Trump's cultural overhaul throttles local arts, humanities programs nationwide
But recently, the museum's history programs for schoolchildren were put at risk after the Trump administration canceled its federal grant, saying in a letter that the funding 'no longer serves the interest of the United States.'
'I will forever remember that line,' the museum's director, Dr. Noelle Trent, told CNN.'We were very much embedded into key moments of this country's history. How is that not of interest to the United States and the American people?'
The museum had won a $500,000 grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services, one of the agencies at the center of President Donald Trump's cultural overhaul, to build its capacity to support school trips and educational programs. Now, the museum is planning for a future without the funds, Trent said.
In Washington, Trump has forged ahead with efforts to exert control over which cultural pursuits the government backs, from taking the reins of the Kennedy Center to targeting 'improper ideology' at the Smithsonian.
But his administration's push to align federal support with his cultural agenda – and combat what he sees as 'woke' ideology and 'anti-American propaganda'– has extended beyond the nation's capital.
It has left museums like the Museum of African American History in Boston as well as libraries, archival projects, arts programs, and film festivals reeling after the IMLS and the National Endowments for the Arts and the Humanities canceled tens of millions of dollars in federal grants.
Trump, who has promised to scale back the size of the federal government, has asked Congress to eliminate the agencies. If Congress grants his request, it will amount to an unprecedented gutting of federal support for arts and humanities.
The National Endowment for the Arts helps fund everything from free music and theater programs to film festivals and literary magazines. The National Endowment for the Humanities supports research, historic sites, book programs, and museum exhibits.
And the IMLS, which Trump deemed 'unnecessary' bureaucracy in March and ordered 'eliminated to the maximum extent consistent with applicable law,' pays for job training programs, interlibrary loans, and free e-book and audiobook services for libraries in rural areas.
Several lawsuits across the country are challenging how the Trump administration is gutting or overhauling the grant programs at IMLS, NEA and NEH. The challengers have prevailed in some of the cases, but the administration is seeking to reverse the rulings against it.
The African American history museum in Boston received a letter from IMLS on Wednesday indicating that the agency will adhere to a court order earlier this month from a federal judge in Rhode Island requiring it to reinstate grants. However, the reinstatement of the grant is contingent on an appeal, which is pending, the letter said.
Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency has touted some of the cuts on social media, declaring that NEH grants will be 'merit-based and awarded to non-DEI, pro-America causes' going forward. A lawsuit filed by the American Historical Association and other groups alleges that two DOGE employees 'demanded lists of open NEH grants and then indiscriminately terminated the vast majority of the grants.'
Conservative groups like the Heritage Foundation have long argued that arts and humanities programs shouldn't receive taxpayer money because they have enough financial support from private sources.
The Trump administration has already started to redirect federal funding towards cultural initiatives the president backs.
A portion of canceled NEH funds will help pay for The National Garden of Heroes, a sculpture garden Trump first floated in 2020. Slated to be completed in time for the nation's 250th anniversary next year, it will feature '250 great individuals from America's past,' according to a release.
'We're going to be honoring our heroes, honoring the greatest people from our country. We're not going to be tearing down. We're going to be building up,' Trump said in February.
The IMLS, NEA and NEH did not respond to a request for comment on this story.
As the Trump administration shifts its priorities, arts advocates say programming for children is at risk.
In Nebraska, String Sprouts, a 'no-to-low-cost' music education program hosted by the Omaha Conservatory of Music, had received an NEA grant for a decade. Now, the group may be forced to scale back the number of classes it offers, according to Neidy Hess, the conservatory communication's manager.
In New York, Opera on Tap's Playground Opera program, which immerses students in low-income communities in production and performance, will also have to be dialed back without federal support, co-founder and general director Anne Hiatt told CNN.
Meanwhile, the South Dakota Humanities Council lost $950,000, or 73% of its total budget. While it will be able to continue some programming, it may have to stop its Young Reader Program, which provides free books to third-graders, said the council's executive director, Christina Oey.
Oey's group is one of the 56 councils across the country that saw their general operating and support grants slashed in April. She said the National Garden of Heroes project won't have the same kind of reach as the programs and events councils put on, particularly in rural communities.
'Yes, a monument is educational. It can provide learning opportunities, but you have to travel to that. I mean, I can attest to that in South Dakota: Mount Rushmore is five and a half hours away from me, right?' she said. 'If you fund the humanities, you also fund programming that can change, that can travel, that can be in your community.'
While South Dakota Humanities Council has received some emergency funding from the Mellon Foundation, a private foundation for the arts and humanities, some councils that are more reliant on federal funds say they could close if Congress grants Trump's proposal to gut the NEH.
National History Day, a nonprofit that hosts a nationwide competition for students in grades 6-12 to present their own historical research projects, may not have as many participants without federal support, executive director Cathy Gorn said.
'Kids, when they study history effectively, they learn empathy, and we really need a whole lot more of that in this country, in this world,' Gorn said. 'And so, losing this opportunity is a real crisis for American education.
For Trent, the museum director in Boston, the impact of the Trump administration is more than federal funding cuts. She said corporate support started drying up after the president took office, a trend she blames partly on his efforts to quash diversity, equity and inclusion programs.
When asked why taxpayer dollars should go to museums like the one she leads, Trent said they make communities unique and leave a positive impact on visitors.
'There are places all across this great country, that have really great programs, that have qualitatively changed to peoples lives,' she explained.
On a recent trip to the museum, seventh grader Excel Alabi found herself moved by the stories about young people around her age fighting to end slavery in the Civil War.
'They were fighting for us. I think that's really beautiful,' she told CNN. 'When I was starting school, it was just like 'People are going to war to fight for rights.' I didn't know that it was teenagers trying to fight for their families too.'
'It's important for kids to learn history because it's just such a big impact on what we've been through,' she added. 'I think we should face those tough subjects because those tough subjects are the reason why we're here.'
CNN's Tierney Sneed and Emily Condon contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump nominates Bureau of Statistics critic to lead agency after previous head fired over bleak report
The Trump administration has nominated economist Dr. E.J. Antoni to be the next Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, after the president alarmed observers by firing the previous chief at the beginning of the month over his anger at a poor July jobs report. 'I am pleased to announce that I am nominating Highly Respected Economist, Dr. E.J. Antoni, as the next Commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics,' Trump wrote on Truth Social, nodding towards the previous firing. 'Our Economy is booming, and E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE. I know E.J. Antoni will do an incredible job in this new role. Congratulations E.J.!' Antoni currently serves as chief economist at the conservative Heritage Foundation, a think tank closely aligned with the administration. He was a contributor to the group's Project 2025, a controversial blueprint document outlining many of the moves the Trump administration has taken in office. The economist was reportedly among a handful of candidates under discussion after Trump removed Erika McEntarfer, whom he accused of using 'phony' numbers in the July jobs report that showed private companies adding just 73,000 positions, below projections. Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon pushed for Antoni's nomination shortly after McEntarfer was fired. 'E.J. Antoni as the new head of Bureau of Labor Statistics—that's what we're pushing. He's the guy that almost single-handedly took it down by going through their numbers,' Bannon said on his podcast. Antoni, who will face Senate confirmation, wrote on X last week that the bureau, part of the Labor Department, needed to revise its methods to 'rebuild the trust that has been lost over the last several years.' The bureau conducts wide-ranging surveys of American households and business and its statistics are an important benchmark for the wider economy, impacting everything from investment returns to pension payments. 'If the administration undermines the quality of economic statistics, it would make it impossible for our tax laws to work as Congress intended,' Greg Leiserson, a senior fellow at the Tax Law Center at NYU Law, told the Wall Street Journal after McEntarfer got the axe. Administration officials argue the bureau has become unreliable. "You want to be able to have somewhat reliable numbers,' Trade Representative Jamieson Greer told CBS News earlier this month. 'There are always revisions, but sometimes you see these revisions go in really extreme ways.' Former officials said revisions to the bureau's data, which triggered furor from the administration, are in fact a regular part of the process, and that the commissioner has little direct role within the agency's information gathering. 'The commissioner doesn't do anything to collect the numbers,' William Beach, nominated to serve the position during the first Trump administration, recently told CNN. 'The commissioner doesn't see the numbers until Wednesday before they're published.' The questions surrounding the BLS are part of larger concerns over the Trump economy, including continued uncertainty over the impact of his often-revised tariff plan, which most recently included another 90-day pause for tariff hikes on China. A Times of London/YouGov poll from earlier this month found that 48 percent of Americans graded Trump's job performance over the first six months of his administration as poor, compared to 21 percent who rated it excellent, 16 percent who rated it good and 11 percent who rated it as fair. Four in 10 Americans said that Trump's tariffs will make the country poorer and stifle economic growth.
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump Taps BLS Skeptic To Replace Leader He Fired Over Grim Jobs Report
President Donald Trump announced on social media Monday he's nominating E.J. Antoni, a rightwing economist who criticized the Bureau of Labor Statistics data-collecting, to head that very department. If confirmed by Congress, Antoni, the chief economist at the Heritage Foundation, will replace former BLS Commissioner Dr. Erika McEntarfer, who Trump fired earlier this month after she issued a damning report on poor job growth under his presidency. 'Our Economy is booming, and E.J. will ensure that the Numbers released are HONEST and ACCURATE,' said Trump. When Trump fired McEntarfer, he claimed without any evidence that she had manipulated the jobs data to make him look bad. A HuffPost analysis of Labor Department data found that Trump delivered the worst three months of job growth since the pandemic. Antoni has been critical of the BLS, posting on X days after McEntarfer's ousting that the bureau should change how it collects jobs data. 'There are better ways to collect, process, and disseminate data — that is the task for the next BLS commissioner, and only consistent delivery of accurate data in a timely manner will rebuild the trust that has been lost over the last several years,' he wrote last week. During an appearance on Steve Bannon's podcast earlier this month, Antoni called for McEntarfer to be fired. When Bannon asked him whether a 'MAGA Republican that President Trump knows and trusts' had been installed at BLS, Antoni replied, 'Unfortunately we still haven't gotten there, and I think that's part of the reason why we continue to have all of these different data problems.' In a later episode of his show after McEntarfer's firing, Bannon said he was 'pushing' for Antoni to head the BLS, praising him as 'the guy that almost single-handedly took it down by going through their numbers.' Jason Furman, a top economic adviser in Barack Obama's White House who is now an economics professor at Harvard University, was highly critical of Antoni's nomination. 'I don't think I have ever publicly criticized any Presidential nominee before. But E.J. Antoni is completely unqualified to be BLS Commissioner,' he wrote on social media. 'He is an extreme partisan and does not have any relevant expertise. He would be a break from decades of nonpartisan technocrats.' Antoni's work at the Heritage Foundation includes authoring some of Project 2025, the conservative blueprint for a second Trump administration. The Heritage Foundation was also instrumental in propping up Trump's baseless claims that the 2020 election was stolen from him and has shared false reports of noncitizens registering to vote. Related... Trump Fires Labor Statistics Head In Meltdown Over Grim Jobs Report Former Labor Secretary Calls Absolute 'Bulls**t' On Trump's Jobs Report Claims Donald Trump Just Delivered The Worst Three Months Of Job Growth Since The Pandemic


San Francisco Chronicle
8 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Republicans, Democrats alike exhort Trump: Keep security pact with Australia and UK alive
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. lawmakers from both parties are urging the Trump administration to maintain a three-way security partnership designed to supply Australia with nuclear-powered submarines — a plea that comes as the Pentagon reviews the agreement and considers the questions it has raised about the American industrial infrastructure's shipbuilding capabilities. Two weeks ago, the Defense Department announced it would review AUKUS, the 4-year-old pact signed by the Biden administration with Australia and the United Kingdom. The announcement means the Republican administration is looking closely at a partnership that many believe is critical to the U.S. strategy to push back China's influence in the Indo-Pacific. The review is expected to be completed in the fall. 'AUKUS is essential to strengthening deterrence in the Indo-Pacific and advancing the undersea capabilities that will be central to ensuring peace and stability," Republican Rep. John Moolenaar of Michigan and Democratic Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi of Illinois wrote in a July 22 letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Moolenaar chairs the House panel on China and Krishnamoorthi is its top Democrat. The review comes as the Trump administration works to rebalance its global security concerns while struggling with a hollowed-out industrial base that has hamstrung U.S. capabilities to build enough warships. The review is being led by Elbridge Colby, the No. 3 Pentagon official, who has expressed skepticism about the partnership. 'If we can produce the attack submarines in sufficient number and sufficient speed, then great. But if we can't, that becomes a very difficult problem," Colby said during his confirmation hearing in March. 'This is getting back to restoring our defense industrial capacity so that we don't have to face these awful choices but rather can be in a position where we can produce not only for ourselves, but for our allies." US cannot build enough ships As part of the $269 billion AUKUS partnership, the United States will sell three to five Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, with the first delivery scheduled as soon as 2032. The U.S. and the U.K. would help Australia design and build another three to five attack submarines to form an eight-boat force for Australia. A March report by the Congressional Research Service warned that the lack of U.S. shipbuilding capacities, including workforce shortage and insufficient supply chains, is jeopardizing the much-celebrated partnership. If the U.S. should sell the vessels to Australia, the U.S. Navy would have a shortage of attack submarines for two decades, the report said. The Navy has been ordering two boats per year in the last decade, but U.S. shipyards have been only producing 1.2 Virginia-class subs a year since 2022, the report said. 'The delivery pace is not where it needs to be" to make good on the first pillar of AUKUS, Admiral Daryl Caudle, nominee for the Chief of Naval Operations, told the Senate Armed Services Committee last month. Australia has invested $1 billion in the U.S. submarine industrial base, with another $1 billion to be paid before the end of this year. It has agreed to contribute a total of $3 billion to uplift the U.S. submarine base, and it has sent both industry personnel to train at U.S. shipyards and naval personnel for submarine training in the United States. "Australia was clear that we would make a proportionate contribution to the United States industrial base,' an Australian defense spokesperson said in July. 'Australia's contribution is about accelerating U.S. production rates and maintenance to enable the delivery of Australia's future Virginia-class submarines.' The three nations have also jointly tested communication capabilities with underwater autonomous systems, Australia's defense ministry said on July 23. Per the partnership, the countries will co-develop other advanced technologies, from undersea to hypersonic capabilities. At the recent Aspen Security Forum, Kevin Rudd, the Australian ambassador to the United States, said his country is committed to increasing defense spending to support its first nuclear-powered sub program, which would also provide 'massively expensive full maintenance repair facilities" for the U.S. Indo-Pacific fleet based in Western Australia. Rudd expressed confidence that the two governments 'will work our way through this stuff.' AUKUS called 'crucial to American deterrence' Bruce Jones, senior fellow with the Strobe Talbott Center for Security, Strategy and Technology, told The Associated Press that the partnership, by positioning subs in Western Australia, is helping arm the undersea space that is 'really crucial to American deterrence and defense options in the Western Pacific.' 'The right answer is not to be content with the current pace of submarine building. It's to increase the pace," Jones said. Jennifer Parker, who has served more than 20 years with the Royal Australian Navy and founded Barrier Strategic Advisory, said it should not be a zero-sum game. 'You might sell one submarine to Australia, so you have one less submarine on paper. But in terms of the access, you have the theater of choice from operating from Australia, from being able to maintain your submarines from Australia," Parker said. 'This is not a deal that just benefits Australia." Defense policy is one of the few areas where Republican lawmakers have pushed back against the Trump administration, but their resolve is being tested with the Pentagon's review of AUKUS. So far, they have joined their Democratic colleagues in voicing support for the partnership. They said the U.S. submarine industry is rebounding with congressional appropriations totaling $10 billion since 2018 to ensure the U.S. will have enough ships to allow for sales to Australia. "There is a little bit of mystification about the analysis done at the Pentagon,' Kaine said, adding that 'maybe (what) the analysis will say is: We believe this is a good thing.'