Steven Sim adopts fourth USM student, offers financial and emotional support
Shun Yong, a second-year student facing severe financial hardships, became the latest beneficiary after his struggles came to light.
Shun lost his mother at 14 and has never known his father.
He lives with his 87-year-old grandmother, relying solely on a RM500 monthly welfare aid from the Welfare Department (JKM).
Despite these challenges, he excelled academically, scoring four flat distinctions in his STPM exams and securing a place at USM.
'Student loans from PTPTN were not enough to cover all his expenses.
During semester breaks, Shun took on part-time jobs to support his daily needs and living costs,' Sim shared on Facebook.
The student's difficulties escalated when he nearly missed semester registration due to unpaid fees.
A concerned individual, Uncle Ooi, alerted Sim to Shun's situation.
The Bukit Mertajam MP promptly intervened, settling the outstanding tuition fees.
Shortly after, Shun faced another setback when his laptop malfunctioned, cutting off access to essential academic materials.
Sim arranged to take him to purchase a new device, though Shun initially hoped to repair the old one.
'Uncle Ooi, who is not related to Shun but has quietly supported him all along, had already bought him a new laptop to ensure he wasn't held back by faulty equipment,' Sim explained.
The minister then formally invited Shun to be his 'adopted child,' emphasising that the gesture goes beyond financial aid.
'I want him to know that we stand behind him,' Sim said.
Shun joins three other USM students who have received similar support from Sim, reflecting the minister's commitment to uplifting struggling students. – Bernama
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Dr Wee concerned STPM top scorers may be missing out
DATUK Seri Dr Wee Ka Siong (BN-Ayer Hitam) ( pic ) has raised concerns over the declining number of top Sijil Tinggi Persekolahan Malaysia (STPM) scorers being admitted into public universities through the Unit Pusat Universiti (UPU) system compared to matriculation and foundation pathway students since 2018. In response, Higher Education Minister Datuk Seri Dr Zambry Abdul Kadir said offers to STPM and equivalent leavers for entry into public universities have actually increased by 90.1% over the past seven years. He said a total of 4,530 STPM and equivalent students were offered placements for the 2018/2019 academic session, compared to 8,612 in the 2024/2025 session, in a written reply in the Dewan Rakyat yesterday. However, Dr Wee later said in a Facebook post that Zambry's response warranted further clarification with more detailed data. 'The statement that the number of offers to STPM graduates has nearly doubled must be clearly broken down, as it does not distinguish between qualification categories and critical study programmes. 'Why wasn't the data detailed according to the qualification types as asked – namely STPM, matriculation and foundation – as well as according to the programmes offered? The government must address public concerns and anxieties over a perceived decline in the intake of STPM students in critical programmes compared to matriculation and foundation students,' he said. Dr Wee also questioned the apparent lack of government funding for public universities, which he said had forced institutions to compensate for shortcomings through open admission channels, resulting in higher tuition fees for students. In response, Zambry clarified that these channels operate on an 'over and above' principle and do not affect the intake projections for the main admission stream. 'Open channels are also subject to an evaluation process and must meet all academic, language and programme requirements. There is no compromise on standards set by accredited bodies,' he said. Zambry added that the open channel model reflects the growing maturity of the higher education system amid an evolving academic landscape. 'This requires universities to be agile and equipped with their own financial resources,' he said. To this, Dr Wee said the reply was too general and did not address his question specifically. 'What is the actual number of seats allocated via the open channel for each academic session? Please also state the number of seats available through the UPU channel, as well as the total number of seats offered in critical programmes. 'How is the term 'do not affect' defined if there is no clear comparison between the two channels?' he said. Dr Wee further urged the government to provide evidence if there is truly no compromise in admission standards. 'I have received complaints from excellent students who failed to gain admission through UPU, but were later accepted through the commercial or open channel – provided they were willing to pay significantly higher fees. 'This is a clear example of a lack of transparency in merit-based evaluation and must be explained immediately,' he said. He added that raising commercial channel fees to boost university revenue, without transparency and fairness in student admissions, is a pro-elite policy. 'This is not a real solution. Public universities should instead focus on commercialising the outcomes of their research and development, rather than taking the easy way out by increasing fees through the open channel. 'The government should provide adequate allocations for the operating and development expenditures of public universities based on actual needs, while the Finance Ministry must grant the necessary approvals. 'As long as the Higher Education Ministry or the universities do not disclose detailed data, public concerns over the lack of transparency and fairness in the student intake system will persist,' he said.
Free Malaysia Today
a day ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Fadhlina rubbishes claim matriculation inferior to STPM
Labis MP Pang Hok Liong had asked if the government was prepared to abolish the programme to address 'public suspicions' that it is of a far lower standard than the STPM examination. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : Education minister Fadhlina Sidek has dismissed suggestions to abolish the matriculation programme, and denied claims that it is inferior to the Sijil Tinggi Persekolahan Malaysia (STPM) examination. Fadhlina said the matriculation programme remained a recognised pre-university pathway, with graduates accepted by both local and international universities. 'The qualification is recognised by 58 foreign institutions, including 26 listed among the world's top 100 in the world university rankings. 'These include Cambridge University, University College London, the University of Sydney and Kyoto University,' she said in a written parliamentary reply. Fadhlina said matriculation graduates have also been eligible for Grade 29 executive posts in the civil service since 2017, in line with a 2016 circular. She said this broad recognition by universities and the public sector reflected the programme's quality and relevance. 'Therefore, questions on the standard of the matriculation programme do not arise at all,' she added. The minister was replying to Pang Hok Liong (PH-Labis), who asked if the government was prepared to abolish the programme to address 'public suspicions' that it is of a far lower standard than the STPM examination.
Free Malaysia Today
a day ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Wee slams higher education ministry's ‘general' reply on varsity admissions
Wee Ka Siong had asked the higher education ministry to explain the trend in student intake through the UPUOnline system. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : MCA president Wee Ka Siong has criticised the higher education ministry for what he describes as a vague and inadequate response to his question in the Dewan Rakyat regarding the intake trend of top-performing STPM students and the expansion of open admission channels in public universities. In a Facebook post, Wee said the ministry's written parliamentary reply required further clarification with detailed data. 'The ministry responded that the number of admissions for STPM or equivalent graduates for the 2018/2019 academic session was 4,530, while for the 2024/2025 academic session, it was 8,612, indicating an almost twofold increase (90.1%),' he said. 'The statement that the number of offers to STPM graduates has nearly doubled must be clearly broken down, as it does not distinguish between qualification categories and critical study programmes. 'Why was the data not detailed according to the qualification types as asked, namely STPM, matriculation, and foundation, as well as according to the programmes offered?' Wee had asked the ministry to explain the trend in student intake through the UPUOnline system, in which the number of top-performing STPM students admitted has been significantly lower than matriculation and foundation students since 2018. He also requested clarification on the lack of government funding that has forced public universities to cover the shortfall through open admission channels with higher tuition fees. He questioned the ministry's explanation, that admissions through the open channel were based on the 'over and above' principle, and did not impact the UPUOnline mainstream intake. 'This is a general reply that also does not answer the question specifically,' he said. 'What is the actual number of seats allocated via the open channel for each academic session?' Wee said the government needed to explain its claim that there was 'no compromise' in admission standards for the open channel system. He took issue with the ministry's claim that the open channel reflected the financial independence of public universities, calling it a 'pro-elite policy'. He said raising student fees through the open channel to boost revenue was neither sustainable nor fair, and that universities should instead focus on commercialising research and development outputs. Wee said public concerns over the transparency and fairness of the intake system would continue if the ministry and public universities failed to disclose detailed admission data. Last month, MCA urged the government to set up a royal commission of inquiry to review and reform the admission channels of all public universities. Wee had then pointed out that several public universities had followed Universiti Malaya's lead in offering two enrolment options for undergraduate students – through the UPUOnline system managed by the higher education ministry, and an alternative open channel.
