-round match at the Indonesia Open 2025 today at Jakarta's Istora Senayan. The second-seeded Malaysian duo fought hard to secure a 21-11, 16-21, 21-14 victory in 59 minutes, marking their first-ever clash against the Indian pair. In a post-match audio clip shared by the Badminton World Federation (BWF), Ee Wei admitted the pair struggled to find their rhythm but stayed confident in each other's abilities. Tang Jie praised Tanisha's tenacity, describing her as a formidable opponent. 'Tanisha is tough, very aggressive and physically strong. Her aggressive play pushed us to stay consistent on the court,' he said. Tang Jie-Ee Wei will next face Denmark's Mads Vestergaard-Christine Busch, whom they previously defeated at the French Open 2023 and Japan Open 2024. The Danish pair advanced after defeating another Indian duo, Ashith Surya-Amrutha Pramuthesh, 21-15, 21-9 in another Round of 32 match.
The Sun
14 minutes ago
- The Sun
Court of Appeal allows government's appeal in armed forces pension adjustment case
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal today allowed the appeal by the government and three others to overturn a High Court's ruling that had previously favoured 50 retired Malaysian Armed Forces (MAF) personnel in a pension adjustment dispute. In a unanimous decision, the three-member panel chaired by Justice Datuk Hashim Hamzah ruled that the military personnel failed to prove that the Malaysian Government, the Prime Minister, the Defence Minister and the Malaysian Armed Forces Council had breached the provisions under the Federal Constitution. 'We find there is merit in the defendants' appeal that warranted appellate intervention,' said Hashim, who sat with Justices Datuk Wong Kian Kheong and Datuk Ismail Brahim. The judge said the defendants cannot be said to be breaching Article 147 of the Federal Constitution as they have not placed the plaintiffs in a less favourable position. The court allowed the appeal with no orders as to legal costs. Wong, who wrote a supporting judgment, said two documents namely Garis Panduan Pelaksanaan Pindaan Syarat-Syarat Perkhidmatan ATM dated Jan 17, 2013, and Surat Pelaksanaan Kesetaraan Pangkat dan Penambahbaikan Jadual Gaji Minimum Maksimum bagi Perkhidmatan ATM di bawah SSM dated March 14, 2013, were not salary adjustment but were amendments to the terms of service for serving members of the MAF. He said that the objective is to improve the salary scheme for serving members and not to discriminate against retirees who retired before Jan 1, 2013. Wong also said that there was no unequal treatment between pensioners who retired before Jan 1 and those who retired after Jan 1, 2013, as pension adjustments were not made for retirees after Jan 1 that year. On Feb 5 last year, the High Court ruled that all military personnel who retired before Jan 1, 2013, are entitled to have their pensions adjusted to the rates and methods applied to the retirees who retired after Jan 1, 2013. The 50 military personnels of various ranks filed an originating summons in the High Court on Nov 17, 2022, seeking a declaration that the government had violated the provisions in Federal Constitution read together with Section 187 of the MAF Act 1972 for their respective failures to implement new pension adjustments for the MAF retirees who retired before Jan 1, 2013. They claimed that the government's failures to implement the pension adjustments had caused a significant pension gap between the MAF retirees who retired before Jan 1 and those who retired after Jan 1, 2013. In today's proceedings, Federal Counsel M. Kogilambigai appeared for the government while lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla represented the retired personnel. After the court proceeding, Haniff Khatri told reporters that he would study the court's grounds of judgment before deciding whether to bring the matter up to the Federal Court.
