EC Director of Public Prosecutions says he accepts criticism over Omotoso matter
CAPE TOWN - The Director of Public Prosecutions in the Eastern Cape said that he accepts the criticism against the prosecution team which led the evidence in the Timothy Omotoso matter, because he picked them.
Advocate Barry Madolo told Parliament's Justice Committee today that after the lead prosecutor was replaced when the problems were flagged, he didn't expect the case to fail.
READ: Pastor Timothy Omotoso acquitted on all charges of rape, human trafficking
Madolo plans to appeal the acquittal of the Nigerian pastor once the judge as responded to a request for further clarity on her judgment, in which she was scathing of the prosecutors' handling of the matter.
Madolo said that while he doesn't want to preempt the outcome of an appeal against Timothy Omotoso's acquittal, he's committed to obtaining justice for the victims.
He believes the replacement prosecutors he deployed to the protracted trial had the job in hand, given their successes in similar cases.
"I take responsibility for picking that team because I did not just pick anyone. I picked people whom I thought were capable of dealing with the matter."
Madolo said that lead prosecutor Nceba Ntelwa, against whom the judge made a litany of misconduct findings - and who was removed from the case in 2021 - is still under investigation.
Madolo told the committee he didn't think that in this case Ntelwa had been a 'good team player.'
"I put a team whom I thought was the best team. If I erred there, then the investigation will tell me I erred."
The NPA expects an investigation report into the prosecuting team to be finalised by the middle of next month.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Is the NPA failing South Africa? A deep dive into incompetence and corruption
The Bloemfontein High Court found that Moroadi Cholota's extradition to South Africa from the US was illegal. Image: Dimpho Maja / Independent Newspapers The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) is facing a crisis of credibility, with a string of failed cases and allegations of incompetence and corruption. The recent decision by the Free State High Court to withdraw charges against Moroadi Cholota, the former assistant to former ANC secretary-general Ace Magashule, has highlighted the NPA's struggles. According to legal experts and political commentators, the NPA's challenges are deep-seated and multifaceted. According to Richard Spoor, a legal expert, the NPA's problems are rooted in a lack of leadership, inadequate resources, and a failure to retain skilled personnel. In the Cholota case, the NPA failed to follow the correct procedure for extraditing her from the US, leading to the charges being withdrawn. In other cases, such as the Koko and Nulane cases, the NPA has been accused of failing to secure cooperation from key witnesses. In October 2022, Matshela Koko and seven other people, including members of his family, were arrested on corruption charges relating to an Eskom contract. He was accused of soliciting bribes from Eskom contractors, who received lucrative contracts at Kusile Power Station. He was released a year later, and the court ruled that there was an unreasonable delay on the part of the State to proceed with the trial. Iqbal Sharma, the head of Nulane Investments, was also acquitted by Bloemfontein High Court Judge Nompumelelo Gusha, who said both the police and the NPA had been inept in their handling of the Nulane Investments fraud and money laundering case they had been facing. The NPA's failures have also been highlighted in several high-profile cases. In the case of former president Jacob Zuma, the authority has been accused of delaying and hindering prosecution. In Duduzane Zuma's case, the NPA's case collapsed due to a lack of evidence. The authority is currently pursuing an appeal against Nigerian pastor Tim Omotoso, who faced trial for approximately eight years on allegations of rape. Omotoso was acquitted after the NPA could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was complicit, leaving the South African public outraged. NPA national spokesperson Mthunzi Mhaga did not respond to questions on what challenges the authority had or whether there was a lack of political support. However, responding to questions from journalists after the Cholota case, he said the NPA was "taken aback by the judgment" because the NPA believed Cholota and her lawyers were effectively appealing against the United States judgment, which permitted her extradition from there. Experts believe the NPA's problems are exacerbated by a lack of political will to support the institution. Spoor said the ruling by the Free State High Court on Cholota's extradition highlighted a consistent pattern of failure on the NPA to prosecute high-level corruption cases effectively. "The underlying reason for the ruling is that her extradition from the US was not done in accordance with international law in that the wrong procedure was followed because the request should have been made by the national Department of International Relations and Cooperation, not by the provincial authorities as has happened in this case," Spoor said. He added that the National Director of Public Prosecutions charged Cholota with offences other than the offence for which she was extradited. "This violates the so-called 'speciality principle' which is designed to protect the rights of the extradited person and to uphold the integrity of the extradition process. There are also suggestions that the NDPP lied when it made representations to the US authorities," Spoor said. Political analyst Professor Sipho Seepe said the NPA's failures have given the impression that the institution has been weaponised against certain individuals. "The NPA has not displayed the same appetite for prosecuting cases where a prima facie case has been established," Seepe said. "Bungling the NPA undermines the entire criminal justice system. This has given the impression that the institution has been weaponised against individuals who are regarded as a problem by the current political administration. "Former Chief Justice Zondo is the latest to express himself on Phala Phala, pointing out that Ramaphosa should have resigned. Advocate Ngalwana SC has pronounced himself much earlier on the subject. "The same NPA was eager to frivolously charge the likes of Carl Niehaus for violating the Covid-19 regulations… We know for a fact that it did the same when it targeted Duduzane Zuma. The case against him collapsed," Seepe said. He added: "The Koko case, the Nulane case, and that of Cholota give credence to an institution that has allowed itself to be embroiled in the factional battles of the ANC… Ordinarily, such repeated bungling should have led to the resignation of the individuals involved. Alternatively, they should have been fired." Experts contend that the NPA's problems are systemic and require a comprehensive solution. Sandile Swana, a political analyst, said the NPA's problems are rooted in corruption and incompetence. "The NPA, province by province, a significant number of prosecutors are corrupt," Swana said. "In other words, they are easily manipulated by powerful professionals, well-managed criminals, and criminal syndicates." He added that coordination between detectives and the NPA is substandard. "The engagement between the SAPS and the NPA prosecutors long before anybody is charged should test the quality of charges, the quality of any submissions that should be made," he said. He added that the quality of personnel the NPA possesses, including its leader, Shamila Batohi, was below the standard that is required to prosecute crime successfully in South Africa. [email protected] [email protected]
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Trio convicted for gruesome farm attack in Eastern Cape
The accused tortured a farm owner by binding him, scalding him with hot water, and threatening to dismember him with a chainsaw. Three people who tortured a farm owner by binding him, scalding him with hot water, and threatening to dismember him with a chainsaw in the Eastern Cape have been convicted following the gruesome farm attack. The trio, 26-year-old Odwa Dyabana, 29-year-old Luthando Ngangelizwe and 31-year-old Siseko Qhayisa, were found guilty by the Eastern Cape High Court sitting in East London. The farm attack occurred on 20 February 2024 at Lorain Farm in Bluewater, within the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality. Conviction on multiple charges The three were found guilty on multiple counts, including robbery with aggravating circumstances, attempted murder, pointing of a firearm, five counts of kidnapping, four counts of unlawful possession of a firearm, and unlawful possession of ammunition. In addition, Dyabana was convicted of culpable homicide and reckless and negligent driving in a fatal motor vehicle collision that occurred during their attempt to flee. National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) regional spokesperson Luxolo Tyali said a fourth suspect, 26-year-old Lundi Magobongo, who had also been charged, was acquitted. 'This is after the court accepted his version that he was a contracted e-hailing driver who merely transported the accused and found that there was no evidence linking him directly to the commission of the crimes'. ALSO READ: Four arrested for Free State farm murder, kidnapped wife rescued The farm attack During the trial, the court heard how the trio arrived at the farm under the pretence of wanting to buy dogs. Once they had gained the trust of the farm owner, they lured him to the kennels using his Toyota Land Cruiser. There, they produced firearms, tied him up, and returned to the farmhouse, where they continued their robbery. Tyali said the farm owner and four employees were assaulted, kidnapped, and held hostage during the ordeal. 'The attackers tortured the farm owner by binding him, scalding him with hot water, and threatening to dismember him with a chainsaw in an attempt to force him to reveal the location of safe keys. Accused fled the crime scene 'When their efforts to access the safes failed, the assailants used tools to dislodge them from the walls, loaded them onto the stolen Land Cruiser, and fled the scene in a convoy that included the victim's Toyota Hilux,' Tiyali said. Tiyali said the stolen goods, which included the two vehicles, rifles, wedding rings, wristwatches, binoculars, and other valuables, were valued at more than R2.2 million 'As the accused fled the scene, a collision occurred on the N2 near Beacon Bay between the Land Cruiser, a Toyota Quantum and VW Polo, during which a woman sustained spinal injuries and later passed away in hospital. 'The remainder of the 15 passengers sustained minor to severe injuries. Dyabana was also convicted of her death,' Tiyali said. Arrest near crime scene Dyabana and Ngangelizwe were apprehended near the scene during the getaway — Ngangelizwe after falling from the back of the Land Cruiser, and Dyabana while trying to flee on foot. 'Qhayisa evaded arrest at the time but was captured a few days later. 'The accused pleaded not guilty to all charges. Sentencing proceedings are scheduled to take place from 1 to 4 July 2025 at the East London High Court,' Tiyali said. The NPA said it will 'pray for the court' to impose harsh sentences for the crimes. ALSO READ: Calls to address farm murders after Trump meeting [VIDEO]
IOL News
8 hours ago
- IOL News
'Apartheid Tactics' - Cholota's lawyer slams State after court declares her extradition unlawful
iol A South African court has ruled Moroadi Cholota's extradition from the US unlawful. Her lawyer called the arrest 'an abuse of power,' saying she was targeted for refusing to implicate Ace Magashule in the R255m asbestos case. Image: NPA and Oupa Mokoena "We have always said that the conduct of the State was unlawful and unfair." These were the sentiments of Piet Thabane, attorney for Moroadi Cholota, Ace Magashule's assistant, who won her legal battle in the R255 million Free State Asbestos case. The court recently ruled that Cholota's extradition from the United States of America (USA) was unlawful. The 37-year-old was arrested in the US in April 2024, where she was kept in police custody and extradited to South Africa in August 2024. She was charged with fraud and corruption in the R255 million Free State asbestos roofing case. The final year political science student was kept in police custody for seven days and released on R2,500 bail in the Bloemfontein Magistrate's Court in August 2024. Shortly after being released on bail, Cholota launched an urgent application against the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) to dismiss the charges against her and to declare her extradition unlawful, which was subsequently dismissed. In her founding affidavit, Cholota claimed that the NPA's intention has always been to 'degrade, humiliate and inflict cruel punishment on me for what the State deems as a failure to co-operate with it'. 'As I stated previously, the Asbestos Project has been investigated at length by other State agencies over and above the State Capture Commission, such as the Public Protector, the Special Investigating Unit, and the Auditor General. 'In none of these reports was I ever mentioned, let alone implicated.' Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Speaking to IOL, Thabane said Cholota's arrest and extradition were an abuse of power. "The main reason she was subjected to this unfair treatment was because she refused to implicate her boss, the former Premier Magashule." This week, the court ruled that it had no jurisdiction to try Cholota as her extradition from the United States of America was unlawful. Thabane said during the trial-with-a-trial, the State called two witnesses who had nothing to do with the extradition. "We did not present new facts, but the State failed to meet the minimum standard of proving their case." He described Cholota's arrest in the US as an apartheid tactic. "They thought they could intimidate her." Thabane said his client is relieved and vindicated. "It has been over a year since she has been dealing with this. But it is far from over. We are considering various options because my client's Constitutional Rights were grossly violated." When asked if she would be going back to the US to complete her political studies at Maryland University, Thabane said it was still early days. Thabane said he was aware that the NPA intended to appeal the matter and welcomed the decision. "They will only embarrass themselves."
