Five Home Team officers receive new MHA scholarship to develop skills in AI, data analytics
SINGAPORE - Five officers from the Home Team received a new scholarship on July 22 for the development of technical skills in areas such as data analytics, artificial intelligence, digitalisation, user experience and user interface.
Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) Ng Liang Jie was among the recipients of the Ministry of Home Affairs' (MHA) Emerging Skills scholarship, which received applications in 2024 for the first time.
With the scholarship, the 34-year-old will be pursuing a master's degree in information technology at the Singapore Management University in August.
He is now Operations Officer at the Criminal Investigation Department, where he is in charge of enhancing investigation systems with technology.
With no prior experience with technology when he first took on this role, he taught himself python programming. 'I felt that I lacked domain knowledge (for the job)... (but) I thought it was a good opportunity to gain more exposure,' he said.
'Technology is constantly evolving... the common saying is that you either adapt, or get left behind. That was another motivating factor for me to take up this course of study and keep myself relevant,' said DSP Ng, who joined the Singapore Police Force as an investigation officer (IO) in 2016.
A total of 128 Home Team officers received undergraduate and postgraduate scholarships and sponsorships from MHA on July 22.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Singaporeans aged 21 to 59 can claim $600 SG60 vouchers from July 22
Singapore Miscalculation of MOH subsidies and grants led to $7m in overpayments, $2m in shortfalls
Singapore Singaporeans continue to hold world's most powerful passport in latest ranking
Asia Indonesia on high alert as dry weather fans forest, peatland fires in Sumatra
Singapore 2 charged over alleged role in posting bail for man who later absconded
Singapore Teen charged after allegedly selling vaporisers, advertising e-cigarettes on WhatsApp
Singapore 2,500 turtles seized in India and sent back to S'pore, put down humanely after salmonella detected
Singapore Ports and planes: The 2 Singapore firms helping to keep the world moving
Seven Home Team officers under the Singapore University of Social Sciences' Public Safety and Security programme also received the MHA Book Prize, for the top MHA students in each cohort and the top MHA students with the best dissertation papers.
In his speech at the award ceremony, Second Minister for Home Affairs Edwin Tong noted the rapidly evolving security challenges due to technological advancements and changing global dynamics.
'They are a timely reminder that the Home Team cannot stand still,' he said.
Mr Tong, who is also the Law Minister, said that Singapore was ranked second by the Gallup for Law and Order and by the World Justice Project for Law and Order in 2024, a testament that the Home Team has done well thus far.
In a recent survey conducted by MHA, 94 per cent of Singaporeans favourably rated the Home Team's performance in keeping Singapore safe and secure.
Mr Tong added: 'But to continue to do well, year after year, and no matter what new challenges our operating landscape presents to us, the key is to invest heavily in the development and growth of our officers.'
Mr Daniel Chia, one of the recipients of the MHA postgraduate scholarship, has seen much over two decades since joining the Home Team as an IO in 2004.
Before he took on his current role as deputy director of finance and administration at MHA, he had even earned the nickname 'Death IO' after dealing with 13 cases of unnatural deaths in a day.
He also recalls a case 'where a woman decided to take her own life'. 'Her husband and son called me in the middle of the night asking where she jumped,' said Mr Chia, 45, who will be studying for a master's degree in project management at the National University of Singapore.
Since contracting an illness in 2011, he has had to become a civilian officer as he can no longer do strenuous exercises.
After getting his master's degree, Mr Chia said he is open to any available roles within the Home Team.
'At this point I think I can pretty much do anything, nothing surprises me any more,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
5 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: As cyber threats grow, Singapore walks a careful line on identifying state actors
SINGAPORE: The recent disclosure that a cyber threat group, identified as UNC3886, was attacking critical infrastructure in Singapore took many by surprise. The announcement was made by Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs K Shanmugam during a speech at the 10th anniversary of the country's Cyber Security Agency (CSA) last Friday (Jul 18). He warned that Singapore was actively dealing with a "highly sophisticated threat actor" capable of conducting espionage and 'major disruption to Singapore and Singaporeans'. UNC3886 has been described by Google-owned cybersecurity company Mandiant as a group with a China nexus. Understandably, the Chinese embassy in Singapore was dissatisfied that UNC3886 was described as being linked to China. One question that may intrigue readers more was why the minister did not link UNC3886 to a particular country. Was this a perfunctory attempt to publicly attribute a cyber threat, or was it a policy decision by Singapore based on careful strategic calculations? In his announcement, it was apparent that Mr Shanmugam deliberately focused on only naming the threat group, rather than directly pointing to any country. When he was asked the following day about UNC3886's alleged links to China, he said this was "speculative". "What Mandiant does is what Mandiant does ... Who they (UNC3886) are linked to and how they operate is not something I want to go into," he said. TECHNICAL VS POLITICAL ATTRIBUTION Past cases suggest that when it comes to cyberattacks, Singapore prefers technical attribution over political attribution. The former is based on forensic evidence of tactics, while the latter is based on intelligence to name and shame a country. Without direct state attribution, it is often the media and analysts who examine potential links and broader implications as part of their reporting and analysis. For example, when Singapore telecommunications company Singtel disclosed a malware attack in November 2024, it was a Bloomberg report that attributed it to Volt Typhoon, a group allegedly sponsored by China. Similarly, when Singapore blocked roughly 100 social media accounts for circulating disinformation in July 2024, including those linked to a right-wing group created by former Donald Trump adviser Steve Bannon, it made no mention of the United States. During peacetime, technical attribution offers a more pragmatic way to deter cyber threats. Cyberspace is a complex environment, and non-state threat groups, which may or may not act on the behest of a state, are the dominant actors there. This method allows authorities to expose threat groups without directly shaming the country from which they may be operating. Arguably, not shaming the country where the threat group operates from could risk emboldening future attacks and invite scrutiny from security partners who expect transparency. More importantly, it may make public education about the seriousness of cyber threats more challenging. The public may not understand the full context, for example, of the motivation or geopolitical implications of an attack. WHY NAMING WITHOUT SHAMING While Singapore avoids attributing cyber threats to specific states, naming and shaming is the preferred approach for many Western countries and some of their Asian allies, particularly those that view China as a preeminent threat. For countries not directly involved in adversarial relations or those that pursue a foreign policy of non-alignment, it may be more prudent to deter cyber threats without exacerbating geopolitical animosity. The cost of escalation may be too high a risk to bear. Moreover, it remains debatable whether naming and shaming helps to curb cyber threats in a meaningful way. In Singapore's context, there could also be other plausible strategic considerations. First, Singapore is a cosmopolitan country made up of locally born citizens, naturalised citizens and foreigners. Social cohesion is the glue that keeps its people together and maintains communal harmony. Publicly identifying another country as a threat carries the risk of fuelling racism and xenophobia, including Sinophobia. For example, in 2021, the fear that the Singapore-India Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) posed a threat to the livelihood of citizens raised the ugly head of xenophobia. Second, there is an observable trend in which Western cybersecurity companies often attribute cyber threat groups to China following incidents involving Western digital networks. Even if there is forensic evidence to link these groups to China, these companies often hold contracts with the US government, creating both commercial and political incentives to focus blame on China. If Singapore is seen as endorsing these companies' attributions, it risks making the impression that Singapore has shifted its foreign policy of non-alignment and is siding with the US in the strategic rivalry with China, which involves cyber contestation. Third, while Singapore and China may have differing views on certain issues, both countries at the political level are keen to deepen their bilateral relations. During an official visit to Beijing in September 2024, Singapore Foreign Affairs Minister Vivian Balakrishnan described Singapore-China relations as a 'very bright spot' in a more volatile and less predictable world. Such a world is even less black and white, and similar to dealing with the US tariff threat, countries must find a balance between resisting compulsion and promoting cooperation. It is prudent not to let one issue define the overall state of bilateral relations. Furthermore, Singapore is a member of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and China is a dialogue partner of ASEAN. One essential area where ASEAN and China are cooperating is the signing of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA) 3.0 in October 2025, aimed at building economic resilience. ASEAN countries, therefore, need to consider both national and regional interests. In the same vein, the overall state of bilateral relations - as well as factors such as motivation, attack impact and international law - would determine how Singapore responds to cyber threats originating from other countries. The world is witnessing a growing militarisation of cyberspace where countries in the West, Middle East and Asia are developing military cyber capabilities. Some may be more willing to conduct offensive cyber operations if their interests with Singapore diverge. WHEN NAMING MIGHT BE NECESSARY However, these considerations do not necessarily preclude non-aligned countries like Singapore from naming and shaming any country as a cyber threat actor should the situation justify it. A careful examination of what constitutes Singapore's most vital national interests may provide insight into how and when such a shift in posture might occur. Plausible scenarios could include external military threats operating in both physical and cyberspace domains, as well as a cyberattack that is not for espionage purposes but creates a disruptive impact that endangers the lives of people in Singapore. For example, imagine a scenario where Singapore faces military coercion and concurrently a cyberattack by a state-linked threat actor that shuts down the digital infrastructure and electrical systems of hospitals nationwide, resulting in deaths. These are extreme scenarios that, hopefully, Singapore will never have to deal with but must prepare for in the unlikely event that they occur.
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
No idle punt: Why Singapore called out cyber saboteur UNC3886 by name
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Singapore's naming of cyber threat group signals to state actors that their infiltration is known and is being countered. Cyber attacks on civilian infrastructure aren't unprecedented, says the writer. When the Government revealed that the country's critical infrastructure was under attack from cyber threat group UNC3886, Singaporeans responded by snapping up those 4-D betting numbers. From a glass-half-full perspective this, at least, showed that the message was heard. This was 'peak Singapore' behaviour, as one commentator put it on X.
Straits Times
11 hours ago
- Straits Times
Singapore urges all parties in Thailand-Cambodia border dispute to exercise restraint
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Smoke rises from a convenience store at a gas station, amid the clashes between Thailand and Cambodia, in Kantharalak district in Thailand on July 24, 2025. SINGAPORE – Singapore has urged all parties to exercise restraint and to de-escalate tensions amid a deadly border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia . 'Singapore is deeply concerned by the clashes, and calls on both countries to exercise restraint and cease hostilities,' the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) said in a statement on July 24. 'We call on them to de-escalate tensions through diplomatic means and ensure the safety of all civilians.' MFA said there are no reports of Singaporeans injured arising from the border clashes. It urged Singaporeans to defer all travel to the border regions. 'Singaporeans in Cambodia and Thailand are advised to monitor the news closely, heed the local government's advice and remain vigilant for personal safety,' the ministry said. MFA also urged Singaporeans in or travelling to Cambodia and Thailand to e-register with MFA if they have not done so. Those who require consular assistance in Cambodia and Thailand should contact the respective Singapore Embassies in Phnom Penh or Bangkok. They can also contact the MFA duty office, which is open 24 hours. MFA Duty Office (24 hours) Tel: +65 6379 8800 / +65 6379 8855 Email: mfa_duty_officer@ A long-simmering border dispute between Thailand and Cambodia escalated to deadly violence on July 24 as their military forces clashed at multiple spots, leaving at least 12 people dead. The flare-up is part of a broader disagreement with origins stretching back more than a century and involves parts of a region known as the Emerald Triangle, where the boundaries of Thailand, Cambodia and Laos meet.
