
More than 220 UK MPs urge Starmer to recognise Palestinian state
The call, in a letter signed by lawmakers from nine UK political parties, came less than 24 hours after French President Emmanuel Macron said that his country would formally recognise a Palestinian state at a UN meeting in September.
France would be the first G7 country, and the most powerful European nation to date, to make the move, already drawing condemnation from Israel and the United States.
Starmer has come under rising domestic and international pressure over recognising Palestinian statehood, as opposition intensifies to the ongoing war in Gaza amid fears of mass starvation there.
"We urge you to officially recognise the state of Palestine at the Conference next week," the 221 UK lawmakers wrote in the joint letter, referring to a July 28-29 UN Conference co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia in New York.
"Whilst we appreciate the UK does not have it in its power to bring about a free and independent Palestine, UK recognition would have a significant impact," it said.
The signatories, from parties including the centre-right Conservatives and centrist Liberal Democrats, as well as regional parties in Scotland and Wales, cited Britain's "historic connections and our membership on the UN Security Council".
They also noted the country's role in helping to create the state of Israel through the 1917 Balfour Declaration.
'Responsibility'
"Since 1980 we have backed a two-state solution. Such a recognition would give that position substance as well as living up to a historic responsibility we have to the people," they added.
In the face of growing pressure on the issue, the UK government has maintained its longstanding stance that it supports a two-state solution to the conflict in the Middle East.
But it has insisted that the conditions are currently not right for formal recognition of a Palestinian state.
In a statement Friday following a call about Gaza with his counterparts in France and Germany, Starmer said he was "working on a pathway to peace in the region".
"Recognition of a Palestinian state has to be one of those steps. I am unequivocal about that. But it must be part of a wider plan," he added.
A number of factors could deter Starmer from making the move, including wanting to avoid angering US President Donald Trump.
The American leader, who lands later Friday in Scotland for a five-day visit, dismissed Macron's announcement before departing Washington, saying it "doesn't carry weight".
The pressure around recognising Palestinian statehood has been building on Starmer's government, with nearly 60 Labour MPs reportedly urging Foreign Secretary David Lammy to make the move in a private letter earlier in July.
Meanwhile Macron raised the issue during his UK state visit this month, publicly urging London to work with Paris on a formal recognition announcement.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Bawaba
6 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Germany unveils €100 Billion strategic investment fund to boost energy and raw materials
ALBAWABA- Germany is set to launch a landmark €100 billion ($116 billion) investment vehicle, aimed at bolstering strategic sectors including defense, energy, and critical raw materials, according to a report by Bloomberg. The new fund, named Deutschlandfonds, is part of the government's broader push to revitalize growth and safeguard key supply chains amid growing global geopolitical uncertainty. The Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Climate Action confirmed that the fund will be seeded with at least €10 billion in public funds, to leverage that base to attract up to ten times that amount from private capital, including venture capital firms and family offices. "Private capital is an essential tool for overcoming major economic challenges," the ministry stated, emphasizing that the fund will focus on growth, innovation, and competitiveness, in collaboration with both German and European investors. The initiative is a key component of Chancellor Friedrich Merz's economic revival strategy after two years of economic contraction in Europe's largest economy. It also reflects Berlin's heightened focus on financial security, particularly in light of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, escalating trade tensions under U.S. President Donald Trump, and China's increasingly assertive geopolitical stance. While full details of the fund's structure, investment strategy, and timeline remain under discussion, government insiders expect an official launch between September and October, following parliamentary approval after the summer recess. The fund has reportedly secured backing from Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil, and negotiations are ongoing regarding the precise financing mechanisms with the Finance Ministry and state-owned development bank KfW. Sources also revealed that the previously stalled Raw Materials Fund, launched under former Chancellor Olaf Scholz to invest in biominerals projects, is expected to be folded into the Deutschlandfonds, streamlining Germany's strategic investment efforts. However, questions remain over whether the fund's scope will eventually expand to address politically sensitive areas such as affordable housing, particularly in urban centers facing severe housing shortages. Officials have signaled that the fund's mandate could broaden post-launch, depending on political consensus and investment performance.


Jordan News
a day ago
- Jordan News
What Has Delayed Britain's Recognition of the State of Palestine Until Today? - Jordan News
What Has Delayed Britain's Recognition of the State of Palestine Until Today? Although the United Kingdom has supported the two-state solution for decades since the issuance of the Balfour Declaration in 1917, official recognition of a Palestinian state has been delayed for more than a century due to political complexities, the expansion of Israeli occupation, and the absence of effective negotiations—rendering such recognition more symbolic than practical to this day. اضافة اعلان The recent decision by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer to recognize the State of Palestine—unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire in Gaza—raises an obvious question. But the question is not 'why'? For decades, the two-state solution, which calls for the establishment of a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem, has been the official policy of successive British governments and has received the support of a majority of Members of Parliament more than 11 years ago. The real question now is: why has the decision taken so long? An official statement released on Wednesday, July 30, following an emergency cabinet meeting, confirmed that Britain, frustrated by the ongoing crisis in Gaza and the fading prospects of a negotiated two-state solution, will formally recognize the State of Palestine this coming September. The Balfour Declaration: Britain's Historical Role Britain has long played a pivotal role in the roots of the current Israeli-Palestinian conflict, starting with the Balfour Declaration in 1917. In a letter to British Jewish banker Lord Rothschild—known for his support of the Zionist movement—then-Foreign Secretary Arthur Balfour pledged Britain's support for the establishment of 'a national home for the Jewish people' in Palestine. While many Palestinians—rightfully—view that declaration as the foundational cause of their suffering, the Balfour Declaration was a vague diplomatic maneuver. It did not explicitly call for a Jewish state, especially in a territory that was still part of the Ottoman Empire at the time. However, following the British victory over the Ottoman forces in World War I, that land came under British control. The declaration also stated that 'nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine'—a strange way to refer to the Arab population, who made up the overwhelming majority. The declaration did not clarify how such rights would be protected. More than a century later, that unresolved condition remains a significant part of the Balfour Declaration's unfulfilled promise. From 1948 Onward: A Shifting Reality In May 1948, David Ben-Gurion, Israel's first Prime Minister, declared the establishment of an independent Jewish state. This came after Britain abruptly relinquished control over Palestine—territory it had administered under the League of Nations mandate since 1920—and after Israeli forces repelled the armies of five neighboring Arab countries. Israel emerged from this conflict in control of 78% of what was once known as Mandatory Palestine under British administration. Thus, the Balfour Declaration, alongside the UN Partition Plan, laid the groundwork for a decades-long conflict, the consequences of which still deeply scar the Middle East. Why Recognition Never Came For more than half a century, Western governments—including Britain—have consistently expressed support for the establishment of a Palestinian state in the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. However, the 1967 war (known as the Six-Day War) marked a pivotal turning point. UN Security Council Resolution 242 called on Israel to withdraw from the territories it occupied in exchange for Arab recognition. Neither withdrawal nor recognition ever materialized. At the time, Palestinians still hoped to achieve sovereignty over all of historic Palestine, including areas that had already become part of Israel since 1948—a process that had included the displacement of more than 700,000 Palestinians in what became known as the Nakba. Rather than withdrawing, Israel expanded its presence through massive settlement construction. Today, more than 620,000 Israeli settlers live in the West Bank and East Jerusalem. Some of the most extreme members of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government have even expressed interest in re-establishing Israeli settlements inside Gaza. The 1988 Shift and Growing Global Recognition In 1988, the Palestinian leadership made a historic policy shift by accepting a two-state solution and abandoning the demand for all of historic Palestine. Under Yasser Arafat, the PLO declared its readiness to accept a state within the 1967 borders. Shortly afterward, 78 countries recognized the new Palestinian state. That number has since grown to 147. In July, more than a decade after Sweden became the first EU country to recognize Palestine, and after similar moves by Ireland, Spain, and Norway last year, French President Emmanuel Macron became the first G7 leader to publicly pledge to push for recognition of Palestine at the UN General Assembly this coming September. Is Recognition Still Just Symbolic? As critics rightly point out, recognizing a Palestinian state consisting of the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem remains largely theoretical in nature. In the absence of a viable peace process, there is no functioning state to recognize. While the Palestinian Authority gained non-member observer status at the United Nations in 2012 (similar to the Vatican), it does not have voting rights. The United States has repeatedly used its veto power to block full Palestinian membership. Even as recently as April, the United Kingdom abstained from voting on a Security Council resolution that called for Palestine to be admitted as a full UN member. Why Now? France's recent move—and Starmer's announcement, which followed talks with Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz—should not be seen as merely symbolic. They reflect growing international outrage at the massacres, starvation, and destruction caused by Israel's military campaign in Gaza, in response to Hamas' deadly attacks on October 7, 2023, which killed 1,200 Israelis and resulted in the kidnapping of 251 others. Reports suggest Macron was especially affected by testimonies of Palestinian survivors he met during a visit to Egypt in April. France has now joined Saudi Arabia in co-hosting a UN summit in New York aimed at reviving the two-state solution—sending a strong political message to Israel's leadership. It is a reminder that Saudi Arabia, since 2002, has offered full recognition of Israel in return for a withdrawal to pre-1967 borders, just as Egypt and Jordan did before. Will Britain's Belated Recognition Make a Difference? It may not immediately change the facts on the ground. But Britain's recognition would certainly strengthen the hand of those seeking to shift political dynamics in Washington, and it would represent an acknowledgment of the historic role and responsibility the UK has played in the region. At the very least, one can hope that this long-overdue step will contribute to ending a conflict that has lasted far too long—and of which the tragedy unfolding in Gaza may be its most devastating chapter yet.


Roya News
2 days ago
- Roya News
Calls to cancel Bob Vylan grow ahead of Boardmasters festival
Punk-rap duo Bob Vylan is set to take the stage at the Boardmasters music festival on August 10, despite mounting pressure from critics, government figures, and nearly 300 formal complaints demanding their removal. The London-based group has come under intense scrutiny after leading anti-'Israeli' military chants during a June performance at Glastonbury, which aired on the BBC. During the Glastonbury set, Bob Vylan chanted 'death to the IDF' and made other politically charged remarks about Zionism and the situation in Gaza. The performance sparked backlash at the highest levels of government, including criticism from the UK Prime Minister, questions in Parliament, and a rare apology from the BBC for failing to cut the live feed. In the weeks since, Cornwall Council has been flooded with nearly 300 complaints, many reportedly from outside the region, demanding the band be removed from the Boardmasters lineup. Councillor Dulcie Tudor described the scale of the response as 'more than the most-controversial planning application.' Critics have even taken to social media to call for the cancellation of Bob Vylan. One user stated, "Bob Vylan has had all his concerts for Europe, and the USA canceled. His career is over." Bob Vylan has had all his concerts for Europe, and the USA canceled. His career is over. — Israel Now (@neveragainlive1) July 2, 2025 However, the council has confirmed that any licensing hearing will only take place after the event concludes, citing regulations requiring a 20-day consultation period. Council leader Leigh Frost stated he would respond to each complaint and invite public participation in the eventual license review. Dr. Ed Abrahamson, who filed the initial complaint, claimed the band has been dropped from festivals around the world, had its US visas revoked, and is under investigation by UK anti-terror authorities. He urged local officials to act, warning of the potential influence on young festivalgoers. But Cornwall Council says only Devon and Cornwall Police have the authority to intervene, and the force has signaled it will not act to stop the show. In a statement, police emphasized their focus on event safety and confirmed performance decisions are up to the festival's organizers. Boardmasters, for its part, defended its decision to allow the band to perform. A spokesperson stressed that the festival 'does not tolerate hate speech, incitement to violence or behavior that puts anyone at risk' and had communicated clear expectations to the artists. Following the uproar, Bob Vylan maintained that their message had been misunderstood. 'We are not for the death of Jews, Arabs or any other race or group of people,' the band posted on Instagram. 'We are for the dismantling of a violent military machine.' Support for the band has also emerged within the music community. Artists, including Massive Attack and Brian Eno, have denounced what they describe as coordinated smear campaigns by pro-'Israel' advocates.