New tool reveals how fast you're aging — and predicts dementia years before a diagnosis
Scientists have developed a groundbreaking tool that can measure how fast a person is aging and predict their future risk of chronic diseases like dementia using a single brain MRI scan.
Researchers say this early warning could give people the chance to make lifestyle changes while they're still young and healthy enough to potentially slow or even prevent health problems down the line.
Advertisement
4 The tool can predict the rate a person is aging biologically using a single MRI scan.
ihorvsn – stock.adobe.com
The technology is the brainchild of scientists at Duke, Harvard and New Zealand's University of Otago, who used data from the Dunedin Study — a decades-long health project tracking over 1,000 New Zealanders born in the early '70s.
Since birth, participants have been poked, scanned and tested regularly. Researchers have followed everything from their blood pressure and cholesterol to lung and kidney function to map how their bodies have changed over time.
Advertisement
From that mountain of data, the team crunched the numbers to see how fast each person was aging biologically — not based on their birthdate, but on the physical wear and tear their body had endured.
Then they trained the tool, called DunedinPACE-NI, to predict those biological ages using just a single MRI scan of the brain that was taken when participants were 45 years old.
Next, they put the tool to the test, using it to analyze brain scans from people across the US, UK, Canada and Latin America.
4 The tool relies on MRI scans of the brain to gauge the pace of aging.
Ethan Whitman, Duke University
Advertisement
Across the board, they found that people with higher aging scores performed worse on cognitive tests and showed faster shrinkage in the hippocampus, the part of the brain crucial for memory and learning.
In one analysis, those who the tool deemed to be aging fastest faced a 60% higher risk of developing dementia compared to people with lower scores. They also started to have memory and thinking problems sooner.
When the team first saw the results, 'our jaws just dropped to the floor,' Ahmad Hariri, a Duke professor of psychology and neuroscience, said in a statement.
Advertisement
'What's really cool about this is that we've captured how fast people are aging using data collected in midlife,' he noted. 'It's helping us predict diagnosis of dementia among people who are much older.'
Brain decline wasn't the only red flag the tool picked up.
People with higher DunedinPACE-NI scores were also more likely to suffer from age-related frailty, heart attacks, strokes, lung disease and other chronic illnesses.
4 Dementia affects about 1 in 10 Americans over the age of 65.
LIGHTFIELD STUDIOS – stock.adobe.com
Even more striking, they were 40% more likely to die within the next several years than their slower-aging peers.
Notably, the tool's accuracy held up across race, income and geographic location.
'It seems to be capturing something that is reflected in all brains,' Hariri said.
A ticking clock
Advertisement
The new tool arrives as people are living longer than ever. By 2050, nearly a quarter of the global population will be over 65 — twice as many seniors as today, according to the World Health Organization.
A longer life sometimes comes with a catch.
'More people are unfortunately going to experience chronic age-related diseases, including dementia,' Hariri said.
4 The tool could also help flag the risk of other age-related diseases, like stroke and heart attack.
Pixel-Shot – stock.adobe.com
Advertisement
Studies predict 152.8 million people worldwide will be living with dementia in 25 years — up from 57.4 million cases in 2019.
Despite this sharp rise, effective treatments for Alzheimer's and other dementias remain elusive. Most drugs on the market can help manage symptoms, but fail to stop or reverse the disease.
One reason existing treatments haven't worked, Hariri theorized, is that they often start too late — after the disease has already done too much damage.
Advertisement
'Drugs can't resurrect a dying brain,' he said.
But the new tool could change that by identifying people at risk of Alzheimer's earlier, allowing for interventions before extensive brain damage occurs.
Beyond just predicting dementia risk, the new clock will help scientists figure out why people with certain risk factors — like poor sleep or mental health issues — age differently, said Ethan Whitman, first author on the study and a clinical psychology PhD candidate at Duke.
However, he noted that more work is needed to turn DunedinPACE-NI into a tool that everyday healthcare providers can use.
Advertisement
In the meantime, the team hopes the tool will help researchers with access to brain MRI data to measure aging in a way that algorithms based on other biomarkers, such as blood tests, can't.
'We really think of it as hopefully being a key new tool in forecasting and predicting risk for diseases, especially Alzheimer's and related dementias, and also perhaps gaining a better foothold on progression of disease,' Hariri said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Atlantic
an hour ago
- Atlantic
The Biggest Anti-Abortion Victory Since ‘Dobbs'
This is an edition of The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Amid all the news coverage of the GOP's spending-bill extravaganza—the late-night deficit debates, the strategy sessions, the hallway blanket-wearing —one piece of the package has received comparatively little attention: a provision that would block abortion clinics from receiving Medicaid funds for any of the non-abortion services they provide. During the past three years, abortion restrictions have mostly taken effect mostly in red and purple states—where legislatures have voted to enact them. But if this proposed provision passes, clinics all over the country will be affected. It would 'have a pretty devastating impact on a lot of providers,' Mary Ziegler, a legal scholar and an Atlantic contributor, told me. Some would probably close, and others would have to limit the number of patients they serve. It's 'a really big deal,' she said, with perhaps the most significant consequences for abortion access since the passage of the 1976 Hyde Amendment, which bans federal funds for abortions in most cases. All of this is complicated—which helps explain the dearth of attention to the matter. But funding for independent abortion providers works like this: Clinics receive money from a variety of sources, including local donations, insurance payments, and Medicaid reimbursements. (Yes, the Planned Parenthood Federation of America receives millions in contributions every year, but most of those funds are earmarked for advocacy, Ziegler told me.) A big percentage of Planned Parenthood's patient pool relies on Medicaid. In keeping with the Hyde Amendment, providers are not reimbursed for abortions, but they do receive federal payments for other services, such as breast-cancer screenings, Pap smears, and STI testing. This new legislation would make Planned Parenthood and other clinics ineligible for any kind of Medicaid reimbursement, Ziegler said. If clinics are not paid for these services, then, in many cases, they won't be able to provide them. Maybe some clinics would be able to find funds from state legislatures or local donors to fill in the gaps, but many wouldn't. An initial version of the bill passed by the House would have blocked Medicaid funding for 10 years, but the current version, which passed the Senate earlier today, would prohibit that funding for just one year after the law's passage. (That's right—we'll all be back here again soon.) The cuts represent a pretty clear departure from President Donald Trump's 'leave it to the states' approach to abortion policy. They'd affect clinics everywhere, not just in places where Americans have grown accustomed to hearing about abortion restrictions. Most Planned Parenthood clinics at risk of closure under the bill are in states where abortion is legal, the organization says. That's partly because more blue states have recently expanded Medicaid. Up to one-third of patients at Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, for example, are on Medicaid, and reimbursement totals in the millions of dollars, PPNNE CEO Nicole Clegg told me. 'We'll work with our state leaders' and increase local fundraising efforts, she said. But it will be difficult to make up the difference. The bill's passage is part of an abortion one-two punch: Last week, the Supreme Court made it easier for states to deny Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. 'This is tremendous progress on achieving a decades-long goal that has proved elusive in the past,' Marjorie Dannenfelser, the president of Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, told me in a statement about the SCOTUS decision and the GOP bill. 'This proves what we've said all along: Congress can cut Planned Parenthood's funding—and they just did,' Kristan Hawkins, the president of Students for Life of America, wrote on X about the bill. 'The moral obligation is clear: If we can do it for 1 year, we must do it for good.' The events of this week also represent a slight strategy change. Reporters like me who have long covered the anti-abortion movement anticipated that, under the second Trump presidency, activists would shift their efforts in a different direction: attempting to outlaw abortion via the 1873 Comstock Act. Many who follow this debate agree that they probably still will. But so far, Trump 'hasn't really been doing a lot of what the anti-abortion movement has wanted,' Ziegler said. She wonders whether it was 'a self-conscious decision to go where they thought Republicans already were'—to work toward withholding funding, which is probably politically safer for the GOP than pursuing a relatively unpopular outright abortion ban. Next stop: the House of Representatives. Lawmakers there took up the bill today and want to make it law by Friday. But defenders of abortion access are keeping an eye out. As always, with a razor-thin Republican majority, anything could happen. A big, bad, very ugly bill Jonathan Chait: Congressional Republicans didn't have to do this. A classic childhood pastime is fading. Today's News President Donald Trump visited ' Alligator Alcatraz,' a makeshift migrant-detention center in the Florida Everglades, and said that he wants to see more detention centers in 'many states.' Trump wrote in a social-media post that the Department of Government Efficiency might need to reexamine government subsidies for Elon Musk's businesses. Zohran Mamdani officially won New York City's Democratic mayoral primary by 12 points. Evening Read The Birth-Rate Crisis Isn't as Bad as You've Heard—It's Worse By Marc Novicoff First, the bad news: Global fertility is falling fast. The aging populations of rich countries are relying on ever fewer workers to support their economy, dooming those younger generations to a future of higher taxes, higher debt, or later retirement—or all three … By about 2084, according to the gold-standard United Nations 'World Population Prospects,' the global population will officially begin its decline. Rich countries will all have become like Japan, stagnant and aging. And the rest of the world will have become old before it ever got the chance to become rich. Sorry, did I say 'bad news'? That was actually the good news, based on estimates that turned out to be far too rosy. More From The Atlantic Watch. F1 (out now in theaters) threads the nitty-gritty details of Formula One racing into a traditional underdog drama, David Sims writes. Read. Soft Core, by Brittany Newell, is a noirish novel set in the world of strip clubs and BDSM dungeons that ventures beyond titillation and into the daily grind, Lily Burana writes.
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
FBI warns scammers are posing as fraud investigators to steal sensitive healthcare info — what you need to know
Scammers are targeting both patients and health care providers in a new phishing attack designed to steal your sensitive personal and financial data, according to a new alert from the FBI. As reported by BleepingComputer, the federal law enforcement agency recently put out a public service announcement warning that scammers and other cybercriminals are currently impersonating health insurance companies and their respective fraud investigators in an effort to steal customer data. According to the FBI, the scammers behind this new campaign are sending out phishing emails and text messages with the hope that potential victims will disclose their 'protected health information, medical records, personal financial details' or even provide 'reimbursements for fake service overpayments or non-covered services.' Brand impersonation is nothing new for cybercriminals, but by targeting patients directly, they might be able to trick some people into giving up the kind of information that can be used to commit fraud or even medical identity theft. Given that providing sensitive healthcare information via email or text is a clear HIPPA violation in most cases, this is a major red flag that you're not dealing with an actual health insurance company or even their fraud investigators. Still, for the FBI to issue a public service announcement, this means that this isn't the type of threat to take lightly and that some patients and even health care providers have fallen for this phishing attack. To help Americans avoid falling victim to this new phishing scam, the FBI has provided some guidance on the matter in its public service announcement. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. For starters, you should always be wary of unsolicited emails, text messages and calls asking for your personal information. Likewise, if you do come across one of these emails or messages, you shouldn't click on any links they contain as they could be malicious. To keep your medical accounts safe from scammers and hackers, you want to use strong and unique passwords for all of them. You never want to reuse a password and if you have trouble coming up with complex passwords for your accounts or remembering them, you might want to consider using one of the best password managers instead. Since phishing messages could contain malware or other viruses, you want to make sure that you're using the best antivirus software on your Windows PC or the best Mac antivirus software on your Apple computer. There's a lot that hackers and scammers can do with sensitive medical information and personal data, so I doubt this is the last time we will see an attack like this. For this reason, you want to make sure that you're extra careful when dealing with any emails or text messages claiming to come from your healthcare provider.
Indianapolis Star
2 hours ago
- Indianapolis Star
Trump's tax bill will gut Medicaid in Indiana
President Trump's Big Beautiful Bill is set to become law. What's being celebrated in Washington as a political victory will hit Indiana as a health care crisis. Marketed as tax and budget reform, the bill guts Medicaid, strips away insurance protections and enacts policy changes that will leave tens of thousands of Hoosiers without coverage. For a state that already ranks near the bottom in public health funding, this is deeply irresponsible. This bill creates unmistakable winners and losers. Wealthier Americans and large employers benefit from extended tax cuts and fewer insurance requirements. States with conservative leadership gain more control over Medicaid, allowing them to cut spending with less federal oversight. Meanwhile, the losses fall squarely on working families, rural communities and people with chronic illness. More from Raja Ramaswamy: Nurses are drowning while Braun ignores Indiana's health care crisis Giving Indiana more control over Medicaid isn't inherently harmful. But in Indiana, where leaders have consistently underfunded public health and pushed for tighter eligibility, that control is likely to mean stricter rules, fewer benefits and more people losing coverage. Indiana's hospitals will absorb roughly $800 million in unpaid care, leading to higher bills, strained clinics and more Hoosiers forced into medical debt. Patients who rely on comprehensive plans may find themselves stuck with stripped-down policies that exclude mental health, maternity care or treatment for serious illness. The people who need care the most are the ones being asked to sacrifice. The bill cuts Medicaid by more than $1 trillion nationwide, according to the Congressional Budget Office. In Indiana, 2.3 million people rely on Medicaid, including children, seniors and low-income workers. New work and paperwork requirements are expected to knock tens of thousands of Hoosiers off the rolls. These are bureaucratic obstacles that force families to choose between treatment and financial stability. Supporters claim the bill will root out fraud and encourage work. But with Indiana ranked 48th in public health funding, we are in no position to absorb cuts of this scale. Medicaid is not a handout. It is a lifeline for working families. This bill severs it, leaving thousands vulnerable to financial and health crises. The Center for American Progress estimates the legislation will add $36 billion in uncompensated care costs nationwide, with Indiana's share at roughly $800 million. Those costs will strain hospitals, raise premiums and burden families already struggling to afford care. This bill is a failure of health policy. Health care is not optional. It is as essential as public education or clean water. Cutting coverage for thousands of Hoosiers does not save money. It shifts the burden onto families who cannot afford to get sick. Trump calls it beautiful. In Indiana, it's nothing but brutal.
