Fight against proposed rock crusher site in Burnet heads to Texas Capitol
The Brief
New bills could force a controversial rock-crushing quarry in Burnet County to look elsewhere for development.
The site in question sits near two state parks, a popular lake, and a summer camp for kids.
House Bill 5151, which was filed by State Rep. Terry Wilson, will go before the Environment Regulations committee this Thursday.
BURNET COUNTY, Texas - New bills could force a controversial rock-crushing quarry in Burnet County to look elsewhere for development.
The fight against a proposed rock-crushing site in Burnet County traveled to the Texas Capitol recently.
What they're saying
"We said no," said Todd Sifleet at the Natural Resources Committee Hearing. "Now we need your help to protect Texas's resources."
The site in question sits near two state parks, a popular lake, and a summer camp for kids.
"Please don't ruin Camp Longhorn," said Austin State Representative Ellen Troxclair. "Please don't ruin Inks Lake. Please don't ruin the Texas Hill Country."
Austin State Representative Ellen Troxclair is asking the House's Committee on Natural Resources to push her bill to the House floor.
It would add restrictions to quarries or mines located within two miles of a youth camp, four miles of an entrance of two or more state parks, and within four miles of a lake owned or operated by the Lower Colorado River Authority.
"I hope that you agree that this bill strikes a completely reasonable and common-sense balance between providing for the industry that our state needs and relies on while also protecting the rights of existing local residents," said Troxclair.
In order to receive a permit, a site meeting the criteria would have to prove its operations would not harm a lake or state park.
"If and when we are at the point where it's determined that they can do this, we need to know without a shadow of a doubt that it's safe and it is going to work," said Fermin Ortiz, who's with the Texans For Responsible Aggregate Mining.
The backstory
It comes after the TCEQ approved an air quality permit for a rock-crushing quarry near Longhorn Caverns State Park, Inks State Park, Lake Buchanan, and Camp Longhorn.
"Is it reasonable to think though that the closer you are to this facility the more impact it could have on human health?" said State Rep. Brad Buckley in the committee hearing.
"Again representative, we design our permits to be protective wherever for human health and the environment and so proximity whether you're five miles away or one mile away, the way we design it is that it's protective at the fence line so that it ensures protection of human health and the environment," said Sam Short, who was at the hearing on behalf of the TCEQ to testify neutrally.
Camp Longhorn's owner, Nan Manning, has been advocating for this bill since day one.
She worries the 2000-plus kids that come to visit each year could be impacted.
"Tons of people live here. A summer camp, state parks, caverns and they want to bring this thing and set it right in the middle of all of that?" said Manning. "It would be different if it was already there and we decided to live next to it. Where are our property rights?"
Under House comments on this bill, there are 150 pages of comments. Almost every single one is writing to support this bill.
What's next
House Bill 5151, which was filed by State Rep. Terry Wilson, will go before the Environment Regulations committee this Thursday.
It's nearly identical to Troxclair's bill, but it specifies that the regulations do not apply to existing quarries or mines built on January 1, 2025, or before.
The Source
Information in this article comes from a House committee meeting, interviews with FOX 7 and bills filed in the Texas House.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
an hour ago
Johnson: Trump did 'exactly what he needed to do' in sending National Guard to LA
House Speaker Mike Johnson said he is 'not concerned at all' over President Donald Trump's order to send 2,000 National Guard troops to respond to immigration protests in Los Angeles. 'I think the president did exactly what he needed to do,' Johnson told ABC News' "This Week" co-anchor Jonathan Karl on Sunday. 'That is real leadership and he has the authority and the responsibility to do it,' the speaker said, defending Trump's decision. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said he is prepared to mobilize Marines if the violence continues. Pressed if sending Marines into the streets of American cities is warranted, Johnson said, 'We have to be prepared to do what is necessary.'
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Trump shrugs off possible reconciliation with Musk
President Trump said he assumes his relationship with Elon Musk has ended and that he has no desire to repair it after the pair publicly fell out last week. "I think it's a shame that he's so depressed and so heartbroken," Trump said of the billionaire in a phone call with NBC News' Kristen Welker. The big picture: Trump's comments also came with a warning to Musk when the president said the Tesla CEO could face "serious consequences" should he fund Democratic candidates in the next election running against Republicans who vote for Trump's "big, beautiful bill." The billionaire, who contributed more than $290 million to Republicans in the 2024 election but has since said he'd cut back on political spending, posted last week that politicians "who betrayed the American people" should be fired in November. Trump declined to elaborate on what the consequences would be for Musk. House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) said in a Sunday interview on ABC's "This Week" that it would be a "big mistake" for Musk to go after Republicans who vote for the bill. Driving the news: Trump said he has no plans to speak to the Tesla CEO during the Saturday phone interview with Welker. Asked if he thought his relationship with Musk was over, Trump said he "would assume so." He accused the once-close administration ally of being "disrespectful to the office of the President." Catch up quick: The alliance between Trump and the former chainsaw-wielding face of DOGE exploded last week as Musk continuously campaigned against the massive tax-and-spending package, blasting it as a "disgusting abomination." Speaking to reporters during an Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz Thursday, Trump said he was "very disappointed" in Musk, who he claimed was very familiar with the inner workings of the legislation. While Trump talked, Musk fired back in real-time on X, claiming in one post that Trump would have lost the election without him. Zoom in: In one post that appears to have been deleted, Musk accused the president of being "in the Epstein files." Trump told NBC that it's "old news."
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
GOP downplays Trump-Musk feud's impact on midterms
Republicans are downplaying concerns that the feud between President Trump and Elon Musk will hamper the party's chances of defending their majorities in the House and the Senate next year. In the midst of the escalating war of words on Thursday, Musk claimed Trump would not have won the White House without him last year and floated the idea of launching a third party. Musk has also threatened to use his financial war chest and platform to challenge Republicans backing Trump's legislative agenda. However, many Republicans say Trump's influence within the party is strong enough to withstand any kind of political challenge from Musk. Others even say they still think Musk is a part of their team. 'I think if you're a Republican in a primary and you have Trump's support and Elon's opposition, you're going to be okay,' said Rep. Nick LaLota (R-N.Y.), adding that the president would eclipse Musk 'by a 10 or 100-fold.' Musk notably took credit for Trump's White House during his keyboard war with Trump on Thursday, claiming Democrats would control the House and hold a 51 to 49 majority in the Senate. The billionaire was the single largest donor in the 2024 general election, spending nearly $300 million. Musk's political action committee, America PAC, supported Trump and a number of Republicans running in key congressional races. The PAC has remained active during Trump's second administration, spending over $18 million in a closely watched race for a Wisconsin Supreme Court seat. The group has also promoted Trump's work this cycle, releasing its first television ad following Trump's joint address to Congress earlier this year. But despite the resources poured into Wisconsin, the Democratic-backed candidate won the court seat in what was described by critics as an embarrassment for Musk. America PAC spent millions in 18 competitive House races. Ten of the PAC's backed GOP House candidates won their elections, while the other 8 lost. 'America PAC spent $20 million on House races but none of that was super consequential— none of it was on TV, just digital and canvassing,' said one national Republican operative, who noted Musk was still on the GOP 'team.' Speaker Mike Johnson called Musk 'a big contributor in the last election' in an interview on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' on Friday, but said it was ultimately 'a whole team effort.' 'I mean, President Trump is the most consequential political figure of his generation, of modern American history. He is the one responsible for that,' Johnson said. 'But we all worked hard. We delivered the House majority. I traveled the country nonstop. I did over 360 campaign events in 250 cities and 40 states, and I logged enough miles last year to circle the globe five and a half times. I mean, I contributed to it as well. All of our House Republicans did.' Democrats have spent much of the first half of this year making Musk a boogeyman of sorts, painting him as out of touch with most Americans. The feud between Trump and Musk does not appear to be changing that strategy going into the midterms. 'Democrats are going to win by highlighting the fact that Republicans are failing at lowering costs because they are too busy pushing tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations, while making the rest of us pay for them,' said Viet Shelton, a spokesperson for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. 'Elon is, and forever will be, an instantly-recognizable manifestation of the fact that House Republicans don't work for the American people, they work for the billionaires.' Some Republicans remain weary of Musk, noting his massive online following that is made up of over 220 million followers on his platform X. Musk's views on the debt are widely shared by fiscally conservative voters. 'If Musk makes the national debt and deficit his defining issue and starts backing candidates who share that focus, it could create a real fracture inside the GOP. Trump's economic agenda has never been about fiscal restraint,' said a former White House communications aide who worked in the first Trump administration. 'If Musk begins channeling serious money into candidates who want to draw a hard line on spending and debt, you could see a Freedom Caucus 2.0 emerge — this time with financial firepower and a mandate to push back on Trump and Speaker Johnson's spending ambitions,' the aide said. But Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), a member of the House Freedom Caucus, threw cold water on the notion that the feud could jeopardize Republicans in the midterms. 'No, I don't think so. Now everybody's got to decide that. We all have one vote and we'll see,' Norman told The Hill. 'But I hope he keeps doing what he's doing and the team of people he put together, I want to do it statewide. Each state, I would do just what he's done with the federal government,' he added, referring to Musk's leadership at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). DOGE Subcommittee Chair Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) noted the importance of all of Trump's 2024 donors and supporters, including Musk, but suggested the two take their feud offline. 'I think every single American that voted for us deserves credit and Elon Musk is one vote,' Greene told reporters. 'I've said that every single vote and every single donor matters whether they've donated a dollar or hundreds of millions of dollars.' 'I don't think lashing out on the internet is the way to handle any kind of disagreement, especially when you have each other's cell phones,' she said. –Alex Gangitano and Emily Brooks contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
