logo
‘A city that basically screwed them': West Palm Beach leaders stunned by old, racist city plans

‘A city that basically screwed them': West Palm Beach leaders stunned by old, racist city plans

Yahoo17-03-2025

WEST PALM BEACH — No one in the City Hall meeting room, surely, was under any illusions about their city's segregated past, about the ways its historic Black neighborhoods had been forced for decades to subsist cut off and underserved.
But a presentation at a city commission meeting this week brought the hazy bigotries of decades past into vivid focus for the gathered leaders.
An overhead projector was displaying the yellowed paper of an old city document from 1923 on Monday, March 10. It was a West Palm Beach planning proposal, and it had a solution for what it called the 'problem' of providing for the 'negro population.'
'The question of providing for the future negro population of West Palm Beach is one of the important problems that needs to be solved,' the old master plan proposal stated.
It was a premise with a racist solution: ensuring that the city's Black residents would confine themselves to certain sections of town — Pleasant City and the area around Tamarind Avenue, both north of downtown and west of Dixie Highway.
Such segregation would have to be done indirectly. The plan warned that 'it is not possible legally to set aside such districts and restrict them to any race or color.'
But it continued: '…such districts can be established and every facility provided to encourage the settlement therein of people for which they have been planned.'
One benefit of pushing the Black population into that section of town, the plan noted, was that it would be partly separated from the rest of the city by existing railroad lines and future ones.
'The line of the railroad would thus definitely bound the district practically on all four sides,' it stated.
It was a jarring presentation for Mayor Keith James and the city commissioners, offered up by an executive from the Quantum Foundation as historical context for new plans to revive the city's Coleman Park neighborhood.
But it was hardly surprising.
A century later, the effects of segregation efforts remain. Those neighborhoods are still the traditional heart of the city's Black community, and they remain largely cut off by the same railroad tracks and underdeveloped compared to the fast-growing neighborhoods to the east.
'Let this sink in, everyone,' James, the first Black mayor since the city moved to a strong-mayor system in 1991, told meeting attendees after the documents had been displayed.
'This was part of the city's master plan back in 1920,' he said. 'I don't want us to rush through this. This is intentional, institutional. So when people talk about the lack of progress in some of these communities, that was designed.'
Indeed, there was more to the historic presentation. A slide showing yellowed city maps revealed the lack of paved streets and sewer systems in what had been designated the 'negro' neighborhood. A notation next to it made clear the city's intentions: 'Will not improve.'
Raphael Clemente, executive director of a Quantum Foundation initiative called Palm Beach Venture Philanthropy, was leading the presentation, and he called attention to the notation.
It meant, he said, that 'the city will not make investments for infrastructure improvements in these neighborhoods.'
'For the vast majority of that area, particularly north of Banyan (Boulevard), there was no street pavement, there was no water system and there was no sewer system,' he said, 'even though these were neighborhoods that were occupied, and quite densely occupied.'
Six years after the planning proposal was submitted, city leaders in 1929 approved an ordinance to officially designate Pleasant City and adjoining neighborhoods as the "negro district," according to a city timeline.
Clemente, who led the city's Downtown Development Authority for 12 years before moving to the Quantum Foundation, had a particular point in showing the century-old documents, which he said an acquaintance had unearthed in an historic archive.
Clemente and the foundation are putting together a plan to reinvigorate the Coleman Park neighborhood, which sits squarely in the city's historic Black sector, north of Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard and east of the Florida East Coast Railway tracks.
The plans are ambitious, from murals and public art to attracting a fresh food market. The foundation wants to ensure all bus stops in the neighborhood have benches and shade, start a tree-planting initiative and add buffering along the Brightline railyard.
It wants the city to extend 17th Street to create a better connection between Douglass Avenue and Tamarind. It envisions a community land bank and a business incubation program supporting the neighborhood.
Achieving all those things will require investment from the city government, he said, but it was needed to make up for decades of underinvestment and discrimination.
'What took 60 or 70 years to do I think we can significantly undo in a decade,' he said. 'This is an opportunity for meaningful change.'
Commissioner Shalonda Warren, who is Black, said it was 'very stunning' to see the old city plans — not just for the chilling formality of their segregationist aims, but the way the effects still overshadow the city.
'My heart is pounding in my chest now today,' she said, 'just in retrospect of how deliberate the exclusion was and how there's still barriers that are being overcome today more than a century later.'
James said residents in those neighborhoods today have every reason to distrust the city.
'This is a city that basically screwed them, for lack of a better word, for years,' he said. 'So why should they trust city government? So that's a hurdle that we have to overcome as city leaders, unfortunately, but it's understandable.'
James noted with dismay that one of the authors of the proposed city plan had studied at Harvard University, where James received his bachelor's and law degrees.
'What he probably never anticipated,' he said, 'was that a 'Negro' would be mayor of this city.'
Andrew Marra is a reporter at The Palm Beach Post. Reach him at amarra@pbpost.com.
This article originally appeared on Palm Beach Post: Old plans for segregated city remind West Palm leaders of racist past

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says
‘It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says

The execution of a legal method to crack down on dissent, if used by President Donald Trump amid or after current protests in Los Angeles, will not end well for the president, according to one Republican who previously served in Congress. Three days of chaos started after Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents arrested several people at a Home Depot in Paramount, a city just south of Los Angeles. Since then, protests erupted with more arrests, cars destroyed and, as the New York Times reported, reporters shot at by law enforcement. On Saturday, Trump ordered 2,000 National Guard troops to be deployed to Los Angeles without Gov. Gavin Newsom's request. In a series of posts on X, former Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., a frequent critic of Trump's and someone who served on the Jan. 6 Investigative Committee in the wake of the 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, commented on the deployment and Trump not using the Insurrection Act. 'DO NOT FEDERALIZE THE GUARD,' Kinzinger wrote. 'This is absolutely wrong at this moment.' Kinzinger posted shortly after and said the National Guard has 'no ability to do law enforcement without the Insurrection Act.' 'They are essentially no longer National Guard and now are active duty federal troops with all the restrictions,' he continued. 'Only a governor can activate them for law enforcement without the Insurrection Act.' His last remark on the matter, on Sunday morning, read that 'Now, if Trump invokes the Insurrection Act, then we're in a whole new world and it won't end well for Trump.' He did not elaborate further. Trump told reporters on Sunday that the events over the weekend were a riot rather than an insurrection, thus not invoking the Insurrection Act, the Los Angeles Times reported. This act gives the president the legal power to send the military and the National Guard to suppress civil disorder. Los Angeles was the epicenter of the Insurrection Act's last usage, by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when riots broke out following the acquittals of four Los Angeles Police Department officers charged in connection with the beating of a Black man named Rodney King on Interstate 210. Newsom and Los Angeles officials slammed the Trump administration's response to the protests. The governor called out the president after Trump congratulated the National Guard before they were deployed. 'The California National Guard wasn't even deployed in Los Angeles yet when this rant was posted,' Newsom wrote in a post on X. 'Facts matter.' On Sunday night, Newsom formally requested that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth rescind the National Guard from Los Angeles. 'We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved,' Newsom wrote in another post on X. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California." Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and the Los Angeles Police Department both described the protests as peaceful. 'We will always protect the constitutional right for Angelenos to peacefully protest,' Bass wrote on X. 'However, violence, destruction and vandalism will not be tolerated in our city and those responsible will be held fully accountable.' '[On Saturday,] demonstrations across the city of Los Angeles remained peaceful, and we commend all those who exercise their First Amendment rights responsibly,' police said in a statement. '... We will maintain a heightened readiness posture and remain ready to ensure the continued safety of our communities.' 'I don't know if I want to do this anymore': leaked audio highlights turmoil among Dems Graffiti on tank in Trump's parade calls for hanging 2 well-known Americans 'I would': Trump calls for arrest of California's Newsom amid lawsuit over National Guard in LA All Ivy League schools are supporting Harvard lawsuit — except these 2 Embassies directed to resume processing Harvard University student visas Read the original article on MassLive.

How unusual is it for the National Guard to come to LA? Here's what to know about the history
How unusual is it for the National Guard to come to LA? Here's what to know about the history

Hamilton Spectator

time36 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

How unusual is it for the National Guard to come to LA? Here's what to know about the history

President Donald Trump's deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles in response to immigration protests is the latest in a long history of U.S. elected officials sending troops in hopes of thwarting unrest connected to civil rights protests. National Guard troops are typically deployed for a variety of emergencies and natural disasters with the permission of governors in responding states, but Trump, a Republican, sent about 1,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles despite the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, both Democrats. Confrontations began Friday when dozens of protesters gathered outside a federal detention center demanding the release of more than 40 people arrested by federal immigration authorities across Los Angeles, as part of Trump's mass deportation campaign. Trump said that federalizing the troops on Saturday was necessary to 'address the lawlessness' in California. Newsom said Trump's order was a 'complete overreaction,' used to 'purposely inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' Some of the previous National Guard deployments have preserved peace amid violent crackdowns from local law enforcement or threats from vigilantes, but sometimes they have intensified tensions among people who were protesting for civil rights or racial equality. On rare occasion, presidents have invoked an 18th-century wartime law called the Insurrection Act, which is the main legal mechanism that a president can use to activate the military or National Guard during times of rebellion or unrest. Other times they relied on a similar federal law that allows the president to federalize National Guard troops under certain circumstances, which is what Trump did on Saturday. Here is a look at some of the most notable deployments: George Floyd protests in Los Angeles in 2020 Almost five years ago, Newsom deployed approximately 8,000 National Guard troops to quell protests over racial injustice inspired by the death of George Floyd in Minnesota. Well over half of the troops deployed in California were sent to Los Angeles County, where police arrested more than 3,000 people. City officials at the time, including then-Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, supported Newsom's decision. Rodney King protests in 1992 Some have compared Trump's decision on Saturday to George H.W. Bush's use of the Insurrection Act to respond to riots in Los Angeles in 1992 , after the acquittal of white police officers who were videotaped beating Black motorist Rodney King. In just six days the protests became one of the deadliest race riots in American history, with 63 people dying, nine of whom were killed by police. Syreeta Danley, a teacher from South Central Los Angeles, said she vividly remembers as a teen seeing black smoke from her porch during the 1992 uprisings. Danley said that at the time it seemed like law enforcement cared more about property damage affecting wealthier neighborhoods than the misconduct that precipitated the unrest. She said some people in her neighborhood were still more afraid of the police than the National Guard because once the troops left, local police 'had the green light to continue brutalizing people.' The National Guard can enforce curfews like they did in 1992, but that won't stop people from showing up to protest, Danley said. 'I have lived long enough to know that people will push back, and I'm here for it,' Danley said. Watts protests in 1965 There were deadly protests in the Watts neighborhood of Los Angeles in 1965 in response to pent-up anger over an abusive police force and lack of resources for the community. Over 30 people were killed — two-thirds of whom were shot by police or National Guard troops. Many say the neighborhood has never fully recovered from fires that leveled hundreds of buildings. Integration protests in the 1950-1960s In 1956, the governor of Tennessee called the state's troops to help enforce integration in Clinton, Tennessee, after white supremacists violently resisted federal orders to desegregate. President Dwight Eisenhower called the Arkansas National Guard and the 101st Airborne Division of the U.S. Army in 1957 to escort nine Black students as they integrated a previously white-only school. A few years later, the Maryland National Guard remained in the small town of Cambridge for two years after Maryland's Democratic Gov. J Millard Tawes in 1963 called in troops to mediate violent clashes between white mobs and Black protesters demanding desegregation. Selma, Alabama, voting rights protest in 1965 National Guard troops played a pivotal role in the march often credited with pressuring the passage of Voting Rights Act of 1965, when nonviolent protesters — including the late congressman John Lewis — calling for the right to vote were brutally assaulted by Alabama State Troopers in Selma, Alabama, in 1965. Two weeks later, then-President Lyndon B. Johnson sent National Guard troops to escort thousands of protesters along the 50-mile (81-kilometer) march to the state Capitol. Johnson's decision was at odds with then-Gov. George Wallace who staunchly supported segregation. ___ Riddle is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Trump Crashes out Demanding Praise as Newsom Threatens to Sue Him
Trump Crashes out Demanding Praise as Newsom Threatens to Sue Him

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Crashes out Demanding Praise as Newsom Threatens to Sue Him

Donald Trump still believes sending the National Guard into Los Angeles is a stellar idea. California Governor Gavin Newsom has already accused the executive order of being unconstitutional, and announced Monday the Golden State's intention to sue the Trump administration for the overextended breach. But the president didn't have the desires of Californians in mind when news of the impending lawsuit broke. Instead, he was waiting for their gratitude. 'We made a great decision in sending the National Guard to deal with the violent, instigated riots in California,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'If we had not done so, Los Angeles would have been completely obliterated.' 'The very incompetent 'Governor,' Gavin Newscum, and 'Mayor,' Karen Bass, should be saying, 'THANK YOU, PRESIDENT TRUMP, YOU ARE SO WONDERFUL. WE WOULD BE NOTHING WITHOUT YOU, SIR.' Instead, they choose to lie to the People of California and America by saying that we weren't needed, and that these are 'peaceful protests,'' the president continued. 'Just one look at the pictures and videos of the Violence and Destruction tells you all you have to know.' 'We will always do what is needed to keep our Citizens SAFE, so we can, together, MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!' he added. In an interview with podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen, Newsom warned that the escalating situation in Los Angeles should serve as a warning sign for communities around the country as to just how far the Trump administration will go to execute its anti-immigration agenda. 'This is a preview for things to come. This isn't about L.A. per se, it's about us today, and you—everyone wgatching—tomorrow. Donald Trump is unhinged right now,' Newsom said. Thousands of locals flooded the streets of Los Angeles over the weekend in a stunning visual protest of the president's agenda. Protesters blocked off a major freeway, trashed Waymos (self-driving cars), and organized outside of City Hall and the Metropolitan Detention Center. In reaction, law enforcement officials shot rubber bullets and fired tear gas and flash bangs into crowds of civilians. The FBI added protesters suspected of throwing rocks at police cars to their Most Wanted list, and ominously threatened to intervene in the anti-Trump display without guidance from California or the White House. At Trump's behest, roughly 300 National Guard members arrived in Los Angeles on Sunday to squash the protests—the beginning of what is expected to be a wave of some 2,000 troops issued to the city.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store