Investigation finds Alberta government not complying with freedom of information laws
A new report from information and privacy commissioner Diane McLeod says Alberta's government has implemented internal procedures and policies that allow government employees to wrongfully deny freedom of information requests.
The report, released Friday, follows a two-year investigation sparked by complaints made about the handling of more than 30 individual information requests, many of which were made by The Globe and Mail as part of its investigation into freedom of information systems across Canada.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
McLeod's report says the information requests she reviewed were denied for not providing enough detail, which she determined is not a valid reason under provincial freedom of information laws.
Under Alberta's freedom of information rules, government employees have a duty to assist an applicant. If a request doesn't have enough detail to identify records, McLeod said it's up to government staff to seek further information on what is being sought.
McLeod wrote that didn't happen for the requests she reviewed for her investigation, which determined all 27 Alberta government departments to be at fault.
The report said applicants were asked to narrow down the scope of their request, such as time frame and topic, or submit multiple requests so the government could meet its legislated response window of 30 days.
But in many cases, files were actually closed the same day those asks were sent out, the report states.
McLeod said this process, which she says violates the 'scheme' of Alberta's freedom of information law, is laid out in an internal government manual called the 'Access Request Playbook.'
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
The manual and the government's attempts to have information requests be reduced in scope are meant to make it easier to fulfill requests, McLeod wrote, but it has made the process unfair since it's 'not the duty of the applicant to make the search easy for the public body.'
'Further, the degree of specificity identified ... as necessary to meet the 'enough detail' threshold ... is simply unattainable by an applicant and, in my view, it is unreasonable for a public body to require such specificity from an applicant when making an access request,' McLeod wrote.
'A member of the general public does not know what records are in the custody or control of a public body. They are not privy to the inner workings of government and, therefore, could not be expected to know specifics about any records held by government.'
Osagie Ogunbor, a spokesperson for Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally, said in an email that the ministry is considering McLeod's findings and plans to work with her to address concerns.
'We're committed to openness and transparency, and we are proud of our record,' Ogunbor said, adding that about 97 per cent of freedom of information requests in 2023-24 were handled without complaints to the commissioner's office.
McLeod's investigation also found the government unnecessarily refused requests by citing a section of the legislation that allows requests to be denied if creating requested records would unreasonably impede government operations.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW
Her report says that as part of her investigation, the government submitted its interpretation of the section as meaning that it only 'requires public bodies to provide access to records that already exist' rather than create new records that contain government data.
McLeod is recommending the government make a number of changes to its internal policies to ensure requests aren't denied for not providing enough detail, and to ensure government bodies meet their duty to assist applicants.
'I acknowledge that managing the volume of access requests received by government public bodies can be challenging and that resources to do this work are not infinite,' she wrote.
'However, in administering the access to information provisions of the (law), there is only one choice that these public bodies have and that is to administer these provisions ... in such a manner that ensures Albertans are able to effectively exercise these rights.'
A news release from the commissioner's office notes that Alberta will soon replace its freedom of information legislation with a new act after a government overhaul took place last year.
It says the relevant sections at play are unchanged in the new framework.
'For that reason, I expect government public bodies to apply my findings and recommendations to their practices under both the existing and the new legislation,' McLeod said
Ogunbor said that 'many' of the recommendations will be addressed through the new legislation and its regulations.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published May 9, 2025.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
21 hours ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada's trade strategy suffers from delusions of friendship
John Turley-Ewart is a contributing columnist for The Globe and Mail, a regulatory compliance consultant and a Canadian banking historian. Ontario Premier Doug Ford recently declared on CNN that in Canada, U.S. President Donald Trump is the 'most disliked politician in the world . . . because he has attacked his closest family member.' In January, just before Mark Carney announced his leadership bid for the Liberal Party, he appeared on The Daily Show and told Americans that Canada and the United States could be 'friends with benefits.' Are prominent U.S. leaders making time for media appearances to defend Canada as their 'closest family member'? Believing that trading partners are family, or friends even, betrays our leaders' wide-eyed view of the world that not even historical precedent appears able to shake. It has invited complacency and deepens the damaging economic consequences when trade relationships evolve or break apart. If there is one long-term takeaway for Canadian leaders from Mr. Trump's assault on Canada's access to U.S. markets, it's realizing that countries we trade with are neither family nor friends, but jurisdictions that do business with us – business that is transactional, situational and evolving. We have had Donald Trump-like figures before who upended our economy and who we should have already learned this lesson from. One of the first was Robert Peel, who was the British prime minister between 1841 and 1846. Unlike Mr. Trump, he was a protectionist-turned-free-trader. In 1842, he cut tariffs on British timber imports that gave Canadian timber preferential access to British markets. Consequently, our timber exports fell. In 1846, Mr. Peel dropped Britain's protectionist tariffs on grain, ending Canada's preferential grain market access that had been in place since 1815. Lumber producers praise federal plan to diversify markets amid trade war with U.S. Three years later, Canada's then Governor-General, Lord Elgin, reported that property in Montreal and 'in most of the Canadian towns . . . had fallen by 50 per cent in value' and that 'three-fourths of the commercial men are bankrupt.' By 1854, the search for a market to replace lost share in Britain was secured through a reciprocity deal with the U.S. that removed duties on fish, timber, coal and grain just as railways began to boom in Canada, opening more efficient transportation routes to move Canadian goods south. The good times lasted 12 years. U.S. President Andrew Johnson cancelled the trade deal in 1866, given growing protectionist sentiment in the U.S. and popular belief that the deal was benefitting Canadians more than Americans. The abrogation of the 1854 trade agreement helped cement efforts to create what we now know as Canada through Confederation in 1867, a project that was expected to create one national economy to help compensate for lost trade with the U.S. Today's interprovincial trade barriers measure the success of that intention. There are plenty of other past examples. The U.S. Fordney-McCumber Act in 1922 slapped an average 40-per-cent tariff on imports. This was followed by the American Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act in 1930, and in 1971, President Richard Nixon's administration imposed a 10-per-cent tariff on many Canadian goods crossing the border. Opinion: Ottawa can't let our canola industry – a true Canadian success story – fade away The present isn't any friendlier than the past. Last week, China took hostage Canada's multibillion-dollar canola export trade, imposing 75.8-per-cent duties on Canadian canola seed. This is a transparent attempt to force the federal government to backtrack on Ottawa's 100-per-cent tariff on Chinese-made electric vehicles. Equally transparent is China's goal of crushing our EV sector through the sale of cheap EVs produced using low-wage work, heavily subsidized, stolen or misappropriated IP, and as Human Rights Watch has documented, forced labour. Canada has negotiated many trade agreements with other countries, yet, those deals are often more sizzle than steak. As trade experts noted earlier this year in Policy Magazine, 'Today, Canada has more comprehensive trade agreements than any other G7 country. But having a trade agreement is one thing; leveraging it is another. Utilization rates of these agreements have remained low. . .' The 2017 Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement is an example. It has yet to win full ratification by all EU member states. The obstacles are material. Differing approaches to environmental, agricultural and digital regulations and standards are persistent barriers. The Europeans seem not to care, given all the Canadian interprovincial trade barriers that also complicate EU trade with Canada. In Britain, objections to Canada's dairy and supply management systems as well as rules of origin closed the doors on free trade. Trade negotiations with Britain collapsed in 2024. The world isn't made up of countries that want to trade with Canada because they are our family or friends. It's comprised of countries who only value how Canada can serve their economic needs and political agendas. It's time we admitted to that reality. Doing so will at the very least reduce the shock when trade deals go sideways.
Globe and Mail
a day ago
- Globe and Mail
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly to meet with Saab on visit to Sweden, source says
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly will meet this week in Sweden with the company behind a fighter jet that could replace some of the planes Canada has already committed to purchasing from the United States. A government source with knowledge of the minister's plans confirmed that she will meet with Saab along with other businesses in Sweden. The Globe and Mail is not naming the source, who is not authorized to publicly discuss details of the trip. The source did not say whether the talks with Saab will focus on procurement of the planes. Ms. Joly's sit-down with Saab, the runner-up in Ottawa's competition for a new plane to replace the aging CF-18 Hornet, follows an announcement from the government earlier this year that it would review the originally-estimated $19-billion purchase of 88 F-35 Lightning fighter jets. The jets are manufactured by U.S. defence contractor Lockheed Martin, with the first of the new warplanes scheduled for delivery in 2026. Defence review says Ottawa should stick with F-35 jets, sources say But the Liberals decided to review that planned purchase after U.S. President Donald Trump ignited a tariff dispute, with Prime Minister Mark Carney saying in March it behooves Canada to take a closer look at how it is spending its defence budget. He reiterated that position earlier this month, telling reporters the review is continuing. 'The review is driven by the need and the responsibilities and approach that we're taking to making sure that this very large and necessary investment in defence is done so most effectively,' he said during a news conference on Aug. 8, announcing a pay raise for the Canadian Armed Forces. The Defence Department told The Globe and Mail on Friday it expects the review, being carried out by deputy ministers within the department, to be complete by the end of the summer. It has not committed to making the results public. Canada's fighter fleet, originally purchased in the 1980s, is reaching the end of its lifespan, and Ottawa has dragged out a procurement process to pick a replacement for more than a decade. It had originally selected the F-35 model in 2010. Then, after Justin Trudeau was elected prime minister in 2015, in part on a promise not to buy the F-35, the competition was relaunched. Finally, the government selected the Lockheed Martin aircraft, its original choice, in early 2023. The government has said contractually, it must only purchase 16 of the planes. Opinion: Ottawa must prioritize climate tech in Canada's new defence strategy Earlier this year, Auditor-General Karen Hogan said the cost of buying the planes is much higher than originally billed, and now sits around $27.7-billion. Ms. Hogan also noted that the infrastructure required to support the planes was behind schedule, and there is a shortage of pilots qualified to fly them. Saab, the Swedish company which finished second in the competition for the jet contract, proposed assembling at least part of its Gripen E-series jets in Canada. Saab also has a partnership with Canadian aerospace giant Bombardier for a surveillance plane, and said in May they are ready to offer it to the Canadian government. The company has also expressed interest in being a part of the existing plan to revamp the Royal Canadian Navy's submarines. According to a press release announcing the trip, which did not mention the meeting with Saab, Ms. Joly is travelling with Stephen Fuhr, the secretary of state for defence procurement. He is a former CF-18 pilot. 'Discussion will focus on key sectors including aerospace, defence, shipbuilding, biomanufacturing, automotive, mining, and telecommunications,' the press release said. 'Minister Joly will also highlight Canada's world-class industries, their highly skilled work force and cutting-edge innovation. She will emphasize the government's commitment to major economic investments, particularly in the defence sector.' Ms. Joly is also travelling to Finland on the same trip, where she's expected to attend a steel-cutting ceremony at the Davie shipyard there; the Canadian company purchased Helsinki Shipyard Oy two years ago. Analysts have said sidelining the F-35 jets could further antagonize U.S. President Donald Trump, and jeopardize the ongoing talks between his administration and Canada for a new trade and security pact. But Canada is not alone in reviewing its F-35 commitment – Switzerland is now rethinking the purchase after being slapped by U.S. tariffs. With files from Steven Chase
Edmonton Journal
3 days ago
- Edmonton Journal
Information and privacy commissioner says Alberta rejected of her two recommendations
Alberta's information and privacy commissioner says she is prepared to investigate the province's response to access to information requests, should it continue to ignore two recommendations her office made earlier this year. Article content In May, Information and Privacy Commissioner Diane McLeod published a report that followed a 21-month investigation into how the province was handling requests made under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIP). Article content Article content Article content She found that 27 government departments relied on policies that broke FOIP laws, and issued a report with multiple recommendations to make responses to requests compliant with the legislation. Article content Article content 'I am pleased that the government has accepted most of my recommendations and either has implemented or is in the process of implementing them,' said McLeod. 'However, I was disappointed to read that the government is not accepting two of the recommendations.' Article content Those two recommendations centre around the province's practice of limiting the number of topics in an access to information request, and splitting requests with multiple topics into several new requests at the cost of more fees. Article content Article content McLeod said she wants to know if the government is still pursuing those policies under new legislation, The Access to Information Act (ATIA), which came into force on June 11 and superseded the FOIP Act. Article content 'I will be monitoring requests for review coming into my office concerning Government of Alberta public bodies to determine whether this activity is still occurring under ATIA,' McLeod said. Article content 'If I find this to be the case, I will investigate under ATIA to determine whether the government public bodies are permitted to require applicants to split access requests and their rationale for the same.' Article content In a statement, the office of Service Alberta and Red Tape Reduction Minister Dale Nally said his department respects McLeod's role but that his job is 'to get Albertans the information they request, quickly, lawfully, and efficiently.'
