Omagh victims intend to use public inquiry to ‘heap shame' on Irish Government
Victims of the Omagh bombing intend to use a public inquiry to 'heap shame' on the Irish Government for its failings over the atrocity, a barrister has said.
The inquiry also heard that victims are 'sick and tired of platitudes, false assurances and broken promises' from Dublin over the bombing.
The Omagh Bombing Inquiry, chaired by Lord Turnbull, is hearing opening statements from core participants. On Tuesday the focus moved to statements from the legal representatives of bereaved families.
The Real IRA bomb in the Co Tyrone town in August 1998 killed 29 people, including a woman who was pregnant with twins, in the worst single atrocity in the Troubles in Northern Ireland.
The public inquiry was set up by the previous government to examine whether the explosion could have been prevented by the UK authorities.
Speaking in Dublin, Taoiseach Micheal Martin said any claim that his Government had not co-operated with the inquiry was 'not fair comment'.
He said a memorandum of understanding had been agreed with the chair of the inquiry, and the Government was 'very, very committed to co-operating fully with the inquiry and making material available to the inquiry'.
Barrister Alan Kane KC delivered a statement on behalf of the families of Omagh victims represented by solicitor John McBurney.
These include the families of Debra-Anne Cartwright, Olive Hawkes, Julia Hughes, Philomena Skelton, Samantha McFarland, Alan Radford, Lorraine Wilson, who were all killed in the massacre, as well as several other people who were injured.
He told the inquiry: 'It is important that we always keep in focus that it was republican terrorists under the name Real IRA who planned and planted the Omagh bomb. They alone are responsible for the loss and hurt caused by it.
'On hearing the accounts of so many at the commemorative hearings, it beggars all belief as to what else was intended other than murderous carnage by leaving a bomb in a peaceful town's main street on a busy sunny Saturday afternoon where so many innocent women, children and men were likely to be.
'The preventability of the murders and injuries was at all times within the absolute control of the Real IRA.'
He added: 'Our clients are of the clear belief that whatever aspects of preventability may lie at the door of the UK state authorities, blame, to a greater or lesser extent, rests with the state authorities in the Republic of Ireland.
'Our clients again renew their call for a parallel inquiry to be immediately established by the Government of the Republic of Ireland, a call that they should not be required to repeat.
'Our clients remain greatly disappointed at the lack of any commitment of the authorities in the Republic of Ireland to meaningfully assist this inquiry.
'They regard the memorandum of understanding, agreed with the Minister of Justice of the Republic of Ireland as wholly unsatisfactory.
'Our clients wish to use this inquiry to heap shame on the Government of the Republic of Ireland for their failures.'
Mr Kane said there was a 'moral, human and legal imperative' on the Dublin Government to set up its own inquiry.
He said: 'As a country with a professed European inclination, it is extremely regrettable that the Republic of Ireland continues to be in breach of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights in failing to ensure there has ever been any effective investigation into the death of the people to whom they owe that duty.
'There are preventability issues which clearly arise from the territorial origin of the Omagh bomb, and the cowardly refuge which its perpetrators enjoyed within the boundaries of the Republic of Ireland.'
The barrister said his clients had likened the work of the public inquiry to an MOT vehicle test.
He said: 'To their disbelief, they are told only the engine can be inspected, all that exists beyond the engine, including the body, the suspension, the brakes, the contents of the boot, cannot be examined.
'Such an MOT would clearly be unfit for purpose.
'This inquiry can only examine the parts of the car made in the UK as it were, the preventability, it cannot examine the rest of the car where the terrorists sat, or the boot area where the deadly bomb was hidden.
'If this inquiry could examine the whole car then it would also be able to examine any preventability issues which fall on the Republic of Ireland state authorities and all the faults and defects in the vehicle could be identified.'
The barrister referred to comments from former Taoiseach Bertie Ahern that no stone would be left unturned to bring those responsible for the 1998 atrocity to justice.
He said: 'That is a promise which has significance only for the ignoring and disregarding of it which has taken place over the almost 27 years which has passed since the Omagh bombing.'
Mr Kane added: 'I have the authority of those I represent to say they are sick and tired of platitudes, false assurances, broken promises and grand but empty words from the state authorities of the Republic of Ireland.
'Their resolute refusal to institute a parallel inquiry and their ongoing failure to provide real and meaningful cooperation with this inquiry speaks far louder than their words.'
The barrister referred to a memorandum of understanding (MOU) agreed between the inquiry and the Irish Government to allow access to material held in Dublin.
Mr Kane said the MOU is 'redundant' due to the terms of how it was drafted.
He said: 'First because the assessment of relevance is in the power of the Republic of Ireland, secondly because it only relates to relevance concerning preventability by the UK state authorities.
'This is an unacceptable yet significant escape clause for the Republic of Ireland.
'Under the memorandum the Republic of Ireland state authorities, and therefore any information which reflects badly on them, could be determined by them to be irrelevant.'
He added: 'This voluntary statement of participation by the Government of the Republic of Ireland lacks any degree of real commitment and does nothing to give our clients any degree of confidence in it.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Criticizes Fed Chair Jerome Powell at NATO Summit
President Trump lashed out at Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, whose term runs for another 11 months, during a press conference at the NATO summit. Sign in to access your portfolio


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Port Moody councillor pens letter to ministry of municipal affairs calling for end to local oversight of conduct codes
A Port Moody councillor is urging the provincial government to eliminate local council oversight of codes of conduct, warning that the current self-regulation model enables bullying, retaliation, and political weaponization – particularly against councillors in the minority. In a June 18 letter to Housing and Municipal Affairs Minister Ravi Kahlon, Coun. Haven Lurbiecki called for sweeping reform to how conduct concerns are addressed in B.C. municipal governments. She argued that locally adopted and enforced codes allow those in power to target dissenters, silence critics, and foster a toxic workplace culture without meaningful checks. 'Much more often than public feuds, local elected representatives, especially those in the minority, can face issues such as bullying, intimidation, or retaliation, alone and without adequate support,' Lurbiecki wrote. 'These issues rarely make headlines, yet their impact can be just as severe.' The letter comes after Minister Kahlon publicly committed to bringing forward new legislation to improve local government oversight, though no draft has been released. Lurbiecki said she hopes her letter will help shape that work. Lurbiecki has made these arguments before , frequently pushing for a larger provincial role overseeing municipal conduct. She is often a minority vote on council, particularly around development issues. While councils can hire external investigators or seek legal advice in response to conduct complaints, those decisions typically rest with a majority vote of council. That creates an inherent conflict of interest when a complaint is made by – or against –members of that same majority, Lurbiecki stated in the letter. 'There is currently little or no protection or support for local elected representatives in minority situations who may be facing bullying, retaliation or weaponization of a code of conduct,' she wrote. 'The mere threat of an investigation is enough to have a significant negative emotional and psychological impact.' Lurbiecki said the confidentiality often surrounding code of conduct investigations means that even when councillors are cleared of wrongdoing, they may be unable to speak publicly about their experience or the process, which itself can be isolating and traumatic. She described the model as fundamentally flawed, especially in cases where access to legal support depends on the approval of council – a potential obstacle if the councillor under scrutiny is not part of the majority. 'Minister, I respectfully ask: in the legislature can you imagine if a simple majority vote could take these types of actions against individual MLAs?' Lurbiecki wrote. Lurbiecki called on the province to scrap locally adopted codes of conduct entirely and establish a provincial or regional Municipal Government Ethics Commissioner. Such an office, she contended, could offer impartial and consistent oversight and reduce the risk of politically motivated abuse. She also pointed to Alberta's recent decision to eliminate local government codes of conduct as a potential model, suggesting B.C. should consider doing the same. As an interim step, Lurbiecki said the province should standardize conduct codes across all B.C. municipalities and create an independent body to oversee their application. 'I am not surprised so many in local government, often women, leave local politics disillusioned,' she wrote. 'Without institutional support, we risk losing more, and others may never run for office at all.' Code of conduct issues have often been raised during the council's current term. Following allegations of an illegal meeting between a majority of council and a developer, Lurbiecki introduced a motion calling for a municipal ethics commissioner. While a majority of council disputed that anything improper took place, the motion found unanimous support, with several councillors citing historical precedent. Lurbiecki also raised the issue following an somewhat murky altercation at a 2023 convention between Mayor Meghan Lahti and former Port Moody council candidate David Stuart, which resulted in the latter filing a formal complaint. One Port Moody councillor, Coun. Kyla Knowles, was subject to three code of conduct complaints in her first year in office, though no disciplinary action was taken. The city did not release any information about the complaints. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
US Extends Debt-Limit Special-Measures Period Through July 24
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told US lawmakers he's extending the latest period for deploying special accounting measures to keep within the debt limit through July, 24, 2025. The Treasury chief also repeated his May guidance to congressional leaders that they must act to increase or suspend the debt limit as soon as possible, before its scheduled August recess.