logo
Sunderland North Sands massacre remembered 200 years on

Sunderland North Sands massacre remembered 200 years on

BBC News03-08-2025
The murder of seven people during a seafarers strike 200 years ago is being commemorated after being "lost from the history books".In 1825, at least seven people were shot dead by soldiers during attempts to end a strike led by seamen who were resisting wage cuts and demanding higher pay on North Sands beach in Sunderland.David Scott, lead organiser of the North Sands Massacre Bicentennial Commemorations, said the "massacre" should be remembered, but that few people had heard of the tragedy.Now the deaths will honoured with traditional songs, speeches and a procession towards the site beginning at 14:00 BST at St Peter's Church.
On the 3 August 1825, under the leadership of local magistrate John Davison and Lieutenant Phillips, 12 soldiers from the 3rd Light Dragoons forced the striking seamen to return to North Sands beach from the River Wear where they had been blocking larger ships from sailing.More than 100 people, including women and children, had gathered on the beach where the soldiers eventually opened fire.Mr Scott said six people were seriously wounded and at least seven people were killed.
A coroner ruled the deaths of sailors Thomas Aird, 42, Richard Wallace, 45, and John Dover, 27, were justifiable homicide. Ralph Hunter Creighton, 22, was shot dead while working as a carpenter at a nearby shipyard.Labourer James Quigley, 31, also died after being hit by a stray bullet while walking home from work.The names of two other people were recorded as killed in the parish record - Thomas Wilkinson, 25, and Mary Wilson, 76."It was clearly a massacre," Mr Scott said."It's just been completely lost in the history books and it's certainly been lost in public memory."We're not sure exactly at what point this became invisible."
'Great injustice'
Mr Scott said it was a "massive event" and that he had found more than 60 newspaper reports going back to 1825. At the time the Sunderland seafarers union and the Seamen's Loyal Standard Association (SLSA) also believed the deaths should be remembered."It was raised at the highest political level," he said."Sir Robert Peel, who was then home secretary, knew all about it."North Sands is now the site of Sunderland University's St Peter's Campus, where a procession will take place and a wreath laid. "We're challenging the great injustice for these victims," Mr Scott said.
Follow BBC Sunderland on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gary Lineker and Mo Salah's ‘we can't hear you' hypocrisy is plain to see
Gary Lineker and Mo Salah's ‘we can't hear you' hypocrisy is plain to see

Telegraph

time15 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Gary Lineker and Mo Salah's ‘we can't hear you' hypocrisy is plain to see

'We can't hear you, Uefa,' wrote Gary Lineker, outraged that European football's governing body had not acknowledged the alleged circumstances of the death of Suleiman al-Obeid, aka the 'Palestinian Pele'. According to the Palestine Football Association (PFA), the 41-year-old was killed while waiting for humanitarian aid last week in the south of the Gaza Strip. Of all the subjects on which to claim a conspiracy of silence, this was surely not Lineker 's wisest choice. After all, when 1,195 Israelis were slaughtered by Hamas on October 7, 2023, nobody could hear him either. On the occasion of the worst single-day massacre of Jews since the Holocaust, the one sally on social media by the self-appointed moral conscience of the game was the observation: 'Super Spurs are top of the league.' Almost two years on, his suggestion that Uefa is under some urgent imperative to tell the world about what happened to Al-Obeid feels at best naive, at worst cynical in its inconsistency. Strictly speaking, there was no need for anybody in Nyon to address the issue publicly, given Palestine's affiliation to the Asian confederation, outside Uefa's jurisdiction. But Aleksander Ceferin, pathologically averse to anything that could be construed as political, still offered a lavish tribute, reflecting in a statement attributed to the president: 'His talent and dedication gave the children of Gaza and beyond hope in a brighter tomorrow.' In stark contrast, the murder at the Nova music festival of Lior Asulin, a striker who played at the highest level in his home country for Hapoel Tel Aviv and Beitar Jerusalem, passed entirely without Uefa comment 22 months ago, despite Israel falling within its orbit. Asulin even competed in its own competition, turning out six times in 2007 for Hapoel in the Uefa Cup. But for 674 days the details of his death – he was killed by Hamas terrorists at a rave where he had been celebrating his 43rd birthday – have gone wholly unremarked by Ceferin, or indeed by Lineker. In fairness, Lineker is far from the only influential figure imploring Uefa to broadcast the Palestinian narrative around how Al-Obeid died. Mohamed Salah also took the organisation to task, replying to the 'Palestinian Pele' message: 'Can you tell us how he died, where, and why?' That intervention was swiftly amplified by Jeremy Corbyn, the former Labour leader who refused to condemn Hamas in the aftermath of October 7. 'Well done Mo!' he said. While there is no doubting the sincerity of Salah's sentiments, his contributions have followed the Lineker playbook in terms of only conveying one side of the story. In a rare non-sponsored video message, released just 11 days after the Hamas atrocities, he did not mention Israel once, instead focusing only on the escalating Israeli response and a call to open a humanitarian corridor into Gaza. There is a sense that Salah's anger on this front would be better directed against his own government in Egypt, rather than an avowedly apolitical body like Uefa. Egypt has adopted a hardline opposition to allowing vulnerable Palestinians to cross the Rafah border crossing into Sinai, denying them a temporary safe haven on the grounds that Israel might never permit them to go back. Mohamed Farid, an Egyptian senator, has argued that the forced displacement of Palestinians from Gaza would merely fuel support for Hamas's extremist ideology and exacerbate tensions throughout the region. Surely Salah, well-intentioned though he might be, would be better advised to engage with this school of thought in his homeland, rather than to play to the gallery online. Sadly, it is only performative antics that cut through in his sphere. Take Lineker's recent comment, addressing the sharing of an anti-Semitic rat emoji that hastened his exit from the BBC, that he was 'anti-the killing of children'. It read as another appeal for secular sainthood, another reminder that he was on the side of the angels. 'I come from a place of complete impartiality,' he declared. If only. Sadly, the problem with his pieties is that they have been filtered through a distinct ideological prism. He is the radicalised product of social networks, seeing fit to peddle the sophomoric propaganda of Owen Jones as if it were inscribed on tablets of stone. He is interested in truth only as far as it corresponds with his preconceived version of truth. This is why the pressure on Uefa to give more specifics about Al-Obeid feels so opportunistic. For a start, we will perhaps never know the definitive version of his death: where the PFA has said he was killed by Israel while waiting at an aid distribution point, the Israel Defence Forces have denied this, with spokesman Nadav Shoshani telling Salah: 'We found no records of any incidents. In order to take a closer look, we need more details.' From the vantage point of Lineker et al, Uefa's selective testimony on Al-Obeid is cast as a damning indictment ofindifference to the Palestinians' suffering. But you cannot be taken seriously as a paragon of virtue if your application of morality is so one-sided that you fail to address an Israeli footballer's murder, or even the massacre of Jews that precipitated this entire conflagration. That is not altruism, it is activism.

Men in court charged over Sunderland care home crash
Men in court charged over Sunderland care home crash

BBC News

time21 hours ago

  • BBC News

Men in court charged over Sunderland care home crash

A driver has admitted causing serious injury by dangerous driving after crashing a stolen BMW into a care home while being pursued by elderly residents died soon after the car ploughed into Highcliffe Care Home in Sunderland on 10 at Newcastle Crown Court via video link, Sam Asgari-Tabar, 21, of no fixed address, admitted robbery and causing serious injury by dangerous driving, and denied a charge of kidnapping a Reece Parish, 21, of Fordham Road, Sunderland, did not enter pleas to charges of robbery and kidnap. Both were remanded in custody and will appear at the same court on 19 Police said officers were alerted to reports of a stolen BMW in Fenham, Newcastle, on the evening of 10 July and a suspect vehicle was spotted in the Sunderland area 15 minutes later.A police chase followed, which ended with the BMW crashing into the care days later, two care home residents, a woman in her 80s and another in her 90s, said eight other residents required hospital treatment after the crash which caused extensive damage to the home. Additional reporting by the Press Association. Follow BBC Sunderland on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

Driver admits causing serious injury after crashing stolen car into care home
Driver admits causing serious injury after crashing stolen car into care home

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

Driver admits causing serious injury after crashing stolen car into care home

A 21-year-old has admitted causing serious injury by dangerous driving after crashing a stolen car into a care home while he was being pursued by police. Two elderly residents at Highcliffe Care Home, Witherwack, Sunderland, died following the crash which happened last month. Sam Asgari-Tabar, of no fixed address, appeared before Newcastle Crown Court where he admitted robbery, relating to stealing a BMW 3-series, and causing serious injury by dangerous driving to a resident who suffered spinal fractures. He denied a charge of kidnapping a woman who was in the BMW which he was test driving. The Crown Prosecution Service asked the court for more time to consider whether those pleas were acceptable. Co-accused Ryan Parish, 21, of Fordham Road, Sunderland, did not enter pleas to charges of robbery and kidnap, also relating to the BMW and the test drive. Northumbria Police were alerted to reports of a stolen car in Fenham, Newcastle, on the evening of July 10 and a suspect vehicle was spotted in the Sunderland area 15 minutes later. A pursuit then followed which ended with the BMW crashing into the care home, causing extensive structural damage to the building. Initially, Northumbria Police said eight residents required hospital treatment. Two days later, the force said a woman in her 90s and a woman in her 80s, neither of whom were in the eight taken to hospital, had died and police inquiries were ongoing. The pair will appear again before Newcastle Crown Court on August 19 and Judge Carolyn Scott told Parish he must enter pleas on that occasion.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store