Scalable housing models and the future of infrastructure investment
Founded by serial entrepreneur Sal Patalano and global investor Christian Schroeder, ARCbuild is redefining what modular construction can deliver. Their approach is rooted in speed, regional customization, and long-term investor returns. It's not about shipping prefabricated units from afar. It's about building factories close to demand and training local developer crews to lead installations independently.
A Scalable Platform, Adapted for Global Needs
ARCbuild's model centers on launching decentralized factories in high-demand regions. These semi-automated facilities are equipped to pivot production based on market conditions, unit types, and buyer profiles. The goal is to offer developers the flexibility to address local housing needs without delays or import dependencies.
For emerging markets where infrastructure development is critical, this local-first manufacturing approach can help accelerate timelines, reduce capital outlay, and minimize risk. ARCbuild works with landowners and real estate partners to identify where demand meets opportunity, ensuring that each factory serves a viable market segment. The adaptability of this model makes it ideal for countries balancing rapid urbanization with the need for sustainable, cost-efficient growth.
Enabling Long-Term Asset Growth
At the heart of ARCbuild's mission is a simple premise: communities are investable. By turning underutilized land into well-designed housing at scale, ARCbuild enables developers and investors to generate consistent rental income or sales proceeds, while also building long-term community value.
Every ARCbuild home is designed to be resilient, ESG-compliant, and cost-efficient. Materials are selected for durability and energy efficiency. Layouts are optimized for local climate, utility integration, and cultural preferences. Whether in California or sub-Saharan Africa, these homes are built for permanence, not just deployment.
This makes ARCbuild a vehicle not only for real estate return but for economic stimulus. As housing is developed, demand for local services rises, creating secondary economic benefits that ripple across job creation, infrastructure use, and community resilience.
An Investment in People and Process
ARCbuild doesn't just drop in product. It brings process. Local training and oversight programs equip developer teams with the knowledge to manage installations independently. Over time, this lowers labor costs, reduces reliance on external contractors, and fosters a local construction ecosystem that is scalable and self-sustaining.
This approach positions ARCbuild as a partner in workforce development as much as in housing. It is particularly valuable in regions where skilled labor shortages pose a constraint on infrastructure development. By embedding knowledge transfer into its model, ARCbuild leaves behind capacity as well as completed homes.
This makes ARCbuild attractive to global impact investors, sovereign wealth funds, and infrastructure lenders who are looking to de-risk projects while ensuring community benefits. It's a long-term strategy that balances profitability with place-making.
Sal Patalano: Leading with Vision, Grounded in Execution
As CEO, Sal Patalano brings over 35 years of operational leadership, from Fortune 500 corporations to venture-backed tech startups. After growing up with housing insecurity, he has committed his career to solving housing at scale. By blending process innovation with purpose, he has made ARCbuild a global-ready solution for landowners and developers seeking smart, impactful growth.
Christian Schroeder ensures that each step of ARCbuild's growth is grounded in investment logic and scalability. Together, they've built a platform that is both mission-driven and market-tested.
The Future of Infrastructure is Modular
Across Africa and other growth markets, the demand for housing and infrastructure far outpaces supply. ARCbuild offers a way to close that gap—not just with units, but with strategy, systems, and local empowerment.
For governments, landowners, and institutional investors looking to unlock value, ARCbuild is more than a construction company. It's a partner in regional development and a blueprint for scalable, sustainable investment. In a world where infrastructure must deliver not only efficiency but equity, ARCbuild stands out as a model for what the future of housing can achieve.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trucking Hub Debuts $29/Month Plan for Complete DOT Compliance with Free Nationwide Drug Testing
CHICAGO, Aug. 18, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Trucking Hub, an industry leader in Transportation Management System (TMS) software and connected fleet solutions, announced new pricing plans that make complete DOT compliance simple and affordable for carriers of any size. For just $29 per month per truck, fleets receive everything required for compliance – including ELD compliance and nationwide random drug testing at 24,000+ locations, at no additional cost. The launch expands Trucking Hub's integrated Drug & Alcohol Consortium, combining compliance technology with nationwide coverage. Every carrier enrolled receives a custom DOT-compliant drug and alcohol policy and full testing coverage: Random drug & alcohol testing – Quarterly selections with automated notifications and tracking Pre-employment testing – Fast onboarding with integrated results Post-accident testing – Immediate access when required by regulation Reasonable suspicion testing – Supervisor process support with documentation Return-to-duty & follow-up testing – Structured programs with reminders and reporting 24,000+ collection sites – Nationwide access with results stored directly in the TMS In addition, Trucking Hub unifies all compliance requirements into one connected platform: ELD compliance – FMCSA-certified HOS and DVIR with native dispatch and TMS integration Driver Qualification Files – Centralized DQF management with instant access to PSP and MVRs Accident reporting & recordkeeping – A complete accident register with digital forms and evidence tracking Maintenance – Preventive schedules, inspection logs, and repair history tied to each asset IFTA – State mileage tracking, fuel card integration, and automated quarterly reporting By including random drug testing in its $29 plan, Trucking Hub now offers the most affordable drug and alcohol program available to trucking companies, eliminating the hidden costs and complexity that traditionally burden small and mid-sized fleets. Learn more about Trucking Hub's Drug Testing solutions here: To download and learn more about Trucking Hub's DOT Drug Consortium software, visit Beyond Compliance: Dashcam One™ To further simplify compliance, Trucking Hub recommends pairing the $29 Plan with Dashcam One™, the industry's first all-in-one device that combines ELD, real-time telematics, AI-powered video safety, and driver scoring in a single plug-and-play device. Go beyond complete DOT compliance with one login, one plan and one device. Learn more at About Trucking Hub Trucking Hub delivers an enterprise-grade Transportation Management System and connected fleet solutions designed by a carrier, for carriers. From dispatch to compliance, telematics to driver safety, Trucking Hub provides a single, unified platform to manage and scale modern trucking operations. Contact Trucking Hubsales@ View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Trucking Hub Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Latest News In AI Chips - Lantronix Advances AI Tech for Defense with Teal Drones
Lantronix Inc. has announced a significant development in the realm of AI chips by providing a TAA and NDAA-compliant solution for Teal Drones' Black Widow™ drones, which are part of the U.S. Army's Short-Range Reconnaissance (SRR) Program. This solution leverages the Qualcomm® Dragonwing™ QRB5165 processor to deliver advanced Edge AI capabilities while adhering to stringent security requirements. By ensuring compliance with U.S. standards, Lantronix is positioning itself as a key player in the rapidly expanding defense and autonomous systems market, with its solution opening up growth opportunities in both secure defense and commercial sectors. last closed at $157.85 down 0.2%. In other market news, was a notable mover up 11.1% and finishing the session at $199.95. At the same time, softened, down 14.1% to end the day at $161.76. Qualcomm's rapid expansion into AI and IoT sectors could unlock new growth channels amid rising competition click to explore the full narrative on their strategic opportunities. Additionally, refer to our Market Insights titled "AI Enters the 'Show Me The Money' Phase," where we swiftly explored AI chip investment opportunities. Act soon to capitalize on these insights! Best AI Chip Stocks ended the day at $180.45 down 0.9%, near its 52-week high. ended the day at €636.70 down 1%. ended the day at $177.51 down 1.9%, near its 52-week high. Key Takeaways Explore the 59 names, such as Credo Technology Group Holding, Arm Holdings and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, from our AI Chip Stocks screener here. Curious About Other Options? Rare earth metals are an input to most high-tech devices, military and defence systems and electric vehicles. The global race is on to secure supply of these critical minerals. Beat the pack to uncover the 28 best rare earth metal stocks of the very few that mine this essential strategic resource. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sources: Simply Wall St "Lantronix Solution Powers U.S. Army-Approved Teal Drones, a Red Cat Holdings Co., Unlocking Secure Edge AI Growth Opportunity" from Lantronix, Inc. on GlobeNewswire (published 18 August 2025) Companies discussed in this article include NasdaqGS:FSLR NasdaqGS:QCOM NasdaqGS:NVDA ENXTAM:ASML NasdaqGS:AMD and NasdaqGS:AMAT. This article was originally published by Simply Wall St. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@ Sign in to access your portfolio
Harvard Business Review
4 hours ago
- Harvard Business Review
Boards Can Continue to Lead the Way on Climate Governance
During the past year, political and investor pushback against corporate climate efforts has intensified. Nearly 320 anti-ESG bills have been introduced across U.S. state legislatures since 2021. States such as Florida and Texas have curbed the use of ESG considerations in public investments. The U.S. SEC has all but repealed its climate-disclosure rules, and pending climate-disclosure rules in California are mired in litigation. This backlash has triggered a corporate retreat in some parts of corporate America. Firms are scaling back climate disclosures, reducing sustainability headcount, and in some cases abandoning emissions goals. Major financial institutions—including BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, State Street, and JPMorgan Chase—have withdrawn from global climate alliances, while companies such as Alphabet and McDonald's have purged 'ESG' from public statements. ExxonMobil took the unusual step of suing shareholders for proposing stronger emissions targets. Yet the underlying risks associated with climate change—from supply-chain disruption to asset impairment and shifting consumer preferences—haven't disappeared. If anything, they are accelerating. As climate impacts grow more visible, companies will need strategies that address both mitigation (reducing emissions) and adaptation (strengthening resilience to physical and operational climate risks). Globally, companies appear to recognize these risks. Despite headlines about ESG retreat, a PwC study found that 37% of the more than 4,000 companies reporting climate targets to CDP in 2024 had increased their ambitions, and only 16% had dialed them back. The question for boards then is not whether they should engage in climate governance, but how to do so credibly, legally, and effectively in an era of heightened scrutiny. Guidance for a Shifting Landscape Last year, in an HBR article ' How Robust Is Your Climate Governance? ' we outlined eight hallmarks of meaningful board engagement on climate. In view of the political and social changes that have taken place since that article was published, we provide the following updated guidance for navigating today's shifting climate landscape. 1. Know your climate profile, now more than ever. In an era of heightened scrutiny, a board's foundational knowledge of its climate profile serves as its first line of defense. Boards must develop rock-solid understanding of their climate exposure—how the company affects climate and especially vice versa. Climate data must be not only internally accurate but externally defensible. This means requesting third-party verification of emissions metrics, rigorously stress-testing assumptions, and preparing for public scrutiny. Scenario planning should incorporate a range of plausible futures—including regulatory fragmentation, delays in policy implementation, supply-chain instability, reduced tax benefits, and escalating physical climate impacts. For each scenario, boards should understand the risks and opportunities it presents for the company as well as how it affects the company's responsibilities as a corporate citizen. 2. Define the board's role. When facing pressure to retreat from climate oversight, boards should recognize that climate risks connect to core business fundamentals rather than ESG trends. As we wrote in our earlier article, the board's role in climate oversight should be clearly defined and documented in charters, committee descriptions, and proxy filings. The linkages to fiduciary duties—risk management, strategic resilience, and long-term value creation—should also be clear. We recommend having legal counsel review governance documents to ensure compliance with evolving expectations. 3. Build a defensible oversight structure. Rather than centralize oversight in a stand-alone ESG committee, a distributed governance model is more resilient and less vulnerable to attacks. A stand-alone 'ESG committee' makes an easy target for activists. We continue to recommend assigning responsibility for coordinating climate oversight to a primary committee (such as governance or nominating), while embedding specific climate responsibilities into other relevant committees: audit (for disclosure), risk (for exposure), and compensation (for incentives). The integrated approach becomes even more valuable when facing criticism, because it demonstrates that climate considerations are embedded in core business processes. This signals integration into the business, not conformity to the latest trend. Explicitly document how the board's structure supports accountability and coherence, reducing perceptions of arbitrary decision-making. Should the political winds shift again, boards can adjust emphasis without wholesale structural change. 4. Build expertise thoughtfully. Meaningful oversight requires informed engagement. Focus on ensuring that directors have business-relevant expertise—transition economics, energy systems, regulatory risk—rather than symbolic 'climate credentials.' Use independent briefings, industry site visits, and neutral education partners to demonstrate a multi-source learning approach. Boards that show deliberate, ongoing engagement will enhance both their credibility and their understanding. At a time when trade-offs are more complex than ever, boards lacking climate literacy will struggle to make informed choices—or explain their climate position to skeptical stakeholders. 5. Clarify climate positioning—consistency is critical. Companies face the delicate task of defining their climate posture without appearing to abandon commitments or stakeholder expectations. Whether the company aims to lead, follow, or comply on climate the current environment, clarity is crucial. As we've previously emphasized, boards must align with management on the company's climate posture. They should also communicate the company's stance accurately. ' Greenhushing '—downplaying or withholding information about climate commitments and activities from the public—may seem sensible as a way to avoid the spotlight, but lack of transparency can alienate other stakeholders, and failure to disclose financially material climate-related information raises legal issues. Lack of transparency also makes collective action to address climate change more difficult. Inconsistent or opaque positioning creates unnecessary risk. Stakeholders—including employees—will be watching to see whether a company's actions consistently reflect its stated climate position and corporate values. This means aligning internal strategy with public statements, investor presentations, and regulatory filings. If you are scaling back goals, explain why—whether due to technology limits, economic shifts, or capital reallocation. Such positioning should be the result of business strategy, not political convenience. In the face of skepticism about climate initiatives, a coherent climate stance—regardless of ambition level—builds trust. 6. Probe management plans, and demand clarity and accountability. With average shareholder support for ESG resolutions declining from 33.3% in 2021 to 19.6% in 2024, boards must ensure their oversight provides the accountability that external mechanisms may not. We continue to advocate the approach from our previous article: Boards must review climate strategies with the same rigor as financial forecasts. This includes emissions targets, capital allocation, and operational planning. Avoid aspirational goals without clear roadmaps. Ask: What assumptions underpin our targets? Who is accountable? Can we defend these assumptions publicly—to shareholders, the media, or policymakers? Independent verification and board-level dashboards add credibility and clarity to climate oversight. Plans to scale back strategies or relax emissions targets should get the same level of scrutiny as plans to increase them. A useful litmus test: 'If called before a Congressional hearing, can we explain our climate plan with clarity and credibility?' 7. Tie incentives to operations. Though controversial, tying climate goals to executive incentives can signal serious intent. Figures for 2025 are not yet available, but the practice actually grew slightly in 2024—28% of S&P 500 companies linked executive pay to climate metrics in 2024, up from 23% in 2023. Whenever it is used, climate-linked compensation must be auditable, proportionate, and clearly tied to operational outcomes. Consider how climate performance connects to business outcomes rather than external recognition or ratings. If incentives are politically sensitive, use non-compensation levers such as performance reviews, strategy reviews, or balanced scorecards. The goal is creating alignment through accountability mechanisms. 8. Acknowledge trade-offs and embrace complexity. Climate governance is no longer about win-win narratives (if it ever was). It requires navigating real tensions: short- vs. long-term returns, investor expectations vs. emissions goals, and resilience vs. risk. Be honest about trade-offs and avoid overly simplistic ESG narratives, such as 'Doing well by doing good.' Instead, document how the board weighs competing priorities and scenarios. Sophistication and transparency signal integrity. The best defense against politicized criticism is a well-reasoned, well-documented decision-making process rooted in business realities. Articulate clearly how the board weighs competing stakeholder interests and time horizons. More than ever, boards must embrace a realistic perspective on climate governance, acknowledging the complexities and uncertainties involved. In an environment where climate action faces criticism, transparently acknowledging challenges and demonstrating a thoughtful approach to overcoming them—rather than presenting a simplistic narrative—will foster greater trust and resilience. . . . Retreating from climate governance in the current political moment may provide short-term relief, but it carries long-term strategic risk. Climate change remains a material business issue. Even if the pushback grows, some stakeholders—from insurers to employees—will continue to demand clarity and accountability. That means embedding climate into the core of governance—not as a political gesture but as a strategic necessity. And it means preparing for scrutiny, not fearing it.
