Russia does not care about Trump's theatrics, official says
Trump, sitting beside NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte in the Oval Office, on July 14, announced new weapons for Ukraine and threatened 'biting' secondary tariffs of 100 per cent on the buyers of Russian exports unless there is a peace deal in 50 days.
'The U.S. president's statements are very serious. Some of them are addressed personally to President Putin,' Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters.
'We certainly need time to analyze what was said in Washington.'
Peskov, though, added that it was already clear that decisions being made in Washington and other NATO capitals were 'perceived by the Ukrainian side not as a signal for peace but as a signal to continue the war.'
Story continues below advertisement
Putin, who has spoken to Trump by telephone at least six times this year, has yet to comment publicly on Trump's remarks.
But two other senior Russian officials did not hold back.
Former President Dmitry Medvedev, now deputy chair of Russia's Security Council, said Moscow did not care about Trump's 'theatrical ultimatum,' while a senior Russian diplomat, Sergei Ryabkov, suggested that giving ultimatums to Moscow was unacceptable and pointless.
Get daily National news
Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Trump, who has said he wants to be seen as a 'peacemaker' president, said he wanted to see the end of the war – on which he said the United States had spent $350 billion – but that he had been 'disappointed' by Putin.
Trump specifically expressed frustration that Putin's 'talk' about peace was often followed by Russian strikes on major Ukrainian cities, and indicated Washington wanted to press Moscow into ending the war by sending more arms to Ukraine.
'I don't want to say he's an assassin, but he's a tough guy,' Trump said of Putin, a reference to former U.S. President Joe Biden calling the Russian leader 'a killer' in a 2021 interview.
1:42
Russia launches barrage of drones, missiles at Kyiv as US resumes Ukraine weapons deliveries
The Financial Times reported that Trump had privately encouraged Ukraine to step up strikes deep in Russian territory, even asking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy whether he could hit Moscow if the U.S. provided long-range weapons.
Story continues below advertisement
Trump told the BBC that he was 'not done' with Putin and that he thought a Ukraine peace deal was on the cards.
Putin ordered Russian troops into Ukraine in February 2022 after eight years of fighting in eastern Ukraine between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian forces. The United States says 1.2 million people have been injured or killed in the war.
In Moscow, state television broadcasts led with advances by Russian troops in Ukraine, of which Russian forces control just under a fifth, and an attack on Russia by Ukrainian drones which injured 18 people.
Kommersant, one of Russia's most respected newspapers, invoked William Shakespeare's 'Julius Caesar' in its front page headline to suggest betrayal: 'Et tu, Trump – the main peacekeeper of Ukrainian conflict joined the 'party of war'.'
Putin has repeatedly said he is ready to make peace – but on his terms – and that there is no point discussing a ceasefire until the details of what a peace would look like are nailed down.
In Washington, a White House official said Trump's intention is to impose '100 per cent tariffs on Russia' and secondary sanctions on other countries that buy oil from Russia if a peace deal is not struck in 50 days.
'We can do secondary,' Trump said. 'We're probably talking about 100 percent or something like that. We can do secondary tariffs without the Senate, without the House, but what they're crafting also could be very good.'
Story continues below advertisement
Eighty-five of the 100 U.S. senators are co-sponsoring a bill that would give Trump the authority to impose 500 per cent tariffs on any country that helps Russia.
China, India and Turkey are the biggest buyers of crude from Russia, the world's second largest exporter of oil.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
39 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Solid Transaction-Based Revenues to Drive HOOD's Q2 Earnings
Robinhood Markets' HOOD transaction-based revenues (comprising more than 60% of total net revenues) are expected to have been impressive in the second quarter of 2025. The company is scheduled to announce its quarterly numbers tomorrow after market close. During the second quarter, trading volume and client activity remained robust as market volatility was sparked by President Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariff proposals and the resulting uncertainty. As the quarter advanced, increased clarity on trade policy helped propel equity markets to record highs. Additionally, trading momentum was strong across other asset classes, including cryptocurrencies, supported by the introduction of new legislation favoring digital assets. These are likely to have supported Robinhood's transaction-based revenues in the to-be-reported quarter. The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the metric is pegged at $508.4 million, indicating a 55.5% surge from the prior-year quarter. The solid performance is likely to have been driven by higher options, equity and cryptocurrencies transaction revenues during the second quarter. The consensus estimate for Robinhood's options transaction revenues is $252.2 million, suggesting 38.6% growth. Further, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for equity and cryptocurrencies transaction revenues is pegged at $68.1 million and $156.1 million, respectively. Equity transaction revenues are projected to surge 70.2%, while cryptocurrencies transaction revenues are estimated to jump 93.2% year over year. HOOD's Q2 Earnings & Revenue Growth Expectations The Zacks Consensus Estimate for second-quarter earnings is pegged at 31 cents, which has remained unchanged over the past seven days. The figure suggests a jump of 47.6% from the year-ago reported number. The consensus estimate for sales of $915.2 million indicates a 34.2% year-over-year rise. Click here to know about the other factors that are likely to have influenced HOOD's overall performance. How Robinhood's Peers Fared in Q2 Two of Robinhood's close peers – Interactive BrokersIBKR and Charles SchwabSCHW – announced results on July 17 and July 18, respectively. Interactive Brokers' second-quarter 2025 adjusted earnings per share of $1.51 surpassed the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.46. The bottom line grew 15.9% from the prior-year quarter. Results primarily benefited from an increase in revenues as trading volume, customer accounts and daily average revenue trades increased in the quarter. As such, Interactive Brokers recorded a 27.1% jump in commissions. Similarly, Schwab's second-quarter 2025 adjusted earnings of $1.14 per share outpaced the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $1.09 and surged 56% year over year. The solid performance of the asset management business and higher net interest revenues supported the results. Also, trading revenues, which soared 22.5% year over year, drove Schwab's quarterly performance. Our Take on Robinhood's Q2 Performance Apart from impressive transaction-based revenues, Robinhood is expected to have witnessed higher interest income as interest rates were relatively high in the second quarter. Hence, this will also support this Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy) company's second-quarter numbers. You can see the complete list of today's Zacks #1 Rank stocks here. On the other hand, HOOD's operating expenses are likely to have stayed high due to ongoing investments in platform upgrades, product innovation, customer support and regulatory compliance. Nonetheless, Robinhood's shares have had a remarkable run on the bourses since the beginning of the year. This year, the stock soared a whopping 186.6%, outperforming the industry's growth of 23.6%. Image Source: Zacks Investment Research Higher. Faster. Sooner. Buy These Stocks Now A small number of stocks are primed for a breakout, and you have a chance to get in before they take off. At any given time, there are only 220 Zacks Rank #1 Strong Buys. On average, this list more than doubles the S&P 500. We've combed through the latest Strong Buys and selected 7 compelling companies likely to jump sooner and climb higher than any other stock you could buy this month. You'll learn everything you need to know about these exciting trades in our brand-new Special Report, 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Want the latest recommendations from Zacks Investment Research? Today, you can download 7 Best Stocks for the Next 30 Days. Click to get this free report This article originally published on Zacks Investment Research ( Zacks Investment Research
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
US stocks edge higher as a busy week for markets picks up momentum
NEW YORK (AP) — U.S. stock indexes are ticking higher as a busy week for Wall Street picks up momentum. The S&P 500 was up 0.2% in early trading Tuesday after setting all-time highs for six straight days. The Dow Jones Industrial Average was flat, and the Nasdaq composite was up 0.5%, coming off its own record. JetBlue Airways and SoFi Technologies rose but Merck fell following a jumbled set of profit reports from big U.S. companies. Treasury yields were easing a bit as the Federal Reserve gets set to begin a two-day meeting where it will decide what to do with short-term interest rates. THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. AP's earlier story follows below. Wall Street chugged mostly higher in premarket trading Tuesday as Chinese and U.S. officials begin a second day of trade talks and the Federal Reserve kicks off its two-day meeting to make a decision on interest rate policy. The meetings come amid one of the busiest weeks of corporate earnings season and a flurry of economic data. Futures for the S&P 500 were up 0.2%, while futures for the Dow Jones Industrial Average edged 0.1% higher. Nasdaq futures rose 0.4% before the bell. Analysts said investors were watching for the latest from President Donald Trump and U.S. trade talks with China in Stockholm. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng were meeting in the Swedish capital. 'Aside from addressing economic imbalances, tariffs are also now well entrenched in the geopolitical arena,' Tan Boon Heng of the Asia & Oceania Treasury Department at Mizuho Bank said in a commentary. With regard to the Fed meeting, the widespread expectation on Wall Street is that officials at the U.S. central bank will wait until September to resume cutting interest rates, though a couple of Trump's appointees could dissent in the vote. The Fed has been on hold with interest rates this year since cutting them several times at the end of 2024. Trump has publicly chastised Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not cutting the benchmark lending rate, which Powell says is due to the uncertain ramifications of Trump's trade war, most notably whether those policies will trigger higher inflation. In corporate news, UnitedHealth Group shares slid 4% after the company badly missed Wall Street's second-quarter earnings expectations and disappointed investors with its updated profit forecast. The health care giant said Tuesday that it expects rising medical costs to continue to pressure its performance and forecast adjusted earnings of at least $16 per share in 2025. The company had started 2025 with an initial forecast for adjusted earnings of up to $30 per share. Union Pacific rose 1.2% in premarket after it offered up details on its bid to merge with Norfolk Southern that would create the U.S.'s first transcontinental railroad. Union Pacific is offering $20 billion cash and one share of its stock to buy Norfolk Southern, the companies said Tuesday, adding that the merger would streamline deliveries of all kinds of raw materials and goods. Norfolk Southern shares fell 3%. Novo Nordisk, which makes the weight loss drug Wegovy, plunged 24% in premarket trading after the company cut its sales and operating profit for the year. Also reporting earnings Tuesday are Boeing and Starbucks. Hundreds of U.S. companies are lined up to report how much profit they made during the spring, with nearly a third of the businesses in the S&P 500 index scheduled to deliver updates this week. The government will also be busy this week, releasing three separate sets of data on the labor market, punctuated with the July jobs report on Friday. The first second-quarter GDP estimate come on Wednesday, followed by the Fed's preferred measure of inflation on Thursday. Elsewhere, in Europe at midday, France's CAC 40 jumped 1.3% in early trading, while the German DAX rose 1.1%. Britain's FTSE 100 added 0.5%. Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 fell 0.8% to 40,674.55 on broad selling of major companies including automakers and big banks. Toyota Motor Corp. dipped 2.3% and Honda Motor Co. fell 2.1%. Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group finished 1.8% lower, while Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group stock dipped 1.6%. Hong Kong's Hang Seng dropped 0.2% to 25,524.45, while the Shanghai Composite gained 0.3% to 3,609.71. Australia's S&P/ASX 200 edged 0.1% higher to 8,704.60. South Korea's Kospi gained 0.7% to 3,230.57. Samsung Electronics edged 0.3% higher after jumping nearly 7% on Monday on news that it signed a deal with Tesla to provide computer chips for its electric vehicles. In energy trading, benchmark U.S. crude was unchanged at $66.71 a barrel. Brent crude, the international standard, gained 5 cents to $69.37 a barrel.
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
With AI plan, Trump keeps chipping away at a foundational environmental law
When President Donald Trump rolled out a plan to boost artificial intelligence and data centers, a key goal was wiping away barriers to rapid growth. And that meant taking aim at the National Environmental Policy Act — a 55-year-old, bedrock law aimed at protecting the environment though a process that requires agencies to consider a project's possible impacts and allows the public to be heard before a project is approved. Data centers, demanding vast amounts of energy and water, have aroused strong opposition in some communities. The AI Action Plan Trump announced last week would seek to sweep aside NEPA, as it's commonly known, to streamline environmental reviews and permitting for data centers and related infrastructure. Republicans and business interests have long criticized NEPA for what they see as unreasonable slowing of development, and Trump's plan would give 'categorical exclusions' to data centers for 'maximum efficiency' in permitting. A spokeswoman for the White House Council on Environmental Quality said the administration is 'focused on driving meaningful NEPA reform to reduce the delays in federal permitting, unleashing the ability for America to strengthen its AI and manufacturing leadership.' Trump's administration has been weakening the law for months. 'It's par for the course for this administration. The attitude is to clear the way for projects that harm communities and the environment,' said Erin Doran, senior staff attorney at environmental nonprofit Food & Water Watch. Here's what to know about this key environmental law, and Trump's effort to weaken it: What is NEPA and why does it matter? NEPA is a foundational environmental law in the United States, 'essentially our Magna Carta for the environment,' said Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, another environmental group, referring to the 13th century English legal text that formed the basis for constitutions worldwide. Signed into law by President Richard Nixon in 1970, NEPA requires federal agencies proposing actions such as building roads, bridges or energy projects to study how their project will affect the environment. Private companies are also frequently subject to NEPA standards when they apply for a permit from a federal agency. In recent years, the law has become increasingly important in requiring consideration of a project's possible contributions to climate change. 'That's a really important function because otherwise we're just operating with blinders just to get the project done, without considering whether there are alternative solutions that might accomplish the same objective, but in a more environmentally friendly way,' Park said. But business groups say NEPA routinely blocks important projects that often taken five years or more to complete. 'Our broken permitting system has long been a national embarrassment,' said Marty Durbin, president of the U.S. Chamber's Global Energy Institute. He called NEPA 'a blunt and haphazard tool' that too often is used to block investment and economic development. The White House proposal comes as Congress is working on a permitting reform plan that would overhaul NEPA, addressing long-standing concerns from both parties that development projects — including some for clean energy — take too long to be approved. What's happened to NEPA recently? NEPA's strength — and usefulness — can depend on how it's interpreted by different administrations. Trump, a Republican, sought to weaken NEPA in his first term by limiting when environmental reviews are required and limiting the time for evaluation and public comment. Former Democratic President Joe Biden restored more rigorous reviews. In his second term, Trump has again targeted the law. An executive order that touched on environmental statutes has many agencies scrapping the requirement for a draft environmental impact statement. And the CEQ in May withdrew Biden-era guidance that federal agencies should consider the effects of planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions when conducting NEPA reviews. Separately, the U.S. Supreme Court in May narrowed the scope of environmental reviews required for major infrastructure projects. In a ruling involving a Utah railway expansion project aimed at quadrupling oil production, the court said NEPA wasn't designed 'for judges to hamstring new infrastructure and construction projects.' 'It's been a rough eight months for NEPA,' said Dinah Bear, a former general counsel at the Council on Environmental Quality under both Democratic and Republican presidents. John Ruple, a research professor of law at the University of Utah, said sidelining NEPA could actually slow things down. Federal agencies still have to comply with other environmental laws, like the Endangered Species Act or Clean Air Act. NEPA has an often overlooked benefit of forcing coordination with those other laws, he said. Some examples of cases where NEPA has played a role A botanist by training, Mary O'Brien was working with a small organization in Oregon in the 1980s to propose alternative techniques to successfully replant Douglas fir trees that had been clear-cut on federal lands. Aerially sprayed herbicides aimed at helping the conifers grow have not only been linked to health problems in humans but were also killing another species of tree, red alders, that were beneficial to the fir saplings, O'Brien said. The U.S. Forest Service had maintained that the herbicides' impact on humans and red alders wasn't a problem. But under NEPA, a court required the agency to redo their analysis and they ultimately had to write a new environmental impact statement. 'It's a fundamental concept: 'Don't just roar ahead.' Think about your options,' O'Brien said. O'Brien, who later worked at the Grand Canyon Trust, also co-chaired a working group that weighed in on a 2018 Forest Service proposal, finalized in 2016, for aspen restoration on Monroe Mountain in Utah. Hunters, landowners, loggers and ranchers all had different opinions on how the restoration should be handled. She said NEPA's requirement to get the public involved made for better research and a better plan. 'I think it's one of the laws that's the most often used by the public without the public being aware,' said Stephen Schima, senior legislative counsel at environmental law nonprofit Earthjustice. 'NEPA has long been the one opportunity for communities and impacted stakeholders and local governments to weigh in.' Schima said rolling back the power of NEPA threatens the scientific integrity of examining projects' full impacts. 'Decisions are going to be less informed by scientific studies, and that is one of the major concerns here,' he said. Ruple said uncertainty from NEPA changes and competing opinions on how to comply with the law's requirements may invite even more litigation. Wednesdays What's next in arts, life and pop culture. 'And all of this will fall on the shoulder of agencies that are losing the staff needed to lead them through these changes,' he said. ___ Follow Melina Walling on X @MelinaWalling and Bluesky @ ___ The Associated Press' climate and environmental coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
