Government in denial about what constitutes genocide, says Labour MP
Brian Leishman also described as 'appalling' a statement from Foreign Secretary David Lammy where he ruled out 'any discussion of sanctions' against Israel as 'just not correct'.
The MP for Alloa and Grangemouth criticised the Government's response in the Middle East during a Westminster Hall debate on the International Court of Justice (ICJ) advisory opinion on Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPTs).
In July, the ICJ issued an advisory opinion that ruled Israel should pay reparations to the Palestinian people, Israel's policies violate the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and the creation of Israeli settlements are illegal under international law.
In May 2024, the International Criminal Court (ICC) also issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and then-defence minister Yoav Gallant.
Mr Leishman told MPs: 'The ICJ advisory opinion is significant because it adds to the growing international consensus that Israel is committing the crime against humanity of apartheid against Palestinians.
'And that language is extremely important, because the international community has, and continues to, witness annexation, occupation, segregation and apartheid.
'The world is the witness of crimes against humanity and while the UK Government is in denial about what constitutes a genocide, millions of our own citizens, Amnesty International, and many nations from the international community are not.'
He added: 'The hard truth is that the UK needs introspection. To look at what we have done and what we continue to do to allow these dreadful acts of death and destruction to happen with impunity.'
During Foreign Office questions in January, the Foreign Secretary said: 'Israel remains an important ally. We have an important trading relationship, worth £6.1 billion last year and involving 38,000 British jobs. I am sorry; any discussion of sanctions is just not correct.'
Intervening on Mr Leishman on Wednesday, Independent MP for Leicester South Shockat Adam asked if he agreed that Mr Lammy's refusal to implement sanctions against Israel 'because we have a £6.1 billion trade deal is an absolute abhorrent statement'.
Mr Leishman replied: 'Quite simply yes, I'm in agreement it's an appalling statement and I would like to think our country is frankly better than putting a pounds and pence figure on the cost of humanitarian disaster and genocide.'
Labour MP for Birmingham Hall Green and Moseley Tahir Ali said a two-state solution could only be achieved 'if the UK Government recognises both states'.
He said: 'By recognising one state you can never achieve a two-state solution. It's almost saying that we agree with Netanyahu who simply wants a one-state solution.
'That is not the way forward for a peace process and it should not be taken lightly what is being said and our denial is almost a complicity in that agenda.'
Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesperson Calum Miller said the UK should observe the rulings of the ICJ and ICC.
He said: 'We think it is irresponsible for Conservative members to say, as they often do in the chamber, that these are foreign courts.
'They may be located overseas but they have legitimate jurisdiction over the UK because previous governments, both Conservative and Labour, have consented to this.
'Trying to portray them as a threat to UK sovereignty is not only false but damaging as it undermines the likelihood of other states accepting their jurisdiction.'
Foreign Office minister Hamish Falconer said the Government is taking its time in considering the ICJ opinion because of the 'complexity and novel elements' involved.
He said: 'Honourable members will appreciate that such an important decision necessarily takes time and careful consideration.'
Labour MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth Debbie Abrahams intervened to ask if the decision would be made before a conference of contracting parties to the Geneva Convention in March, to which Mr Falconer said would 'not be drawn on precise timings'.
A number of MPs said the Government needs to condemn comments made by US President Donald Trump when he claimed 'the US will take over the Gaza Strip' and turn it into the 'Riviera of the Middle East'.
Mr Falconer said: 'The UK has always been clear and we remain clear we must see two states with Palestinians able to live and prosper in their homelands, in Gaza, in the West Bank.
'There must be no forced displacement of Palestinians nor any reduction in the territory of the Gaza strip.'
Mr Falconer concluded by reiterating the Government's 'commitment to international law', stating they are continuing to consider the ICJ opinion 'with the seriousness and the rigour that it deserves'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
RACHEL RICKARD STRAUS: We pay a high price if No 11 is scared of markets
What can throw tantrums and fling its toys out of the pram when it doesn't get what it was hoping for? A petulant child may spring to mind – but it's an equally accurate description of financial markets. Investors crave certainty and Governments tie themselves in knots trying to give it to them for fear of the consequences. Understandably so – if investors start to lose confidence in a Government's prudence, they can throw a strop and refuse to lend it more money unless they are compensated with higher interest payments. Debt costs then spiral, gobbling up taxes and leaving the Government with less to spend on everything else. So you can see where Chancellor Rachel Reeves was coming from when she made it clear from the off that her mission is to keep financial markets happy. With debt interest predicted to cost us £111 billion this year, we can hardly afford for the bill to rise further. That's already around £3,915 per household. Appeased markets should mean lower debt payments – in theory, good news for us all. But Reeves' attempts to provide security for financial markets are resulting in her eroding it elsewhere. UK households are now the ones in the dark and fearful about what's coming their way – and that is starting to have its own consequences. Ms Reeves' strategy to create certainty was to construct rules about how much the Government would borrow and pledge never to break them. But meeting her rules is getting trickier as economic growth weakens. Short of a miracle, the only way she'll manage it is if households stump up. She'll have to find £50 billion from somewhere – be it tax rises or spending cuts. The problem is that we won't know where she'll target – and are unlikely to for several long months until the autumn Budget. The uncertainty is already starting to bite. Financial experts have told us that households risk making costly mistakes when trying to protect their estates against the possibility that Ms Reeves chooses to target inheritance tax. Leading estate agent Savills last week warned that a 'vacuum' of information about potential changes to inheritance tax is also affected house sales. Potential buyers are sitting on their hands in part because they don't know what is coming down the line. Collectively that hurts the housing market, but individually that's thousands of households stuck in homes that no longer suit them and putting life plans on hold. Aviva boss Amanda Blanc also warned last week that fears of a Budget tax raid are stoking customers' uncertainty. 'There's been a huge amount of speculation… customers should wait and see before they take any action,' she said. 'It is really important you don't do anything detrimental.' Relentless uncertainty about the outlook for pensions erodes confidence in them – which can make savers think twice before making such a long-term investment. Things will only get worse as we get closer to the Budget. Chancellors and the Treasury have a habit of stoking rumours about what they might do – to gauge the public response and decide whether or not to go ahead. Think-tanks, financial firms and other invested organisations publish endless papers about what the Chancellor could and should do in the hope of steering her decisions. Speculation mounts, fears grow. It's easy to get caught up in the frenzy. So what to do? For most of us, the best action to take is likely to be none at all. Acting rashly on rumour could leave you worse off than waiting to see what happens. Any changes the Chancellor does make are unlikely to come in immediately, so you should have time to act then if you need to. But it doesn't hurt to do things that are win-win – in other words, that you wouldn't regret regardless of what the Chancellor does or doesn't announce. That means stashing what you can in your Isa, where investment returns, dividends and interest earned are tax-free. It means remembering your pension as well. Tax relief is effectively free money in your long-term savings – an incredibly generous perk – and long may it remain. And it means doing what makes sense in your life, rather than what may prove to be the most tax efficient. Giving away wealth now may help keep it from the Chancellor if she targets inheritance tax, but that's little solace if it leaves you short in older age. Finally, the Chancellor should keep a check on the uncertainty that she's creating among households. If it results in fearful households curbing their spending, making poor financial decisions and a gummed-up housing market, then financial markets won't like that either – and, as always, they'll make her pay.
Scottish Sun
36 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
British racing to go on strike for first time in its history in protest at betting tax rise with ALL meetings cancelled
Key figures within the sport are opposing a Government proposal RACE IS RUN British racing to go on strike for first time in its history in protest at betting tax rise with ALL meetings cancelled Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) BRITISH racing is set to go on strike for the first time EVER next month. September 10 events at Carlisle, Uttoxeter, Kempton and Lingfield Park are all set to be scrapped. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Four events are set to be scrapped next month, including at Lingfield Credit: Getty The Treasury have proposed to up taxes paid by bookies on racing profits from 15 to 21 per cent - in line with online casinos. According to The Times, the British Horseracing Authority (BHA) have organised the strike, which could cost the industry around £700,000, in opposition to the proposal. The BHA claim that the proposed change would cost the sector £66million every year and put up to 2,752 people out of a job While they also warned that it would send the sport into "irreversible decline". The proposed strike is set to take place just one day before the start of the St Leger Festival at Doncaster. This means that the issue will be placed at the forefront of the sport by the time the prestigious event, that prime minister Keir Starmer attended alongside his wife last year, comes around. Chief executive of the BHA Brant Dunshea said: "This latest tax bombshell from the Government, if followed through, poses one of the gravest risks to horseracing the sport has ever seen. 'The horseracing industry is already in a precarious financial position, and the latest research provides a much more catastrophic forecast than we first thought. 'We're talking thousands of jobs at risk across the supply chain, severely impacted towns and communities, and the irreversible decline of the country's second most popular sport.' It's claimed that bookies would likely look to increase their prices should the proposal come into effect - while two thirds of punters claim that a tax increase would push people towards the gambling black market. Owners remove £195,000 Grade 2-winning horse from Gordon Elliott's yard with his blessing and send to his protege It's also said that bookmakers would cut their advertising and market budgets - while turning their focus towards online gaming. David Menuisier, a trainer at Coombelands Racing Stables, recently told The Sun: 'Racing is much more than just a sport in this country. 'It brings fun and excitement to millions and is a major local employer, particularly here in West Sussex as we prepare for another fantastic year at Goodwood.'
ITV News
41 minutes ago
- ITV News
UK must bring in sick and injured children from Gaza 'without delay', MPs demand
A cross-party group of 96 MPs have urged the government to bring sick and injured children from Gaza to the UK for treatment "without delay". In a letter to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper, Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Health Secretary Wes Streeting, the MPs warn the health system in Gaza has been "decimated" and that conditions in the territory are "worsening by the minute". More than 50,000 children are estimated to have been killed or injured in Gaza since October 2023, according to Unicef. With "essential infrastructure destroyed" and a long-running blockade by Israel of food, water and medical supplies, they say the population now faces a "medical and humanitarian catastrophe of horrific proportion". Citing World Health Organisation estimates, the letter warns 14,800 Palestinians are "in urgent need of medical evacuation - including children at immediate risk of death from trauma injuries and severe pre-existing conditions, such as cancer and cardiovascular disease.". "Given this grave reality, we urge the government to launch the medical evacuation scheme without delay". The letter, co-ordinated by Labour MP and GP, Dr Simon Opher, welcomes the government "finally prioritising" the issue but calls on senior ministers to "recognise the real urgency around medical evacuations". The group make six key demands of ministers while a scheme is developed: Timeline: MPs ask ministers to confirm the planned timeline for a medical evacuation scheme for Palestinian children. "This should be done in close coordination with the WHO and civil society organisations, with all eligible evacuees and their accompanying family members expedited as a matter of urgency," they add. Medical needs first: " The prioritisation of medical evacuations from Gaza must be determined solely based on clinical necessity and individual case assessment, without regard to financial implications, political considerations or reputational interests," the letter says. Funding: "Large-scale evacuations cannot rely on private donations or diversion of aid from other conflict responses," MPs say. "We urge you to ensure adequate government funding for medical treatment, psychosocial support, housing and other essential costs." Family unification: The 96 MPs say it is "vital" that children are accompanied by parents, close family members or another appropriate caregiver. "There is clear medical evidence to suggest their presence can positively impact the recovery of sick or injured children," they add. Legal status of evacuees: Ministers are asked to clarify the legal status of evacuees upon their arrival in the UK and following completion of medical treatment, including any rights to remain and pathways to settlement."We would urge that children and their families are given the option of applying for asylum, humanitarian protection or the chance to resettle in the UK. Evacuees must not be returned to Gaza," the MPs say. Biometrics:"The requirement for biometrics as a prerequisite to issue visas remains a major barrier, given that the only authorised biometrics centre in Gaza closed in October 2023," the groups warns. "We urge you to waive biometric requirements for evacuees under this scheme and permit applications to be completed after departure from Gaza." ITV News has contacted the government for comment on the MPs demands. Ministers have already started working on plans to evacuate up to 300 seriously ill or injured children from Gaza for NHS treatment in the UK. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said in late June that the government was 'urgently accelerating' efforts to bring children over for treatment. Two weeks ago a government spokesperson said: 'We are taking forward plans to evacuate more children from Gaza who require urgent medical care, including bringing them to the UK for specialist treatment where that is the best option for their care. 'We are working at pace to do so as quickly as possible, with further details to be set out in due course.' Scottish First Minister John Swinney welcomed the move to fly up to 300 children from Gaza but criticised the Westminster government for not taking action sooner. 'We have been consistently clear that the suffering being inflicted on the people of Gaza is beyond any justification.'People in Gaza are being bombed and left to starve by Israel on a massive scale. I wrote to the Prime Minister on 9 July to request support from the UK government in meeting the call from Unicef to provide medical care for children from Gaza.'If the UK government is prepared to evacuate Palestinians for medical treatment it would be entirely only regret is the UK government has taken this long to act."
