logo
US Army and FAA in the hot seat publicly for the first time since January's fatal midair collision

US Army and FAA in the hot seat publicly for the first time since January's fatal midair collision

CNN27-03-2025

Family members of some of the 67 people killed in January's midair collision in Washington listened to the US Army and Federal Aviation Administration take fiery questions from lawmakers for the first time Thursday at a Senate subcommittee hearing on the preliminary findings of the accident.
'I'm glad that something's being done about it now,' said Dailey Crafton, whose brother, Casey, was killed. 'But you know, it's too little, too late for those of us who had family members on that plane.'
The Senate hearing came two weeks after the National Transportation Safety Board, whose chair also testified Thursday, unveiled its preliminary report on the fatal collision between the American Airlines regional jet and an Army Blackhawk helicopter at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport. It was the first major aviation accident in the United States in nearly 20 years. The NTSB issued two urgent safety recommendations with the report, which the FAA adopted rapidly.
'(The FAA and Army) have been very cooperative with our investigation,' NTSB Chair Jennifer Homendy told reporters following the hearing. 'We're working closely. It's a pretty broad investigation. It's a very complex investigation.'
Previously, investigators uncovered 15,214 'near miss events' between 2021 and 2024 where aircraft were within one nautical mile of each other, with a vertical separation of less than 400 feet. There were also 85 cases where aircraft were less than 1,500 feet apart, with a vertical separation of less than 200 feet, according to the NTSB.
The findings revealed a 'systemic issue,' that lawmakers are demanding answers on, said Sen. Maria Cantwell, ranking member of the Senate's Commerce, Science and Transportation committee.
'I want to know, why did the FAA not act?,' Cantwell said. 'Why did the FAA not act on 15,000 reports of dangerous proximity? How were these helicopter routes allowed to remain when alarm bells were literally going off in the towers?'
FAA Acting Administrator Chris Rocheleau responded he was 'very concerned' about what's been learned so far.
'Clearly something was missed,' he said.
The FAA acted following the release of the report to adopt NTSB recommendations to close the flight path the helicopter was using at the time of the collision.
Following the hearing, CNN's Pete Muntean questioned Homendy on whether allowing the route to exist was a failure of oversight by the FAA.
'I wouldn't just put that on the FAA,' Homendy said. 'I'd also put that on the Army. The Army also has to monitor their own helicopters. They also have to figure out a way to monitor close proximity events and get that information and determine when their helicopters are exceeding maximum altitude.'
Among those in the crowd was Tim Lilley, father of Sam Lilley, the first officer who was killed while flying the PSA Airlines flight on January 29. Tim flew Black Hawk helicopters for the US Army for 20 years and flew the helicopter routes 'hundreds of times,' but never had an aircraft on approach when flying.
'It's apparent that the administration gets it,' Lilley said. 'They're acting. They're acting quickly … The army, they need to take that same action. There are things that could be done and could have been done already in the last two months that still need to get done.'
'I think that my son's legacy is to get some things done to make sure that this doesn't happen again,' Lilley said.
American Airlines said in a statement it continues to 'mourn the lives lost in the traffic accident.'
'We're grateful for the NTSB's urgent safety recommendations to restrict helicopter traffic near DCA and for Secretary Duffy and the FAA's quick adoption of those recommendations,' the statement read. 'We will continue to coordinate closely with PSA Airlines as it cooperates with the NTSB as a party to the investigation.'
Among the testimony came a commitment from the FAA that the agency will require nearly all aircraft near Reagan Airport to use an automatic dependent surveillance-broadcast out system, known as ADS-B.
'All aircraft operating in DCA class B airspace will be required to broadcast their position and identification using ADS-B Out with very limited exceptions,' Rocheleau testified.
Civilian and military aircraft use ADS-B, which helps an aircraft broadcast its location, altitude and other key factors while monitoring other aircraft around it. But the Army often turned it off while flying on missions in Washington.
The NTSB previously confirmed the helicopter had the necessary equipment and was capable of transmitting, but investigators are still unclear why it was not transmitting.
Brig. General Matthew Braman also testified during the hearing the status of the operation and functionality of the helicopter's ADS-B Out was still under investigation, but said the crew was approved to operate with ADS-B Out off, in accordance with Army policy.
Lawmakers also grilled the Army for still flying training missions after the crash near Reagan Airport with the technology turned off.
'I find that shocking and deeply unacceptable and I want to encourage the Army right now to revisit that policy and to revisit that policy today,' Sen. Ted Cruz said at Thursday's Senate subcommittee hearing.
The Army, however, often turns ADS-B off when flying around Washington DC – including when in the airspace around DCA, the Army acknowledged.
Cruz also pushed for the Army to hand over a memo from August entitled, 'ADS-B Out off Operations in the National Airspace,' stating the Army hadn't given him the memo when his staff asked, but Braman wouldn't commit to providing it.
'If it is not provided to this committee within 24 hours, I am confident that you will have a senior commanding officer give you a direct order to provide that memo to this committee,' Cruz said. 'I just want to underscore; there's no reason the Army has to wait for the conclusion of the NTSB report to revisit your policy on ADS-B out. You can do so right now.'
Rocheleau also said the FAA is reviewing helicopter operations with machine learning and language modeling to scan incident reports and explore data sources.
'We're also continuing to analyze other airports that have both established helicopter routes and nearby airplane traffic,' he said. 'I will establish a safety risk management panel and engage with aviation stakeholders to identify additional hazard areas involving helicopter and fixed wing interactions.'
Homendy told reporters the data will show 'the next big accident.' When asked whether she was confident in machine learning and artificial intelligence, Homendy said, 'We'll see.'
The FAA also confirmed Thursday that collision warnings in commercial planes landing earlier this month at Reagan Airport were caused by testing of anti-drone system by the US Navy and Secret Service.
The mysterious warnings were reported around March 1 and occurred only miles from the site of the January accident.
'We were about 1200 feet, there was somebody diving straight onto us,' one of the pilots who got the warning told control tower at the time, according to audio captured by LiveATC.net.
Several flight crews reported the mystery alerts on their Traffic Collision Avoidance System, known as TCAS, 'indicating another aircraft was nearby when no other aircraft were in the area,' the FAA said in a statement at the time.
'Apparently, the Navy was using the same spectrum band as TCAS, causing the interference and faulty resolution advisories,' Cruz told the FAA during the hearing. 'Even though the FAA had previously warned the Navy and the Secret Service against using that specific spectrum band due to interference risks.'
'Yes, sir, that's correct,' Rocheleau responded.
'This is deeply disturbing that just a month after 67 people died while an approach to DCA that the Secret Service and Pentagon would inadvertently cause multiple flights to receive urgent cockpit alerts recommending evasive action,' Cruz said. 'It is inappropriate for such testing to occur at DCA, given the facts of what occurred.'
As for the family members of the 67 people killed in January's mid-air collision, this investigation hasn't gotten any easier. Lilley told reporters he wants answers and action.
'The hardest day of my life was the 29th,' Lilley said. 'The second-hardest day was the day after that, when the NTSB told us about our loved ones spread across the ice. What keeps us moving forward is that we're going to ensure that no other family has to go through what we're what we've had to go through.'
CNN's Pete Muntean and Aaron Cooper contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Administration Live Updates: Tariffs Are Planned for Appliances Made With Steel
Trump Administration Live Updates: Tariffs Are Planned for Appliances Made With Steel

New York Times

time34 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Trump Administration Live Updates: Tariffs Are Planned for Appliances Made With Steel

A law that expired last year was meant to compensate civilians sickened by the legacy of the nation's aboveground nuclear testing program, as well as uranium miners. Senate Republicans on Thursday included in their version of President Trump's domestic policy bill a provision that would revive and significantly expand a law for compensating victims of government-caused nuclear contamination who developed cancer and other serious illnesses. The measure, long championed by Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, would overhaul a law passed more than three decades ago with a narrow scope. It was meant to compensate civilians sickened by the legacy of the nation's aboveground nuclear testing program, a hallmark of the Manhattan Project in the 1940s, and uranium miners who worked between 1942 and 1971. It paid out more than $2.6 billion in benefits to more than 55,000 claimants since its creation in 1990. The Senate passed bipartisan legislation last year to substantially broaden the scope of that law — called the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, or RECA — beyond Cold War-era victims to cover others who have been harmed by the aftereffects in the decades since. But after Republican leaders refused to allow it to come to a vote on the House floor, the law expired, dashing hopes of compensation for sickened civilians. Senate Republican leaders are now, at the behest of Mr. Hawley, giving the measure another shot at passage, including it in the Senate version of the domestic policy bill that they are hoping to pass in weeks. He is considered a key vote on the bill because he opposes several provisions floated by his party for cutting Medicaid. 'I think about, in the St. Louis area alone, how many folks I've talked to whose grandfathers or grandmothers were involved with the radiation project and whose families have subsequently had cancer in the family for generations,' Mr. Hawley said in an interview. 'And they're very proud of their service to the nation, but they would like to be thanked for that and be treated appropriately and not lied to anymore by their government.' The measure would revive the law and authorize its compensation fund to run for another two years. It would also expand eligibility to include civilians in the swaths of New Mexico, Utah and Arizona that were previously excluded from benefits coverage. And it would for the first time allow residents in Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky and Alaska — sites where workers processed uranium for the nation's nuclear program — who were exposed to nuclear contamination to be eligible for benefits. Mr. Hawley's involvement in the issue stems from St. Louis's history with the atomic bomb. Scientists first began churning out uranium for the Manhattan Project in 1942 at the Mallinckrodt Chemical Works factory there. But over the next several decades, hundreds of thousands of tons of radioactive waste stored in open steel drums were hauled and dumped across the city. The waste seeped into the city's soil, including on land that later became ball fields, and into Coldwater Creek, a tributary that snakes through the metropolitan area for 19 miles through backyards and public parks. Rare cancers, autoimmune diseases and other mysterious illnesses have since spread through the community. Lawmakers like Mr. Hawley have maintained that the government should help foot residents' health care bills. Asked whether the inclusion of the measure might encourage him to support his party's domestic policy bill despite his concerns about the legislation's Medicaid provisions, Mr. Hawley suggested that it could. 'This will really dramatically increase the availability of health care for people in my state,' he said. 'If you are a RECA claimant, if you are a nuclear radiation survivor, then you're going to get a lot of help with your medical bills here. So what this is going to mean, practically in Missouri, is a lot of people are going to get a lot more access to health care, which is really, really important.' Mr. Hawley continued: 'So, I still have concerns about Medicaid, and believe me, I'm talking about those on an almost hourly basis now with my leadership. But this is a big, big deal, and not just for my state. This is going to be a big deal for a lot of people, and it's going to help a lot of people get health care.'

Trump Reacts To 'No Kings' Protests With A 'Hell'-ish Whine
Trump Reacts To 'No Kings' Protests With A 'Hell'-ish Whine

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Reacts To 'No Kings' Protests With A 'Hell'-ish Whine

President Donald Trump on Thursday declared he doesn't 'feel like a king' after he was asked to address the protests planned across the country in the coming weekend to counter the expensive Washington, D.C., military parade scheduled for Saturday — his birthday and the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary. 'I don't feel like a king,' Trump told reporters at the White House. 'I have to go through hell to get stuff approved.' Trump cited the example of having to involve GOP leaders House Speaker Mike Johnson (La.) and Senate Majority Leader John Thune (S.D.) before signing a resolution passed by Congress to block California's ban on the sale of new gas-powered cars from 2035. 'No, no. We're not a king. We're not a king at all,' Trump added. Reporter: There are several no kings protests planned across the country on Saturday, as well, what are your thoughts on that?Trump: I don't feel like a king, I have to go through hell and get things approved. We're not a king — Acyn (@Acyn) June 12, 2025 The organizers of the 'No Kings' protests said Saturday will mark 'a nationwide day of defiance,' noting that they plan to deliver a strong message against authoritarianism. 'We're not gathering to feed his ego. We're building a movement that leaves him behind. The flag doesn't belong to President Trump. It belongs to us,' the event's website states. 'We're showing up everywhere he isn't — to say no thrones, no crowns, no kings.' 'No Kings' protests are scheduled in 50 states and 1,500 cities across the country, but not in Washington. Organizers said they will host a flagship march and rally in Philadelphia. The protests come as the Trump administration's immigration crackdown has caused uproar in Los Angeles and other cities, where demonstrators came out to protest the raids carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents. In response, Trump authorized the deployment in California of the National Guard, against Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) wishes, and also of the U.S. Marines — a move Newsom warned would pour fuel on the fire. Trump's Saturday parade, which is expected to feature armored vehicles, thousands of soldiers and military aircraft, is estimated to cost taxpayers about $45 million — a price tag Republicans have had a hard time defending. Earlier this week, Trump had a warning for demonstrators planning to take to the streets in Washington this weekend. 'If there's any protest that wants to come out, they will be met with very big force, by the way,' he said. 'And for those people that want to protest, they're gonna be met with very big force.' GOP Senators Freak Out When Asked About Trump's Military Parade Costing $45 Million Trump Says Protesters At Weekend Military Parade Will Face 'Very Heavy Force'

Louisiana plays a ‘wait-and-see game' after approving a slate of bills to lower insurance rates
Louisiana plays a ‘wait-and-see game' after approving a slate of bills to lower insurance rates

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Louisiana plays a ‘wait-and-see game' after approving a slate of bills to lower insurance rates

Gov. Jeff Landry speaks to reporters about his legislative agenda to bring down high auto insurance rates on April 9, 2025. (Photo credit: Wes Muller/Louisiana Illuminator) The Louisiana Legislature wrapped up its 2025 regular session Thursday having passed an agenda to try to lower insurance rates with legislation that focused on consumers and so-called 'tort reform' policy targeting personal injury lawyers on the belief they are the cause of the state's high coverage premiums. The agenda was part of what Gov. Jeff Landry promised to shepherd through the legislature as a 'balanced approach' to the state's insurance crisis. However, one of Landry's latest actions — vetoing a tort reform bill Wednesday — has upset a member of his own party, Sen. Alan Seabaugh, R-Many. Seabaugh sponsored Senate Bill 111, which would have watered down Louisiana's 'bad faith' statute that holds insurance companies liable when they unreasonably delay or deny claims. Such practices made headlines in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita in 2005. Landry snubbed Seabaugh's bill, writing in his veto explanation that it would have allowed insurers to deny claims, refuse reasonable settlements and avoid accountability. 'If the legislature would like to make reasonable changes to the bad faith statute next year, I will gladly work with them over the next year to make those changes,' the governor said. In an interview Thursday, Seabaugh expressed frustration with Landry, saying he felt blindsided by the veto because he thought he had the governor's support. He contrasted Landry with former Gov. John Bel Edwards, a Democrat. 'John Bel would call and tell me when he vetoed a bill,' Seabaugh said. 'Jeff didn't.' Senate President Cameron Henry, R-Metairie, said Landry also doesn't speak to him before vetoing any legislation, though Henry did not express any frustration over it. As for the rest of the approved insurance legislation, Henry said it lives up to the governor's promise of a 'balanced approach' to rein in both sides — insurance companies and trial lawyers — and their unpopular practices that have become the target of complaints from policyholders. The Senate president said he wants to hold off on any additional reforms for a couple of years to see if the measures approved this session have any impact on policy rates. 'That's kind of a wait-and-see game,' Henry said, adding that laws the insurance industry backed last year are supposed to lower homeowner premiums but have so far not had any noticeable impact. Others are less confident that the new laws will do anything to lower insurance rates. 'I talked to people in the insurance industry who tell me none of this is gonna make rates go down,' Sen. Jay Luneau, D-Alexandria, said, citing statements from the heads of tort reform associations. Another controversial measure became the center of a public feud between the governor and Insurance Commissioner Tim Temple. Gov. Landry might get the insurance laws he wants, but not without ruffling some Republican feathers House Bill 148 by Rep. Jeff Wiley, R-Maurepas, was among the first this session that Landry signed into law, gives the state insurance commissioner power to strike down any insurance rate increase considered 'excessive' or unreasonably high. Prior to the change, the commissioner could only exercise that power after holding a public hearing in which someone proved the state insurance market lacks competition. Although Wiley sponsored the bill, the governor crafted the legislation with the help of two House Democrats and lobbied heavily for its passage, arguing that Temple wasn't doing enough to regulate insurance rates. Temple and other critics argued that Landry is using the new law to try to deflect any blame voters might place on him for Louisiana's insurance crisis. Wiley's bill allows the public to review documents insurance companies file with the state when seeking a rate increase, but only if the insurance commissioner determines the information shouldn't be kept confidential as a proprietary trade secret. It takes effect on Aug. 1. Included among the many insurance bills passed this session are: Consumer-focused bills House Bill 329 by Rep. Troy Hebert, R-Lafayette, allocates $5 million per year to the Louisiana Fortify Homes Program with fees collected from insurance companies. It will take effect July 1, 2026. The program, managed by the Louisiana Department of Insurance, offers $10,000 grants to homeowners for the installation of hurricane-resistant roofs and has been effective at lowering homeowner insurance costs, according to a review by Louisiana Legislative Auditor Mike Waguespack. Senate Bill 28 by Sen. Kirk Talbot, R-River Ridge, would give homeowners a nonrefundable income tax credit for up to $10,000 for out-of-pocket expenses used to pay for a fortified roof. Combined with an LDI grant, the new tax credit could allow more Louisiana homeowners to invest in fortified roofs. Talbot's bill is pending approval of the governor. House Bill 345 by Rep. John Wyble, R-Franklinton, requires a 60-day notice, up from 30 days, from an insurer to a policyholder prior to any cancellation or non-renewal of a homeowner policy except when termination of coverage is for nonpayment of premium. The bill is pending the governor's consideration. House Bill 496 by Rep. Troy Hebert, R-Lafayette, would give policyholders a pass protecting them from any rate increases tied to a lapse in auto coverage so long as the lapse doesn't exceed 90 days. The bill would prohibit insurers from penalizing policyholders for a single instance of nonpayment during a five-year period. It received overwhelming bipartisan support from both chambers and is pending approval by the governor. Senate Bill 34 by Luneau would prohibit an insurance company from changing or altering the repair estimate filed by the adjuster originally assigned to the claim without that adjuster's permission. It is pending approval by the governor. Pro-insurance, tort reform bills House Bill 450, by Rep. Michael Melerine, R-Shreveport, ends the Housley presumption, a standard of evidence explained in a 1991 Louisiana Supreme Court ruling that applies to auto accidents, medical malpractice and other injury lawsuits. In a nutshell, the Housley presumption says courts should assume a plaintiff's injuries resulted from the accident in question if they were in good health beforehand. Lawmakers tried repeatedly to revoke the presumption in previous years, only to see their attempts fail or vetoed. Landry signed Melerine's bill into law May 28, and it took effect immediately. Lawmakers reject insurance bills that had direct relief for Louisiana homeowners Senate Bill 231 by Sen. Mike Reese, R-Leesville, deals with a concept called 'collateral source' that prevents civil defendants from admitting certain types of evidence into court, which critics say has allowed plaintiffs to sue for medical expenses they never actually had to pay. Reese's bill would effectively undo that rule and could ultimately reduce the money plaintiffs can recover in auto accident lawsuits. It is pending consideration by the governor. House Bill 431, by Rep. Emily Chenevert, R-Baton Rouge, limits the ability for people to recover damages for injuries sustained in accidents for which they are mostly at fault. The bill changes Louisiana's comparative fault statute, which assigns a percentage of blame to each party in an accident and allows for the recovery of damages in proportion with those percentages. Under prior law, a person partly at fault in an accident would be liable for their share of the damages and can recover the remaining amount found to be the fault of the other party. Chenevert's bill changes that to prohibit recovery of any amount by a party who's 51% or more at fault. It will take effect Jan. 1. House Bill 436, by Rep. Gabe Firment, R-Pollock, prohibits 'unauthorized aliens' — defined in the measure as individuals illegally in the United States under federal immigration law — from receiving general damages stemming from auto accidents. General damages include compensation for pain and suffering, but the proposal would still allow recovery for 'special damages' such as medical expenses and property damage. It will take effect Aug. 1. House Bill 291, sponsored by Rep. Jay Gallé, R-Mandeville, would extend the filing deadline, called a 'prescriptive period,' for wrongful death lawsuits from one year to two, aligning Louisiana with the deadline in most other states. It does not apply to medical malpractice cases. Proponents of the bill have argued a shorter prescriptive period attracts more tenuous lawsuits by essentially forcing people to quickly file claims so as to not lose their litigation rights. The proposal, which awaits the governor's consideration, also complements a similar measure lawmakers approved last year to extend the deadline for filing personal injury claims. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store