
Republicans are quietly rolling back Obamacare. Here's how
Unlike in 2017, when the late GOP Sen. John McCain's dramatic thumbs-down dashed his caucus's hope of overturning the Affordable Care Act, Republicans barely mentioned Obamacare as they swiftly pushed Trump's massive domestic agenda package through Congress this year. Instead, they focused their talking points on eliminating fraud in Medicaid and protecting the program for the most vulnerable.
And this time, they were successful in dealing a major blow to the Affordable Care Act. The 'big, beautiful bill,' along with a new rule from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, is expected to leave millions more people without health coverage, raise costs for those who remain in Obamacare policies, and reverse more than a decade of improvement in the nation's uninsured rate.
In addition, Trump's package is projected to shrink another major provision of the Affordable Care Act — expanding Medicaid coverage to low-income adults — by requiring many of them to work, volunteer or engage in other activities at least 80 hours a month.
'The net effect of the changes they are making is a partial repeal of the ACA,' said Larry Levitt, executive vice president for health policy at KFF, a nonpartisan research group.
What's more, Republicans may further undermine Obamacare before the end of the year if they do not extend the enhanced federal premium subsidies that former President Joe Biden and congressional Democrats approved in 2021. The beefed-up subsidies, which helped propel record sign-ups for Obamacare coverage but lapse at the end of 2025, will be a subject of debate when Congress returns in September.
Democratic lawmakers are already calling attention to the subsidies' expiration, which would send people's premium payments skyrocketing and prompt millions to drop their policies, experts say. Some Republicans have voiced support in exploring the matter, especially since red-state residents would likely be among those losing coverage.
Even though the 'big, beautiful bill' contains the largest-ever cuts to federal support for health coverage, it remains to be seen whether the Republicans' toned-down rhetoric on Obamacare will help them avoid the retribution they suffered in the 2018 midterms, when the repeal effort was a major factor in the Democrats winning control of the House.
'Many of the changes are so technical, it may be hard for the public to grasp what's happening,' Levitt said. 'Many of the changes will take years to take effect.'
Between them, the new law and rule will make it harder to enroll in and renew Affordable Care Act coverage by increasing verification requirements, hiking out-of-pocket costs for enrollees, and banning certain legal immigrants from qualifying for federal subsidies.
The rule is expected to cause up to 1.8 million people to lose Obamacare coverage next year, and the losses will likely be concentrated in seven GOP-led states, including Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and Texas, as well as North Carolina, which has a Democratic governor, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Meanwhile, the Affordable Care Act provisions in the law are forecast to lead to 2.1 million more people being uninsured in 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
'It's a radical weakening of what the marketplaces will be able to deliver in the next few years,' said Jennifer Sullivan, director of health coverage access at the left-leaning Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
But supporters of the Republicans' efforts say the law and rule aim to eliminate many of the expansions and flexibilities in enrollment and verification that Biden introduced into Obamacare, which also opened it up to more fraud, mainly by insurance brokers. (The Biden administration last year took steps to counter an increase in brokers fraudulently accessing and making changes in consumers' accounts without authorization.)
'The One Big, Beautiful Bill restores the ACA, rather than repeals it,' Brian Blase, president of Paragon Health Institute, a right-leaning think tank, told CNN. 'It actually seems like [it's] upholding the integrity of the program.'
'If you can take sort of simple steps like having people every year update their information and having that verified to reduce billions — if not tens of billions — [of dollars] of waste and fraud expenditures, it doesn't undermine the program,' continued Blase, who served as a health policy adviser at the White House's National Economic Council during the first Trump administration and whose work is closely followed by Republican lawmakers.
The law and the rule make sweeping changes to the Affordable Care Act.
Enrollees will be required to verify their income in advance of receiving federal premium assistance to guarantee they are eligible, instead of only reconciling their earnings and subsidies on their tax returns to ensure they received the proper amount of assistance.
Also, they will not be allowed to receive federal subsidies if they fail to file their taxes and reconcile for one year. Plus, if they received too high a subsidy (because they underestimated their income when enrolling), they will have to pay back the entire amount of the excess assistance. Previously, there were limits on the repayment requirement.
The beefed-up verification mandate effectively ends automatic reenrollment in Obamacare, a key method of keeping people covered. Nearly 11 million people — or 45% of sign-ups — were automatically reenrolled for 2025, according to KFF.
The rule also temporarily requires low-income enrollees who qualify for plans with $0 premiums to pay $5 a month until they verify their eligibility. And it allows insurers to require enrollees to pay both initial and past-due premiums before coverage starts.
In addition, it shortens the open enrollment period on the federal healthcare.gov exchange to November 1 through December 15 and requires state-run Affordable Care Act exchanges to end open enrollment by December 31.
The rule also temporarily repeals the ability for those with household incomes at or below 150% of the federal poverty line to enroll year-round, while the law bars those who sign up via certain types of special enrollment periods from receiving federal subsidies.
What's more, the rule makes technical changes that will hike the annual cost of coverage by hundreds of dollars by reducing the premium subsidies and allowing insurers to raise out-of-pocket costs when people receive care. And certain legal immigrants, including refugees, asylees and victims of sex and labor trafficking, will no longer qualify for federal assistance.
The additional documentation and higher costs are expected to lead to healthier enrollees dropping out of the exchanges in coming years, leaving sicker consumers with greater health care needs in the program. That will likely cause insurers to raise their premiums even more or drop out in coming years.
The rule is being challenged in two lawsuits filed by a coalition of Democratic-led states and by a group of cities and organizations, which argue that it will lead to more people losing coverage. That, in turn, will raise the states' and cities' costs for providing health care services to these newly uninsured residents, the plaintiffs say.
The turmoil is already having an impact. Insurers have proposed a median premium hike of 18% for 2026, more than double last year's proposed increase, in part because of the looming expiration of the enhanced premium subsidies, according to a KFF analysis. And Aetna has already announced it will not offer Obamacare coverage next year.
'It will be a tumultuous few years as insurers and people who rely on the marketplace for health insurance ride this out,' Sullivan said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Take a Vitamin B12 Supplement?
Credit - Photo-Illustration by TIME (Source Images: eyenigelen/Getty Images, Sersol/Getty Images) Everyone needs vitamin B12: It helps the body produce red blood cells and maintain healthy brain function, along with so many other things. But are you getting enough of it? Here's what to know about vitamin B12 and whether you should consider upping your levels. A boon for brain health 'Vitamin B12 is important for brain health because it helps protect nerve cells in the brain, which support memory and thinking skills,' says Michelle Routhenstein, a preventive cardiology dietitian and certified diabetes educator in New York. It's water-soluble, so the body does not store it in large amounts, and daily intake is essential. The current federal recommendations are for adults to get 2.4 mcg of vitamin B12 per day. Great food sources of B12 include seafood like oysters, salmon and tuna, beef, and fortified products like nutritional yeast, plant-based milks, some breads and breakfast cereals, says Routhenstein. But some recent research suggests that some people may need even more than that. Vitamin B12 deficiencies can impact your brain function even when your intake levels are considered normal, says Dr. Ari J. Green, a professor at the University of California, San Francisco's department of ophthalmology. In a recent study, Green and his colleagues found that people with B12 levels that were technically normal but on the lower end of the range had impaired brain function. 'We could detect neurological impairment at levels currently considered 'normal,' independently of other factors like years of education," particularly in older people, says Dr. Alexandra Beaudry-Richard, a resident at McGill University and co-author of the study. 'To us, this should reinvigorate a conversation about how much B12 is needed for optimal neurological function.' Read More: Should You Take a Vitamin D Supplement? Other studies have found that people with Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment tend to have lower B12 levels—and supplementation with B12 can reduce the rate of brain atrophy. However, on the opposite end, the study showed signs of a possible detrimental effect on the brain when people had high B12 levels in their blood. 'This warrants further studies to evaluate what healthy B12 levels are on both ends of the spectrum,' says Dr. Ahmed Abdelhak, one of the study's authors and a clinical instructor in neurology at UCSF School of Medicine. Should you take a B12 supplement? You can (and should) get B12 from your diet, but some people may have a tough time getting adequate levels of the nutrient from food alone. Older adults are more likely to develop vitamin B12 deficiencies because the vitamin requires stomach acid to be absorbed, and stomach acid production starts to decline with age. Routhenstein recommends people look closer into their B12 status starting around age 50 or if they are at higher risk of a B12 deficiency. This category includes vegans and vegetarians, people taking specific medications that interfere with B12 absorption such as metformin or proton pump inhibitors, and those who have gastrointestinal disorders like Crohn's, celiac, or atrophic gastritis. You can get tested for a vitamin B12 deficiency at your annual physical. If you are deficient, your doctor might recommend supplementation. Read More: 7 Surprising Symptoms of Lyme Disease The UCSF study authors recommend checking levels starting at age 70, but you can get it checked on a standard blood test at any age through your primary care physician. Dr. Ralph Green, a professor of pathology and lab medicine at the University of California, Davis—and another author on that recent study—says that checking B12 may also be valuable for people who have unexplained symptoms that have been linked to B12 deficiency. For those with declining gastric function, he says taking supplements is likely the best way to promote absorption, and the level of supplementation a person should consume depends on whether their absorption is normal or not. Pregnant women, too, need higher B12 intake to support fetal brain development; if you're pregnant, consult with your ob-gyn about optimal B12 levels for you. What kind of B12 supplement is best? B12 in supplements and fortified foods can be more easily absorbed than from food, especially for older adults and those with absorption issues, says Routhenstein. If your doctor has advised you to take a B12 supplement, it's best to ask them to recommend specific dosages and brands. But Routhenstein recommends following these general guidelines when selecting a B12 supplement. Always look for those with methylcobalamin on the label, as this is the most bioavailable form of B12, meaning the body can absorb it the best. It's also the optimal form for heart and brain health and nerve function, she says. Sublingual (under the tongue) or liquid B12 is often touted for better absorption. This form of B12 does so 'by bypassing the digestive system and entering the bloodstream directly,' says Routhenstein. Of course, no supplement is a cure-all, and there are other ways to support brain health, including maintaining a healthy diet and exercise regimen. Activities that stimulate multiple brain areas simultaneously are excellent at promoting cognitive longevity, Beaudry-Richard says. Practicing a musical instrument, dancing, and studying a foreign language daily, for example, all recruit 'brain circuits responsible for vision, hearing, movement, emotions' and more. 'It's like a full-body workout for the brain,' she says. Contact us at letters@
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom praised for new online posting style: All Caps and mimicking Trump
California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom is earning plaudits for his recent trolling of President Donald Trump by mimicking his social media habits, including all-caps posts. Newsom, a frequent foil for the president's social media outbursts, took to X Tuesday night to blast 'DONALD 'TACO' Trump,' -- a reference to 'Trump Always Chickens Out,' coined by a financial columnist over the president's back-and-forth tariff policies. Trump has been pushing several red states to gerrymander their congressional maps to give Republicans an upper hand, amid growing fears that the GOP could lose the House in next year's midterms. The maps are typically redrawn every ten years following the census, and not in the middle of the decade. Newsom sent Trump a letter Monday calling on him to end the 'unprecedented, mid-decade, hyper-partisan gerrymander to rig the upcoming midterm elections.' 'If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states,' he wrote. 'But if the other states call off their redistricting efforts, we will happily do the same. And American democracy will be better for it.' Newsom subsequently posted on X that Trump had 24 hours to respond to the letter. On Tuesday, as the deadline passed, he wrote: 'DONALD 'TACO' TRUMP, AS MANY CALL HIM, 'MISSED' THE DEADLINE!!! CALIFORNIA WILL NOW DRAW NEW, MORE 'BEAUTIFUL MAPS,' THEY WILL BE HISTORIC AS THEY WILL END THE TRUMP PRESIDENCY (DEMS TAKE BACK THE HOUSE!).' 'BIG PRESS CONFERENCE THIS WEEK WITH POWERFUL DEMS AND GAVIN NEWSOM — YOUR FAVORITE GOVERNOR — THAT WILL BE DEVASTATING FOR 'MAGA,'' he added. 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!' Sports reporter Emily Bicks wrote on Threads: 'Gavin Christopher Newsom keepin the no f***s energy comin.' Liberal social media commentator, Harry Sisson, wrote: 'I absolutely love how Gavin Newsom is treating Donald Trump with the disdain and disrespect that he absolutely deserves.' Journalist Karly Kingsley added: 'I don't think we're giving Gavin Newsom enough credit for what he's doing to defend democracy and to stop a wannabe dictator from consolidating power.' Attorney and Never Trump-er George Conway joined the presidential mockery, writing in response to Newsom: 'Many people, big strong men with tears in their eyes, will soon be saying, 'Sir, you have the most Amazing State, with the Most Beautiful Maps. No one has ever seen anything like this. Your Excellency, Sir, we are in awe of your Incomparable Gubernatorialicityness'.' But not all were on board with Newsom's style change. The Chief Strategy and Public Affairs Officer at Future Caucus, an organization for young lawmakers, Reed Howard, wrote: 'Race-to-the-bottom politics is a darn shame. America deserves better than this. I want real leadership.' Reporter Alex Gault added: 'If this becomes a lasting approach to political communications, I will be committing myself to whatever mental hospital still does lobotomies.' Last month, Trump asked Texas to redraw its maps to hand Republicans another five House seats in the state. Texas Democrats left the state to deny Republicans the ability to move forward with their proposal. Democrats then said they would look to redraw maps in blue states such as Illinois, California, and New York, prompting Republicans to consider taking action in Ohio and Indiana. California has an independent commission that draws political maps, and if Newsom moves ahead with his threat, he would need passage of a special ballot in November.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Colorado rabbits seem to be growing horns and tentacles. What's behind 'Frankenstein rabbits'?
A Colorado Parks and Wildlife representative told Yahoo that this virus is common in the Midwest during the summer. People in northern Colorado have been reporting sightings of wild rabbits with black horns and tentacles on their faces. The rabbits appeared to have 'black quills or black toothpicks' and 'a scabbiesh-looking growth over their face,' some Fort Collins residents told local outlet, 9News. Others have dubbed them 'Frankenstein rabbits.' These dark growths are most likely caused by a virus that tends to pop up in the summer in states like Colorado, South Dakota, Minnesota and Texas. The virus is Shope papilloma virus (SPV), which causes wart-like, waxy growths on a rabbit's face and is spread through biting insects like fleas or ticks, Kara Van Hoose, a spokesperson for Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW), told Yahoo. The virus is found in cottontail rabbits and is common in Colorado, especially during the summer when there is higher rabbit density and insect activity. While CPW has received around a dozen reports of sightings over the last week, Van Hoose speculates that there probably aren't that many cases of SPV, but rather, many people are likely seeing the same group of infected rabbits. There is no risk of virus transmission to humans or other animals, though the CPW recommends that humans and pets should still stay away and not interact with infected rabbits if they cross paths. However, the CPW also notes that domestic rabbits, if they are housed outside, could contract the virus from infected insects or rabbits. What to do if you spot a rabbit with SPV Rabbits remain mostly healthy after contracting SPV, even if the growths get very long and start to look like horns, which is why the CPW does not recommend euthanizing the infected rabbits. 'If someone sees a rabbit with the black tumors on its head or neck it is not a concern for Animal Control,' Julie Lindstrom, a supervisor at Sioux Falls Police Animal Control, told Keloland, a South Dakota outlet. 'There is no rehabilitation for wild rabbits with this disease.' SPV is only harmful when the growths start to interfere with a rabbit's ability to eat or drink, which does not happen in every case. A person may be able to spot if this is a problem if they notice the rabbit doesn't seem able to hop properly, Lindstrom said. If you find a dead rabbit on your property, regardless of whether it is visibly infected or not, Lindstrom noted that it is safe to wear gloves and handle the animal yourself if you feel comfortable. Solve the daily Crossword