US Sends New Bombers to Frontline Air Base in West Pacific
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The United States appears to have rotated its bomber fleet to the Western Pacific Ocean by deploying aircraft to Guam, a strategic hub that serves as a staging area for projecting power.
Newsweek has reached out to the U.S. Pacific Air Forces for further comment by email.
Why It Matters
The U.S. often deploys its bombers—consisting of the B-1B Lancer, B-2 Spirit, and B-52H Stratofortress—at bases in the Indo-Pacific region for Bomber Task Force (BTF) missions, including Guam, its westernmost territory in the Pacific Ocean, a Newsweek map shows.
Guam serves as the center of the Second Island Chain under the U.S. containment strategy, which seeks to keep adversaries' forces in check. The island also hosts Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps bases that sustain and maintain the American military presence in the region.
What To Know
The U.S. Air Force 2nd Bomb Wing—a B-52H Stratofortress bomber unit headquartered at Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana—released a video on Saturday indicating that an unspecified number of bombers have been deployed to Andersen Air Force Base in Guam.
The video shows a bomber undergoing maintenance and post-flight inspections at the air base on May 22, with its caption stating that BTF missions provide opportunities to train and work with U.S. allies and partners across different combatant command areas of operations.
The B-52H bomber is capable of carrying up to 70,000 pounds of nuclear or conventional weapons and features "worldwide precision navigation capability." It has a stated range of 8,800 miles and a top speed of 650 miles per hour, according to a U.S. Air Force fact sheet.
This marked the third BTF deployment in the Western Pacific Ocean this year, according to the map created by Newsweek. The last mission saw four B-1B bombers deploy to Misawa Air Base in Japan in mid-April, returning to the U.S. in two flights on May 9 and May 12.
A United States Air Force B-52H bomber arrives at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam after completing a Bomber Task Force mission on April 29, 2024.
A United States Air Force B-52H bomber arrives at Andersen Air Force Base in Guam after completing a Bomber Task Force mission on April 29, 2024.
Tech. Sgt. Eric Summers Jr./U.S. Air Force
The map also shows that Andersen Air Force Base hosted another BTF deployment from mid-January to early March, involving a separate group of four B-1B bombers. These bombers are not nuclear-capable and carry up to 75,000 pounds of conventional weapons.
It was not clear how long the B-52H bombers will be deployed in Guam. The U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command, responsible for America's bomber force, previously told Newsweek that it is ready to conduct BTF missions "anyplace, anytime, and for any duration required."
What People Are Saying
The U.S. Air Force 2nd Bomb Wing said: "Bomber Task Force missions demonstrate the credibility of our forces to address a global security environment that is more diverse and uncertain than any other time in recent history."
The U.S. Air Force Global Strike Command previously told Newsweek: "Our command is committed to working with U.S. allies and partners to deter aggression in the Indo-Pacific; those allies and partners provide an asymmetric advantage that our adversaries can never hope to match."
The U.S. Pacific Air Forces previously told Newsweek: "The U.S. Air Force routinely deploys a variety of aircraft and units throughout the Indo-Pacific area of operations in support of geographic combatant command objectives and training."
What Happens Next
It remains to be seen when the Guam-based B-52H bombers will execute their first mission since arriving on the Western Pacific island, where tensions remain high in the South China Sea, across the Taiwan Strait, and on the Korean Peninsula.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
6 hours ago
- Newsweek
'Game-Changing' Anti-Ship Weapon Tested by US Stealth Bomber
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. An American stealth bomber recently tested a "game-changing" weapon designed to sink warships amid China's rapid naval buildup to challenge the United States in the Pacific. The new weapon—known as Quicksink—is capable of "rapidly and efficiently" sinking maritime targets, the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory said in a news release on Wednesday. Newsweek has contacted the Chinese Defense Ministry for comment by email. Why It Matters China has the largest navy in the world by hull count, according to the Pentagon, with more than 370 ships and submarines—including two aircraft carriers in active service—enabling Beijing to expand its military reach and presence within and beyond the western Pacific. Facing China's growing naval threat, the U.S. has been arming its allies and partners in the Pacific—Australia, Japan and Taiwan—with various anti-ship weapons and deploying the Maritime Strike Tomahawk, the ship-sinking variant of the Tomahawk cruise missile. A United States Air Force B-2 stealth bomber returning to Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri on May 9. A United States Air Force B-2 stealth bomber returning to Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri on May 9. Senior Airman Devan Halstead/U.S. Air Force What To Know The test—which took place at a Gulf test range near Eglin Air Force Base in northwestern Florida—involved a B-2 stealth bomber and the 500-pound variant of the Quicksink maritime weapon. Official photos indicate the test was conducted in late April. Quicksink is a U.S. Air Force weapons program aimed at creating "air-delivered, low-cost, surface vessel defeat capability" to enhance Washington's power projection and maintain freedom of navigation in critical waterways, the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory said. The weapon itself is a modified Joint Direct Attack Munition—a family of precision-guided bombs—enhanced with anti-ship capabilities. The 2,000-pound Quicksink variant was successfully tested during an exercise in the Pacific last year, according to the news release. The new, smaller Quicksink variant is modified from the GBU-38 Joint Direct Attack Munition and is set to expand the B-2 bomber's targeting capabilities. The bomber is designed to penetrate the "most sophisticated defenses" and can carry up to 40,000 pounds of weapons. This capability provides a rapid response to maritime threats, the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory said, significantly bolstering the Air Force's counter-maritime deterrence and operations. However, it remains unclear whether the weapon has been officially fielded. A United States airman preparing GBU-38 Joint Direct Attack Munitions to be loaded onto a B-2 stealth bomber at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri for a Quicksink test on April 22. A United States airman preparing GBU-38 Joint Direct Attack Munitions to be loaded onto a B-2 stealth bomber at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri for a Quicksink test on April 22. Senior Airman Joshua Hastings/U.S. Air Force Tom Shugart, a former U.S. Navy submariner and an adjunct senior fellow at the Center for a New American Security, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, that he would be "pretty surprised" if the stealth bomber flew within range of Chinese warships to drop the bomb. "Are we 1,000 percent sure that their air defense systems aren't going to get a sniff?" he asked. The B-2 bomber is one of the U.S. Air Force's most valuable assets, with only 19 aircraft in service. What People Are Saying General David Allvin, the U.S. Air Force's chief of staff, wrote on X on Wednesday: "We unleashed a new QUICKSINK weapon, which significantly enhances our ability to strike stationary or moving surface vessels. This is a true game-changer for the [Department of Defense] and is exactly what [President Donald Trump] means by PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH!" The U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory said on its website: "QUICKSINK is an answer to the need to quickly neutralize menacing maritime threats over vast areas around the world. … QUICKSINK is unique because it can provide new capabilities to existing and future DoD weapons systems, giving combatant commanders and our national leaders new ways to defend against maritime threats." What Happens Next It remains to be seen whether the U.S. Air Force and other service branches will develop entirely new weapons or modify existing armaments to neutralize enemy warships.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's why ‘loud talking' puts a strain on relationships: ‘I don't realize I'm doing it in the moment'
They say love is about communication — just not at full blast. A Reddit user has ignited an online discussion and debate after posting that their partner keeps asking them to 'lower your volume' — even though they say they're just excited, not screaming. The anonymous user, who goes by u/Farts2Long (yes, really), brought their relationship beef to the infamous r/AmITheA–hole forum, explaining that their voice naturally gets louder when they're engaged in conversation. 'Sometimes when I get excited about a topic, I naturally start speaking louder than usual,' they wrote. They added, 'Not shouting, just louder than normal conversation level. The thing is, I don't realize I'm doing it in the moment.' But their partner isn't a fan of the verbal volume. The poster noted that their significant other will often interrupt them 'mid-sentence,' asking them to 'lower' their volume. The Redditor acknowledged that this likely isn't 'in a mean or rude way,' but stressed that it still makes them feel dismissed and discouraged. Redditors rushed to weigh in, with over 12,000 upvotes and hundreds of mixed opinions. 'I lose my enthusiasm and no longer feel like talking about the thing I was excited about,' the original poster continued. While many commenters agreed the partner's request was reasonable, others urged empathy and better communication. 'I get it, you're happy to be speaking to someone who cares about something you care about,' one wrote. 'However, speaking as someone whose partner is the same as you in this situation, it's very hard to be sat trying to engage with someone when they are essentially shouting in your face.' Another chimed in, 'You have every right to feel how you feel, but it also does sound like you may be disregarding how it makes them feel.' Relationship expert Angelika Koch, of the LGBTQ+ dating app Taimi, recently told Newsweek that timing and tone are crucial when addressing someone's volume. 'Telling someone mid-sentence that they're being loud, even if it's well-intentioned, can feel a bit humiliating,' she explained. 'Most people don't even notice when their voice rises.' Koch suggested couples use a subtle hand signal or touch to gently flag the issue. 'Over time, they might even start to catch themselves,' she said. 'But this can only happen if they don't feel like their personality is being attacked.' If couples are looking for ways to speak up without ruining an entire conversation, they might take a cue from psychotherapist Amy Morin. Morin previously told CNBC Make It that mentally strong couples lean on a few key phrases to keep things cool and constructive. Among them? 'I'm going to tell you something that may be upsetting to hear,' and 'It's understandable you feel that way.' The goal: empathy, ownership, and solution-seeking. 'Taking responsibility for your share increases the chances that your partner will accept responsibility for theirs, too,' Morin said, as previously reported by The Post. 'Then you can both put your energy into developing a solution.' Sounds like a recipe for turning the volume down — without turning each other off.
Newsweek
10 hours ago
- Newsweek
Putin Suffers His Worst Week of 2025
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. "God loves the Trinity," said Ukrainian intelligence chief Vasyl Malyuk, in a boast about Kyiv's third Kerch Bridge attack but he could also have been talking about the number of setbacks Russian President Vladimir Putin has been dealt in recent days. Malyuk said Tuesday's strike on the bridge linking Crimea with Russia was months in the planning and came on the heels of a drone operation, which Kyiv said had taken out a third of Russia's aircraft bomber fleet. Ukraine's drone strike had left Kremlin officials "angry and alarmed" over the vulnerability of a nuclear-capable air fleet far from the battlefield, Bloomberg reported. Meanwhile, Russia's investigative committee has launched a terrorism investigation into the collapse of two bridges in the border region following incidents likely to heap pressure on the Russian president. "It's certainly a bad week for the Russian people and for the Russian military," retired U.S. Vice Admiral Robert Murrett told Newsweek. Putin has had several bad weeks during his full-scale invasion, such as the destruction of the Black Sea Fleet flagship Moskva in April 2022, Russia's retreat from Kherson in November that year and Ukraine's incursion into the Kursk region in August 2024. Oleg Ignatov from the International Crisis Group told Newsweek this week's incidents delivered the worst setback for Putin for 2025 in terms of military damage and the impact on public morale. Newsweek has contacted the Kremlin for comment. This image from 2016 shows Russian President Vladimir Putin outside of Moscow. This image from 2016 shows Russian President Vladimir Putin outside of It Matters Ukraine's drone attacks on military airfields deep inside Russian territory and the targeting of the bridge, which serves as a symbol of Moscow's occupation of Crimea, delivers a PR boost and possible leverage for Kyiv amid peace talks that the Russian president has been accused of stalling. What To Know Overnight Saturday, two bridges collapsed in Russia's western regions bordering Ukraine, killing at least seven people and injuring dozens, according to local authorities. It is not clear whether what their causes are or if the two collapses are even linked or but Russia's investigative committee said they were being investigated as potential terrorist attacks. Ignatov, senior Crisis Group analyst for Russia, said Ukraine was likely behind sabotage attacks targeting the bridges although Kyiv has not commented on the incidents. In one incident in Bryansk's Vygonichi district, about 60 miles from the Ukrainian border, a road bridge gave way crushing the moving train underneath and injuring at least 66 people, Russian authorities reported. Bryansk's governor, Alexander Bogomaz, said the bridge had been "blown up." In another incident overnight into Sunday, a bridge collapsed in the Kursk region as a freight train was passing over it, injuring one of the drivers, according to the acting governor of the region. In a third incident that night, a Russian military freight train was blown up near the occupied city of Melitopol in Ukraine's Zaporizhzhia region, according to the Defense Intelligence of Ukraine. Operation Spiderweb On the eve of talks in Istanbul between Russia and Ukraine, the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) launched a drone attack across Russia. Targeted were the Olenya air base in Russia's Murmansk region, the Diaghilev airbase in the Ryazan region, the Ivanovo air base in Ivanovo region and the Belaya air base in the Irkutsk region over 2,500 miles from the Ukraine border. Dubbed Operation Spiderweb, the attacks 18 months in the planning saw 117 drones launched from concealed trucks, hit 41 aircraft, disabled a third of Russia's strategic bomber fleet and inflicted $7 billion damage, according to Kyiv. Zev Faintuch, head of research and intelligence at international security firm Global Guardian, told Newsweek the operation was a huge intelligence coup and probably not a one-off. He said this operation can be seen as an opening move in a strategic campaign involving deception, covert prepositioning and strategic psychological warfare. Ukraine may have many more of these prepositioned containers ready with hundreds or thousands of drones for subsequent attacks, and even if it didn't, the Russians are now on the lookout, Faintuch added. Murrett, deputy director of the Syracuse University Institute for Security Policy and Law, told Newsweek that from a tactical military standpoint, they were very effective attacks that had dealt a significant blow to Moscow's military machine. He said Ukraine is demonstrating new tactics and what he describes as 21st-century war fighting that has an impact far beyond their borders. Sources close to Russian officials told Bloomberg that damage inflicted on the warplanes including targets on Tu-160, Tu-95 and Tu-22 M3 bombers "is likely to rattle decision makers around Putin." Kerch Bridge Attack A day after the Russian drone operation, Malyuk, chief of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), said his agents had mined the supports of the Kerch bridge which is a critical supply and transport route for Moscow's forces. He suggested the structural integrity of the bridge is in a critical condition after 1,100 kilograms (nearly 2,500 pounds) of explosives in TNT equivalent were detonated in the early hours of Tuesday. Imagery captured on June 3, 2025, by the U.S. satellite firm Planet shows Russia's Olenya air base, one of five bomber bases targeted by a Ukrainian drone raid on June 1, 2025. Imagery captured on June 3, 2025, by the U.S. satellite firm Planet shows Russia's Olenya air base, one of five bomber bases targeted by a Ukrainian drone raid on June 1, 2025. Planet Labs PBC The SBU released an image of the bridge which did not indicate damage to the roadway. Russian opposition outlets pro-Russian milbloggers circulated footage which showed another naval drone strike against the bridge on Tuesday afternoon. Yuriy Boyechko, CEO of Hope for Ukraine, which provides aid to the war-torn country said that the drone attacks and the Kerch Bridge explosion had undermined Putin's image. "The damage that was done on Sunday to the Russian Air Force could only be possible with tactical nuclear weapons," he told Newsweek, adding that the biggest headache for the Kremlin now was to figure out if other military sites are vulnerable to further Ukrainian attack. What People Are Saying Ukrainian intelligence chief Vasyl Malyuk: "God loves the Trinity, and the SBU always finishes what it starts. We struck the Crimean Bridge in 2022 and 2023. Today, we continued this tradition—this time underwater." Robert Murrett, retired U.S. Vice Admiral: "Putin's had several bad weeks. It's certainly a bad week for the Russian people and for the Russian military." Yuriy Boyechko, CEO of nonprofit Hope for Ukraine: "For Putin it's personal because he is a former FSB agent, and is being outplayed by a former comic [Volodymyr Zelensky]. Putin will respond by increasing strikes on civilian targets in Ukraine, but that is all he can do at this time." What Happens Next Ukraine's drone attack on Russian airfields was likely intended to disrupt the Kremlin's position that it has the upper hand and can dictate the terms of any peace deal, according to the Crisis Group's Ignatov. "It's an attempt to change the narrative that Ukraine is losing the war gradually," he said.
