Irish MEP warns of dangers to LGBT community across Europe
Ms Walsh was speaking on the 10th anniversary of the Marriage Equality referendum in Ireland, which saw 62 per cent in favour of same-sex marriage, on a high turnout of 61 per cent.
Advertisement
The Fine Gael MEP made headlines in 2014, as she was the first openly gay winner of the Rose of Tralee.
Speaking to Breakingnews, Ms Walsh recalled the celebrations in Australia as Ireland voted for same sex couples to have the right to get married.
"In many ways, it was a bittersweet moment", said Ms Walsh.
"I wasn't in Dublin Castle for the announcement of equality for my peers and my generation, but I was on the dance floor in Perth, having just watched the new Perth Rose get selected, standing alongside a Labour politician, who is Dublin born but Australia raised of the name of Stephen Dawson.
Advertisement
"While he and his husband were married in 2013, he re-proposed right in front of us on the dancefloor. For him, his home country had seen this overwhelming change of welcome and removal of indifference.
"It was such a unique moment to experience, but obviously I would have loved to have been in and around Dublin Castle, but probably more so the West of Ireland, where the perception coming into the election was rural communities would never see the equality that was needed."
Ms Walsh admitted the referendum, combined with passing the referendum in 2018 for abortion rights in the country, were big contributing factors to her entering politics.
However, she warned that referendums alone would not be enough to continue social change in the country.
Advertisement
"People were excited about themselves or a family member or a friend or an auntie or uncle who moved away in the 70s because of their orientation, was now being celebrated.
"Repeal the eighth, just the very basic right to women's healthcare, it captured the change that was needed. It was a removal of the shackles in many ways for cultural beliefs.
"That hold that we had of ourselves or of other people had of us as a country, that just lifted, which is incredible.
"I remember having really deep and meaningful conversations around marriage equality and repeal the eighth, and one of the things that really frustrated me in those conversations was a general election would be coming on and I would ask if they are interested in that, and they would say "not at all, that's not really for me".
Advertisement
"We do know the circle of change happens when we elect people who want positive change and positive change. That disconnect was apparent in those two referendums.
"They are sexy, they are trendy, they mobilised a vote, they got people home to vote. All of that became so relevant, which is fantastic.
"Since then, I wonder how we can connect people to push that progressive change outside of these referendums."
In the last few years, countries across Europe have seen a push from far-right politicians and groups which have targeted the rights of LGBTQ+ people.
Advertisement
Earlier this week, an event by the Labour party had to be postponed 'due to the threat of protest from far-right actors at the original venue'.
Ms Walsh highlighted further examples of moments of feeling unsafe for herself and other members of the community, both in Ireland and across Europe.
"There is a website dedicated to me from the 2019 election created by a very infamous family from the west of Ireland, that says by going to schools I brainwash children into becoming LGBTI people, which is so far away from the truth it is laughable.
"In June last year, Wicklow Pride was forced to cancel due to threats from protestors. Research from the Midlands LGBTI+ project show 20 per cent of gay people feel unsafe.
"Panti Bliss shared on the radio over the weekend that she has never felt more unsafe in the last 10, 15, or 20 years.
"I feel safe, but I'm not walking around Dublin city all the time. I am not coming out of gay pubs or nightclubs every weekend.
"I absolutely felt unsafe when I was in Belgrade in the Euro Pride parade two years ago. I absolutely felt unsafe attending Budapest pride a couple of years ago, I have no doubt I will feel unsafe when I attend again at the end of June.
"There is points over the campaign where do I feel unsafe, no, but it is certainly unsafe online. It doesn't take a whole lot to shift from online to the physical space.
"Equality is so hard fought, and very quickly lost, and that is the epicentre of the work we still need to do."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Budapest mayor questioned over organising banned pride march
Budapest's mayor has been questioned by police as a suspect in helping to organise a banned LGBTQ march in the event took place on June 28 despite warnings of potential legal repercussions by Hungary's nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban, whose government passed a law earlier this year banning the say that despite threats of fines, a record 200,000 people took part in the rally, which swiftly descended into an anti-government a rainbow T-shirt featuring the capitals coat of arms, Mayor Gergely Karacsony, who appeared at Hungary's National Bureau of Investigation on Friday, told supporters: "Neither freedom nor love can be banned in Budapest". If charged and convicted, Karacsony could face up to a year in prison for organising and encouraging participation in a banned march."They described the accusation. I said that I considered this to be unfounded and that I will lodge a complaint against it," Karacsony told a crowd of some 200 supporters and journalists who had gathered outside the building where he was questioned for more than an hour."Neither freedom nor love can be banned in Budapest," said the mayor, who added: "If it cannot be banned, it cannot be punished."Accompanied by his lawyer, Karacsony did not answer any questions posed by investigators but instead presented them with a statement of his annual pride march had been in doubt since the government passed a law in March restricting gatherings if they break child protection laws on the public promotion on was the latest measure from Orban's government targeting Hungary's LGBTQ+ 2020, Hungary abolished its legal recognition of transgender people, and in 2021, the government passed a law banning the depiction of homosexuality to the ban, the mayor stood in defiance, vowing: "Budapest city hall will organise the Budapest Pride march as a local event on 28 June," and argued that police could not legally ban a municipal month, police announced they would not take action against attendees who could have faced fines of up to €500 (£427; $586) for attending the Pride Hungary's National Bureau of Investigation, which is tasked with investigating serious and complex crimes, said it had launched a probe against an "unknown perpetrator" accused of organising the rally.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Presidential candidates can now be reimbursed up to €250k for election expenses
An order increasing the maximum amount of election expenses that can be reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election from €200,000 to €250,000 has been signed by Minister for Housing and Local Government James Browne. Election expenses are reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election who is elected or, if not elected, the total of their votes exceeds one quarter of the quota. Advertisement Section 21A of the Electoral Act 1997 provides that the maximum amount of election expenses that can be reimbursed to a candidate at a presidential election is €200,000. However, under the Act, the minister may vary the amounts having regard to changes in the Consumer Price Index. A review of the amounts typically takes place in advance of each election. Applying the CPI increase since the amount was last revised resulted in a potential increase to €252,700 which has been rounded down to €250,000. Section 53 (as amended) of the Electoral Act 1997 provides that spending by a candidate at a presidential election shall not exceed €750,000. It is not proposed to increase the spending limit, so it will remain at €750,000.
Telegraph
6 hours ago
- Telegraph
SNP rebels challenge John Swinney with radical independence plan
Rebel SNP members have laid down the gauntlet to John Swinney by rejecting his independence blueprint and setting out their own radical alternative. They have unveiled a plan to open independence negotiations with the UK Government if nationalist parties get a majority of the popular vote in next year's Holyrood election. A motion outlining the plan has been submitted for discussion at the SNP conference in October, and has been backed by 43 regional branches, The Herald reported. If selected for discussion, it will rival Mr Swinney's motion outlining his new independence plan, which the First Minister unveiled earlier this week. Mr Swinney said the SNP winning an outright majority at Holyrood should force Sir Keir Starmer to drop his opposition to allowing another independence referendum. He argued a precedent had been set at the 2011 election, when Alex Salmond led the SNP to a majority win and David Cameron, the then prime minister, authorised a vote. But Alex Neil, a former SNP health secretary, told The Telegraph Mr Swinney was 'living in cloud cuckoo land' given the current level of public support for the SNP. It has previously emerged that some of the rebel group of SNP members want to oust Mr Swinney as party leader amid concerns he is not doing enough to achieve independence. The motion setting out their alternative blueprint is a direct challenge to his authority by the rebel group, which will meet in Perth on Aug 9. It invites the conference to instruct 'the Party to prioritise obtaining a mandate from the sovereign Scottish people to deliver independence.' This will be possible if the independence-supporting parties – the SNP, the Greens and Alba – together achieve a majority of the ballots cast in the regional list vote for Holyrood, it states. Graeme McCormick, one of the people behind the strategy, told The Herald: 'If we get a majority of pro-independence votes on the list, we'll open negotiations with the UK Government around independence. If the negotiations aren't successful, then we'll move to dissolve the union. It's perfectly legal to do so. 'Our plan is coming from members with experience of how states work – we aren't just dewy-eyed 'the dream will never die' nationalists. We've invited John to come and speak with us, and look forward to discussing this with him. I think the strength of what we have requested is clear.' But a party source predicted that the motion would not be selected by the party's conference committee, which decides what will be discussed at the Aberdeen gathering. The provisional conference agenda will be published on Aug 8 after the committee has considered all the submitted motions. Successive UK governments have repeatedly turned down SNP calls for a second referendum, with the UK Supreme Court ruling in 2022 that only Westminster can allow another poll. Sir Keir said last month that he could not imagine another referendum being staged while he is prime minister, and an SNP victory in the May 2026 election would not change his mind. When she was first minister, Nicola Sturgeon claimed there should be another referendum if there was a majority of independence-supporting MSPs, including SNP and Green members. But Mr Swinney's new benchmark of an outright SNP majority is much more difficult to achieve under Holyrood's electoral system, which is partly based on proportional representation. Rachael Hamilton, the Scottish Tory deputy leader, said: 'This spat just demonstrates how out of touch John Swinney and the SNP are with ordinary Scots. Under the nationalists, our public services are in meltdown and taxes are sky high. But instead of fixing the mess they've created, they're fighting about how best to push their independence obsession.' Alastair Cameron, the chairman of the Scotland in Union campaign group, said: 'Imagine if the SNP spent as much time exploring how to save the NHS rather than fighting over different wheezes for an unwanted second referendum. This is a party that has lost its way and is detached from the people of Scotland.'
