Alcohol labels should warn of cancer risk, urge health groups
The labels are vital to combatting a historic lack of awareness among Britons that alcohol consumption is proven to cause seven forms of cancer, as well as 17,000 cases of the disease a year, they claim.
The campaign to have warnings placed on alcoholic drinks is being spearheaded by the World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF), which has written a letter to Sir Keir Starmer.
They demanded that 'bold and unambiguous' labels be placed on all drinks containing alcohol, while also calling for a minimum alcohol pricing of 65p per unit in England.
'The evidence is clear: health labelling on alcoholic drinks is urgently needed in the UK to help save lives,' it said. 'They should carry strong, clear messages about the health risks, which include the risk of cancer, far beyond vague advice like 'consume in moderation'.'
Kate Oldridge-Turner, the WCRF's head of policy and public affairs, said: 'Providing alcohol warning labels would empower millions to make informed choices by clearly understanding the risks.'
Dr Helen Croker, assistant director of research and policy at WCRF, suggested 'bottles of beer show less information than bottles of orange juice', suggesting that England must have a national alcohol strategy. It has not had a plan in place since 2012.
From next May, Ireland will become the first country in the world to include cancer warning labels on alcoholic drinks. They will be required to warn consumers of a 'direct link between alcohol and fatal cancers'.
Earlier this year, the World Health Organisation's European office issued calls for such labelling to become commonplace, publishing a report entitled: 'Alcohol health warning labels: a public health perspective for Europe'.
Introducing the report, WHO regional director Dr Hans Henri P. Kluge claimed that 'clear and prominent health warning labels on alcohol, which include a specific cancer warning, are a cornerstone of the right to health'.
The organisation added in the report that policymakers should 'resist all the pressure that will inevitably come from commercial actors' who suggest warning labels will not work.
Alcohol industry spokespeople have since voiced their opposition to warning labels, claiming they can create 'unnecessary anxiety'.
A spokesperson for the Portman Group, a drinks industry-funded body that oversees alcohol labelling in the UK, told The Guardian: 'Whilst we do not dispute the link between alcohol and certain cancers, and that drinking at harmful levels is dangerous and increases risks, blanket cancer warning labels are not a proportionate policy measure and do not put the risks into an appropriate context.
'This can create unnecessary anxiety, eroding trust in health advice and alienating the very people who require support.'
They added that most drinks already include the advice from the UK's chief medical officers to drink no more than 14 units of alcohol per week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
8 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
A&E waits fuel 4,000 attacks on NHS staff a year: One worker is attacked every two hours in 'tinder box' hospitals as nurses face violence and gun threats
NHS staff are facing 'utterly abhorrent' levels of violence in A&E – with one worker attacked every two hours, damning figures reveal today. Middle-class patients and their families are among those driven to rage by long waits and dehumanising care in corridors, the Royal College of Nursing said. It warned that its members were physically and mentally scarred after being punched, spat at – and even threatened with guns. Many have been forced to take time off to recover, with some too traumatised to return. The nurses' union warned that the Government's ten-year plan to reform the Health Service will 'fail completely' without action to protect and retain staff. In all, 89 hospital trusts responded to a Freedom of Information request from the RCN, revealing that they recorded 4,054 reports of physical violence against A&E staff last year – almost double the 2,093 in 2019. It means 11 members of A&E staff are attacked on average every day in England. However, the true figure is likely to be even higher as just 69 per cent of NHS acute trusts responded to the RCN, and they were only asked for figures for their biggest A&E. Meanwhile, a separate analysis by the RCN shows that incidents of patients having to wait more than 12 hours in A&E increased 20-fold between 2019 and 2024. The news comes as: Nine in ten pharmacies are victims of shoplifting, with strong painkillers among the drugs being targeted. Victims' minister Alex Davies-Jones admitted shoplifting had 'got out of hand' after police ordered a store to remove a sign calling thieves 'scumbags'. Sarah Pochin, Reform UK's only female MP, said it was 'no surprise' that vigilante groups were patrolling the streets as immigration led to fears for women's safety. Rachelle McCarthy, a senior charge nurse from the East Midlands, was punched 'square in the face' by a 'drunk, 6ft 2in bloke'. She said: 'Even patients you would expect to be placid are becoming irate because of just how long they have to wait. You can only imagine the behaviour of those who are already prone to violence.' A senior A&E nurse based in east London said her hospital was a 'tinder box' for violence. She has seen colleagues punched, kicked and had a gun pointed at them, while she had been spat at by a patient and threatened with an acid attack. She said she became depressed and anxious and took a research role to take a break from nursing, adding: 'The violence I saw made me become more fearful outside work. I saw how volatile people can be.' Sarah Pochin (pictured), Reform UK's only female MP, said it was 'no surprise' that vigilante groups were patrolling the streets as immigration led to fears for women's safety A senior A&E nurse in the South West said a patient 'pinned a nurse up against a wall' and another punched a member of staff 'in the groin and stomach'. She added: 'It's not going to help with our retention and recruitment if you think you're going to be clobbered every shift.' Sarah Tappy, a senior A&E sister in east London, was punched in the head and knocked unconscious by a patient, leaving her with anxiety and PTSD. 'The violence is awful,' she said. 'And it's just constant. None of us feel safe.' At Maidstone Hospital in Kent, incidents rose by more than 500 per cent, from 13 in 2019 to 89 in 2024, while at Manchester Royal Infirmary, attacks rose from 39 to 79. In April, Health Secretary Wes Streeting pledged to 'keep NHS staff safe' by implementing mandatory hospital-level reporting of violence against staff, saying that 'protecting staff from violence is not an optional extra'. However, the RCN says the Government 'needs to do more than just record the shocking levels of violence'. Professor Nicola Ranger, RCN general secretary, said: 'Behind these shocking figures lies an ugly truth. Dedicated and hard-working staff face rising attacks because of systemic failures that are no fault of their own. Nursing staff not only go to work underpaid and undervalued but face a rising tide of violence. It leads to physical and mental scarring, lengthy time off and sometimes staff never returning. 'You can't fix the Health Service when vital staff are too scared to go into work. 'Unless the Government does something about lengthy waits, corridor care and understaffed nursing teams, more staff will become victims of this utterly abhorrent behaviour. Left unaddressed, this could see plans to reform the NHS fail.' Daniel Elkeles, chief executive of NHS Providers, which represents trusts said: 'These findings are absolutely shocking.' Rebecca Smith, of NHS Employers, said: 'No one should have to face violence at work – it is totally unacceptable.' Mr Streeting said: 'I am appalled. Nurses dedicate their lives to helping others and deserve to go about their jobs free from violence. Anyone who violates this core principle will feel the full force of the law.'
Daily Mail
38 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
How our 'killer' immune cells can be harnessed to beat diabetes and arthritis
A 'game changing' new technique which wipes out rogue cells responsible for autoimmune conditions may offer the hope of a one-off treatment for many debilitating diseases. Around four million people in the UK live with an autoimmune condition, according to a major study published in The Lancet. These arise when immune cells produce faulty antibodies that mistakenly attack the body's own tissues, triggering inflammation and tissue damage. Depending on the condition, different parts of the body are affected. In rheumatoid arthritis, for example, it's mainly the joints, with type 1 diabetes it is cells in the pancreas that produce insulin, and in multiple sclerosis, it's the nerves, leading to numbness and movement difficulties. The new treatment harnesses the body's own immune defenders, 'natural killer' cells, to wipe out rogue white blood cells responsible for producing the antibodies that launch these attacks. Early trials show it not only improves symptoms, but 'resets' the immune system, suggesting it may offer long-lasting relief. Current treatment for autoimmune conditions often relies on long-term use of steroids and immunosuppressant drugs, but in reducing the immune response these can increase risk of infection, cancer and other complications. In the absence of effective treatments many patients face years of fatigue, pain and disability. More recently, scientists have begun trialling CAR-T therapy, better known as a cutting-edge cancer treatment, for autoimmune diseases such as lupus – where multiple tissues and organs come under attack, including the kidneys, lungs, joints and brain. CAR-T therapy works by modifying a type of white blood cell called T cells so they recognise a marker on the cancer cell and then kill it. While promising, 'one drawback to this approach is there can be significant side-effects', says Professor Lucy Walker, chair in immune regulation at the Institute of Immunity & Transplantation, University College London. These include cytokine release syndrome, where the immune system goes into dangerous over-drive, triggering widespread inflammation, and neurological complications. 'While these may be acceptable in cancer settings, as late-stage cancer patients tend to be older, for autoimmune diseases, approaches with fewer side-effects are needed because they're chronic but not immediately life-threatening and often affect younger people,' she adds. It's hoped the latest breakthrough (called CAR NK –which stands for Chimeric Antigen Receptor Natural Killer cells) may prove an even better option. The CAR NK cells are a type of immune cell genetically engineered in the lab to target the cells that produce the faulty antibodies. The immune system then regenerates with 'normal' cells. The difference with CAR-T therapy, says Professor Walker, is that with the newer technique the 'CAR' (an artificial protein that helps immune cells attack specific targets) is put in 'another type of white blood cell, the NK cell, in order to deliver the same killing effect, but with fewer toxicities'. And while CAR-T cells must be made from the patient's own immune cells in a complex and time-consuming process, CAR NK cells can be manufactured in bulk from donor umbilical cord blood or stem cells, then frozen and stored ready for use, significantly reducing cost. The treatment is already being tested on patients with lupus, a condition affecting around 70,000 people in the UK and which can be debilitating, even life-threatening. After 27 people with severe lupus received an infusion of CAR NK cell therapy, all showed signs of improvement and 70 per cent went into full remission, according to results presented in June at a major rheumatology conference in Barcelona. What's more, there were no reports of serious side-effects. In another study, published in Cell in June, researchers treated a patient with systemic sclerosis, a rare and serious autoimmune disease that attacks blood vessels and connective tissue, leading to organ damage. After treatment, the patient's skin and blood vessels began returning to normal. One benefit of using natural killer cells is they do not usually trigger rejection, so there is no need for a tissue match. Professor Zhao Dongbao, a senior immunotherapy researcher at Shanghai's Naval Medical University and one of the lead investigators on the lupus study, told Good Health CAR NK therapy 'is expected to be used for the treatment of more than ten million patients worldwide, with more than one million patients with autoimmune diseases in the US and the UK'. He says plans are under way for formal clinical trials for lupus, 'with potential expansion to other autoimmune diseases in the future'. He believes the approach could 'transform care' for people with a wide range of autoimmune conditions. But Professor Walker cautions: 'The approach is promising but is in its infancy – it's only been tested on a very small number of people.' However, she says, if follow-up work 'showed it was successful, it could represent a much more targeted approach than long-term immunosuppression and potentially be tolerated much better'. Luke Evnin, chair of the US-based Scleroderma Research Foundation, is upbeat: 'The promise is that in a single course of treatment, the patient would get lasting benefit and potentially stop other medicines and be freed from disease progression. It would be a game-changer.'
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Fat cat vet firms preying on owners to push up profits as they face 5-figure bills & minutes to decide to put pets down
FACING an astronomical £18,500 vet bill, Charley Marvin had just moments to decide whether her beloved French bull dog would live or die. The bank worker had already spent nearly £5,000 after being told Hank, four, had intervertebral disc disease, which can cause paralysis. 8 But just as she was preparing to take him home to start medication, she was told he actually needed expensive surgery. Worse still, Charley was warned she should 'act now' as the next day was a bank holiday, giving her little time to make an informed choice for her precious pooch. Sadly, the 33-year-old, from Essex, is not the only pet owner to face a horrific decision like this. People across the UK are facing skyrocketing vet bills — with many claiming 'care went down and prices went up' due to giant companies monopolising the market. Over the last decade alone, six 'fat cat' firms have bought over a bumper 60 per cent of practices, up from 10 per cent in 2013 — a scandal that has sent shockwaves all the way to Whitehall. The Competition And Markets Authority has launched a formal investigation into the £2billion industry amid fears animal lovers are being taken for a ride. Their initial report found that some vet bills increased by up to 70 per cent between 2016 and 2023. For the 16.2million animal caregivers in the UK like Charley, a potential crackdown is long overdue. Now, an investigation by The Sun has revealed a stark decline in the quality of care for animals while a corporate empire blossoms. In April, Charley rushed Hank to an emergency vet, where they first suspected IVDD. 5 crucial pet safety tips every dog owner should know He had an MRI under general anaesthetic at a practice owned by Linnaeus — one of the veterinary industry's Big Six, along with Pets At Home, CVS Group, IVC, VetPartners and Medivet. Charley was told they would make a decision on whether to put Hank on medication or operate after his MRI. In a later call, meds were agreed upon. However, no sooner had Charley arrived at the clinic to collect Hank than the vets announced he needed an urgent, £18,500 op. She said: 'The vet said his spinal cord could die and I might have to put him down if he wasn't operated on now.' Charley claims she was also told to make a decision 'quickly' because 'it's a bank holiday tomorrow'. She refused the surgery, explaining: 'I just couldn't put him back under again. Hank was in such a state. "Then the vet said, 'Well you could have to put him down'. 'I feel like she was just wanting the money.' Hank ended up staying at the practice overnight for £500 without surgery, and the vet offered to submit an insurance claim — for a fee of £60. Two weeks went by and Charley heard nothing. But she says she was later informed by her insurer that it would not pay out due to Hank's IVDD symptoms being pre-existing — despite not being officially diagnosed. 'MANIPULATE EMOTIONS' Charley recalled: 'It felt like the biggest legal scam you could ever imagine. "The way that they manipulate your emotions when you sign up to these things, it's like, 'We care about your pet', but then, when you actually need them the most, they don't really speak to you very nicely, and they just don't really care.' Charley's experience was mirrored by scores of pet owners across the UK, who told The Sun that the 'trusted' large corporations were deeply disappointing. And we can reveal that, behind the practice names, the real owner of your local vet may surprise you. Linnaeus is part of the Mars group in the US which also makes chocolate bars; Medivet is backed by Liechtenstein's royal family; and IVC is part-owned by the Swiss food giant Nestle. VetPartners is run by a private equity group, while fellow British firms Pets At Home and CVS are listed on the stock market. Melanie Osborne, 49, had used the same vet in Worcestershire for 18 years, but said 'care went down and prices went up' after it was taken over by IVC. When her British shorthair cat Teddy fell ill, she suspected it was a blocked bile duct — but she claimed vets dismissed her concerns. After three weeks of worrying, she took Teddy, six, to an independent vet, who operated immediately. Tragically, he died just two days later. It's such a waste of a gorgeous cat, and now I'm left thinking if we'd taken him somewhere which knew what they were doing, would he still be alive? Melanie Osborne Mel said: 'The worrying thing was when we went to the vets and asked, 'Could it be a blocked bile duct?' and they said 'no', they recommended I take him to a different practice. 'But they said I'd probably spend between £3,500 to £4,000, he would probably die anyway 'And if I wanted them to do the operation, they would need to reread a book on it to refresh themselves.' She added: 'Then they charged us £55 for that consultation to essentially tell us he was going to die. 'It's such a waste of a gorgeous cat, and now I'm left thinking if we'd taken him somewhere which knew what they were doing, would he still be alive?' Mel now makes a 40-mile round trip to an independent vet rather than use the corporate clinic, which would be a journey of just six miles. One veterinary nurse with over 40 years' experience noticed deeply concerning changes after her practice was acquired by a corporation. She felt the new bosses were 'non-veterinary people' and 'not interested in the care of the animals'. 'All they want to do is make as much money as possible by reducing staff, restricting the variety of drugs and equipment we can order and increasing prices,' she says. 'All of this makes it so much harder to provide five-star treatment.' Evie Clark, 82, from East London, recalled her shock after rushing her poorly Jackapoo Reggie to a VetPartners practice, only to receive the bill BEFORE the treatment. She said: 'The first thing they said to me when we got him there was the price. 8 "They hadn't even laid a hand on him. They said this is going to be between £1,000 and £1,500-plus. "I said, 'I don't even know what's wrong with him yet'.' Meanwhile, Aniko Ingham saw her vet bills soar after her local practice was sold to CVS. Her cat was referred to a Linnaeus-owned specialist after developing a heart issue. The cost for one month of medication was £195. Aniko, who is in her sixties, found the exact same drugs online for just £76. She fumed: 'They have to make a profit, but this is daylight robbery. "These large corporate fat cats are a disgrace. "They are not there for the animals or their owners — they're focused on pleasing their shareholders. It's greed.' But veterinary staff are also suffering the consequences of an industry in crisis. One vet nurse described enduring 'screaming fits', having 'medication thrown at her', 'storm-outs' and 'shouting' from pet owners. On a daily basis, the sector is blighted by a heavy sense of doom, which has been aggravated by Covid and corporate takeovers. 'CAT CRISIS' The worker said: 'With the bills being so expensive, people are saying they can't afford to keep pets. So we see more animals being abandoned. 'Cats are dumped regularly. But the rehoming centres can't take them.' During the pandemic, it is believed more than 3.2million UK households took on a pet and, since then, about 60 per cent of Brit homes have at least one animal. 'It's the worst it's ever been,' said one 59-year-old cat rescuer currently housing 16 kitties, 'Lack of vets, prices of vets. All of that is part to do with why we have a cat crisis on the streets now.' Even the British Veterinary Association agrees current legislation for vet practices is 'not fit for purpose'. The CMA is expected to publish its plan next month. Possible proposals include a price comparison website and a cap on prescription fees. Lisa Webb, Which? consumer law expert, said: 'Many owners face unexpectedly high vet bills and feel pressured into costly treatments, often with no clear way to challenge them if things go wrong. "Regulation hasn't kept pace with the rise of corporate-owned practices. "Which? is calling for clearer pricing, transparency around treatment options and a simple complaints process that works for pet owners, not against them. 'We also want to see a mandatory veterinary ombudsman to provide fair, independent dispute resolution when problems can't be resolved with the practice directly.' The Big Six firms were asked to comment. A VetPartners spokesperson said: 'Each of our individual practices delivers their own range of services and pricing is determined locally rather than centrally. "Our practice websites contain price lists.' CASE 1: HANK French bulldog 8 Owner: Charley Marvin Problem: Intervertebral disc disease Cost: Estimated £18,500 Vet: Linnaeus Charley said: 'The vet said, 'Well, you could have to put him down'. It took all my might not to tell her to do one' CASE 2: TEDDY British shorthair 8 Problem: Suspected blocked bile duct Cost: Estimated £3,500 - £4,000 8 Vet: IVC Melanie said: 'They said he'd probably die anyway and if I wanted them to do the op they'd have to read a book first' CASE 3: REGGIE Jackapoo 8 Owner: Evie Clark Problem: Required investigation Cost: Estimated: £1,000-£1,500 Vet: VetPartners Evie said: 'They started calculating how much it was going to cost me. They hadn't even laid a hand on him' 8
