logo
‘Hopefully will purchase plenty from US…': Donald Trump says China can get Iran oil, but wants it to buy from America; will it listen?

‘Hopefully will purchase plenty from US…': Donald Trump says China can get Iran oil, but wants it to buy from America; will it listen?

Time of India3 hours ago

Oil prices dropped approximately 6% on Tuesday, influenced by Trump's remarks regarding China following the ceasefire declaration. (AI image)
US President
Donald Trump
announced on Tuesday that China may proceed with Iranian oil purchases following the Israel-Iran ceasefire agreement, though the White House subsequently clarified this statement does not represent an easing of US sanctions.
"China can now continue to purchase oil from Iran. Hopefully, they will be purchasing plenty from the US, also," Trump posted on Truth Social, shortly after authorising US strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities.
A senior White House official explained to Reuters that Trump's statement highlighted Iran's decision not to block the Strait of Hormuz to oil vessels, as such a blockade would have significantly affected China, which is the largest buyer of Iranian oil.
The official said, "The president continues to call on China and all countries to import our state-of-the-art oil rather than import Iranian oil in violation of US sanctions."
Oil prices dropped approximately 6% on Tuesday, influenced by Trump's remarks regarding China following the ceasefire declaration.
US Sanctions On Iran
A potential easing of sanctions on Iran would indicate a departure from the previous stance, as Trump had announced in February his intention to maintain maximum pressure on Iran, targeting its oil exports due to concerns over its nuclear programme and regional militant support.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Что о вас может рассказать поза во время сна?
Удивительные Новости
Undo
Trump had previously implemented multiple sanctions affecting Chinese independent refineries and port operators due to their Iranian oil purchases.
"President Trump's greenlight for China to keep buying Iranian oil reflects a return to lax enforcement standards," said Scott Modell, a former CIA officer, now CEO of Rapidan Energy Group, according to the Reuters report.
Beyond non-enforcement, the president holds authority to suspend or waive sanctions through executive orders or congressional legislation.
According to Modell, Trump is unlikely to waive sanctions before upcoming US-Iran nuclear negotiations, as these measures provide strategic advantage considering Tehran's requirement for permanent sanctions relief.
Jeremy Paner from Hughes Hubbard & Reed law firm indicated that a presidential decision to suspend Iran-related oil sanctions would necessitate substantial inter-agency coordination.
The United States Treasury would require authorisation permits, whilst the State Department must provide waivers that necessitate notification to Congress.
China To Buy More US Oil?
Market specialists and oil analysts across Asia indicated that Trump's statements were unlikely to influence China's immediate procurement patterns for oil, whether from Iran or the United States.
Iranian crude constitutes approximately 13.6% of China's petroleum acquisitions this year, with the reduced-price supplies serving as crucial support for independent refineries operating under tight margins.
American oil represents merely 2% of Chinese imports, and Beijing's imposed 10% duties on US petroleum effectively discourage additional purchases.
China consistently challenges what it terms Washington's "abuse of illegal unilateral sanctions."
When questioned about Trump's statement during a standard press conference, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun stated that China would implement appropriate energy security measures aligned with its national interests.
Increased Iranian oil acquisitions by China and other nations could potentially create tension with Saudi Arabia, the global leader in oil exports.
The effectiveness of US sanctions on Iranian exports has remained restricted since the initial stringent measures implemented during Trump's previous administration.
This year, Trump has imposed sanctions on Chinese trading firms and terminals, yet the outcomes have been notably less impactful than intended, according to Modell's assessment.
In response to media queries, State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce confirmed that Trump had indicated his objectives and the administration is committed to achieving them. She declined to elaborate on specific procedures.
"But clearly we are focused on making sure that (the) guiding hand of President Trump prevails and moves this government forward, so we will have to wait and see when it comes to what that ends up looking like," Bruce said.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Days After US Strikes, Iran Confirms Nuclear Facilities "Badly Damaged"
Days After US Strikes, Iran Confirms Nuclear Facilities "Badly Damaged"

NDTV

time33 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Days After US Strikes, Iran Confirms Nuclear Facilities "Badly Damaged"

Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmail Baghaei confirmed Wednesday the country's nuclear facilities had been "badly damaged" in American strikes over the weekend. Speaking to Al Jazeera, Baghaei refused to go into detail but conceded the Sunday strikes by American B-2 bombers using bunker buster bombs had been significant. "Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure," he said. Meanwhile, the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran appeared to be holding on Wednesday after a rocky start, giving rise to cautious hope that it could lead to a long-term peace agreement even as Tehran insists it will not give up its nuclear program. The ceasefire took hold on Tuesday, the 12th day of the war between Israel and Iran, with each side initially accusing the other of violating it until the missiles, drones and bombs finally stopped. On Wednesday, US President Donald Trump, who helped negotiate the ceasefire, told reporters at a NATO summit in the Netherlands that it was going "very well." "They're not going to have a bomb and they're not going to enrich," Trump said about Iran. Iran has insisted, however, that it will not give up its nuclear program and in a vote underscoring the tough path ahead, Iranian parliament agreed to fast-track a proposal that would effectively stop the country's cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Vienna-based UN watchdog that has been monitoring the Iranian nuclear program for years. Ahead of the vote, Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf criticised the IAEA for having "refused to even pretend to condemn the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities" that were carried out by the United States on Sunday. "For this reason, the Atomic Energy Organisation of Iran will suspend cooperation with the IAEA until security of nuclear facilities is ensured, and Iran's peaceful nuclear program will move forward at a faster pace," Qalibaf told lawmakers. In Vienna, IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said he had already written to Iran to discuss resuming inspections of their nuclear facilities. Among other things, Iran claims to have moved its highly enriched uranium ahead of the American strikes and Grossi said his inspectors needed to reassess the country's stockpiles. "We need to return," he said. "We need to engage." Questions Over Effectiveness Of US Strikes The American strikes hit three Iranian nuclear sites, which Trump said had "completely and fully obliterated" the country's nuclear program. From Tehran, Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, confirmed that the strikes on Sunday by American B-2 bombers using bunker-buster bombs had caused significant damage. "Our nuclear installations have been badly damaged, that's for sure," he told Al Jazeera on Wednesday, while refusing to go into detail. Trump's special envoy to the Mideast, Steve Witkoff, said on Fox News late on Tuesday that Israel and the US had now achieved their objective of "the total destruction of the enrichment capacity" in Iran, and Iran's prerequisite for talks - that Israel end its campaign - had also been fulfilled. "The proof is in the pudding," he said. "No one's shooting at each other. It's over." At the NATO summit, when asked about a US intelligence report that found Iran's nuclear program has been set back only a few months, Trump scoffed and said it would at least take "years" to rebuild. Israeli military spokesman Brig. Gen. Effie Defrin said Wednesday his country's assessment was also that Iran's nuclear facilities had been "significantly damaged" and its nuclear program "set it back by years." Grossi said he could not speculate on how bad the damage was but that Iran's nuclear capabilities were well known. "The technical knowledge is there, and the industrial capacity is there," he said. "That no one can deny, so we need to work together with them."

Trump Compares Strikes On Iran To Hiroshima Bombing, Says "It Ended The War"
Trump Compares Strikes On Iran To Hiroshima Bombing, Says "It Ended The War"

NDTV

time33 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Trump Compares Strikes On Iran To Hiroshima Bombing, Says "It Ended The War"

US President Donald Trump said that the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities last week had resulted in the "total obliteration" of the country's nuclear capabilities, and had set the country's atomic programme back by "decades". However, according to a report by the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA), Iran's nuclear facilities that had been struck by the United States, such as Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan, had been damaged, but not destroyed, and could be restored. On Wednesday, at a Nato summit in The Hague on Wednesday, Trump dismissed the intelligence report and compared the US strikes on Iran to the second world war bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. "I don't want to use an example of Hiroshima, I don't want to use an example of Nagasaki, but that was essentially the same thing that ended a war," Trump said at the summit. "This ended [the Israel-Iran] war. If we didn't take [out the nuclear facilities], they would be fighting right now," he added. The bombings that took place during World War II, were intended to force Japan's unconditional surrender. Trump said that the US Defence Intelligence Agency "really don't know" about the damage and further stated that damage to Iran's facilities can be fully gauged only after Israel delivered an assessment. "The intelligence says, 'We don't know, it could have been very severe.' That's what the intelligence says. So I guess that's correct, but I think we can take the 'we don't know'. It was very severe. It was obliteration," Trump added. Trump wrote on Truth Social, "Fake news CNN, together with the failing New York Times, have teamed up in an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history. The nuclear sites in Iran are completely destroyed! both The Times and CNN are getting slammed by the public!" Dan Caine, the chairman of the US joint chiefs of staff said that although the evaluation suggested that the nuclear sites sustained "severe damage and destruction", final assessments "would take time". The White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that the report was "flat out wrong" and "a clear attempt to demean President Trump", adding, "Everyone knows what happens when you drop fourteen 30,000 pound bombs perfectly on their targets: total obliteration."

Trade pacts with US, EU, India may not boost short-term UK growth: S&P
Trade pacts with US, EU, India may not boost short-term UK growth: S&P

Fibre2Fashion

time38 minutes ago

  • Fibre2Fashion

Trade pacts with US, EU, India may not boost short-term UK growth: S&P

The United Kingdom's trade agreements with the United States, the European Union (EU) and India will do little to boost economic growth in the short term as they are either too narrow, or, in the case of the UK-US trade deal, still leave exporters worse off than before, according to S&P Global Ratings. The US-UK agreement has not yet been implemented in full. When this will happen, and exactly what shape the agreement will take, are still uncertain. In addition, the agreement still leaves tariffs higher than they were before, at 10 per cent for most products, it noted. The UK's trade pacts with the US, the EU and India will do little to boost short-term growth as they are either too narrow, or, in the case of the UK-US one, still leave exporters worse off than before, S&P Global Ratings said. The US-UK pact has not yet been fully implemented; the UK-EU one is narrow in scope; and the UK-India one is smaller in terms of economic significance than the UK-EU deal. 'Even if the UK is slightly better off in terms of trade with the US than other countries, UK-US trade will still be lower than it would have been under the tariffs before April 2, 2025,' S&P Global Ratings said. The UK-EU agreement is narrow in scope, even if it suggests that the United Kingdom may have put Brexit aside in favour of cooperation. Finally, the country's trade agreement with India will give British exporters more options as they seek to diversify their trading partners. However, even if India is a fast-growing market, the UK-India trade deal is smaller in terms of economic significance than the UK's narrow deal with the EU, according to British Treasury estimate, i.e., £4.8 billion versus £9.0 billion in the long run. India is a smaller trading partner, buying only around 2 per cent of total UK goods exports in the past 12 months, compared with around 64 per cent for the EU and United States combined, S&P Global noted. The UK economy is weaker than it looks from the first quarter (Q1 2025) statistics and has shed 280,000 jobs in the past 12 months, it observed. Surveys point to subdued demand, especially in manufacturing, and consumers continue to save much more than they have historically. The Bank of England (BoE) will continue to take a gradual approach to cutting rates, as volatile economic data continue to point to elevated price pressures even though the labour market is cooling down. S&P Global expects one rate cut per quarter until February 2026, which should help investment and consumption rebound more quickly. The country's economy expanded by 0.7 per cent quarter on quarter in Q1 2025. Consumers have continued to lower their expectations for the economy. This is likely to be motivating higher savings than usual, preventing a stronger recovery in household spending. Retail sales dropped by 2.6 per cent in May 2025, reversing earlier yearly gains. The UK gross domestic product is likely to contract in the second quarter, reflecting the subdued trends and a drop-off in trade with the United States, as the new tariffs have now kicked in. Exports to the United States were already 31 per cent down month on month in April this year. Fibre2Fashion News Desk (DS)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store