The way forward for housing — Nur Fareza Mustapha
A house is, first and foremost, a home.
Houses are owned or occupied by people, are located within a neighbourhood, and form part of a wider kampung, town or city. Houses fulfil the basic human right for shelter and is 'the basis of stability and security for an individual or family'. Thus, when we talk about housing, it is pertinent that these discussions fundamentally revolve around the needs, values, and priorities of the people and households that live in them. As such, housebuilding practices in our country and the regulatory framework that governs it should be anchored in principles that encourage the pursuit of this goal.
This means prioritizing the individual's right to adequate housing, first through the provision of secure tenure, regardless of your status as a renter or homeowner. As our country designs its first Rental Tenancy Act, the provisions under this act must provide the grounds to present renting as a viable option to meet one's housing needs, not as an inferior alternative to homeownership. Renters must be given adequate protection under the law against forced evictions, discriminatory rental practices, and substandard housing quality.
More importantly, the narrow interpretation of what 'adequate housing' means for our country has relegated many of our policy interventions thus far to simply prioritize putting a roof over someone's head without accounting for the suitability or liveability of the housing unit. While issues on housing quality are more pervasive within the social housing sector, the current policy focus on improving housing affordability has been pursued at the expense of maintaining liveable standards for households and communities. This strategy overlooks the fundamental need of individuals and families to access decent housing.
Similarly, debates surrounding the recent announcement over the proposed Urban Renewal Act highlight the need to centre the discourse on when and why redevelopment is needed and how to do so equitably. Urban renewal initiatives under the act (if adopted) must be anchored and driven by the need to improve the quality of life for households and neighbourhoods. To do this, the proposed URA and its underlying legal provisions must be designed to safeguard the needs and rights of affected households; the Act must place affected families and communities as its main and biggest beneficiaries. This means prioritizing renewal and rejuvenation initiatives over outright redevelopment in the first instance to ensure that existing communities are not displaced. This means ensuring that the financial and societal benefits from renewal, rejuvenation, and/or redevelopment initiatives are primarily held by and/or returned to the families and communities of the designated areas of renewal/redevelopment.
Additionally, we must consider the way our housing ecosystem has been built and designed. We must ask, who benefits the most from the way houses are built in this country?
Under the current Sell-then-build (STB) system, housing developers and banks benefit by shifting the costs and risks of housing development to the house buyer. Individuals or families who want to own new homes under the STB system are forced to buy these houses before they are built, often through mortgages provided by the banking system. By linking consumer mortgages to the production of housing, our housing delivery system allows housing developers to gain access to essentially free financing to build houses as the financial costs and risks are primarily borne by the buyers. Under the STB system, when you sign an SPA to acquire a house, you essentially act as an investor in the housing development project – you provide funding to the housing developers, and you bear the risk of project failure.
The banking system is complicit in this practice. Housing loans are attractive for banks because they are low risk: interest payments on housing loans are front-loaded (i.e. banks secure their profits from the loan early in the tenure), the tenure on housing loans are long (i.e. most housing loans have a lifespan of 30-40 years), and most importantly, housing loans are backed by an actual asset (i.e. the house is the collateral on your loan). Instead of lending money to developers and taking on the higher risk of funding the development of a housing project, banks choose to profit from this system by shifting the risk to house buyers. When you sign a loan agreement with the bank to buy a new house under the STB system, you are essentially borrowing money on behalf of the housing developer.
A general view of PPR Kampung Bri Hicom Shah Alam on April 8, 2023. — Picture by Ahmad Zamzahuri
A system that allows these practices to perpetuate is neither efficient nor just – it is predatory. Thus, the demand to shift to the Build-then-sell system is not only necessary, but also way overdue. The housing industry has had 60+ years to build and hone its capabilities, both financial and operational. It must now be able thrive through innovative building practices and the production of competitive housing products, not through the direct financial support of its housebuilding practices by Malaysian households.
As we forge our way forward, we must change the way we look at housing. Houses in the country must not only be affordable, but they must also effectively serve the needs and aspirations of diverse Malaysian households. To do this, housing policy and proposed housing interventions in the country must be guided by the true purpose of housing, that is, to accord households with a 'secure base from which to carry out all of life's functions' and allow them 'full citizen participation in society and the economy'. The centrality of housing to an individual and/or family's pathway to a dignified life must be accounted for in our national discourse on housing and in determining what needs to be done to improve the state of the housing sector in the country.
* Dr Nur Fareza Mustapha is a Research Associate at the Khazanah Research Institute (KRI). The views expressed here are solely the writer's own and do not represent the official views of KRI. All errors remain the authors' own.
** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Illogical to put FT dept under Zahid, says Save KL
The federal territories ministry was formed in 1979 to align Kuala Lumpur's development with that of the Klang Valley. (Envato Elements pic) PETALING JAYA : A group representing Kuala Lumpur residents has opposed the proposal by an Umno Youth leader for the federal territories department to be placed under the supervision of deputy prime minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi. Save KL chairman M Ali said such a move was illogical and impractical, and would render Dr Zaliha Mustafa's role as federal territories minister redundant. He also voiced fears about additional costs, overlapping roles, and inefficiencies. 'If such a transfer occurs, Zahid would oversee the federal territories department, which indirectly means he would be overseeing Zaliha who is the head of the department,' he told FMT. Ali also said that Zahid, the Umno president, already served as deputy prime minister, rural and regional development minister, and chairman of the National Technical and Vocational Education and Training Council, in addition to representing the prime minister when necessary. 'Rural development is a very active and key role,' he said, adding that it would take up much of Zahid's time and focus. The federal territories ministry was formed in 1979 to align Kuala Lumpur's development with that of the Klang Valley. It was abolished in 1987 with a federal territories development department taking its place instead. The ministry was revived in 2004, restructured into the current federal territories department in 2022, and placed under the Prime Minister's Department. FT Umno Youth had proposed placing the department under Zahid's purview, saying the development of the three federal territories – Kuala Lumpur, Putrajaya and Labuan – seemed to have lost direction since the ministry was scrapped. FT Umno Youth chief Aliff Firdaus Abd Hadi claimed that key agencies in the territories were also working in silos, and that Zahid would be able to ensure better inter-agency coordination.


Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
BN-PH pact likely to continue for GE16, but may change after that, says Zahid
Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said BN is firm on continuing its alliance with PH in the run-up to the next nationwide polls despite calls for it to go solo. PETALING JAYA : While Barisan Nasional plans to continue its alliance with Pakatan Harapan in the next general election (GE16), BN chairman Ahmad Zahid Hamidi says its strategies for elections after that may change. Zahid, the Umno president, acknowledged that there were calls for BN to contest in GE16 on its own, but said the coalition is firm on continuing its alliance with PH. However, he said BN's political strategies for the general elections that follow will be determined by the electoral performance of the parties in the alliance, Berita Harian reported. 'We do not know how many seats we will have, and how many seats they will have. 'Remember that, in Malaysia, differences in views are conventionally based on differing party 'colours'. We are willing to forget our different 'colours' for the sake of political stability,' he was quoted as saying. The Umno-led BN played a crucial role in enabling Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim to form the unity government in the wake of the 2022 general election, which resulted in a hung Parliament. PH had won 81 parliamentary seats while BN won 30, in what was the latter's worst electoral performance to date.


Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Zahid warns of a ‘cancer' that could bring down Umno
Umno president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi opening the Arau Umno division's office today. (Bernama pic) ARAU : Umno leaders and members must respond swiftly to issues raised by their detractors to avoid such issues becoming 'a severe cancer that could bring us down', party president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi said today. Zahid said that if such issues are not addressed in a timely manner, they could go viral and affect public perception, regardless of their validity. 'Even if these are repeated or fabricated issues without basis, if left unaddressed, they will become a severe cancer that could bring us down,' he said after visiting the Arau Umno division today. He acknowledged that the party must accept the reality that it has been ineffective in managing issues, thus allowing other parties to win more seats in elections by manipulating public sentiment. 'There are parties that instil cult-like loyalty among their followers. Though their membership is smaller than ours, they secure more seats than we do,' he said. Zahid called on Umno leaders at all levels to deal with arising issues promptly and effectively. At the same time, the party leadership and the members must protect internal unity and party strength, even if faced with differing views and opinions, he said.