CNN 'fact checks' Trump's hyperbolic claim that Beyoncé was paid $11 million for campaign endorsement
The famous singer endorsed Harris at a campaign rally in Houston just weeks before the election last November in a last-minute bid to jolt support for the Democratic nominee.
Trump has alleged that Harris's political team illegally paid for the support, and that they should be prosecuted for it.
'I'm looking at the large amount of money owed by the Democrats, after the presidential e lection, and the fact that they admit to paying, probably illegally, eleven million dollars to singer Beyoncé for an endorsement (she never sang, not one note, and left the stage to a booing and angry audience!)' Trump wrote on Saturday.
The Truth Social post also alleged that Oprah Winfrey was paid $3 million for 'expenses' and MSNBC's Al Sharpton was given $600,000.
'These ridiculous fees were incorrectly stated in the books and records,' Trump claimed. 'You are not allowed to pay for an endorsement. It is totally illegal to do so.'
'Can you imagine what would happen if politicians started paying for people to endorse them. All hell would break out! Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, broke the law. They should all be prosecuted!'
However, an article from CNN's fact checker Daniel Dale asserted that Trump's allegation was baseless. Evidence of the $11 million payment has not been reported.
The White House did not respond to the Daily Mail's request for evidence of the multi-million dollar payment.
Harris' campaign has denied paying for endorsements and Beyoncé's mother, Tina Knowles, has called the allegations a 'lie.'
'Beyonce did not receive a penny for speaking at a presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harrris' (sic) Rally in Houston,' Knowles wrote on her Instagram.
According to an Federal Election Commission (FEC) filing, Harris' campaign payed the signer's production company, Parkwood Production Media, $165,000 for 'campaign event production.'
Additionally, a spokesperson for Harris' campaign said last year that the political operation did not pay for celebrity endorsements, but they did concede that they had to cover costs associated with the production, like staff and equipment.
Another denial came when a spokesperson for Beyoncé told PolitiFact last year that the claim the singer was paid millions was 'beyond ridiculous.'
Harris' campaign paid a non-profit led by Sharpton a total of $500,000, FEC filings show. The Democrat's political operation also paid Harpo Productions, a company owned by Oprah, $1 million for a live stream event.
Trump last spoke about the alleged endorsement payment in February.
'They go out and they pay Beyoncé, as an example. Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million,' the president said at the time.
In a May post on Truth Social the president again slammed the alleged payment to Beyoncé while also suggesting that Bruce Springsteen accepted money for his performance at a Harris rally.
'I am going to call for a major investigation into this matter. Candidates aren't allowed to pay for endorsements, which is what Kamala did, under the guise of paying for entertainment,' the president wrote.
Neither the White House nor Congress have announced probes into the endorsement, which obviously did not move enough votes into Harris' column come Election Day.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
a few seconds ago
- Sky News
Two senior US officials to make rare visit to Gaza later today
Two senior US officials will visit Gaza later today, amid growing concerns about the scale of the humanitarian crisis. Donald Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff and US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee will inspect a food distribution site - and report back to the president immediately. Our US correspondent David Blevins says the visit "is not unprecedented but is highly unusual ... due to obvious security concerns and political sensitivities". He added: "I think it reflects the growing concern there is here in the United States about the scale of the humanitarian catastrophe." Aid workers on the ground have warned that a "politically manmade famine" is taking place in the territory. Philippe Lazzarini, the head of the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees, told The World With Yalda Hakim that "more and more people will continue to die" unless there is urgent change. Donald Trump has expressed frustration at the lack of aid reaching Palestinians and has repeatedly blamed Hamas - but US government analysis has found no evidence that the militant group is systemically stealing supplies. He told reporters yesterday: "It's terrible what's occurring there. People are very hungry, you know. "The United States gave $60m ... for food. And, it's a shame because ... I don't see the results of it. Part of the problem is Hamas is taking the money and they're taking the food." 8:07 On Thursday, Mr Witkoff arrived in Israel and held discussions with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu - the first meeting between the pair since both Israel and the US withdrew their negotiating teams from Qatar a week ago. At the time, he claimed that Hamas "shows a lack of desire" to reach a truce. Under heavy international pressure, Israel has paused fighting in parts of Gaza and airdropped food - although the volume of supplies remains far lower than what aid organisations say is needed. While more aid trucks have entered Gaza, nearly all the lorries are stripped of their cargo by crowds of Palestinians desperate for food, or looted by armed gangs. The alternative food distribution system run by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has also been marred by violence. Doctor Tom Adamkiewicz, a paediatrician working at Nasser Hospital in Gaza, told Sky News that the majority of the hospital's patients have signs of malnutrition - and "many children are passing out literally during the day and injuring themselves". 3:41 Separately, German foreign minister Johann Wadephul also arrived in Israel on Thursday on a two-day trip that will also take him to the occupied West Bank. Germany, traditionally a staunch ally of Israel, has been increasingly critical. Mr Wadephul warned that Israel is "increasingly finding itself in a minority position". But he stopped short of moving towards recognising a Palestinian state, something his allies France, the UK and Canada have vowed to do in September if certain conditions are met. Meanwhile, Sweden's prime minister has called on the EU to "freeze" its trade agreement with Israel - with Ulf Kristersson describing the situation in Gaza as "utterly deplorable". After visiting Gaza, Mr Witkoff will travel to Russia. He has held extensive talks in Moscow with Vladimir Putin in the past. The US president has given his Russian counterpart until 8 August to reach a deal to halt the fighting in Ukraine, or else he will impose economic sanctions.
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Panama files lawsuits against owner of ports at centre of US-China struggle
Panama's comptroller general has lodged two cases with the country's supreme court against the owners of two ports at the centre of a geopolitical struggle between the US and China, in a move likely to be seen as a victory for Donald Trump in his attempt to rid the Panama canal of Chinese influence. The decision follows a failed attempt to sell the ports to a consortium headed by the US investment fund BlackRock and Swiss shipping firm MSC. The two ports, at each end of the Panama Canal, were originally awarded to the Hong Kong-based firm CK Hutchison in 1997. They entered the geopolitical spotlight on 20 January when Trump used his inauguration speech to vow he would 'take back' the canal from supposed Chinese influence. The very same day, Anel Flores, the comptroller general, announced he would begin an audit of the ports' owner, Panama Ports Company, in which CK Hutchison holds a 90% stake. In March, BlackRock, the world's biggest asset management company, announced it was working with MSC to acquire Panama Ports Company and 41 other ports in CK Hutchison's global portfolio. The parties to the deal agreed a deadline of 27 July to finalize details of the acquisition. But the sale of these strategic assets did not go down well in Beijing. On 28 March China's anti-trust regulator said it would review the deal 'to protect fair competition in the market and safeguard the public interest'. Earlier this month the Wall Street Journal reported that the Chinese government had threatened to block the deal unless Cosco, a local shipping giant, was included as a veto-holding member of the takeover consortium. On Wednesday, Flores said that Panama Ports' contract was 'unfair' and 'abusive'. He claimed that the company had not paid sufficient royalties to the government and that its 25-year extension, signed in 2023, was made without the necessary authorizations. One case lodged with the supreme court seeks to nullify the contract, the other seeks to declare it unconstitutional. In response to media speculation that Cosco would be included in the deal he said: 'It doesn't seem correct that in other [parts of the world] there are people negotiating the future of assets that belong to us, the Panamanians.' Panama's president, José Raúl Mulino, said on Thursday, that he supported Flores's decision – which he claimed had nothing to do with the ongoing struggle over the ports' ownership. However, the timing of the announcement is convenient for the US-backed consortium. Should the court cases prove successful, the contracts for port operations would have to be re-tendered and, with Panama having exited China's Belt and Road Initiative in April, it would seem likely the successful bid will come from a US firm or an ally country. Nullifying the PPC contract and re-tendering the operation of the ports would allow Panama to potentially redesign the contract terms to be more beneficial to the state. However, the country could also find itself exposed to litigation from CK Hutchison which could potentially argue it is tantamount to a politically motivated expropriation.
Daily Mail
28 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Blake Lively's lawsuit deposition is shaken up as she faces down Justin Baldoni in shock appearance
Blake Lively had an unexpected guest in the room when she testified on Thursday as part of the deposition in her sexual harassment lawsuit — Justin Baldoni, the man she filed suit against. The 37-year-old actress — whose legal team previously shared fears that Baldoni would try to make a spectacle out of her deposition — gave her sworn testimony while facing her 41-year-old It Ends With Us costar and director, sources told TMZ on Thursday. The legal foes were gathered at the office of Lively's attorneys, where she had requested that the deposition be held. Baldoni's presence there was a shock, as he was reportedly not expected to attend the deposition, in which Lively answered questions under oath posed both by Baldoni's attorneys and her own. Notably, the judge overseeing the case had ordered Baldoni's attorneys to provide a list of everyone who would be attending the deposition, and it is unclear if Baldoni's name was on that list or if his team was able to deviate from what it originally submitted. has reached out to representatives for Lively and Baldoni for comment but hasn't yet received a reply. Baldoni's appearance at the deposition was ultimately less of a distraction that what his attorney Bryan Freedman had originally suggested: that Lively be sworn in at Madison Square Garden. He said at the time that tickets could be sold to the spectacle, with the proceeds to be donated to domestic violence victims. According to the publication, the deposition was otherwise a modest gathering. Lively was joined by her attorneys, while Baldoni and his attorneys were also present, along with a court reporter and a videographer to document the proceedings. The Gossip Girl star's deposition had originally been set for July 17, but it had to be rescheduled after the legal teams came to a mutual agreement. Matthew Russell Lee from Inner City Press previously reported that Lively had requested that the deposition last no longer than seven hours. While federal rules already state that depositions can last a maximum of seven hours per day, some complicated cases require multiple days of testimony. However, Lively requested that she only be subjected to a single day under oath. Lively was joined by her attorneys, while Baldoni and his attorneys were also present, along with a court reporter and a videographer to document the proceedings; pictured June 9 in NYC The postponement of the deposition was necessitated after Lively's claims against the PR expert Jed Wallace were dismissed by the judge overseeing the case. A spokesperson for Lively told TMZ that Lively respects the court's decision to dismiss Wallace from the lawsuit due to jurisdictional reasons. They added that it 'has nothing to do with the merits of her allegations about Mr. Wallace's role in the smear campaign and relates solely to the procedural question of whether he is subject to jurisdiction in New York or elsewhere.' Her team said they are still considering their 'numerous options for holding Mr. Wallace accountable.' Lively is suing Baldoni, his publicity team, and other defendants, alleging that they retaliated against her after she made sexual harassment allegations. She claims Wallace was hired because he engages in 'untraceable' campaigns across social media platforms, and could 'weaponize a digital army' to 'create, seed, manipulate and advance disparaging content.' He was described in her civil rights complaint acting as a 'hired gun' for Baldoni. Wallace filed a defamation lawsuit against the actress earlier this year. Lively was granted the request to pick the location of her deposition by a judge earlier this month, according to Variety, after her lawyers argued that Baldoni's attorneys were trying to turn the proceeding into a media spectacle. Baldoni's side requested for the deposition to be held at the Park Avenue offices of Meister Seelig & Fein, one of the firms handling his case. However, Lively's team objected to the location in a motion last week, claiming they feared a media ambush in which Lively could be swarmed by paparazzi on her way in and out of the building. Baldoni pushed back on her claim by accusing her of trying to use her 'celebrity status' to gain an upper hand in the proceedings. Lively's team also raised concerns that Baldoni would invite social media influencers to be present at the deposition, which is intended to be confidential. On Monday, Judge Lewis Liman approved for the deposition to be held at a different location, which has been redacted in the public version of the motion. Lively's lawyers also asked for Baldoni's side to provide a list of everyone who will be attending. Liman granted the request, with Baldoni's team instructed that they need to provide the list by noon on Tuesday. Baldoni pushed back on her claim by accusing her of trying to use her 'celebrity status' to gain an upper hand in the proceedings; He is pictured 2024 The judge also instructed Lively's team to provide printing and copying facilities for Baldoni's lawyers. In a moment of snark, Baldoni's attorney Bryan Freedman previously told TMZ that Lively's deposition should be live-streamed to an audience at Madison Square Garden. Freedman's suggestion, which Lively's attorney shot down at the time as a publicity-seeking distraction, would be to sell tickets to the event and donate the proceeds to domestic violence victims. Lively's team argued that Freedman's remarks demonstrated he couldn't be trusted to keep things professional if the deposition occurred at the place of his choosing. Mitchell Schuster, one of Baldoni's lawyers, dismissed the concern as unfounded, adding that holding the deposition somewhere else would be inconvenient for his team. The two sides are preparing to face off in court after they clashed while filming It Ends With Us last year. After Lively claimed that Baldoni's side would try to make the deposition into a 'public spectacle', the filmmaker hit back by arguing, via his lawyer, that Lively has not supported her claim with evidence. According to TMZ, Baldoni's defense team believes holding the deposition at Lively's lawyer's office puts them at a disadvantage. Baldoni's lawyer cited the potential need to consult with his hundreds of pages of notes and to use a conference room to speak in private. Baldoni's side wrote in the filing, 'Although Lively's foot-stomping and use of her celebrity status may have enabled her to seize control of the film, which is the crux of this dispute, her counsel's tantrum has no place in this Court. Lively is bound by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure like every litigant.' The parties have currently agreed to conduct the deposition on July 17, though recent legal filings indicate that the two sides have been in conflict over discovery requirements. In emails between Lively and Baldoni's attorneys that were entered into the record, Lively's lawyers accused Baldoni's team of failing to mail hard drives of evidence to them in a timely manner, which would make it difficult for the Gossip Girl star and her team to examine any documents or videos the defendants may refer to when questioning her. Her legal team also expressed concern in the new filings that Baldoni may hope to have her paraded in front of paparazzi and gawkers if the deposition is held in a less-private location. In a statement to TMZ, Lively's representative said: 'Ms. Lively is looking forward to her deposition next week, and it should follow the same rules as every other witness in this case. 'Justin Baldoni's lawyer has tried to make this matter a public spectacle at every turn, even proposing to sell tickets to a televised deposition at Madison Square Garden,' they continued. 'This is a serious matter of sexual harassment and retaliation and it deserves to be treated as such.' Lively, who along with husband Ryan Reynolds, 48, was dismissed from Baldoni's $400 million defamation and extortion lawsuit nearly a month ago, is tentatively slated to take the stand when the trial begins in New York City in March 2026. Insiders close to Lively told the outlet that she was prepared to face a series of difficult inquiries at her deposition, and that Reynolds isn't expected to attend. Lively has accused Baldoni of sexual harassment in a lawsuit; while Baldoni accused Lively, her husband Reynolds and publicist Leslie Sloane of defamation and extortion in a $400 million suit - the latter of which was dismissed. Baldoni has denied the allegations brought about by Lively, while Lively, Reynolds and Sloane have denied the accusations made in litigation by Baldoni. In June, Lively suffered a setback in the case when a judge denied her attorneys' application for a protective order seeking to block her text messages with Taylor Swift from being entered as evidence. Baldoni's team subpoenaed Lively for text messages, emails and any other messages between her and Swift. His lawyers have subsequently been allowed to pore through the text trail, with all communications related to It Ends With Us set for scrutiny. In one embarrassing text exchange, Lively appeared to refer to herself as the Game of Thrones character Khaleesi, and to Swift as one of her 'dragons.' Elsewhere in Baldoni's filing is the claim that Swift was present at a meeting convened by Lively at her New York penthouse to discuss It Ends With Us script changes. Sources close to Swift insisted the singer had no knowledge of the meeting and simply arrived to find it underway. The situation reportedly left Swift — who is godmother to Lively's three daughters — feeling 'exploited' by her friend of ten years.
