Missouri eyes free college tuition for public safety personnel and dependents
Senate Bill 71, sponsored by Sen. David Gregory, R-St. Louis, would provide college tuition awards for public safety personnel such as police officers, firefighters, paramedics, telecommunicators, first responders, emergency medical technicians or advanced emergency medical technicians.
Public safety personnel with at least six years of service shall be entitled to an award worth up to 100% of the resident tuition charges, including fees, for an institution of higher education located in Missouri.
The legal dependent of public safety personnel with at least ten years of service is also eligible for a tuition award if he or she executes an agreement with the institution of higher education outlining the terms and conditions of the tuition award, including the legal dependent's commitment to reside in Missouri for the next five years.
Buchanan County Sheriff Bill Puett called the measure a new and innovative" tool that would not only benefit public safety personnel and the departments they work for, but the communities they serve by offering new ways to recruit and retain valuable officers in Missouri.
"This is a good hand in glove kind of concept because the more we train, the more we educate our staff, the better they serve the community," he said. "It's a win-win. It keeps our folks here in the state of Missouri and it allows our universities that have really quality programs to continue to prosper."
Puett said the measure would focus on degree programs designed specifically for public safety and public safety-oriented fields. Individuals who have already earned a baccalaureate degree are ineligible to use the tuition award to earn another degree.
The measure passed both the Missouri House and Senate this legislative session and now awaits approval from Missouri Gov. Mike Kehoe. The governor has identified fighting crime and enhancing public safety as a top priority.
"Kudos to the governor, Department of Public Safety and the legislature because the governor came in with a law enforcement priority and he is holding true to those values," Puett said. "This is one of the planks in that effort to recruit and retain good law enforcement officers for our state.
Puett said if the measure is ultimately approved, the department would look to utilize it immediately, helping them save local tax dollars that are currently used for tuition assistance.
According to a fiscal analysis, the measure would lead to a decrease of roughly $3.4 million in general revenue funding.
Four St. Joseph Police officers talk at the scene of a shooting at 16th and Grand streets in 2024 in St. Joseph. Cameron Montemayor | News-Press NOW
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
Senate judicial confirmation delays spark President Trump's ire
The recent flare-up between President Trump and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) conjures the image of two elderly neighbors quarrelling over a back fence about property line disagreements. That metaphor is not far from the reality of the latest clash. Presidents and Congress have been tangling over turf from the beginning of the republic. Who is encroaching on whose constitutional prerogatives. In the present instance, the president has attacked Grassley for allowing so-called 'blue slips' — 'an ancient and probably unconstitutional custom' — to get in the way of confirming nominees for federal district court judgeships and U.S. attorney posts. Grassley says he was especially 'offended' and 'disappointed' by the president's personal insults on his Truth Social platform. He called Grassley a RINO ('Republican in name only') for protecting Democratic senators and went on to call for term limits (Grassley was first elected to the Senate in 1981 and is 91 years old), saying it's time to 'dethrone the kings.' Fellow senators of both parties rallied to Grassley's defense. They like the seniority system (especially the closer they get to a committee chairmanship). They like the blue-slip system when it comes to confirming judicial nominees from their home states. And they dislike it when a president meddles in their chamber's internal rules and procedures since, as the Constitution makes clear, ' Each house may determine the rules of its proceedings.' What is a blue slip? It is a document, written on blue paper, on which the home state senators of presidential nominees for federal district court judgeships and U.S. attorney positions indicate their approval or disapproval of those nominees. In other words, only two senators are eligible to submit blue slips for each nominee. The blue slip process is not written in Senate rules or even in the rules of the Senate Judiciary Committee. Instead of a rule, it has been variously described as a 'custom' or 'tradition.' The Judiciary Committee chairmen set the ground rules for the confirmation process in each Congress. The president was correct when he said Chairman Grassley could abolish the blue slip requirements with 'just a flick of the pen.' In 2017, for instance, Judiciary Chairman Grassley declared that blue slips would no longer be required for appeals court judgeships, and that is still the case. The committee has gone through multiple iterations of the custom dating back to 1917. In many of those instances, the lack of both senators' approval would be taken into consideration by the committee in determining whether to proceed with confirmation hearings and whether to vote on sending the nomination to the Senate floor for debate and a vote. As it now stands, a covered nominee must have blue slip approvals from both senators for the nomination to move forward in committee, though a Judiciary Committee chair may declare an exception for any reason on any occasion — that was done twice during Joe Biden's tenure as Senate Judiciary Committee chairman. The president, in his attack on Grassley in July, incorrectly stated that presidents would never be able to appoint judges in liberal strongholds if even one senator in the opposition party refuses to submit a blue slip of approval. In fact, only the two senators from the home state of the judicial nominee may do so. Still, the president is understandably peeved that his judicial and executive nominees are taking too long to be confirmed. President Trump set two confirmation process records during the first 200 days of his second non-consecutive term. According to Chris Piper of Brookings, based on data compiled by his colleague Kathryn Dunn Tenpas, Trump submitted more executive and judicial nominations over that period (401) than any previous president. The second record he set, though, was that he faced more confirmation delays than any of his predecessors. Piper offers several explanations for the current delays, most notably that Senate Democrats are slow-walking nominations because they are not satisfied with their quality. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) attributes it to the nominees' lack of experience, ethical conflicts of interest and perceived extreme views. Consequently, Senate Democrats are demanding full debates and recorded votes on nearly every nominee, both in committee and on the floor. When Trump demanded that Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) cancel the August recess and keep the Senate in session until all pending nominations were dealt with, Thune extended the session by one day only and was able to clear the docket of several of the longstanding and most controversial nominees. It is doubtful that confirmations will pick up significantly in the fall, with critical budget-related deadlines once again pressing. The flurry of negative blue slips may still resemble record snowfalls by winter. Don Wolfensberger is a 28-year congressional staff veteran, culminating as the House Rules Committee chief of staff in 1995. He is author of, 'Congress and the People: Deliberative Democracy on Trial' (2000), and, 'Changing Cultures in Congress: From Fair Play to Power Plays' (2018).
Axios
31 minutes ago
- Axios
Sherrod Brown challenges crypto PACs to rematch in Senate bid
Political operatives working for the cryptocurrency industry will be on high alert now that Democrats appear to be all in on Sherrod Brown as the national party's candidate for Senate in Ohio. Why it matters: With Brown as their pick, Democrats — already facing steep odds of retaking the Senate in 2026 — are directly squaring off against Fairshake, the crypto PAC that helped unseat the industry critic just a year ago. At the SALT Wyoming Blockchain Summit Tuesday, Sen. Tim Scott (R.—SC) told the room, "Thank you to all y'all for getting rid of Sherrod Brown." Fairshake, the network of PACs that opposed Brown in 2024, has $140 million on hand already to support pro-crypto candidates and — crucially, for Brown — oppose those that are seen as impediments. Between the lines: The organization Stand With Crypto has ranked Brown as "strongly against crypto" based on his statements and actions in Congress. And his former position as chair of the Senate Banking Committee, from which he stonewalled industry-backed legislation, made him a target for Fairshake in the last election. What he's saying: "Cryptocurrency is a part of America's economy," Brown said in a statement Tuesday sent by the campaign to Axios, in response to a request for an interview. "My goal is to make sure that as more people use cryptocurrency, it expands opportunity and lifts up Ohioans and they are not put at risk." The campaign did not respond to multiple requests to answer follow up questions about whether his policy positions have shifted since his loss. In addition, neither the Ohio Democratic Party nor the Democratic Senate Campaign Committee replied to a request for comment from Axios. What they're saying: Brian Wright, a longtime Ohio-based political strategist serving as president of WrightPath Solutions, tells Axios that he can see why the party wants Brown. Over his 32 years in Congress, the last 18 spent in the Senate, Brown had been able to flip otherwise Republican counties with a pro-worker message, Wright explained, though it didn't work out as well in 2024. Still, even with millions spent against him, Brown only lost 46% to 50% a year ago. "Anything can really happen here, but is it a bad idea for him to run again? I don't think he was defeated soundly enough to say that," Wright says. Zoom out: A Democrat's odds of winning the Ohio Senate seat haven't risen above 33% on the Kalshi prediction market since the contract started in July, now with $2.7 million in volume. State of play: Party leader Sen. Chuck Schumer (D.—NY) wants Brown. Schumer has been perplexing on crypto issues, both acting as if pro-crypto legislation could pass in 2024 but also voting against the recently enacted stablecoin legislation, GENIUS. The Cook Political report still favors Jon Husted in the Ohio race, the Republican incumbent appointed to fill J.D. Vance's vacated seat, and the larger map still favors Republicans going into 2026.
Epoch Times
an hour ago
- Epoch Times
Chip Roy Announces Run for Texas Attorney General
The U.S. lawmaker, who was first elected in 2018, has had a fiscally conservative record in Congress, often proving to be a thorn in the side of GOP leadership Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) announced on Aug. 21 that he is running to become Texas attorney general. If he wins, he would succeed Ken Paxton, who is running for the U.S. Senate.
