logo
Average credit card debt increased 3.5% to $6,730 in 2024

Average credit card debt increased 3.5% to $6,730 in 2024

Miami Herald26-03-2025

Despite record-high annual percentage rates (APRs) for consumers, credit card debt grew at a slower rate in 2024 than it did in 2023. The total amount of consumer credit card debt in the U.S. grew 8.6% to reach $1.16 trillion as of the third quarter (Q3) of 2024, according to Experian data.
Among those consumers who carry a balance—revolvers, in industry jargon—the average balance grew 3.5% to reach $6,730 as of Q3 2024. That increase from 2023 marks the slowest annual growth since the start of the pandemic.
This pullback in credit card debt growth reflects that more consumers are reining in their spending, with some simply refusing to take on more debt. The current social media trend du jour, broadly termed low-buy or no-buy, has consumers eliminating or greatly reducing nonessential spending. Rising credit card balances may be a big reason why.
Credit card issuers are making their own changes as well, says Rakesh Patel, executive vice president for the Experian Consumer Services Marketplace.
"With the economic climate, along with rising delinquency and charge-off rates, lenders are taking more of a conservative position on acquiring new customers," Patel says. "To manage risk and impending economic change, they are also looking at alternative data points such as income, cash flow and employment to help make better underwriting decisions."
As part of Experian's regular review of consumer debt and credit trends in the U.S., we're taking a look at some top-line numbers around the credit card market that powers the U.S. economy in 2025 and beyond.
The total balance of U.S. consumer credit card debt grew by $92 billion to end Q3 2024 at more than $1.16 trillion. This 8.6% increase outran the overall rate of inflation, which slowly fell from 3.7% to 2.4% over the same period. Still, it is a far cry from the credit card debt growth witnessed from 2022 to 2023, which clocked in at 17.3%.
Anyone carrying a balance from one month to the next knows one culprit to blame for higher balances: high APRs. The average credit card APR was 23.37% as of Q3 2024, the highest it's ever been, according to Federal Reserve data.
At the same time, more Americans are still carrying more plastic, metal and virtual cards than last year. U.S. consumers have roughly 18 million more credit card accounts than in 2023. However, that expansion in 2024, while significant, was less than half the number of new cards added to consumers' wallets in 2023.
"With lenders taking a more conservative approach to new customer acquisition, it may be harder for consumers without a credit history to get approved for their first credit card," Patel says. "Many lenders prefer to see some credit history to assess risk."
The average credit card balance among consumers was $6,730 as of Q3 2024, up by $229 from the previous year's average of $6,501. That increase in revolving credit was more or less in line with inflation, which ranged from 2.4% to 3.7% (at an annual rate) between September 2023 and September 2024.
There was no great deviation among the states in their average credit card balance growth in 2024.
California, Hawaii and, quite curiously, Vermont, were the three states where credit card balances increased the most in 2024: Residents in each state grew their credit card balances by more than 5%. Meanwhile, credit card spending in the Appalachian states of Kentucky, Ohio and West Virginia (as well as non-Appalachian North Dakota) slowed to less than 2% in 2024.
Average balances are higher in states that sport higher annual incomes (Connecticut, New Jersey and Washington, D.C., have average balances exceeding $7,500 in 2024), and/or have higher consumer costs in general (like Alaska and Hawaii).
The average credit card utilization ratio among consumer credit cards remained at 29% in 2024, a relatively good indication that consumers, overall, aren't overextended (although we identify some outliers below).
Generally speaking, a lower utilization has a more positive impact on one's credit score than a higher utilization. When it comes to a good credit utilization ratio, having one below 30% helps avoid more serious damage to your FICO® Score, but staying under 10% is best for scores. You'll still need to check other boxes as well: On-time payments are the most important score factor, but the types of credit you use, the length of your credit history and new applications for credit all influence one's FICO® Score as well.
Looking at utilization by state, it's evident lower credit utilization ratios are generally correlated with higher FICO® Scores, absent other factors. Most states with credit card utilization ratios of less than 30% have credit scores of 720 or higher. Meanwhile, states where credit utilization average is above 30% sport lower average FICO® Scores (and likely higher average APRs).
For the second consecutive year, millennial credit card balances grew faster than any other generation, according to Experian data. The 6.3% jump to $6,932 among millennials last year built on a double-digit percentage leap in 2023. This is also the second year in a row the millennial generation's average card balance was higher than the overall U.S. average. Based on historical debt trends, millennials' average balances will likely remain above the overall national average for years to come.
What changed? There are three identifiable contributors to the recent acceleration of millennial credit card debt balances:
Rising APRs: While the average APR of 23% isn't kind to credit card borrowers of any age, it puts a bigger squeeze on consumers with larger balances and further accelerates growth. Even worse: Millennials are likely receiving higher APRs than older generations, who have better average credit scores.Higher rates of inflation: Even if their wages are keeping up with higher prices, many consumers carrying balances from month to month may still be paying off purchases made in 2022.Life itself: Consumers tend to spend more as working adults than generations outside of ages 25 to 54, considered the primary working demographic by the Labor Department. And as many millennials are painfully aware, home purchase costs remain out of reach for many in their generation. Tighter budgets may force consumers of any generation to lean on credit card spending to make up for sharp increases in the costs of housing, driving or insurance, among other higher costs that can't be deferred.
Once again, as in 2022 and 2023, Generation X has the highest average balance among the generations, with one nearing $10,000. That balance is thousands of dollars above the average balances of millennials and baby boomers, who have the next-highest averages. And although Gen X didn't see the highest increase on a percentage basis in 2024, their average balance grew by $434—more than even millennials' $411 increase.
In addition, while lenders appear to be accommodating the additional demand for credit for other generations, Generation X, appears to be in a squeeze. Although their average balances grew by 4.8% in 2024, collectively they've only received 4.9% in additional credit—perhaps an indication that they've hit a ceiling.
Additional evidence that Generation X has a bigger lift than other generations: They aren't as likely to be consistently paying their entire credit card balance each month, compared with other age ranges, according to an Experian survey conducted in 2024.
Finally, consider each generation's demand for additional credit in the broader context of how much of their credit each one is using. On average, Gen Z, millennials and Gen X use more than 30% of their credit, while baby boomers and the Silent Generation use less than 30%. Reading across the groups, the strong relationship between average credit utilization and average FICO® Score becomes quite apparent.
Given the above, and despite the relatively uniform and modest increases in credit card balances in 2024, there's no guarantee the same will occur in 2025. Changing consumer habits could very well result in a turning tide.
An example of newly altered consumer behavior can be found at your local McDonald's: In 2024, the hamburger giant reported that the number of sales made at its stores was lower than the previous year, a decline they expect to persist in 2025. At the same time, customers were spending more per order. In other words, as order costs went up, some consumers were priced out of the market.
If you carry the fast food example over to the broader economy, you'll see other examples of consumers pulling back from more expensive purchases—particularly in the supermarket. Even though inflation had largely been tamed in 2024, more consumers are trading down to less expensive versions of everyday purchases, according to a McKinsey analysis. This includes switching to supermarket private-label brands. That's especially true if the pricier purchases were previously being bought with the types of credit that are now seeing record-high rates.
How Might Credit Cards, and Credit Card Users, Change in 2025?
It's going to be difficult to set expectations for almost any economic issue as 2025 proceeds, and that's above and beyond the trickier forecasts around economic growth, stock prices and bond yields. Even the direction of short-term interest rates, which have been telegraphed by the Federal Reserve for a number of years, could move in either direction in 2025. Renewed inflation may mean rate increases, while a flagging economy could mean additional rate cuts.
But aside from interest rate mysteries, other factors are in play this year:
APR fatigue: Looking back to 15 years ago, 23% APR was more commonly seen as a rate that consumers just starting out or rebuilding credit would receive. But in 2024, it was the norm, according to Federal Reserve data. That trend will seemingly continue in 2025 as well, despite a 1 percentage point reduction of many credit card APR rates in recent months.Tapped-out consumers: According to Moody's analytics, a leading macroeconomic observer, some U.S. consumers are presently "tapped out" from further consumer spending. In other words: Consumers, particularly those with annual incomes below $50,000, will be cutting back on discretionary spending they may currently be financing with a credit card. And while reduced credit card spending could give consumers some breathing room, high APRs will continue to add interest on top of any lingering balances.More buy now, pay later (BNPL): To avoid 20% and higher APRs, more consumers are indulging the occasional splurge with interest-free financing. BNPL has become a secondary form of alternative credit for consumers that isn't likely to go away in 2025.
Methodology: The analysis results provided are based on an Experian-created statistically relevant aggregate sampling of our consumer credit database that may include use of the FICO® Score 8 version. Different sampling parameters may generate different findings compared with other similar analysis. Analyzed credit data did not contain personal identification information. Metro areas group counties and cities into specific geographic areas for population censuses and compilations of related statistical data.
This story was produced by Experian and reviewed and distributed by Stacker.
© Stacker Media, LLC.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘A lesson in worst practices': Shocking audit reveals Chicago parking meters have made $2B for private company
‘A lesson in worst practices': Shocking audit reveals Chicago parking meters have made $2B for private company

Yahoo

time24 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

‘A lesson in worst practices': Shocking audit reveals Chicago parking meters have made $2B for private company

Have you ever been strapped for cash? Perhaps you took a payday loan, sold a long-term asset or even made an early withdrawal from your 401(k). And chances are, you've later regretted it. This is the situation the City of Chicago finds itself in — and the cost may have been billions. Privatizing public infrastructure is a growing trend among cash-strapped cities that need fast revenue. Back during the 2008 financial crisis, Chicago was broke and needed to raise money. Rather than make the unpopular move of raising property taxes, then-mayor Richard M. Daley chose to privatize public assets. Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 5 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Nervous about the stock market in 2025? Find out how you can access this $1B private real estate fund (with as little as $10) 'If we didn't have money for a long-term debt, you're talking about a serious economic crisis then for Chicago,' Daley said at the time, according to NBC 5 Chicago. So, Chicago City Council struck a deal to lease the city's 36,000 parking meters to investment consortium Chicago Parking Meters LLC, a group of global investors led by Morgan Stanley. The investors paid nearly $1.157 billion to receive the revenue from the meters for 75 years — and the city must reimburse them whenever the parking meters are taken offline, such as for festivals or construction. The deal was essentially rubber-stamped 40-5 in favor by the council, which had only a few days to review it before voting — turning out to be what the Better Government Association later called 'a lesson in 'worst practices.'' Soon after, a report issued by the then-inspector general found the city was paid at least $974 million less than it could have made from operating the parking meters itself over the term of the deal. While an analysis done by 32nd Ward Alderperson Scott Waguespack — who voted against the deal — found the deal could have been worth $5 to $10 billion, reported NBC 5. Now, a 2024 audit by accounting firm KPMG has found that, with another 58 years still left in the agreement, the private investors have already recouped their initial investment. In 2023, the meters generated a record $160.9 billion in income, bringing the total income from the start of the deal to $1.97 billion. 'It's just one of those deals that I would beg people never to replicate anywhere in the United States,' Waguespack told NBC 5. Still, many Americans can relate to the situation that faced Mayor Daley. When we're desperate for funds, we can make rash decisions that negatively affect our long-term financial health. Almost 4 in 10 (37%) U.S. adults would not be able to cover a $400 emergency expense with cash savings, according to the Economic Well-Being of US Households in 2024 report from the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. And while many of these people say they could cover the expense some other way, such as using a credit card, borrowing from family or friends or selling something, 13% would not be able to pay the expense by any means. About 58% of Americans are 'living paycheck to paycheck and experienced a cash emergency in the past 12 months,' according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report from peer-to-peer lending platform SoLo Funds. Read more: Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says — and that 'anyone' can do it These 'cash-poor' Americans may not be who you think they are. Forty percent have a full-time job and one in seven cash-poor households earn more than $75,000 per year. The top unexpected expenses, according to the report, are auto repairs, medical bills and utility bills — common expenses that can happen to any of us. To cover these expenses, some may turn to short-term financing options that could end up costing them more money in the long term. For instance, buy now pay later (BNPL) services come with an average borrowing cost of 23%, according to The 2025 Cash Poor Report, which can increase substantially if the borrower incurs repeat late fees. Another option is a payday loan, which is one of the most expensive ways to borrow. The industry average cost of borrowing for payday loans is 35%, according to the report, but origination fees, late fees and processing fees can push this as high as 49% of the principal borrowed. Increased borrowing and missed payments can also affect your credit score, which in turn can limit your future ability to borrow. People might also look to sell long-term assets such as stocks, bonds or mutual funds, but this too can have long-term financial costs. If you're 30 years from retirement and sell $10,000 of an asset today that's earning 7% per year, then you'll have about $76,000 less when you retire due to the loss in compounding interest. Plus, research has shown that time out of the stock market can be costly — and missing the best days in the market can be devastating to your long-term returns. And, if you make an early withdrawal from a tax-deferred account such as a 401(k), you'll also pay a 10% tax penalty. To avoid high-cost borrowing in an emergency or cashing out long-term investments during a downturn, start by building an emergency fund that could cover unexpected expenses. A rule of thumb is to have three to six months' income in an accessible account, such as a high-yield savings account. While desperate times may call for desperate measures, it's worth consulting with a financial advisor (or a free counseling service) to discuss your options before getting saddled with debt or selling long-term assets. Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead How much cash do you plan to keep on hand after you retire? Here are 3 of the biggest reasons you'll need a substantial stash of savings in retirement Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? Like what you read? Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise straight to your inbox every week. This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.

Palantir CEO Warns of AI Arms Race With China
Palantir CEO Warns of AI Arms Race With China

Yahoo

time28 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Palantir CEO Warns of AI Arms Race With China

Palantir (PLTR, Financials) CEO Alex Karp said Thursday that artificial intelligence poses serious risks and that the ongoing AI arms race will ultimately be won by either the United States or China. There are positive and negative consequences, and either we win or China will win, Karp told CNBC's Squawk on the Street. He emphasized that the U.S. currently holds an advantage due to corporate willingness to embrace new technologies, but said Western allies, particularly in Europe, are lagging behind and must learn from the U.S. approach. In the interview, Karp also addressed a recent New York Times report suggesting Palantir is assisting the Trump administration in gathering data on American citizens. He denied the claim, stating, We are not surveilling Americans. The Denver-based data analytics and AI software firm has gained 74% year to date as investors bet on the company's growing role in U.S. government contracts and defense applications. While the stock continues to outperform broader tech peers, Karp acknowledged investor concerns around its valuation. You don't like the price, exit, he said. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

How Trump's pick for surgeon general uses her big online following to make money
How Trump's pick for surgeon general uses her big online following to make money

Boston Globe

time28 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

How Trump's pick for surgeon general uses her big online following to make money

In her newsletter, on her social media accounts, on her website, in her book and during podcast appearances, the entrepreneur and influencer has at times failed to disclose that she could profit or benefit in other ways from sales of products she recommends. In some cases, she promoted companies in which she was an investor or adviser without consistently disclosing the connection, the AP found. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Means, 37, has said she recommends products that she has personally vetted and uses herself. She is far from the only online creator who doesn't always follow federal transparency rules that require influencers to disclose when they have a 'material connection' to a product they promote. Advertisement Still, legal and ethics experts said those business entanglements raise concerns about conflicting interests for an aspiring surgeon general, a role responsible for giving Americans the best scientific information on how to improve their health. Advertisement 'I fear that she will be cultivating her next employers and her next sponsors or business partners while in office,' said Jeff Hauser, executive director of the Revolving Door Project, a progressive ethics watchdog monitoring executive branch appointees. The nomination, which comes amid a whirlwind of Trump administration actions to dismantle the government's public integrity guardrails, also has raised questions about whether Levels, a company Means co-founded that sells subscriptions for devices that continuously monitor users' glucose levels, could benefit from this administration's health guidance and policy. Though scientists debate whether continuous glucose monitors are beneficial for people without diabetes, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has promoted their use as a precursor to making certain weight-loss drugs available to patients. The aspiring presidential appointee has built her own brand in part by criticizing doctors, scientists and government officials for being 'bought off' or 'corrupt' because of ties to industry. Means' use of affiliate marketing and other methods of making money from her recommendations for supplements, medical tests and other health and dietary products raise questions about the extent to which she is influenced by a different set of special interests: those of the wellness industry. A compelling origin story Means earned her medical degree from Stanford University, but she dropped out of her residency program in Oregon in 2018, and her license to practice is inactive. She has grown her public profile in part with a compelling origin story that seeks to explain why she left her residency and conventional medicine. 'During my training as a surgeon, I saw how broken and exploitative the healthcare system is and left to focus on how to keep people out of the operating room,' she wrote on her website. Advertisement Means turned to alternative approaches to address what she has described as widespread metabolic dysfunction driven largely by poor nutrition and an overabundance of ultra-processed foods. She co-founded Levels, a nutrition, sleep and exercise-tracking app that can also give users insights from blood tests and continuous glucose monitors. The company charges $199 per year for an app subscription and an additional $184 per month for glucose monitors. Means has argued that the medical system is incentivized not to look at the root causes of illness but instead to maintain profits by keeping patients sick and coming back for more prescription drugs and procedures. 'At the highest level of our medical institutions, there are conflicts of interest and corruption that are actually making the science that we're getting not as accurate and not as clean as we'd want it,' she said on Megyn Kelly's podcast last year. But even as Means decries the influence of money on science and medicine, she has made her own deals with business interests. During the same Megyn Kelly podcast, Means mentioned a frozen prepared food brand, Daily Harvest. She promoted that brand in a book she published last year. What she didn't mention in either instance: Means had a business relationship with Daily Harvest. Growing an audience, and selling products Influencer marketing has expanded beyond the beauty, fashion and travel sectors to 'encompass more and more of our lives,' said Emily Hund, author of 'The Influencer Industry: The Quest for Authenticity on Social Media.' With more than 825,000 followers on Instagram and a newsletter that she has said reached 200,000 subscribers, Means has a direct line into the social media feeds and inboxes of an audience interested in health, nutrition and wellness. Advertisement Affiliate marketing, brand partnerships and similar business arrangements are growing more popular as social media becomes increasingly lucrative for influencers, especially among younger generations. Companies might provide a payment, free or discounted products or other benefits to the influencer in exchange for a post or a mention. But most consumers still don't realize that a personality recommending a product might make money if people click through and buy, said University of Minnesota professor Christopher Terry. 'A lot of people watch those influencers, and they take what those influencers say as gospel,' said Terry, who teaches media advertising and internet law. Even his own students don't understand that influencers might stand to benefit from sales of the products they endorse, he added. Many companies, including Amazon, have affiliate marketing programs in which people with substantial social media followings can sign up to receive a percentage of sales or some other benefit when someone clicks through and buys a product using a special individualized link or code shared by the influencer. Means has used such links to promote various products sold on Amazon. Among them are books, including the one she co-wrote, 'Good Energy'; a walking pad; soap; body oil; hair products; cardamom-flavored dental floss; organic jojoba oil; a razor set; reusable kitchen products; sunglasses; a sleep mask; a silk pillowcase; fitness and sleep trackers; protein powder and supplements. She also has shared links to products sold by other companies that included 'affiliate' or 'partner' coding, indicating she has a business relationship with the companies. The products include an AI-powered sleep system and Daily Harvest, for which she curated a 'metabolic health collection.' Advertisement On a 'My Faves' page that was taken down from her website shortly after Trump picked her, Means wrote that some links 'are affiliate links and I make a small percentage if you buy something after clicking them.' It's not clear how much money Means has earned from her affiliate marketing, partnerships and other agreements. Daily Harvest did not return messages seeking comment, and Means said she could not comment on the record during the confirmation process. Disclosing conflicts Means has raised concerns that scientists, regulators and doctors are swayed by the influence of industry, oftentimes pointing to public disclosures of their connections. In January, she told the Kristin Cavallari podcast 'Let's Be Honest' that 'relationships are influential.' 'There's huge money, huge money going to fund scientists from industry,' Means said. 'We know that when industry funds papers, it does skew outcomes.' In November, on a podcast run by a beauty products brand, Primally Pure, she said it was 'insanity' to have people connected to the processed food industry involved in writing food guidelines, adding, 'We need unbiased people writing our guidelines that aren't getting their mortgage paid by a food company.' On the same podcast, she acknowledged supplement companies sponsor her newsletter, adding, 'I do understand how it's messy.' Influencers who endorse or promote products in exchange for payment or something else of value are required by the Federal Trade Commission to make a clear and conspicuous disclosure of any business, family or personal relationship. While Means did provide disclosures about newsletter sponsors, the AP found in other cases Means did not always tell her audience when she had a connection to the companies she promoted. For example, a 'Clean Personal & Home Care Product Recommendations' guide she links to from her website contains two dozen affiliate or partner links and no disclosure that she could profit from any sales. Advertisement Means has said she invested in Function Health, which provides subscription-based lab testing for $500 annually. Of the more than a dozen online posts the AP found in which Means mentioned Function Health, more than half did not disclose she had any affiliation with the company. Means also listed the supplement company Zen Basil as a company for which she was an 'Investor and/or Advisor.' The AP found posts on Instagram, X and on Facebook where Means promoted its products without disclosing the relationship. Though the 'About' page on her website discloses an affiliation with both companies, that's not enough, experts said. She is required to disclose any material connection she has to a company anytime she promotes it. Representatives for Function Health did not return messages seeking comment through their website and executives' LinkedIn profiles. Zen Basil's founder, Shakira Niazi, did not answer questions about Means' business relationship with the company or her disclosures of it. She said the two had known each other for about four years and called Means' advice 'transformational,' saying her teachings reversed Niazi's prediabetes and other ailments. 'I am proud to sponsor her newsletter through my company,' Niazi said in an email. While the disclosure requirements are rarely enforced by the FTC, Means should have been informing her readers of any connections regardless of whether she was violating any laws, said Olivier Sylvain, a Fordham Law School professor who was previously a senior adviser to the FTC chair. 'What you want in a surgeon general, presumably, is someone who you trust to talk about tobacco, about social media, about caffeinated alcoholic beverages, things that present problems in public health,' Sylvain said, adding, 'Should there be any doubt about claims you make about products?' Potential conflicts pose new ethical questions Means isn't the first surgeon general nominee whose financial entanglements have raised eyebrows. Jerome Adams, who served as surgeon general from 2017 to 2021, filed federal disclosure forms that showed he invested in several health technology, insurance and pharmaceutical companies before taking the job — among them Pfizer, Mylan and UnitedHealth Group. He also invested in the food and drink giant Nestle. He divested those stocks when he was confirmed for the role and pledged that he and his immediate family would not acquire financial interest in certain industries regulated by the Food and Drug Administration. Vivek Murthy, who served as surgeon general twice, under Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden, made more than $2 million in COVID-19-related speaking and consulting fees from Carnival, Netflix, Estee Lauder and Airbnb between holding those positions. He pledged to recuse himself from matters involving those parties for a period of time. Means has not yet gone through a Senate confirmation hearing and has not yet announced the ethical commitments she will make for the role. Hund said that as influencer marketing becomes more common, it is raising more ethical questions, such as what past influencers who enter government should do to avoid the appearance of a conflict. Other administration officials, including Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Administrator Dr. Mehmet Oz, have also promoted companies on social media without disclosing their financial ties. 'This is like a learning moment in the evolution of our democracy,' Hund said. 'Is this a runaway train that we just have to get on and ride, or is this something that we want to go differently?' Swenson reported from New York.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store