logo
Nancy Mace: House Representative shows alleged non-consensual nude photo of her taken by Patrick Bryant

Nancy Mace: House Representative shows alleged non-consensual nude photo of her taken by Patrick Bryant

Express Tribune21-05-2025
Listen to article
Rep. Nancy Mace displayed a blurred image of what she described as her 'naked silhouette' during a House Oversight subcommittee hearing on Tuesday, alleging it was recorded without her consent.
The image was shown on a poster behind her at the hearing, which focused on surveillance in private spaces.
Mace said the screenshot was taken from a hidden camera placed at a rental property linked to her ex-fiancé, Charleston tech entrepreneur Patrick Bryant.
Today I exposed a monster whose victims deserve justice. The victims also deserve stronger federal and state laws to protect them.
To other potential victims, I want you to know, 'I have your back.'
I would run through a brick wall to protect women and girls in South Carolina.… pic.twitter.com/RjcsXDz7pr — Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) May 20, 2025
She also presented censored images of other women, which she said were recorded without their knowledge. Bryant has denied the allegations.
'Freedom is not a theory. It is the right to breathe. It is the right to dress and undress, to sleep without someone's camera filming your naked body,' Mace said.
She described herself as a survivor and urged lawmakers to pass legislation to strengthen legal protections against non-consensual recording and voyeurism.
Mace first made the allegations publicly on the House floor in February, accusing Bryant and three other men of secretly filming women, sexual assault, and other crimes.
"So I say, bring it on, brother, because there is no defamation in the truth. And if you're going to be the kind of moron and monster who sues his own victims, may God help you."
Hold the line. pic.twitter.com/khyOeVO1ce — Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) May 21, 2025
Bryant denied the claims in a statement, calling them 'false' and 'malicious.' He also said that if Mace believed the accusations to be true, she would pursue them outside of Congress.
One of the men named by Mace has filed a defamation lawsuit against her.
Mace's office has cited the Speech or Debate Clause of the US Constitution, which protects members of Congress from legal action based on their legislative activities.
Predator and rapist, Patrick Bryant, says he has 'never raped anyone… never hidden cameras… never harmed any woman…'
1. If you aren't a rapist, why would you film a rape and why would you be filmed raping another?
2. Dozens of women filmed, recorded and stored on your… — Rep. Nancy Mace (@RepNancyMace) May 20, 2025
Mace defended her decision to use her position to raise awareness about voyeurism and privacy violations, noting she has introduced multiple bills to protect victims. Her efforts received support from several lawmakers during the hearing.
'I would run through a brick wall to protect women and girls in South Carolina and to other potential victims,' Mace said.
The hearing highlighted ongoing concerns about privacy, consent, and the need for updated laws addressing non-consensual surveillance.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Govt to restore executive magistracy system
Govt to restore executive magistracy system

Express Tribune

time3 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

Govt to restore executive magistracy system

The government has decided to reinstate the executive magistrate system, which had been discontinued in 2001. According to sources, the Ministry of Law has completed all constitutional and legal consultations, and the system will be restored down to the police station level. Executive magistrates will be empowered to inspect police stations, conduct price checks, and monitor protests and public gatherings. Law enforcement will not be allowed to use force during protests without a magistrate's approval. Additionally, magistrates will be authorised to conduct trials for minor offences with punishments up to two years, including summary trials for small fines and traffic violations. Originally introduced during the British colonial era in the 1800s, the executive magistracy was a powerful administrative arm. Post-independence, both the Congress and the Muslim League retained the system, which ensured state writ at the district level. The system included district magistrates, subdivisional magistrates, and executive magistrates. The system was abolished in 2001 by then-President Pervez Musharraf under the new local government framework. Though provinces like Punjab have long demanded its restoration, the federal government is now moving forward with amendments to the Code of Criminal Procedure (1898) to grant magistrates these powers once again. In 1996, the judiciary-administration separation was ordered by the Sindh High Court and upheld by the Supreme Court. The then Benazir Bhutto government removed administrative magistrates at the police station level but retained judicial powers with district and divisional magistrates until 2000. Musharraf's local government reforms ultimately abolished these powers entirely.

14th August Independence Day: A Dawn of Independence
14th August Independence Day: A Dawn of Independence

Business Recorder

time2 days ago

  • Business Recorder

14th August Independence Day: A Dawn of Independence

Seventy-nine years ago, a frail yet determined and resolute man led a nation to freedom—freeing us from the double yoke of colonial British domination and Hindu-majority Congress tyranny. The British Raj and Congress conspired to suppress our aspirations, yet the will of the people triumphed. The ballot prevailed over the bullet. A homeland was won —Pakistan—envisioned as a welfare state where the common man, the real architect and author of freedom, would steer the wheels of destiny. But alas, that dream remains unfulfilled. Faiz's stained dawn still lingers--a freedom incomplete, a dream deferred. Despite the passage of nearly eight decades, the life of the common man-- the very soul and architect of Pakistan, remains unchanged—his pain multiplied, his miseries deepened. Betrayed and ignored, he has been reduced to a rhetorical figure—celebrated in speeches during election days, then discarded like torn posters in the corridors of power. Lofty promises evaporate the moment power is secured. Women with malnourished children wander hospitals, only to find absent doctors and missing medicines. Justice is a mirage—expensive, delayed, and often denied--remains out of his reach, especially in lower courts. Police stations designed to protect him, often serve as hubs of power, where only connections and currency speak. In rural Pakistan, children walk miles to access distant, dilapidated schools; public services are practically nonexistent reminding common man of his insignificance. When the skies pour, cities resemble stagnant rivers for days. Water remains accumulated till such time, it gets naturally evaporated. Infrastructure crumbles. The billions borrowed in the people's name for uplifting them vanish into a black hole of inefficiency and corruption making no visible difference. Instead, every rupee borrowed adds weight to the shoulders of the poor—who pay taxes only to endure humiliation, inflation, insecurity, and systemic decay. Those who gave blood for Pakistan now beg for bread in it. Democracy, once promised as the guardian of rights, has been repeatedly derailed by power-hungry generals, exploiting the incompetence of corrupt and opportunist politicians. Parliament—meant to be the voice of the people—has often been silenced. The judiciary, rather than questioning usurpers, has offered them validation—starting from Justice Munir's infamous verdict in the MaulviTamizuddin Khan case of 1955. Since then, dictators have ruled while courts have looked away. Even when democracy returned, it remained controlled, diluted, and elitist. The arrival of Imran Khan was celebrated as a change, a breath of fresh air—a departure from dynastic politics. But that hope, too, proved illusory. He mirrored the very practices he had vowed to end. The man who rallied against begging bowl and slavery shattered past records in borrowing. Political adversaries were hunted and jailed; language unbecoming of leadership became routine. The reformer became just another name in the long ledger of letdown. The change he promised was swallowed by the status quo. The common man—the one who labours, toils, sacrifices—is still shackled by poverty, unemployment, hunger, disease, crime, and injustice. The Constitution guarantees his rights. Parliament claims to represent him. But in truth, he remains marginal—talked about, never acted for. Why, after 79 years, is he still food insecure? Why does poverty, unemployment, and disease haunt every street? Why do a few enjoy palatial homes while millions live in slums, their children pulled out of schools to earn bread? In rural areas, the feudal lords thrive, their opulent havelis towering over peasants shacks. In cities, slums fester beside skyscrapers, a monument to inequality. What did freedom mean if the multitudes remain shackled? This glaring inequality pushes disillusioned youth towards crime, drugs, and extremism. What have we achieved if our people still grope in darkness while nations born after us touch the skies? Nations that rose from ashes--Germany, Japan, South Korea stand as titans. Even Bangladesh once poorer out spaces us in growth. We are still here with birthday problems, and wallow in misgovernance and mediocrity. Our Parliament unites only when it comes to increasing its own perks and privileges. Why not show the same unity and urgency for solving public woes? Why not brainstorming for breaking begging bowl and reviving a moribund economy? Why don't they mourn their failures instead of picking up quarrels in parliament, to take us out of the abyss? Let our legislators burn the midnight oil—not for personal gains but for national salvation. Let them tackle staggering foreign debts, tax evasion, bloated administrative spending, and the burden of unnecessary advisers, SAPMs and parliamentary committees. Let them shrink the cabinet to a functional size, cut elite privileges, and redirect the saved funds to education and health. Let the rich parliamentarians lead by example—living modestly, earning only daily allowances when in session. Let the judiciary be truly independent. Let the Election Commission be powerful and free of political manipulation. Let institutions serve the people, not power. We have a right to ask Parliament to be accountable—to be the house of the people, not the elite. Our struggle for freedom did not end in 1947; it remains unfinished. Real azaadi will come when the people are freed from hunger, fear, debt, and despair and Constitution's promises and fruits of independence reach out to the street, the village, the slum and to the vulnerable. Let us, on this 79th anniversary of our independence, solemnly pledge to fulfilFaiz's dream and vision of a radiant, unblemished dawn worthy of those who gave their all for this land. Let us strive for that 'bright and shining dawn' we once dreamed of—a Pakistan where the common man is no longer betrayed, but finally empowered. Ye daaghdaaghujala, ye shab-gazidasahar Who intezaarthajiska, ye who sahar to nahin… (This stained light, this night-bitten dawn— This is not the dawn we had waited for…) — Faiz Ahmed Faiz Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Opposition 'bias claim' in civil awards sparks Senate uproar
Opposition 'bias claim' in civil awards sparks Senate uproar

Express Tribune

time2 days ago

  • Express Tribune

Opposition 'bias claim' in civil awards sparks Senate uproar

The upper house of the parliament witnessed uproar on Friday as opposition lawmakers accused the government of politicising this year's civil awards by allegedly favouring ministers and treasury benches, while ignoring deserving figures. The Senate session, chaired by Chairman Yousaf Raza Gillani, turned heated after he announced that several cabinet members and senators had been conferred national honours on August 14. Opposition members demanded disclosure of the criteria used for selection. Among the awardees were Ishaq Dar, Mohsin Naqvi, Musadik Malik, Azam Nazeer Tarar, Faisal Sabzwari, Senator Sherry Rehman, Senator Bushra Anjum, Ahsan Iqbal and Ahad Cheema. Irfan Siddiqui and Sarmad Ali are to receive their awards on March 23 next year. Senator Falak Naz Chitrali questioned, "What war did Atta Tarar fight?" while Senator Humayun Mohmand sarcastically remarked that "the designer of the war, Nawaz Sharif, has not been awarded." PTI's Senator Faisal Javed said party social media activists had countered Indian propaganda "day and night" but were ignored, accusing the government of "destroying the sanctity" of the honours. Defending the awards, Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar said martyrs and heroes of the Marka-e-Haq had been recognised, including those who lost their homes. He said some senators had "fought on diplomatic fronts abroad" and thanked PTI's social media workers for their online role in the campaign. The atmosphere grew tense when Senator Faisal Javed raised the omission of Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah's picture from official Independence Day advertisements, displaying the founder's picture on the Senate floor. "Explain, or we will not let this House run," he warned. Tarar expressed ignorance of the matter, called the omission "hurtful" and promised an inquiry. The House later unanimously adopted a resolution lauding the founding fathers, the framers of the Constitution and the armed forces. Earlier, Senator Zeeshan Khanzada criticised that while prisoners often receive sentence remissions on August 14, PTI leaders were instead handed "10-year jail terms like Bata sale rates." Separately, Senator Kamran Murtaza voiced concern over the suspension of mobile internet across 36 districts of Balochistan and alleged closure of rail, road and air links, warning of damage to Pakistan's image. Minister for Parliamentary Affairs Dr Tariq Fazal Chaudhry clarified that only mobile internet services had been suspended from August 6 to 31 due to "credible security threats" under the Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganisation) Act, 1996. He said telephone lines, airline operations, and road and rail links remained functional. "These measures are taken in specific areas facing threats, not across unrelated regions," he said, citing past terror attacks in the province, including on the Jaffar Express and the Army Public School in Khuzdar. On concerns over prepaid internet packages, Dr Chaudhry pledged to take up the matter with the concerned ministry, assuring that unused credit during the suspension period would be carried forward to the next month. The session was adjourned till Monday evening.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store