Fight against proposed rock crusher site in Burnet heads to Texas Capitol
New bills could force a controversial rock-crushing quarry in Burnet County to look elsewhere for development.
The site in question sits near two state parks, a popular lake, and a summer camp for kids.
House Bill 5151, which was filed by State Rep. Terry Wilson, will go before the Environment Regulations committee this Thursday.
BURNET COUNTY, Texas - New bills could force a controversial rock-crushing quarry in Burnet County to look elsewhere for development.
The fight against a proposed rock-crushing site in Burnet County traveled to the Texas Capitol recently.
What they're saying
"We said no," said Todd Sifleet at the Natural Resources Committee Hearing. "Now we need your help to protect Texas's resources."
The site in question sits near two state parks, a popular lake, and a summer camp for kids.
"Please don't ruin Camp Longhorn," said Austin State Representative Ellen Troxclair. "Please don't ruin Inks Lake. Please don't ruin the Texas Hill Country."
Austin State Representative Ellen Troxclair is asking the House's Committee on Natural Resources to push her bill to the House floor.
It would add restrictions to quarries or mines located within two miles of a youth camp, four miles of an entrance of two or more state parks, and within four miles of a lake owned or operated by the Lower Colorado River Authority.
"I hope that you agree that this bill strikes a completely reasonable and common-sense balance between providing for the industry that our state needs and relies on while also protecting the rights of existing local residents," said Troxclair.
In order to receive a permit, a site meeting the criteria would have to prove its operations would not harm a lake or state park.
"If and when we are at the point where it's determined that they can do this, we need to know without a shadow of a doubt that it's safe and it is going to work," said Fermin Ortiz, who's with the Texans For Responsible Aggregate Mining.
The backstory
It comes after the TCEQ approved an air quality permit for a rock-crushing quarry near Longhorn Caverns State Park, Inks State Park, Lake Buchanan, and Camp Longhorn.
"Is it reasonable to think though that the closer you are to this facility the more impact it could have on human health?" said State Rep. Brad Buckley in the committee hearing.
"Again representative, we design our permits to be protective wherever for human health and the environment and so proximity whether you're five miles away or one mile away, the way we design it is that it's protective at the fence line so that it ensures protection of human health and the environment," said Sam Short, who was at the hearing on behalf of the TCEQ to testify neutrally.
Camp Longhorn's owner, Nan Manning, has been advocating for this bill since day one.
She worries the 2000-plus kids that come to visit each year could be impacted.
"Tons of people live here. A summer camp, state parks, caverns and they want to bring this thing and set it right in the middle of all of that?" said Manning. "It would be different if it was already there and we decided to live next to it. Where are our property rights?"
Under House comments on this bill, there are 150 pages of comments. Almost every single one is writing to support this bill.
What's next
House Bill 5151, which was filed by State Rep. Terry Wilson, will go before the Environment Regulations committee this Thursday.
It's nearly identical to Troxclair's bill, but it specifies that the regulations do not apply to existing quarries or mines built on January 1, 2025, or before.
The Source
Information in this article comes from a House committee meeting, interviews with FOX 7 and bills filed in the Texas House.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
6 minutes ago
- Washington Post
To stop the gerrymandering wars we need peace without victory
Fred Bauer is author of the newsletter 'Rounding Up.' The escalating redistricting war is the logical extension of the take-no-prisoners struggle for power in American politics. Because power is so closely divided in Washington, each side wants to flex every ounce of political muscle it has; when control of the House teeters on a knife's edge, even a marginal advantage has a major payoff.
Indianapolis Star
37 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana's U.S. House members can pay for flyers with taxpayer dollars. Here's who spent the most
The messages arrive in Hoosier mailboxes. They pop up as text messages, emails and television or radio commercials. Others show up as billboards in Northwest Indiana or newspaper ads in Richmond. "Congresswoman Spartz has also been working with President Trump and DOGE to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse, and codify their findings," reads text on a March postal mailer from U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz's office. "Under Biden's policies, millions of illegal aliens entered our country," a separate December 2024 text from U.S. Rep. Jim Baird reads. These congressional communications to Hoosiers aren't political messages from campaigns. Instead they are paid for through members' allowances, which are funded by taxpayers. Both past and present members in Indiana's U.S. House delegation have taken advantage of this centuries-old congressional privilege known as franking, which allows members to send unsolicited mail or share communications, like text messages or emails, with constituents. U.S. Senators can disseminate franked materials, too, but there are different rules and Indiana's senators over the last 10 years have not used it. Indiana's nine House members since 2020 have annually spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on just franked mail items, according to quarterly House financial disbursement reports reviewed by IndyStar. That isn't a full picture of their spending, though, because that number doesn't include any additional money spent on text messages or billboards. They typically spend more during election years despite rules requiring 60-day blackout periods with no office communications before elections. While the core purpose of franking is to communicate with Hoosiers, it has also been viewed as a controversial privilege. The ability to regularly send messages to constituents on taxpayer dimes provides an advantage to incumbents over election challengers, experts say. Plus, while a bipartisan House group reviews and approves materials, the rules on franking allow representatives to disseminate political critiques and messages that can sometimes appear like campaign ads. In Indiana, where congressional primaries are typically the more competitive races, a politically relevant advertisement or mail piece from a congressional office can widen the recognition gap between an incumbent and potential competitors, experts said. In some cases, photos included in franked materials can also provide a recognition boost to a representative's family members. "Everyone's trying to get their name out and there's a lot of noise to break through," said Mike Wolf, the chair of the Mike Downs Center for Indiana Politics at Purdue University Fort Wayne. "Members of Congress, at any chance they can, need to do that." U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz, who had the tightest primary election in Indiana during the most recent cycle, disclosed the most spending on franked mail in both 2023 and 2024 of any Hoosier in Congress, enabling her to use taxpayer dollars to remind voters of her priorities. The costs of sending franked materials are reported in the House's quarterly disbursement reports, which shows records of how members used their allowances. In 2024, Indiana's House delegation collectively spent more than $600,000 on franked mail to Hoosiers. Digital communications or advertisements also cost money but, because they are not categorized the same as mail, they're harder to identify in the quarterly disbursement reports. For example, U.S. Rep. Erin Houchin submitted 50 advisory opinion requests for franked materials in 2024, the most of Indiana's House members. But Houchin's requests were largely for text messages to constituents. Members of Indiana's delegation received between about $1.8 million and $1.95 million in member allowances last year to cover franking and other office expenses. The biggest spenders on franked mail in 2024, according to the reports, were Spartz, Baird and Democratic U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, who all cracked six figures. Spartz in 2024 reported spending $196,000 on franked mail with Baird spending nearly $174,000 and Mrvan spending $104,000, according to an IndyStar review of the financial reports. (A spokesperson for Spartz told IndyStar the actual spend was higher, but did not respond to a question as of press time about the discrepancy between the two numbers.) "Our office budgets approximately $300k annually to send three-four quarterly update mailers to stay in touch with our constituency, with the Q4 annual update mailer size adjusted based on available funds," the spokesperson said. "We generally provide updates on constituent services, town halls, and key policy developments in D.C." U.S. Rep. André Carson, a Democrat, and former Republican U.S. Reps. Jim Banks, Greg Pence and Larry Bucshon in 2024 all spent less than $1,000 on franked mail. Pence and Bucshon did not seek reelection in 2024 and Banks successfully ran for U.S. Senate. Before a text message arrives on someone's phone or a newsletter in someone's inbox, representatives must get those materials approved by the House Communications Standards Commission. This bipartisan group signs off on franked communications and issues advisory opinions to ensure the materials follow House rules on restrictions like timing and content of the materials. Franking is a bipartisan affair in Indiana. But the content and type of materials released to Hoosiers between 2024 and the first seven months of 2025 largely depends on the member of Congress directing the messages, according to an IndyStar review of submitted materials. The current delegation for the 119th Congress has submitted 82 requests for advisory opinions to the House Communications Standards Commission between Jan. 1 and July 31, which span from texts to emails to mailers. Franked materials by Indiana's seven Republican members at times contained more political messaging, but they still were approved for distribution by the bipartisan House Communications Standards Commission. In 2025, most of the communication from Indiana's Republicans included supportive messages about President Donald Trump's agenda, including the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Who represents Indiana in Congress: Who represents Indiana in Congress? Who you need to know and how to contact them In 2024, though, many of the materials sent by Republicans criticized the Biden administration and former President Kamala Harris. For example, U.S. Rep. Rudy Yakym sent a postal and digital mailer to constituents in the 2nd Congressional District about his vote to impeach former Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. The postal mailer features a large grainy photo of Mayorkas alongside a headline about Yakym's impeachment vote. 'Every state—including Indiana— has become a border state under Secretary Mayorkas' tenure,' Yakym is quoted in the mailer. 'My vote to impeach Secretary Mayorkas is an important step in holding the Biden Administration accountable and ensuring we end this crisis and stand up for America's sovereignty by restoring Law and Order to the southern border.' Yakym's mailer was approved in February 2024 under a provision of federal code that allows elected officials to tell the public about "matters of public concern" from a past or current session of Congress. 'Impeachment, for example, that's an action of Congress,' said Danielle Caputo, senior legal counsel with the Campaign Legal Center. 'They're allowed to talk about that and their perspective on what they did and why it matters to their district.' Members from both parties have also spent dollars on billboards in past years. Both Mrvan in 2024 and Baird in 2023 and 2024 submitted advisory opinion requests for billboards advertising their congressional offices in their districts. Materials shared in 2024 by Indiana's two Democrats, Mrvan and Carson, featured fairly tame political messaging. In addition to billboards, Mrvan in 2024 sent mailers to constituents about his legislative actions, including support for law enforcement. Carson in 2024 released a television ad about his support for former President Joe Biden's bipartisan infrastructure law and another on how to apply for a service academy through his office. Mrvan has yet to submit requests for advisory opinions on franked messages in 2025 while Carson prepared radio ads for a youth job fair held in March. Just as they did in the 18th century, franked materials do serve a purpose for Indiana's elected officials, who seek to inform the public about actions in Washington, D.C. "The original basis of the frank was very simple," said Matt Glassman, a professor with the Government Affairs Institute at Georgetown University. "Members of Congress need to communicate with their constituents, and in 1795 had to be able to write letters to people and post things and tell them what was going on. That's still an important service, right? Getting the message out about what's going on in Congress, how you voted, is a public service." While the rules for what they can spend taxpayer money on allows a vast amount of options to be shared with their constituents, ethics experts told IndyStar it's worth it for members to consider if their message helps the broad spectrum of people that live in their district. 'All of those individuals, regardless of their politics, regardless of who they voted for are legally represented by this elected member of Congress," said Donald Sherman, the executive vice president and chief counsel for Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington. "So I think mailers should be written with them in mind, not just catered to a Republican primary voter or a swing voter.' Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at
Indianapolis Star
37 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
4 ways Indiana's U.S. House members used taxpayer dollars to communicate with Hoosiers
Hoosiers in Indiana's U.S. House delegation regularly use a centuries-old congressional privilege known as franking to communicate with their constituents. Franked material can look like informational fliers that might land in someone's mailbox, but you might also see them as billboards, radio commercials or text messages. They are paid for through a House member's congressional allowance, which is funded by taxpayers. (You can typically identify franked material by language, often in small print, that states 'Paid for by official funds authorized by the House of Representatives.') What franked material Hoosiers might see largely depends on who their representative is and what message that elected official wants to share. Here are some examples of what Republicans and Democrats in Indiana's House delegation have sent through franking. Both Republicans and Democrats have used their congressional allowances to pay for billboards in their districts in recent years. Between 2023 and 2024, the House Communications Standards Commission approved three different billboards for U.S. Rep. Jim Baird, each one ranging in political messaging. In one case, a simple sign refers passersby to Baird's congressional website and says he is 'bringing Hoosier values to Congress.' Another billboard declares Baird 'A Conservative Patriot in Congress" with checkmarks above text that says "Defending the 2nd Amendment," "Voting for a secure border," and "Cutting wasteful spending." U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan also got approval twice in 2024 to pay for billboards in the 1st Congressional District in Northwest Indiana. '1st District Congressman Frank J. Mrvan, Here to Serve You,' reads the text submitted by Mrvan's office. It's not easy to pinpoint the exact amount Baird and Mrvan spent on the billboards, but House disbursement records show Baird collectively paid just over $23,000 to billboard advertiser Lamar and just over $8,000 to Reagan Outdoor Advertising around the time Baird's billboards were approved in 2023 and 2024. Disbursement records from early 2024 show Mrvan paid four $5,000 payments to Lamar between January and July. Both parties also used franking privileges to send mail to constituents. But the content of the mailers varies from how Hoosiers can access constituent services, to tips on protecting seniors, to 2024 attacks on Biden administration policies. In December, U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz sent mail to 5th District constituents with information about how Hoosiers could get help with federal agencies and sign up for a congressional newsletter. A mailer sent by U.S. Rep. Rudy Yakym to 2nd Congressional District constituents in January 2024 included images of former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris, and accuses the prior administration of 'creating a humanitarian and national security crisis' through their border policies. Who represents Indiana in Congress?: Who you need to know and how to contact them U.S. Rep. Erin Houchin in May sent mail to 9th District constituents claiming to return 'nearly $3.5 million to constituents across Indiana's 9th District through casework assistance' and directed Hoosiers how to contact her office. Newspaper advertisements are frequent franking tools for Indiana's House members. Most approved for distribution in 2024 and 2025 provide readers with ways to contact their congressional offices or how to engage with their representatives. In May, U.S. Rep. Jefferson Shreve placed an ad in the Richmond Palladium-Item declaring he is 'fighting to build the wall,' 'secure our borders,' and 'protect our communities.' In mid-March, Spartz purchased newspaper ads ahead of nationally covered town halls she held in Westfield and Muncie. 'Please join for updates on Congresswoman Spartz's recent work,' the ad says, while listing examples including 'Make America Healthy Again' and 'Assist DOGE and President Trump in eliminating waste, fraud and abuse.' Mrvan in August 2024 published a newspaper ad that describes ways his office was 'standing up for the city of Gary and Northwest Indiana.' 'I'm proud to share with you my successful efforts to secure federal investments that will benefit all Gary residents, including the recent completion of the South Shore Rail Line Double Track project,' Mrvan said in the ad. Baird and Houchin regularly send out mass text messages to constituents in their district about political issues or ways to contact their office. Franked texts cost money, just like congressional mailers. Houchin has sent at least 15 texts from January through the end of July this eyar, which range from updates on legislation like Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' or asking for feedback on Trump's performance ahead of his address to Congress in March. 'Hi, it's Rep. Houchin. I'm headed to the House Floor for Trump's joint session speech,' a Houchin text said on March 4, which quarterly disbursement reports show cost just over $3,500. 'I want your input: Is America headed in the RIGHT or WRONG direction under President Trump's leadership?' Baird's texts to 4th District constituents also seek insight on topics associated with his office, including a January message on Inauguration Day. 'Hi, it's Rep. Baird. I'm on my way to the Inauguration to watch President Donald Trump take his oath of office,' reads the Jan. 20 text, which disbursement reports show cost just over $4,000 to send. 'I want your input before seeing the President: What's the #1 issue Trump & Congress should tackle in 2025?' Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at
