
As Gaza faces starvation, reluctant Germany starts to curb support for Israel
Conservative Chancellor Friedrich Merz, hitherto a staunchly pro-Israel leader, made the announcement on Friday arguing that Israel's actions would not achieve its stated war goals of eliminating Hamas militants or bringing Israeli hostages home.
It is a bold move for a leader who after winning elections in February said he would invite Benjamin Netanyahu to Germany in defiance of an arrest warrant against the Israeli prime minister issued by the International Criminal Court.
The shift reflects how Germany's come-what-may support for Israel, rooted in its historical guilt over the Nazi Holocaust, is being tested like never before as the high Palestinian civilian death toll in Gaza, massive war destruction and images of starving children are chipping away at decades of policy.
"It is remarkable as it is the first concrete measure of this German government. But I would not see it as a U-turn, rather a 'warning shot'," said Muriel Asseburg, a researcher at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
It caps months of the German government sharpening its tone over Israel's escalating military campaign in the small, densely populated Palestinian enclave, though still shying away from tougher steps that other European countries and some voices in Merz's ruling coalition were calling for.
The suspension of arms deliveries to Israel would affect just those that could be used in Gaza.
The move reflects a hardening mood in Germany, where public opinion has grown critical of Israel and more demanding that its government help ease a humanitarian disaster - most of the 2.2 million population is homeless and Gaza is a sea of rubble.
According to an ARD-DeutschlandTREND survey released on Thursday, a day before Merz's announcement, 66% of Germans want their government to put more pressure on Israel to change its behaviour.
That is higher than April 2024, when some 57% of Germans believed their government should criticise Israel more strongly than before for its actions in Gaza, a Forsa poll showed.
Despite Germany helping air drop aid to Gaza, 47% of Germans think their government is doing too little for Palestinians there, against 39% who disagree with this, the ARD-DeutschlandTREND this week showed.
Most strikingly perhaps, only 31% of Germans feel they have a bigger responsibility for Israel due to their history - a core tenet of German foreign policy - while 62% do not.
Germany's political establishment has cited its approach, known as the "Staatsraison", as a special responsibility for Israel after the Nazi Holocaust, which was laid out in 2008 by then-Chancellor Angela Merkel to the Israeli parliament.
Reflecting that stance days before his most recent trip to Israel in July, Merz's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told Die Zeit newspaper that Berlin could not be a "neutral mediator".
"Because we are partisan. We stand with Israel," he said, echoing similar statements by other conservative figures in Merz's party.
But Merz's junior coalition partner, the Social Democrats (SPD), had already been more explicit in wanting to put sanctions against Israel on the table.
Adis Ahmetovic, an SPD foreign policy spokesperson, said suspending weapons shipments was only the first step.
"More must follow, such as a full or partial suspension of the (European Union) Association Agreement or the medical evacuation of seriously injured children, in particular," Ahmetovic told Stern magazine. "Furthermore, sanctions against Israeli ministers must no longer be taboo."
The deepening divide within Germany has also played out in its media landscape.
In two major editorials published in late July, Der Spiegel magazine accused Israel of violating international humanitarian law and condemned what it said was the German government's complicity. The front cover displayed a picture of Gaza women holding out empty bowls with the headline: "A Crime".
Meanwhile Bild, the mass-market daily owned by Axel Springer, Germany's largest media group, decried the lack of outrage toward Islamist Hamas whose cross-border assault on Israeli communities triggered the war, pointing to what it saw as growing anti-Israel sentiment and one-sided protests.
Filipp Piatov, a Bild reporter whose X account is followed by Merz, accused the chancellor on Friday of doing exactly what he had criticised others for, "that Germany is cutting off support to its ally in the middle of a war."
Israel denies having a policy of starvation in Gaza, and says Hamas, which killed some 1,200 people in its October 7, 2023 attack and took 251 hostages back to Gaza, could end the crisis by surrendering.
Israel's ground and air war in Gaza has killed over 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry.
Critics had argued that Germany's approach has been overly hesitant, weakening the West's collective ability to apply meaningful pressure for an end to the fighting and restrictions on humanitarian aid to the Israeli-besieged enclave.
Germany had hitherto even been cautious about a modest sanction such as supporting the partial suspension of Israel's access to the EU's flagship research funding programme.
There are other reasons for Germany's reluctance to criticise Israel beyond its Nazi past, analysts say, including its strong trading relationship with Israel and the United States.
Germany is Israel's second biggest weapons supplier after the U.S., but also buys arms from Israel as part of a massive revamp of its armed forces since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. That includes the Arrow-3 missile interception system.
Last week, Israeli defence company Elbit Systems announced a $260 million deal with Airbus to equip the German Air Force's A400M planes with directed infrared defence systems.
"German arrogance should be avoided," Volker Beck, a former member of parliament and the head of the German-Israeli Society, told Reuters.
"If Israel were to retaliate by restricting arms deliveries to Germany, the future of German air security would look grim."
($1 = 0.8590 euros)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
17 minutes ago
- BBC News
Alaska summit: Europe allies urge Trump not to deal with Putin 'without Ukraine'
European allies have rallied behind Ukraine in a renewed surge of support, insisting that any peace talks with Russia must include comes as Donald Trump prepares to hold talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday."The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine," said a joint statement issued by the leaders of the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the European that Ukraine will not be invited to its own peace talks, President Volodymyr Zelensky said that any agreements without Kyiv would amount to "dead decisions". Late on Saturday, a White House official said that Trump would be willing to hold a trilateral meeting with both Putin and Zelensky - but for now, it remains just the two of them, as initially requested by the Russian has previously suggested that he could start by meeting only with Putin, telling reporters he planned to "start off with Russia." But the US president also said that he believed "we have a shot at" organising a trilateral meeting with both Putin and Putin would agree to this is unclear - the Russian and Ukrainian leaders have not met face-to-face since Putin launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine more than three years on Friday, Trump also suggested that there "will be some swapping of territories" in order for Moscow and Kyiv to reach an agreement - to which Zelensky reacted strongly."We will not reward Russia for what it has perpetrated," he said on Telegram. "Any decisions against us, any decisions without Ukraine, are also decisions against peace.""The Russians... still impose the idea of 'exchanging' Ukrainian territory for Ukrainian territory, with consequences that guarantee nothing but more convenient positions for the Russians to resume the war," he added the BBC's US media partner, has reported that the White House is trying to sway European allies to accept an agreement that would include Russia taking the entire Donbas region in eastern Ukraine, and keeping the Crimean and European powers, on the other hand, presented their own blueprint for ending the war to Trump and his top officials, the Wall Street Journal has reported. It includes demands that any territory can be exchanged only in a reciprocal manner - so if Ukraine pulls out of some regions, Russia must withdraw from European leaders, in their statement released late on Saturday night, stressed that "international borders must not be changed by force". 'Not without Ukraine' "Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny," they said, stressing that their nations would continue to support Ukraine diplomatically, militarily and leaders also said that a "diplomatic solution" is critical, not just to protect Ukraine - but also Europe's not just Ukraine that is struggling to be part of the Alaska allies are also worried about their lack of influence over the outcome of any agreement that Trump could reach with Putin. In a post on X on Saturday, French President Emmanuel Macron raised concerns about Russia and the US excluding European involvement."Europeans will also necessarily be part of the solution, as their own security is at stake," he has taken a tough approach to Moscow - including imposing sanctions against Russian entities and providing military aid for said he told Macron in a phone call on Saturday that the key was to make sure "the Russians do not get to deceive anyone again"."We all need a genuine end to the war and reliable security foundations for Ukraine and other European nations," the Ukrainian leader diplomacy with Europe and Ukraine fell to Vice-President JD Vance on Saturday, when visited the UK and held talks with Foreign Secretary David Lammy as well as two of Zelensky's top Vance for the discussions, Andriy Yermak, the head of Zelensky's office, stressed the need for Ukraine to be included."A reliable, lasting peace is only possible with Ukraine at the negotiating table," he said. "A ceasefire is necessary - but the frontline is not a border."The summit in Alaska, the territory which Russia sold to the US in 1867, would be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents, since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva in June 2021. Nine months later, Moscow sent troops into 2022, the Kremlin announced the annexation of four Ukrainian regions - Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson - despite not having full control over has failed to achieve a decisive breakthrough in its full-scale invasion, but occupies large swathes of Ukraine's eastern territory. Ukrainian offensives, meanwhile, have not been able to push the Russian forces back.


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
North Korea removing propaganda loudspeakers in border areas amid efforts to ease tensions
South Korea's military has said North Korea has started dismantling some propaganda loudspeakers aimed at the South in parts of the border area, following similar moves by Seoul made in a bid to ease tensions. South Korea's Joint Chiefs of Staff didn't disclose the sites where the North Koreans were removing speakers and said further confirmation was needed as to whether the dismantling was taking place across all areas, adding it would continue monitoring related activities. 'Activities by the North Korean military removing loudspeakers against South Korea have been detected in parts of the front-line area since Saturday morning,' the military said in a notice to reporters on Saturday. The announcement is a rare sign of rapprochement between the two Koreas since President Lee Jae Myung became president in June, replacing conservative hardliner Yoon Suk Yeol following his short-lived attempt to impose martial law. Shortly after Lee took office, his administration switched off propaganda broadcasts criticising the North Korean regime as it looked to revive stalled dialogue with its neighbour. The South Korean military said the North stopped its broadcasts in June too. A week ago, South Korea then began dismantling its own speakers, which blast a mix of world news and information about democratic and capitalist society alongside K-pop music. The sound is believed to travel more than 20km (12.4 miles) into North Korea. Previously, South Korean border residents had complained that North Korean speakers blasted irritating sounds, including howling animals and pounding gongs, in a tit-for-tat response to South Korean propaganda broadcasts. North Korea, which is extremely sensitive to any outside criticism of its authoritarian leadership and its third-generation ruler, Kim Jong-un, didn't immediately confirm it was taking down its speakers. South Korea's previous conservative government resumed daily loudspeaker broadcasts in June last year, following a years-long pause, in retaliation for North Korea flying rubbish-filled balloons toward the South. President Lee has taken further measures to improve ties with Pyongyang, urging civic groups to suspend distribution of leaflets criticising the North, and delaying some annual joint military drills with the US taking place in the coming weeks as part of the Ulchi Freedom Shield exercises. The two Koreas remain technically at war after the 1950-53 Korean war ended only in a truce, and relations have deteriorated in the past few years. With Reuters and Associated Press


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Lammy and Vance hold meeting to discuss US-brokered Ukraine peace plan
The UK foreign secretary, David Lammy, and the US vice-president, JD Vance, held a meeting with Ukrainian and European partners in Britain on Saturday to discuss the drive for peace in Ukraine. The summit comes before a meeting between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin set for next Friday in Alaska. In a comment that that was met with pushback from Kyiv, the US president said that an end to the war must involve 'some swapping of territories'. The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, stressed early on Saturday that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to occupiers'. Trump has agreed to meet the Russian president even if he refuses to meet Zelenskyy, adding to fears Ukraine could be sidelined in negotiations. A White House official said later on Saturday that Trump was open to holding a trilateral summit in Alaska with Putin and Zelenskyy, but that it was planning a bilateral meeting with Putin at the Russian's president's request. In a Telegram post on Saturday in which he emphasised Kyiv must be represented for any peace deal to be viable, Zelenskyy wrote: 'Any decisions that are without Ukraine are at the same time decisions against peace. They will not bring anything. These are dead decisions. They will never work.' The meeting between Lammy and Vance took place at Chevening in Kent. The Guardian understands it was held at the request of the US. On Saturday evening, Lammy posted on X that he had held a meeting with Vance, Andriy Yermak, the head of the office of the Ukrainian president, Rustem Umerov, Ukraine's defence minister, and European national security advisers. 'The UK's support for Ukraine remains ironclad as we continue working towards a just and lasting peace,' he said. Zelenskyy said on Saturday evening that the meeting of security advisers from Ukraine and its partner countries had been constructive, adding that Kyiv's arguments were heard and dangers were taken into account. Zelenskyy said officials from Britain, the United States, France, Germany, Italy, Finland and Poland took part in the meeting, aiming to consolidate positions to achieve a ceasefire. 'The path to peace for Ukraine should be determined together and only together with Ukraine, this is key principle,' he said in his evening address. On Saturday evening the leaders of the UK, France, Italy, Germany, Poland and Finland, and the president of the EU Commission, released a joint statement declaring that the path to peace could not be decided without Ukraine. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion 'We welcome President Trump's work to stop the killing in Ukraine, end the Russian Federation's war of aggression, and achieve just and lasting peace and security for Ukraine,' they said. 'We are convinced that only an approach that combines active diplomacy, support to Ukraine and pressure on the Russian Federation to end their illegal war can succeed. 'We stand ready to support this work diplomatically as well as by upholding our substantive military and financial support to Ukraine.' On Saturday morning Starmer and Zelenskyy had talked by phone. A No 10 spokesperson said: 'Both leaders welcomed president Trump's desire to bring this barbaric war to an end and agreed that we must keep up the pressure on Putin to end his illegal war.' The statement added that Starmer had reiterated 'his unwavering support for Ukraine and its people' during the call. Zelenskyy communicated with Trump and European leaders in recent days as news broke that the US leader and Putin were planning to meet. On Friday Poland's prime minister, Donald Tusk, said there could be a 'freeze' in the conflict. If the summit goes ahead between Trump and Putin, it will be the first time a US president has met the Russian leader since the full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. The last meeting Putin had with a US president was with Joe Biden in Geneva in June 2021.