
Can I really be fined for honking my car's horn when I pick my friend up?
Last week, he got in the car and said to me: 'You know you could be fined thousands of pounds for doing that?' He claimed that there is a law that says you can't honk a car's horn when it's not moving. Is this true?
Daily Mail and This is Money Motoring Reporter Freda Lewis-Stempel replies: I'm afraid that your friend is correct. Well mainly. While I don't want to pour cold water on your selfless weekly act of giving your mate a lift to football, honking your horn to let him know his chauffeur has arrived isn't a good idea.
If the car is stationary then using the horn can land you a fine but your (somewhat dramatic sounding) friend is wrong when he says you'll be fined thousands.
However, regardless of the legalities, we'd point out for the sake of your mate's neighbours that honking your horn is quite anti-social - let's hope you don't go to football at 7am.
But to settle your concerns, here's what the Highway Code says about honking your car horn.
The little-known Highway Code car horn rule
There is indeed an obscure Highway Code rule regarding the use of the car horn when stationary: Rule 112 focuses on vehicle horn use.
The rule states: 'Use only [the horn] while your vehicle is moving and you need to warn other road users of your presence. Never sound your horn aggressively. You MUST NOT use your horn while stationary on the road or when driving in a built-up area between the hours of 11.30 pm and 7.00 am.'
The exception is when another road user poses a danger.
RAC Breakdown spokesperson Alice Simpson comments: 'An essential part of learning to drive is knowing when it's appropriate to sound your car horn. Drivers should not use the horn in stationary traffic to express frustration or get the attention of other road users, except when there's a danger.
'It's a safety device and misuse can result in fines for both the driver and vehicle owner.'
Freda Lewis-Stempel adds: So, unless your friend suddenly poses a danger to you or anyone else you can't honk your horn to get him to hurry up.
Stationary applies to waiting outside his house - honking at him to let you know you're there clearly violates rule 112.
Rule 112 of the Highway Code clearly states that you can only use your car horn when the vehicle is moving - tooting when stationary is NOT allowed
What's the fine for honking your horn illegally?
Freda Lewis-Stempel says: This is where your friend is slightly off the mark.
Using a car horn when stationary in traffic jams or at traffic lights - both illegal - can lead to a Penalty Charge Notice, but of up to £1,000. So, the fine is not, as your friend said, 'thousands'.
But it's still enough to get you to stop honking your horn - unless you're rolling up in a Rolls-Royce to give him a lift and then £1,000 might be small change.
You could be forgiven for thinking that it is highly unlikely you would be fined for a one off use of the horn. But beware, in theory, you could be.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Auto Blog
2 minutes ago
- Auto Blog
Mercedes CEO Says We Need A Reality Check Over Combustion Bans
By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. The Mazda CX-5 has always been the crossover for people who actually like driving. Does the 2025 model still live up to this expectation? Mercedes Is Concerned About Combustion Restrictions Mercedes, like most other automakers, had once committed to going all-electric by the end of this decade, but weak demand for EVs has forced the company to rethink those targets. Now, Mercedes-Benz CEO Ola Källenius said that even Europe's planned 2035 combustion ban is too ambitious, reports Reuters. 'We need a reality check. Otherwise, we are heading at full speed against a wall,' the CEO told German newspaper Handelsblatt, adding that Europe's car market could 'collapse' if the ban is approved after its review later this year. 2025 Audi S3 vs Mercedes-AMG CLA 35: the executive decision Watch More Käallenius Wants A Different Approach Source: Mercedes This comes after Mercedes-AMG revealed plans to develop a new V8 engine that has no defined 'natural end date,' citing customer demand for more combustion-powered products. Regular, non-AMG Mercedes products will also have a gas option for a long time to come. 'Of course, we have to decarbonize, but it has to be done in a technology-neutral way,' Källenius said. 'We must not lose sight of our economy.' This mirrors earlier comments made by the CEO, after he said in June that he believes 'the most rational approach in the current situation is for an established manufacturer to do both [EV and gas] and not neglect one technology.' Porsche has also walked back plans for going all-electric, thanks to weak demand, and like Mercedes, it sees a varied product offering as key to sustained sales. Essentially, Mercedes and other automakers in Europe are happy to continue developing EVs for those who want them, but they believe that while a ban on combustion cars would lead to a sharp rise in sales just before gas cars are outlawed, disaster would soon follow as consumers look to other brands. View post: Mercedes-Benz Confirms EV Pricing Cut Ahead News Mercedes-Benz Confirms EV Pricing Cut Ahead Price drops of up to $15,000 indicate the EQ line might have a pricing problem. Steven Paul Lots To Come From Mercedes Earlier this month, Källenius revealed that Mercedes-Benz intends to launch an onslaught of 18 new vehicles by 2027, with half of them being all-electric and the other half featuring combustion engines of various descriptions. The CEO says this will be 'probably the most intense amount of launches in a three-year period in the history of [Mercedes].' These vehicles will be ready to live until 2035, but it's clear that the company wants to sell them long after that. With the Trump administration reversing the vast majority of CAFE standards fines and nixing tailpipe emissions rules, Mercedes now hopes that a similarly tolerant view of gas power will take hold in Europe, and given the influx of remarkably good yet well priced EVs from China on the Old Continent, it's quite possible that local lawmakers will change their tune on the combustion ban to sustain the European auto industry. Source: Mercedes-Benz About the Author Sebastian Cenizo View Profile


The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Max Verstappen pinpoints ‘incredible' reason for McLaren's F1 advantage
Join the Miguel Delaney: Inside Football newsletter and get behind-the-scenes access and unrivalled insight Join the Miguel Delaney: Inside Football newsletter Join the Miguel Delaney: Inside Football newsletter Email * SIGN UP I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice Max Verstappen believes he has now worked out why McLaren are dominating F1 so comprehensively this season, pointing to something that he describes as 'incredible to see'. McLaren clearly have the best car on the grid, as proven by the constructors' standings where they are a mammoth 299 points clear of second-placed Ferrari and have all-but sewn up the title ahead of the summer break. It's a similar story in the race for the drivers' crown with the title looking like a straight shootout between the team's two drivers, Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri. Just three of the 14 races so far have been won by a driver from another team with Verstappen taking the chequered flag twice and Mercedes's George Russell triumphing in Canada. Piastri leads his McLaren teammate in the drivers' standings, although Norris closed the gap to a mere nine points by winning in Hungary in the final race before the summer break. Over the past 18 months, McLaren's MCL39 appears to keep it tyres alive longer than any other car on the grid. That has led to plenty of speculation as to why but while Red Bull star Verstappen acknowledges that the minimal tyre degradation does play a role, he has highlighted another reason for their success – their medium corner speed. open image in gallery McLaren's dominance is showing no signs of abating ( Getty Images ) 'It's definitely better on its tyres', Verstappen told the media. 'But at the same time, I think their medium speed performance is incredible compared to, I would say, everyone else on the grid. 'The rotation that they have on the front axle, without losing the rear, is something that is also quite incredible to see, and that's something that we have to try to achieve.' Any mid-season improvements from their rivals may come too late to catch a rampant McLaren but the rule changes coming into force for the 2026 season could signal a shifting of the guard. In the meantime, McLaren team principal Andrea Stella responded to Verstappen's cornering speed assessment. open image in gallery McLaren's MCL39 has been the best car on the grid by far ( Getty Images ) 'That's an easy answer because it can be answered just by looking at the GPS data,' Stella replied. 'When you look at the speed comparison with some other teams, the data says that McLaren can generate the highest mid-corner speed in medium-speed corners. 'So, I think the assessment of Max is correct. 'We still have our weak points. If you go on a very high-speed corner like Copse, for instance, or Pouhon, we are not the fastest car. Likewise, probably in very low speed, we are not the fastest car. 'But the majority of corners in a championship happen to be medium-speed corners, and certainly in that range, our car is, data in hand, the best.'


BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
No stricter licence rules for young drivers a 'major oversight', AA says
The government's planned overhaul of driving laws in Great Britain has a "major oversight" by not including stronger driving licence rules for new and young motorists, the AA has said.A number of proposed changes to driving laws were set out on Monday, including possible driving bans for over 70s who fail compulsory eye have been calls for the introduction of graduated licences, which would place limits on new drivers, such as not carrying passengers for an initial period after they pass their practical Justice Minister Alex Davies-Jones told the BBC there were no plans to introduce such measures over concerns they might "unfairly discriminate" against young parents or carers. The AA welcomed the government's plans in the main, but said "the missing element is measures to safeguard and to save new driver and passenger lives by limiting peer-age passengers for six months".The latest government figures show a quarter of fatalities from road collisions involve at least one young also suggest that male drivers between the ages of 17 and 24 are more likely to be killed or seriously injured than any other age group, apart from those aged 86 or safety charity Brake said this was due to young drivers being more likely to take risks on the road or crash when they have passengers of their own age, something that does not happen as much for older drivers. On Monday, the government announced a radical shake-up of driving laws in Great Britain. The changes are expected to be included in a new road safety strategy set to be published in the proposals include measures to ban motorists over 70 from driving if they fail compulsory eye tests - a move that comes after an inquest into four deaths caused by drivers with failing eyesight saw a coroner call the UK's licensing system the "laxest in Europe".Other plans would involve reducing the drink-driving limit in England and Wales to be in line with Scotland's laws, and giving people points on their licence for not wearing a seatbelt, which Davies-Jones cited as part of the government's plans to protect younger why graduated licences had not been included, she told BBC Breakfast: "We feel it could potentially overly target younger drivers and unfairly discriminate against them, particularly those who are young parents, young carers, for those who are working, for example. "This is not currently something that is being looked at. But we will keep everything under review."Campaigners have previously called for similar restrictions, arguing that new drivers should not be permitted to carry passengers aged 25 or under for an initial period, or until they turn 20, unless accompanied by an older adult. The RAC has also pushed for such limits under a graduated licensing scheme. Other measures suggested include:A minimum six-month learning period for learner drivers before they are eligible for a practical testIntroducing driving curfews during certain times, most likely late at nightA reduction in the legal alcohol limit for driving or zero alcoholIts head of policy, Simon Williams, said: "We are keen to find out what measures [the government] believes will make the biggest difference, especially given so many young drivers are involved in collisions in their first year of driving."A Department for Transport (DfT) spokesperson said: "Whilst we are not considering graduated driving licences, we absolutely recognise that young people are disproportionately victims of tragic incidents on our roads and continue to tackle this through our THINK! campaign."We are considering other measures to address this problem and protect young drivers, as part of our upcoming strategy for road safety - the first in over a decade."