Why Jane Street, a US trading giant is in trouble in India
Who is Jane Street?
Jane Street was founded by a small group of traders and technologists in a tiny New York office. It is a quantitative trading firm which uses mathematical models and algorithms to decide trading strategies.The company has more than 3000 employees who trade in a broad range of asset classes across 45 countries. According to the Financial Times, the firm accounted for over 10% of North America's equity trading volume in 2023, making it a significant player on Wall Street.
What is Jane Street accused of doing?
India's stock market has two main segments. The cash market is where investors buy and sell actual shares of companies, owning a piece of the business. And the derivatives market is where traders use tools like futures and options to bet on stocks or commodities, without owning the underlying shares.Sebi claims the suspicious trading activity by Jane Street happened on India's Bank Nifty index which tracks the performance of 12 large Indian banks.The regulator alleges that Jane Street operated in both the cash and derivatives market through different entities.So on a very basic level what is alleged is, one entity bought large quantities of bank shares – pushing up the price of Bank Nifty when the market opened in the morning.Simultaneously, it's claimed, the second entity would bet on the decline in Bank Nifty's value in the derivatives market.On the day of expiry - when the contracts are settled in the derivative market - as the trading session inched towards close of day, Jane Street, it's claimed, dumped the bank shares it bought in the cash market, causing the bank index price to plunge. This, in turn, would pay off the bet taken by its other entity in the derivatives market on a decline in prices, Sebi says. "Such a trade is called 'marking the close' which is considered illegal even in the US," says Deepak Shenoy, CEO, Capitalmind Asset Management Pvt Ltd in Bengaluru city.Mom and pop investors lost money because during the day they'd bought shares at higher levels, as they were pushed up because of the big volumes bought by Jane Street.
What has Sebi said?
Sebi basically said Jane Street's activities created "a false or misleading appearance of market activity" and attracted "unsuspecting" investors to trade at levels that were "artificial and temporary".By doing this, it was enticing unsuspecting investors to trade in Bank Nifty index options at interim levels that were artificial and temporary.On 3 July, in a lengthy order, Sebi concluded that "the integrity of the market, and the faith of millions of small investors and traders, can no longer be held hostage to the machinations of such an untrustworthy actor".
What is Jane Street's defence?
As per several global media reports, Jane Street has denied all these allegations of wrongdoing and described the trades as "basic index arbitrage" - the price differential between the price of a stock in the cash market and its corresponding derivatives contract - saying it plans to challenge SEBI's order.
What do independent experts think?
"Index arbitrage is legal and even Indian broking firms have done this for ages and used algorithms and machines to trade in the market. But what they (Jane Street) did is not index arbitrage," claims says Mr Shenoy."What they have done is taken a position in two different markets. And this is not arbitrage. You took X on one side and 7X on other side. You sold that X and gained from 7X. That is the problem," he explains."The same script would play out every week on expiry day when index contracts are settled," says Mayank Bansal, a UAE-based investor who operates in India's derivatives market . "While retail investors lost money expecting a strong finish, Jane Street would have profited by betting on a fall and we are talking of a trade of millions of dollars.""It is not illegal to be smarter than your counterparties in a swap transaction. However if you read the allegations made in the Sebi filing, the whole thing appears to stink very badly," Alexander Gerko, CEO of XTX, a rival firm of Jane Street, wrote on his LinkedIn account.
What impact will this have on the broader markets?
According to recent data from the regulator, there are nearly 10 million retail investors in the derivatives market. In FY25 they lost 1.05 trillion rupees ($11.6bn, £8.6bn) up from 750bn rupees in FY24.On average, each retail investor lost 110,069 rupees ($1,283; £958) last year.While these losses cannot be attributed to Jane Street directly, Sebi says the firm made $4.3bn from India in a little over two years while small investors were bleeding."They've rigged the prices for their own convenience," a Mumbai-based investor, who didn't want to be named, alleged to the BBC."On 17 January 2024, Sebi says Jane Street had its most profitable day. I lost nearly $7,000, my worst single-day loss in a year."The episode exposes deeper regulatory concerns say experts."SEBI should have acted before so many people lost their money," says Mr Bansal. "The surveillance systems must be strong enough to detect and stop manipulation in real time. Who knows how many more players are operating like this here," he says.
So, what happens next?
The Indian market regulator says Jane Street has deposited just over $560mn in an escrow account with a lien marked in favour of Sebi, requesting it to lift the temporary trading ban.Sebi says Jane Street's request to remove the trading ban is currently "under examination".But under Indian laws, if these allegations of market manipulation are proven, the US trader could face a fine that is up to three times this amount.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
5 minutes ago
- Reuters
Oil little changed after OPEC+ proceeds with September output hike
SINGAPORE, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Oil prices edged higher on Monday, paring earlier losses, as traders expect the market to absorb another large output hike by OPEC+ in September, while worries about disruptions to Russian oil shipments to major importer India also provided support. Brent crude futures climbed 11 cents, or 0.16%, to $69.78 a barrel by 0647 GMT, and U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $67.52 a barrel, up 19 cents, or 0.28%. Both contracts closed about $2 a barrel lower on Friday. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and their allies, known as OPEC+, agreed on Sunday to raise oil production by 547,000 barrels per day for September, the latest in a series of accelerated output hikes to regain market share. It cited a healthy economy and low stockpiles as reasons behind its decision. The move, in line with market expectations, marks a full and early reversal of OPEC+'s largest tranche of output cuts, plus a separate increase in output for the United Arab Emirates, amounting to about 2.5 million bpd, or about 2.4% of world demand. "This additional production appears to have little impact because it was so well flagged ahead of time," said Michael McCarthy, chief executive officer of online trading platform Moomoo Australia. It appeared that traders focused on the comments from state OPEC producers that previous additions were easily absorbed, particularly across Asia, he said. Analysts at Goldman Sachs expect that the actual increase in supply from the eight OPEC+ countries that have raised output since March will be 1.7 million bpd, because other members of the group have cut output after previously overproducing. Still, investors remain wary of further U.S. sanctions on Iran and Russia that could disrupt supplies. U.S. President Donald Trump has threatened to impose 100% secondary tariffs on Russian crude buyers as he seeks to pressure Moscow into halting its war in Ukraine. At least two vessels loaded with Russian oil bound for refiners in India have diverted to other destinations following new U.S. sanctions, trade sources said on Friday and LSEG trade flows showed. This puts about 1.7 million bpd of crude supply at risk if Indian refiners stop buying Russian oil, ING analysts led by Warren Patterson said in a note. This would potentially erase the expected surplus through the fourth quarter and 2026 and provide OPEC+ the opportunity to start unwinding the next tranche of supply cuts totalling 1.66 million bpd, they added. However, two Indian government sources told Reuters on Saturday the country will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite Trump's threats. Concerns about U.S. tariffs impacting global economic growth and fuel consumption are also hanging over the market, especially after U.S. economic data on jobs growth on Friday was below expectations. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said on Sunday that the tariffs imposed last week on scores of countries are likely to stay in place rather than be cut as part of continuing negotiations.
BBC News
7 minutes ago
- BBC News
SpiceJet: Indian airline files case against army officer seen hitting staff in viral video
Police in Indian-administered Kashmir have opened an investigation against an Indian army officer for allegedly assaulting an airline's staff, after he was asked to pay for excess baggage. The incident took place on 26 July at the Srinagar airport but made headlines over the weekend, after a video showing the man hitting the ground staff of SpiceJet with a metal stand went viral online. The carrier said that one of the employees had suffered a "spinal fracture and serious jaw injuries" in the assault. The army officer, Ritesh Kumar Singh, has denied the allegations, claiming he was "provoked" by the staff. He has also reportedly filed a police complaint against SpiceJet for allegedly assaulting him. The Indian army said it was looking into the incident and would decide on the further course of action based on the outcome of the investigation."The Indian Army is committed to upholding the highest standards of discipline and conduct and takes all allegations seriously," its public relations office said on said in a statement that the incident took place when Mr Singh was about to board a flight to Delhi from airline said Mr Singh was carrying cabin luggage that weighed twice the permissible the staff asked him to pay for the excess luggage, he allegedly refused and forcefully entered the aerobridge - a passageway that connects the airport terminal to the aircraft - without completing the boarding process, it staff members escorted Mr Singh back to the gate where he "grew increasingly aggressive and assaulted four members of SpiceJet ground staff", the airline shared online show Mr Singh hitting one of the employees with a metal stand.A security guard grabs the stand from Mr Singh and tries to push him away. Despite this, Mr Singh continues to lash out at the staff with punches and expletives. A policeman then steps in, intervening and separating him from the to the airline, one employee fell unconscious on the floor but Mr Singh continued kicking and hitting him."Another staff member suffered bleeding from the nose and mouth after receiving a forceful kick to the jaw while bending down to assist the colleague who had fainted," it said it has submitted the CCTV footage of the incident to the police and initiated the process of placing the passenger on the no-fly Singh, however, told The Indian Express newspaper that the SpiceJet staff had allegedly harassed and provoked in Kashmir have registered a case against Mr Singh for criminal intimidation and for criminal assault or Mr Singh has filed a police complaint against SpiceJet staff for use of force or violence by an assembly.
Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
Malaysia's end-July palm oil stocks to hit near two-year high
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 4 (Reuters) - Malaysia's palm oil inventories are forecast to rise for a fifth consecutive month in July to reach their highest level in almost two years, as production growth outpaced exports, a Reuters survey showed on Monday. Palm oil stocks are expected to rise to 2.25 million metric tons, up 10.8% from June, according to a median estimate of 11 traders, planters, and analysts polled by Reuters. Crude palm oil output is expected to reach 1.83 million metric tons, an 8% increase from the previous month, snapping last month's decline and hitting a one-year high. Stocks are expected to increase due to a jump in production and adjustments to domestic consumption figures, said Anilkumar Bagani, research head of Mumbai-based vegetable oil broker Sunvin Group. Bagani said that a stock level above 2 million tons during peak production season is not concerning, given that Indonesia's palm oil export supplies remain tight due to their ongoing B40 biodiesel mandate. "However, palm oil has to compete hard with South American and Black Sea soybean oil, which have had very good crop yields this season," he said. Exports of palm oil products are projected to grow 3.2% to 1.3 million metric tons, reversing last month's decline, the survey showed. Malaysian July exports were capped by aggressive selling at a discount by rival Indonesia, which wanted to ship as much as possible before a higher export duty becomes effective in August, said Tajgir Rahman, general manager, trading and procurement at IFFCO. The Malaysian Palm Oil Board (MPOB) is scheduled to release its monthly data on August 11. Breakdown of July estimates (in metric tons): * Official stocks of 2,030,580 tons in June plus the above estimated output and imports yield a total July supply of 3,918,275 tons. Based on the median of exports and closing stocks estimate, Malaysia's domestic consumption in July is estimated to be 368,275 tons.
