Court sets July 16 to hear challenge against Judicial Appointments Act
KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here set July 16 to hear an originating summons filed by a lawyer against the Malaysian government and the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) to challenge the Judicial Appointments Commission Act 2009.
Judge Datuk Amarjeet Singh set the date during the case management today, which was attended by lawyer Shahrulazwad Ismail, representing Datuk Syed Amir Syakib Arsalan Syed Ibrahim, as well as senior federal counsel Ahmad Hanir Hambaly @ Arwi and federal counsel Safiyyah Omar, representing the government and the JAC.
The judge also ordered both parties to file their respective affidavits-in-reply on April 29, while the written submissions are to be filed before or on July 8.
In addition, the court allowed the Bar Council to intervene, while the Human Rights Commission (Suhakam) was allowed to hold a watching brief in the case
Syed Amir, who filed the suit on April 8 this year, is seeking a declaration that the JAC Act is unconstitutional, null and void as it contravenes Article 122B of the Federal Constitution.
He is also seeking a mandamus order to compel the prime minister and the Malaysian government to comply with the judicial appointment process set out under Article 122B of the Federal Constitution, and be free from any interference by the Commission.
Article 122B provides that the appointment of judges shall be made by the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, acting on the advice of the prime minister after consulting the Conference of Rulers.
In addition, he is seeking an interim stay of any judicial appointments made according to the JAC Act 2009 pending the disposal of the application and further orders deemed fair, just and appropriate in the interests of justice
– BERNAMA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysia Sun
3 hours ago
- Malaysia Sun
Malaysia, Poland seek strengthened economic, trade ties
KUALA LUMPUR, June 10 (Xinhua) -- Malaysia is seeking strengthened economic and trade ties with Poland while reaffirming the importance of free and open trade, Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and Polish President Andrzej Duda said here on Tuesday. They reaffirmed the importance of adhering to internationally accepted trade norms and multilateral engagement and cooperation, as this would be mutually beneficial, the leaders said in a joint statement during Duda's official visit to Malaysia from June 9 to 11. "The leaders reiterated their unwavering commitment to open and inclusive trade and a fair, rules-based international trading system. They strongly reaffirmed their support for the swift advancement of the Malaysia-EU Free Trade Agreement (MEUFTA) negotiations and stressed the importance of concluding the agreement at the earliest opportunity," they said. "Both sides agreed to promote balanced trade by reducing economic barriers, enhancing consultation mechanisms between relevant ministries, and fostering collaboration amongst business communities," they said, adding that friendly bilateral cooperation will facilitate cooperation in a number of new and emerging fields such as the digitalization of public services, green transition, particularly the hydrogen economy and renewable energy and the maritime economy. Anwar and Duda also agreed to cooperate on security matters, including enhancing the exchange of experiences and coordination in combating crime, including organized and international crime. Poland is Malaysia's important trading partner among EU member states. Malaysia's main exports to Poland include electrical and electronic products, rubber products and machinery, while main imports from Poland consist of machinery, equipment and spare parts, electrical and electronic products, and transport equipment.
New Straits Times
5 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Zambry urges scholarship providers to diversify student placements beyond US
PUTRAJAYA: Local scholarship providers have been urged to make immediate decisions regarding placing their sponsored students in countries other than the United States (US), following the impact of new tariff policies introduced by the country. Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir said Malaysia had many high-achieving students qualified to pursue studies in the world's best universities, not exclusively in the US. "We can no longer be trapped by policies that are too regressive in nature, to the extent of jeopardising opportunities for students from all over the world, including Malaysia, to study. "For me, the best universities are also available in other countries," he said when met at the 'Luncheon Talk With Editors' session in conjunction with the Asean-Malaysia Chairmanship 2025 Programme, organised by the Higher Education Ministry, here today. He was commenting on the impact of new US tariff policies on Malaysian students pursuing studies there. Previously, the Trump administration issued directives to halt the processing of visas for all foreign students and considered measures to screen new applicants based on their social media posts. Mara chairman Datuk Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki was reportedly quoted as saying that Mara would stop sending its sponsored students to the US starting this year, following the introduction of President Donald Trump's new policies. – BERNAMA
![[UPDATED] Court of Appeal grants Anwar temporary stay in Yusoff Rawther case](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FHQ230325ES029_1749531969.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
New Straits Times
8 hours ago
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] Court of Appeal grants Anwar temporary stay in Yusoff Rawther case
PUTRAJAYA: Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has succeeded in obtaining an ad interim order (temporary stay) of trial proceedings in a sexual assault suit filed against him in 2021 by former research officer Muhammed Yusoff Rawther. This means the trial, scheduled to begin on June 16, along with all related proceedings, will be suspended until the full hearing of the stay application on July 21. A three-member Court of Appeal panel led by Datuk Supang Lian unanimously granted the ad interim order after hearing submissions from Anwar's lawyer, Alan Wong, and Yusoff's lawyer, Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali. "We are of the considered view that under Section 44 of the Courts of Judicature Act, we are empowered to make an ad interim order to preserve the integrity of the appellant's (Anwar) stay application pending the disposal of the appeal. "Accordingly, we hereby make an ad interim order to stay all proceedings, including full trial at the High Court pending the disposal of the appellant's stay application," she said in her decision today. The other judges were Datuk Faizah Jamaludin and Datuk Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin. Anwar's application to stay trial proceedings came after Kuala Lumpur High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain rejected his bid to refer eight constitutional questions to the Federal Court on the immunity of a prime minister from a civil suit. Roz Mawar had also dismissed Anwar's lawyer, Datuk Seri Rajasegaran Krishnan's oral application to stay trial proceedings. Sept 2 was set for case management for the appeal against Roz Mawar's decision that rejected Anwar's referral application to the Federal Court. Earlier, Wong submitted that if a stay on trial proceedings was not allowed, the referral application to the Federal Court would be nugatory. "It is important for the Federal Court to consider the eight constitutional questions as it delves into whether constitutional safeguards are to be implied to protect the functions, institutions and the integrity of the prime minister's office," he said. He said if the trial went on, Anwar, as the sitting prime minister, would be required to divert attention and resources to the proceedings, which would disrupt the business of the government for seven days. Wong argued that there would be no prejudice and irreversible harm to Yusoff if the trial were deferred, as his claims for monetary damages could still be compensated. "But for the appellant (Anwar) and the public office he holds, which is inseparable, the consequences will be real, irreversible and constitutionally significant. "On the other hand, the prejudice to the function and office of the prime minister cannot be compensated in any way. "It cannot be redressed or addressed if the trial proceeded without an appeal being heard or even the Federal Court considering the constitutional questions," he said. In a rebuttal, Rafique argued that the trial dates were fixed a year ago and that Anwar knew very well he was due in court from then. He said the trial would not impair Anwar's capability to carry out his functions as the prime minister. "The prime minister had more than enough time to prepare for this trial, knowing very well that everyone has to submit to the court system. "The trial must proceed, and there is no reason to delay it. When the High Court declined to allow such a stay, it underscored that there is no compelling or special circumstance in this matter. "Moreover, his referral application came 23 days before the trial was supposed to start. "The application to refer to the eight constitutional questions is doomed to fail as they are rhetorical and there is no chance for success," he said. Roz Mawar, in her decision, ruled that Anwar's referral application on the eight constitutional questions was speculative and did not meet the requirements under Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act. Anwar had sought the apex court to rule whether Articles 5,8,39,40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution grant him qualified immunity from Yusoff's suit. He had asked the court to decide whether Yusoff's suit would impair the effective discharge of his executive duties and undermine the constitutional separation of powers. Anwar had also requested the court to consider whether the lawsuit impacts his ability to carry out executive duties and undermines the principle of separation of powers guaranteed by the constitution.
