Algeria Continues to Block UN Roundtable Process on Western Sahara
Rabat – Despite UN Security Council resolutions, Algeria continues to block the UN roundtable of talk initiatives on Western Sahara, shirking its responsibility as one of the four main parties to the Western Sahara dispute.
Algerian Foreign Affairs Minister Ahmed Attaf renewed his country's reluctance to engage in the UN-led political process during a meeting with UN Envoy for Western Sahara Staffan de Mistura on Sunday.
According to a statement from the Algerian Foreign Affairs Ministry, Attaf reiterated 'Algeria's full support for the efforts of the UN Secretary-General Mr. Antonio Guterres and his Personal Envoy, Mr. Staffan de Mistura, aimed at reviving the political settlement process of the conflict in Western Sahara based on the UN Charter and principles of international legality related to decolonization.'
Attaf reiterated his country's stance that they are not a party to the dispute.
De Mistura's meeting with Attaf is part of his regional visit to discuss the dispute with the main parties to the Sahara dispute amid a stagnation at the level of the UN, which continues to fail to put pressure on the Algerian regime to engage in good faith in the political process to contribute to finding an agreed upon political solution to end the dispute.
Not a surprise, but it damages the process
Algeria's regime prefers to refer to itself as merely an observer, despite its direct involvement as it hosts, finances, arms, and supports Polisario's independence claims.
Despite this direct involvement, Algeria has repeatedly declined to engage in roundtable discussions initiated by the UN, bringing together all parties to discuss and deliberate a realistic and pragmatic solution.
Algeria's reluctance has been documented in several UN Security Council resolutions as well as reports by the UN Secretary General.
In his latest report on Western Sahara last year, Guterres acknowledged Algeria rejected its role in the dispute.
'On 27 February 2024, my Personal Envoy met with the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Algeria, Ahmed Attaf, in Algiers, Algeria. On 16 April, he met again with Mr. Attaf on the margins of the Minister's working visit to New York on Security Council matters.'
Attaf notably conveyed the continued focus of Algeria on 'ensuring Western Sahara's people the right to self-determination,' the UN chief added, further quoting the top Algerian diplomat as insisting that his country is not a party to the conflict.
UN Security Council Resolutions, including the latest Resolution 2756, called upon all parties to cooperate more fully with each other, a demand that has long been ignored by Algeria's regime.
Critically, the Security Council recognized that achieving a political consensus would contribute to the stability and security of the region.
Algeria's claims: disconnected from reality
Morocco has long exposed Algeria's reluctance to shoulder its responsibility in the dispute.
In November last year, King Mohammed VI reaffirmed Morocco's unwavering commitment to safeguarding the country's sovereignty over its southern provinces.
In a speech which did not mention Algeria by name, the monarch unmistakably referenced the country's regime's hostile stance on Morocco's territorial integrity and highlighted Algeria's refusal to conduct a census in Tindouf camps.
The King stressed that clinging to the independence referendum amounts to being stuck in another 'world clearly disconnected from reality' and 'outdated theories and claims.'
The King also called on the UN to take bolder action in getting countries to distinguish between real or legitimate worlds and 'frozen worlds disconnected from reality.
'Now is the time for the United Nations to assume its responsibility and spell out the major difference between the real legitimate world, represented by Morocco in its Sahara, and a world which is frozen in time, and which is disconnected from reality and the developments that have taken place,' the monarch said.
Omar Hilale, Morocco's permanent ambassador to the UN, echoed the same remarks during a statement in October last year, rejecting Algeria's attempts to undermine Morocco's territorial integrity.
'It is Algeria that created the Polisario, it is Algeria that finances the Polisario, it is Algeria that pays the Polisario, and it is with Algerian passports that Polisario separatists travel around the world,' Hilale said, noting that the separatist group's headquarters, the Tindouf camps, are also in Algeria.
Morocco has been stressing its four fundamental principles during its previous meetings with de Mistura.
The principles include Morocco's support for the UN-led political process towards finding a mutually acceptable political solution, putting emphasis on the continuity of UN-sponsored roundtable discussions that engage all parties to the dispute.
Another key fundamental is Morocco's Autonomy Plan as the only political solution to end the dispute.
Morocco also echoed its strict respect for a ceasefire by all parties as a prerequisite for the continuation of the political process Tags: Algeriaalgeria western sahara
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
19 hours ago
- Morocco World
UK, France Backtrack on Recognizing Palestine
Rabat – The UK and France have abandoned earlier plans to recognize a Palestinian state at an upcoming international conference in New York, scheduled for June 17–20. The two countries had previously hinted at using the event as a platform to announce its recognition, following lobbying from France and growing support across Europe. Instead of immediate recognition, the UK and France are now pushing for a list of preconditions to be met before any future move, including a permanent ceasefire in Gaza, the release of Israeli captives, reforms within the Palestinian Authority, reconstruction of Gaza, and the removal of Hamas from power. French president Emmanuel Macron had earlier described recognition as a 'moral duty and political requirement,' framing it as part of a possible exchange in which Saudi Arabia might move to recognize Israel. In recent days, France informed Israeli officials that recognition would not take place during the conference. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot defended the reversal, calling recognition at this stage merely 'symbolic' and citing France's responsibility as a UN Security Council member to act in line with its allies. In response, Kenneth Roth, former director of Human Rights Watch, cautioned that these conditions could become another 'endless' process used to stall Palestinian statehood. 'Those steps should not be an endless (nonexistent) 'peace process' but pressure on Israel to stop obstructing a state,' he said. Despite mounting European support, both France and the UK have come under pressure from the United States to shelve their plans. British Foreign Officials had told Middle East Eye earlier this month that the US has cautioned them against formal recognition, pushing them to step back from any such commitments. In a blatant show of disregard for international law, Israel announced plans to build 22 new settlements in the occupied West Bank in retaliation for the UK-France consideration to recognize Palestine. Defence Minister Yoav Gallant declared the expansion 'a strategic move that prevents the establishment of a Palestinian state' — erasing the pretence of a two-state solution with an apartheid state. Even as Israel carries out a livestreamed genocide against over two million Palestinians—deliberately starving them into famine—international efforts to recognize Palestinian statehood remain entangled in appeasement of Israeli demands. Since October 2023, Israel has killed at least 54,000 people—a conservative estimate that excludes tens of thousands buried under rubble, dismembered beyond recognition, or literally vaporized by its latest genocidal weapons.
Morocco World
21 hours ago
- Morocco World
Beneath the Wealth: How Algeria's South Threatens National and Regional Stability
Algeria's southern regions embody a striking governance paradox that is potentially impacting the local and regional security. Despite its vast reserves of petroleum, natural gas, and valuable minerals, the region continues to experience severe poverty and underdevelopment. This contradiction is not merely the result of economic mismanagement but reflects deeper issues related to governance, security, and broader regional dynamics. Numerous studies have emphasized that resource-rich economies, including Algeria, suffer from the so-called ' resource curse' —a phenomenon where wealth from natural resources fails to translate into widespread development. In particular, regions that host natural resource extraction sites remain impoverished and marginalized. Although resource extraction generates substantial national revenues, local populations receive minimal benefits. Employment opportunities are limited, and wealth distribution is starkly unequal. In Algeria, most profits are funneled to distant corporate headquarters or the central government, leaving little investment in the southern cities where the resources originate. This lack of economic diversification exposes the region to external shocks and environmental degradation, while centralized governance continues to exacerbate these inequalities is noticed that in Algeria, power over wealth distribution remains tightly concentrated in the northern regions, with minimal input from southern communities. Governance institutions in the south lack autonomy, resources, and meaningful political representation, leaving them ill-equipped to address the needs of their populations. This governance gap fosters widespread resentment and intensifies the legitimacy crisis facing the state. Crucially, the security implications are profound. As a matter of fact, socioeconomic divide and exclusion has created fertile ground for criminal networks, militant activity, and separatist sentiments to take root in Algeria's southern territories. These groups often exploit public grievances, further undermining stability. In this report, we argue that Algeria's unstable southern regions present not only a domestic challenge but also a broader regional threat. The instability, due to the equitable share of wealth, has the potential to destabilize the entire Sahel, as ethnic spillovers, refugee flows, arms smuggling, and extremist infiltration complicate ongoing peace efforts. South Regions By the Algerian south, we refer specifically to the regions of Hassi Messaoud, In-Salah, and Ouargla—territories that suffer from a glaring disparity in the distribution of oil and gas revenues extracted exclusively from their land. Despite being the primary source of the nation's wealth—thanks to its extensive hydrocarbon reserves, including the giant Hassi Messaoud oil field discovered in 1956, the region paradoxically remains among the poorest in the country, mired in poverty and deprivation. This condition reflects a deeply unequal development model in which hydrocarbon revenues are disproportionately channeled to the northern regions, to the detriment of the southern community. The ruling elites maintain a rentier and corrupt posture that sustains this structural imbalance. Social movements and protests emerging from these southern regions highlight a profound sense of injustice and exclusion. It has been voiced by the local population that they receive neither the economic benefits of oil and gas production nor the promised infrastructure improvements, even as their lands are heavily exploited for natural resources. In In-Salah, for instance, residents have voiced strong opposition to shale gas extraction, fearing further environmental and social harm—particularly since they have seen no tangible benefits from conventional gas revenues. Their concerns also extend to future generations in the south, who risk inheriting a region stripped of its natural resources and burdened with the severe environmental consequences of shale gas operations, especially the potential degradation of the local water table. This unrest reflects broader resistance to an extractivist development model that exacerbates underdevelopment while enabling capital accumulation without equitable redistribution. Despite repeated government announcements of large-scale development budgets, the southern regions remain marginalized, with minimal access to employment in the hydrocarbon sector and enduring socio-economic hardship. The paradox of immense natural wealth existing alongside persistent local poverty underscores Algeria's deep internal divide: oil revenues continue to finance development in the north while leaving the south vulnerable, overlooked, and impoverished. The Resource-Governance Paradox The Algerian South is endowed with significant natural resource reserves—including oil, gas, iron ore, phosphates, and uranium—that are central to the country's economy. However, this region faces persistent challenges similar to those encountered by countries afflicted by rent dependency and the so-called ' oil curse .' As Ross observes, nations like Algeria, despite their substantial oil revenues, often experience diminished levels of democracy, economic volatility, and recurrent civil unrest. These issues, fundamentally rooted in governance failures, are symptomatic of the 'resource curse,' whereby a rentier state's overreliance on oil revenues hampers both economic diversification and democratic development. In Algeria, key production sites are located in the southern regions of Hassi Messaoud, In-Salah, and Ouargla. While these areas generate the bulk of the country's export earnings, the resulting wealth is disproportionately directed to northern elites and central government accounts, leaving the local communities marginalized. This economic disparity is deeply entrenched in centralized governance structures that consistently sideline southern interests. Local institutions in the south remain under-resourced, lack autonomy, and are largely excluded from meaningful decision-making processes. As highlighted by Humphreys, Sachs, Stiglitz and Luong, and Weinthal, corruption and a lack of transparency in revenue management further erode public trust. Southern populations thus face a pronounced democratic deficit, with limited opportunities to influence policies that directly affect their livelihoods. Socio-Economic Marginalization and Its Consequences Southern Algeria faces systemic socio-economic exclusion that manifests across vital public sectors, contributing significantly to regional instability. Public services in the south are alarmingly inadequate: health infrastructure is sparse, forcing residents to travel long distances for basic medical care; educational institutions are underfunded, lacking both qualified personnel and adequate facilities; and transport, telecommunications, and utilities remain severely underdeveloped. Despite decades of intensive resource extraction, local populations continue to be underserved. High unemployment remains a pressing concern, as noted by Boubekeur (2019) and Zoubir (2020), with job opportunities often monopolized by northern elites and foreign contractors. These entrenched inequalities have fueled widespread resentment, as the glaring contrast between visible resource wealth and daily deprivation intensifies anger toward both the state and private sector actors. On the ground, youth disenfranchisement is particularly acute, creating fertile ground for radicalization. In this context, Tanchum (2020) underscores how ethnic and tribal grievances—especially among the Tuareg—deepen feelings of alienation, while internal migration toward the north places additional strain on already overstretched urban infrastructure, compounding broader national challenges. Moreover, resource extraction carries a significant ecological toll. Traditional livelihoods such as herding and agriculture are becoming increasingly unsustainable due to widespread environmental degradation. Water scarcity—exacerbated by industrial usage and the effects of climate change—intensifies competition and stokes intercommunal tensions. In addition, recurrent droughts and accelerating desertification are pushing more people into precarious living conditions, further destabilizing the region. Security Implications and Regional Spillover Effects Southern Algeria's security challenges stem from weak governance and deep-rooted socio-economic marginalization, which together create a permissive environment for criminal and militant activities. In the absence of effective state control, illicit networks involved in drug and arms trafficking, human smuggling, and unauthorized mining operations have flourished . Armed groups, including Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM), capitalize on local grievances to undermine state authority and national cohesion. These domestic challenges do not remain confined within Algeria's borders. The porous frontiers of the Sahel facilitate the cross-border movement of militants and the spread of instability. As highlighted by Chatham House and the Carnegie Endowment (2020), Algeria's internal stability is increasingly intertwined with broader regional peace and security. The situation of Mali, Libya, Niger and Chad reverberate through Algeria's southern regions, compounding internal vulnerabilities. The threat of separatism in southern Algeria, though often overlooked, cannot be entirely dismissed. Historical case studies such as South Sudan and Katanga illustrate how a lack of democratic governance, worsening socio-economic conditions, and a sense of ethnic exclusion—especially when amplified by external influence—can lead to territorial fragmentation. In this context, emerging demands for autonomy in southern Algeria reflect similar dynamics, raising serious concerns about future destabilization if deep-rooted structural grievances continue to go unaddressed. Conclusion Algeria's southern regions stand at a pivotal crossroads. Despite being richly endowed with natural resources, they continue to suffer from systemic exclusion, underdevelopment, and rising insecurity. This paradox can be best understood through two intersecting frameworks: the resource curse and grievance-based conflict theory . On one hand, natural wealth has not translated into inclusive growth; instead, it has produced economic distortions, entrenched rentier practices, and weakened democratic accountability.. On the other hand, deep socio-economic disparities and enduring perceptions of marginalization—particularly in contrast to northern Algeria—have fueled discontent and eroded state legitimacy, creating fertile ground for resistance and instability. The consequences are stark. From widespread unemployment and inadequate public services to environmental degradation and youth disenfranchisement, the south remains excluded from the benefits of its own wealth. These conditions have not only empowered criminal and militant networks but have also raised the specter of separatist demands, echoing patterns seen in other fragmented regions like South Sudan and Katanga. As Algeria's internal stability becomes increasingly intertwined with that of the broader Sahel, the costs of inaction grow heavier. Tags: separatism allianceSeparatism'
Morocco World
2 days ago
- Morocco World
Analysis: For Algeria, Polisario is an Ally, MAK is a Threat
Doha – Algeria's military regime is waging a calculated geopolitical charade in North Africa, fueling instability abroad while silencing resistance at home. Under President Abdelmadjid Tebboune and military chief Saïd Chengriha, the Algerian state has morphed into a launchpad for armed separatist agendas, even as it violently represses peaceful calls for autonomy within its own borders. This glaring contradiction lays bare a regime built not on principles of self-determination, but on selective oppression, weaponized hypocrisy, and a desperate bid to maintain regional influence at any cost. According to an analysis by Sahel Intelligence, 'this paradox is flagrant. Algeria, which qualifies the MAK as a 'terrorist group' without providing concrete evidence of violent acts, simultaneously offers official support to a movement like the Polisario, regularly associated with activities threatening the stability of the region.' The report exposes how Algeria's military leadership has weaponized the concept of self-determination, deploying it selectively to advance regional destabilization while denying the same rights to its own citizens. Algeria's handling of the two movements exposes a glaring double standard—sharp, deliberate, and impossible to miss. The Kabyle independence movement, represented by the Government of Kabylia in exile (GPK) in France, has consistently advocated for peaceful means to achieve self-determination. 'Under Ferhat Mehenni, the Movement for Self-determination of Kabylia (MAK) has always claimed a peaceful, secular and democratic struggle, rejecting any recourse to violence or terrorism,' notes the Sahel Intelligence analysis. 'The MAK denounces a policy of systemic marginalization of Kabylia by the Algerian state, on linguistic, economic, religious and identity levels,' adds the analysis. Meanwhile, Algeria provides comprehensive support to the Polisario Front, which has become 'a hired regional gun that implements Iranian agendas in North Africa.' This goes in line with Algerian objectives in the Western Mediterranean and the Sahel. Algeria's behavior exacerbates tensions and fuels risks of a major regional war that would set back decades of efforts to preserve peace, security, and prosperity in southern Europe and along Africa's Atlantic front. 'Alger furnishes refuge, financing and military as well as diplomatic assistance. Algeria hosts the movement in the Tindouf camps, presents it as a liberation movement, and advocates on its behalf in international forums,' the report states. Polisario's terrorist ties are an open secret The Polisario's terrorist ties are no longer whispers in the dark—they've stepped into the spotlight. Last April, Republican politician John Wilson stressed Washington's 'determination to support the North African kingdom in confronting the threats posed by Polisario Front terrorists' during a meeting with Moroccan Foreign Minister Nasser Bourita. Multiple intelligence reports have documented the Polisario's connections with terrorist organizations. The Sahel Intelligence analysis points to 'connections with Hamas and Iran, via weapons and training networks, complicity with AQMI (Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb) and other jihadist groups operating in the Sahel, facilitating arms trafficking and kidnappings.' These elements have led several observers and states to characterize 'the instrumentalization of the Tindouf camps by the chief of staff General Saïd Chengriha, President Abdelmadjid Tebboune and his advisers, for opaque paramilitary activities, far from the standards of international conventions on refugees.' The situation in the Tindouf camps has deteriorated significantly. Recent protests erupted following what the Sahrawi Association for the Defence of Human Rights (ASADEDH) described as a 'horrific massacre' committed by the Algerian army in the Arkoub district of the Dakhla camp. The incident resulted in two deaths and nine injuries, with three victims in critical condition. NGOs strongly condemned the Algerian army's actions, pointing out that Polisario militias not only failed to denounce the attack but actively aided in suppressing protesters demanding justice for the victims. The growing discontent within the Tindouf camps has ignited an unprecedented wave of dissent, with frustrated Sahrawis openly demanding an end to decades of exploitation and false promises. According to local sources, chants once unthinkable in Polisario-controlled zones are now echoing through the camps. As they muster the courage to oppose the separatist group's illusive agenda, this emerging cohort of Sahrawi dissidents is calling not just for relief from their prolonged suffering, but for the immediate acceptance of Morocco's autonomy initiative as the only viable path forward. The total collapse of Polisario's Algeria-sponsored separatism is increasingly within reach The United Kingdom's recent alignment with Morocco on the Western Sahara marks a profound geopolitical shift. Not only does this shift consolidate the position of the world's major powers – including the US, France, and Spain – in favor of Morocco's territorial integrity, but also signals the collapse of the post-colonial ambivalence that long enabled Algerian-sponsored separatism to persist. That even former colonial actors now endorse Morocco's autonomy initiative reflects a recalibration of global realpolitik: sovereignty, territorial integrity, and strategic partnership now outweigh outdated fantasies of Balkanizing North Africa. If regional tensions continue to escalate and mounting intelligence confirms links between Polisario members and activities that undermine regional security, the path toward designating the group as a terrorist organization in the medium term will become significantly clearer—and more politically inevitable. While the Polisario has not completely disappeared, it is weakened politically, diplomatically and militarily. The balance of power clearly favors Morocco, which is advancing its autonomy initiative, regional development plans, and garnering increasing international support. If the current trend continues, particularly if the US administration designates the Polisario as a terrorist organization, Algeria may find itself forced to reconsider its support for the separatist group to avoid incurring the wrath of America and the Western world. Read also: Hilale Slams Algeria's Regime Over Regional Destabilization, Hypocrisy, and Separatism
