logo
Police seek information after 2 men robbed at gunpoint in Downers Grove

Police seek information after 2 men robbed at gunpoint in Downers Grove

CBS News26-04-2025
Downers Grove police are asking the public for information after two men were robbed at gunpoint Friday evening.
Officers responded to the 1600 block of 75th Street for a report of an armed robbery around 8 p.m.
Preliminary information indicated that the men were robbed of cash and their cell phones.
The suspect was identified as a Black male of unknown age, standing at 6 feet tall, with a muscular build and shoulder-length dreads with yellow/gold highlights.
He was last seen leaving the scene, heading southbound across 75th Street, wearing a black hooded sweater, black pants, and a ski mask.
Anyone with information about the incident is asked to contact the Downers Grove Police Department at 630-434-5600.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Florida Traffic Stop: Excessive Force Or Failure To Comply?
Florida Traffic Stop: Excessive Force Or Failure To Comply?

Black America Web

timean hour ago

  • Black America Web

Florida Traffic Stop: Excessive Force Or Failure To Comply?

adamkaz Many of us have seen the now-viral traffic stop video out of Florida where a 22-year-old Black college student was detained, had his car window smashed in and was punched in the face by a police officer. At the time, majority of those who managed to stomach viewing the heinous attack could clearly see that it was yet another example of excessive force by authorities. In a wild-yet-not-surprising turn of events however, officials have now ruled the incident as a failure to comply after prosecutors confirmed the actions of Officer D. Bowers didn't constitute a crime. RELATED: Is Hiring More Black Officers The Key To Reducing Police Violence? A full investigation into the widely-circulated attack that originally occurred on February 19, 2025 resulted in a multipage report released to the public yesterday (August 14). Take a look below at the core excerpt that goes into detail on what they found in discovery, via The State Attorney's Office for the 4th Judicial Circuit Court: We care about your data. See our privacy policy. 'The driver, William McNeil Jr., opened his door (stating his window was broken) and asked why he was being pulled over. Officer Bowers explained the reasons for the stop and asked for McNeil's license, registration, and proof of insurance. McNeil said, 'No,' argued the basis for the traffic stop, and told Officer Bowers, 'Call your supervisor.' When Officer Bowers asked McNeil to step out of the SUV, McNeil again said, 'No,' and then slammed and locked his door. What started as a routine traffic stop quickly escalated into McNeil's arrest for Resisting an Officer without Violence for failing to follow lawful orders. Despite being told six times he was under arrest, McNeil refused to get out of the SUV. After four minutes and multiple warnings that he intended to break his window, Officer Bowers broke McNeil's window and ordered him out of the SUV, but McNeil still refused to exit the SUV. While continuing to order McNeil out of the SUV, Officer Bowers struck McNeil in the face with an open hand and told him to show his hands, which McNeil did only after being struck. Officer Bowers then unlocked the SUV door and unbuckled McNeil's seatbelt, which McNeil had buckled after he was stopped. Officers pulled McNeil from the SUV, but McNeil actively resisted, continued to argue, and said, 'No' multiple times. In the struggle to gain compliance, Officer Bowers punched McNeil in the chin as officers arrested him, McNeil had drugs in his pocket, drug paraphernalia in the SUV, a large, serrated knife at his feet, and was driving on a suspended license—facts not known to Officer Bowers when he pulled McNeil over. The day after his arrest, McNeil pleaded guilty to Resisting an Officer Without Violence and Driving While License Suspended.' The report went on to add that despite pleading guilty, McNeil Jr. still uploaded the video we all saw five months later as a way to shift the narrative in his favor. We have to admit, the serrated knife and drugs in the car — public use of marijuana is still federally illegal in Florida — make it hard to see him as entirely innocent. At the same time though, he comes off completely non-threatening in the video (seen above) and it simply doesn't seem necessary to hit him with a closed fist. McNeil's attorneys, Harry Daniels and the renowned Ben Crump, seem to agree with that sentiment after telling ABC News , 'Let's be clear, the State Attorney's Office never interviewed William McNeil. They did, however, try to excuse the fact that Officer Bowers failed to disclose his unlawful 'distractionary strike,'' also adding, 'They also tried to decriminalize Officer Bowers punching Mr. McNeil outside the vehicle and completely failed to mention the officers slamming Mr. McNeil's face into the asphalt while he was under control and in custody.' via @TRAVNATION80 2. BODY-CAMERA: via @unlimited_ls via @KissBethany via @AmerPatriot2_0 via @youngblesstmoni via @NSANiTYx via @twistedmimo via @Elwynmisses via @wavu_is_active via @LeftCoast415 SEE ALSO

Gunman who killed 10 Black people in N.Y. supermarket wants charges dropped, says grand jury was too white
Gunman who killed 10 Black people in N.Y. supermarket wants charges dropped, says grand jury was too white

NBC News

time3 hours ago

  • NBC News

Gunman who killed 10 Black people in N.Y. supermarket wants charges dropped, says grand jury was too white

BUFFALO, N.Y. — Attorneys for the white supremacist gunman who killed 10 Black people at a Buffalo supermarket told a judge Thursday that the federal charges against him should be dropped because there weren't enough Black people and other minority groups on the grand jury that indicted him. Payton Gendron did not attend the hearing, during which his lawyers argued that his constitutional rights to a grand jury drawn from a cross section of the community were violated. At the hearing's start, U.S. District Judge Lawrence Vilardo noted Gendron's objection to the prevalence of white people on the panel seemed 'a little incongruous' in the hate crimes case. He did not immediately rule on the motion. Gendron could face the death penalty if convicted in the 2022 mass shooting at a Tops supermarket, which he targeted because of its location in a primarily Black neighborhood. Those killed ranged in age from 32 to 86. Three others were wounded. Gendron already is serving a sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole after pleading guilty in November 2022 to multiple state charges, including murder. A trial on the pending federal hate crime and weapons counts is expected to begin next year. The Justice Department said it would seek the death penalty if Gendron is found guilty. Attorney John Elmore, who represents some of the victims' relatives in lawsuits, said Gendron's lawyers are doing what they can to keep him alive. He said challenges to the makeup of juries rarely succeed, even though he regularly sees juries lacking minorities. 'It is very ironic that attention to this problem is being brought out in this case, where Payton Gendron committed a racially motivated homicide,' he said by phone after the hearing. 'But this has been a persistent problem in our courts that needs to be addressed.' Gendron's lawyers argued in a court filing that Black and Hispanic people and men are 'systemically and significantly underrepresented' in the lists from which jurors are selected in the Buffalo area. 'To illustrate this point, the grand jury that indicted Payton Gendron was drawn from a pool from which approximately one third of the Black persons expected and one third of the Hispanic/Latino persons expected,' Gendron's lawyers wrote. Exacerbating the problem, they said, was that the data sources used by a vendor to pull the lists together weren't preserved. 'We don't know what the vendor did,' Assistant Public Defender Sonya Zoghlin said. 'More importantly, the vendor doesn't know what he did.' Statistically, the addition of two more Black people on the 60-person grand jury panel would have balanced the panel, Vilardo said. 'Can't that be the result of an accident,' the judge asked, rather than systemic exclusion? In opposing the motion, Assistant U.S. Attorney Caitlin Higgins said that at worst, the issue constitutes a 'technical violation,' not grounds to dismiss the indictment. The federal law governing jury selection 'doesn't entitle the defendant to a perfect representation,' she said. Zoghlin said the issue was larger than the panel that ultimately heard Gendron's case and included the exclusion of certain groups from the selection process, including inactive voters. In a written filing, the U.S. Attorney's office said Gendron didn't prove a systematic underrepresentation that was caused by the district's jury plan. Any disparities in the racial makeup were within accepted guidance, they wrote, and not caused by the selection process, which draws from voter, driver, tax, disability and unemployment rolls. Higgins said courts have routinely rejected similar challenges: Vilardo said he was unaware that any such motions had been granted in cases with similar disparities in New York state's federal courts. Gendron's attorneys, in an earlier filing, argued that Gendron should be exempt from the death penalty because he was 18 years old at the time of the shooting, an age when the brain is still developing. That motion is pending.

Labor union accuses 3 companies contracted by Hennepin, Ramsey counties of stealing $700K in wages
Labor union accuses 3 companies contracted by Hennepin, Ramsey counties of stealing $700K in wages

CBS News

time3 hours ago

  • CBS News

Labor union accuses 3 companies contracted by Hennepin, Ramsey counties of stealing $700K in wages

A union representing thousands of workers is accusing three Twin Cities businesses contracted by Hennepin and Ramsey counties of stealing wages. The stolen funds could surpass $700,000, according to SEIU Local 26. More than 70 workers for these contractors have been underpaid between five to twelve dollars an hour, the union said. SEIU Local 26 is pointing the finger at cleaning companies PK Services and Squeaky Services, and security guard service Black Knight Protection Agency. "These workers deserve every cent that they have earned, they've worked so hard for. They need to be made whole," said Jen Guertin, an officer at the St. Paul Regional Labor Federation. The union said they have reviewed pay stubs and spoken with workers, like Jhonnier Gazo. Gazo said he makes $18 per hour working for PK Services. He said he found he should be making what's called a prevailing wage, a required pay of $27.80 per hour in Ramsey County, accounting for pay and benefits. "Although I'm afraid of losing my job, I am not afraid to raise my voice," said Gazo through an interpreter. Paul Beckfeld, the founder of PK Services, said the wage theft allegations are not true. A department of labor audit from a few years ago did find pay errors, but they've since been corrected, he said. Gregory Murphy said he works for Black Knight Security and found he was underpaid by nearly $6 an hour. "I demand that Black Knight pays us what they owe us. This is not fair and we will not stay silent," said Murphy. Neither Black Knight Security nor Squeaky Services would comment on the allegations. The union said there are active investigations, by both the Hennepin and Ramsey County attorneys offices, but neither would comment on if there's an investigation. "We would call on the counties to terminate the contracts with these contractors, as the counties are legally entitled to do," said Greg Nammacher, president of SEIU Local 26.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store