Christian teacher 'sacked after pupil pronouns row'
A Christian teacher allegedly sacked after refusing to use male prounouns for an eight-year-old girl has told an employment tribunal she "could not go against her conscience".
The teacher, who cannot be named and is referred to as A, was dismissed for gross misconduct after raising concerns about the safeguarding of the girl who wanted to "socially transition" and use male pronouns.
Supported by advocacy group Christian Concern, A is bringing a case against Nottinghamshire County Council, which runs the school, on the grounds of victimisation for whistleblowing, unfair dismissal and discrimination because of her beliefs.
The tribunal is expected to last until 14 March.
In her witness statement, heard at Nottingham Employment Tribunal Centre, A said she was told by her school in 2021 that a child who had been born female, referred to as Child X, would be joining her class but she should refer to the child with a male name and pronouns at the parent's request, which left her uncomfortable.
A said staff were provided with literature largely informed by campaign group Stonewall that was "trans-affirming", biased and "ideologically informed and promoted gender ideology over scientific fact".
She said she felt affirming the child would cause "irreversible harm" and that it was "coercive and disrespectful" of the school to force her to use male pronouns for the pupil.
After carrying out research over the summer holidays, which included watching YouTube videos of de-transitioners who had regretted their decision, A said she felt she needed to "speak up" about the potential harm the school's approach could cause Child X.
She is said to have raised her concerns with the school's head teacher who told her she had no choice but to use Child X's preferred pronouns because it was the parent's request and that she had to "go along with it".
After telling the head teacher she did have a choice and could not "in good conscience go along with it", Child X was moved to a different class and A was suspended later that month while a disciplinary investigation was carried out for failing to comply with a "reasonable request".
A said she felt the school had ignored her attempts to navigate the situation by using a gender-neutral name for the child and had shown a "draconian" response to her safeguarding concerns.
She was reinstated the next month after agreeing she would not breach confidentiality about the child's birth name or gender by telling anyone else about the issue.
After returning to school, A's concerns about Child X continued and she lodged a safeguarding letter to the school's governing body but she said her concerns were "ignored at every level".
Deciding she could not resolve the issue internally, A said she had "no other option than to consider disclosing information about the child externally" and a report was made to Nottinghamshire County Council, which subsequently concluded it was satisfied the appropriate action had been taken by the school.
After involving lawyers and pursuing legal action, A said the school raised concerns that she had broken confidentiality by sharing information with a third party and was suspended, before she was later dismissed and reported to the Teaching Regulation Agency, the Disclosure and Barring Service and the Information Commissioner's Office.
A said she felt the school had been "encouraging Child X on a path to self-destruction".
She said: "I pursued this course of action because I care enough about children to insist we ask if we are doing harm.
A said she felt she was "cut off from her colleagues" following the suspension and had been "treated like a criminal".
"I miss the children and it is sad to think that they do not even know why I left. I was treated as if I was a danger to them," she said.
The tribunal was told A had accessed information about Child X on CPOMS, an online system used by schools to log and monitor child protection and other pupil welfare issues.
Acting on behalf of the county council, barrister Ed Beever said A had "gone behind the back" of the school's designated safeguarding lead in doing so.
The tribunal was told A had accessed the system several times to view information about Child X, which she said was "professional curiosity" because she had heard the child's behaviour was poor.
"What I found was very sobering, it seemed to line up with what the experts were saying. That I had a point.
"I felt the head and the school did not want me to see anything which would demonstrate that the expert reports they dismissed might be accurate and correct."
The tribunal continues.
Follow BBC Nottingham on Facebook, on X, or on Instagram. Send your story ideas to eastmidsnews@bbc.co.uk or via WhatsApp on 0808 100 2210.
Nottinghamshire County Council
HM Courts & Tribunals Service
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Funeral row causes chaos for mourners of Zambia's ex-president
Arranging a funeral can be testing at the best of times - let alone for a former head of state. Amid that intense, initial stage of grief, loved ones must juggle cost, the wishes of the deceased and numerous other factors in order to throw a fitting send-off. Add the clashing desires of a national government and its political opponents into the mix, and things become doubly complicated. Edgar Lungu, who led Zambia from 2015 to 2021, died last Thursday. His death at the age of 68 has shocked Zambians - and there is genuine sense of grief with all radio stations playing gospel music for the man who had remained influential in Zambian politics despite being barred from contesting last year's election. Zambia is officially a Christian country - and most people take their religion and periods of mourning seriously. But a standoff between his family, the government and Lungu's political party, the Patriotic Front (PF), has left mourners confused about how exactly the former president should be honoured. The government announced there would be a state funeral and declared that the official venue for mourning would be a lodge it owns in the capital, Lusaka, but the PF dismissed this plan, directing mourners to its headquarters instead. As for Lungu's family, they have said they are not opposed to a state funeral, but have insisted on choosing who will preside over it, family lawyer Makebi Zulu has told the BBC. Then there is the official book of condolence, in which mourners can pay tributes to Lungu. The government has set up an official book - at the lodge - but the PF has urged people to sign theirs instead - at their headquarters. The government wanted to repatriate his body from South Africa last week - Lungu died there after receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness. However, the PF and Lungu's family intervened, wanting to organise the safe passage of the ex-leader themselves. "The state was saying, 'We are giving him full military honours, therefore we're taking over from here' - as if to say that 'you have no say over what happens,'" Mr Zulu said. Plans for returning Lungu's remains are still unclear, though the family are now engaging with the government on this issue. There has also been confusion over the "official" mourning period when all forms of entertainment like big football matches and concerts are stopped. The government declared a seven-day national mourning period starting last Saturday, even though the PF announced one days earlier. This chaos is, in short, a continuation of the tumultuous relationship between Lungu and his successor, President Hakainde Hichilema. The pair are long-time rivals - in 2017, when Lungu was president, he had Hichilema locked up for over 100 days on treason charges after Hichilema's motorcade allegedly refused to give way for him. It took the intervention of the Commonwealth for Hichilema to be released. Four years later, and after five attempts at the presidency, Hichilema defeated Lungu. Now, the PF and the Lungu family's lawyer are accusing Hichilema's government of being partly responsible for the former president's death. Lungu returned to frontline politics in 2023, frequently accusing Hichilema's government of victimising him and other PF members. Now, after Lungu's death, his party allege that Lungu was banned from leaving the country for years and that if he had been allowed to travel to seek medical treatment sooner, he might still be alive. The government has vehemently denied any responsibility for Lungu's death, with spokesperson Cornelius Mweetwa insisting that the ex-president was never prohibited from travelling. Mr Mweetwa told the BBC that the PF was trying to use Lungu's death as a "springboard" for a "political comeback". It is not the first time conflict has broken out following a Zambian leader's death. In 2021, the family of Kenneth Kaunda, the country's first post-independence president, said he wanted to be laid to rest next to his wife and not at the site designated by the government. Despite this, the government went ahead and buried Kaunda at Embassy Memorial Park in Lusaka. "The High Court ruled that national interest takes precedence over individual or family preferences because there is a designated burial place for former presidents, and there is a designated set of protocol to handle those proceedings that are conducted by the state, not a political party," Mr Mweetwa said. This argument - about the state's rights to a dead president's body - has played out numerous times across Africa. In 2019, Robert Mugabe died almost two years after being unseated as Zimbabwe's president by his former right-hand man, Emmerson Mnangagwa. Mugabe's family refused to allow him to be buried at the national Heroes' Acre, arguing that he had been betrayed by his former colleagues. After a bitter feud, the man who had led Zimbabwe to independence was laid to rest after his state funeral in his home village. But a legal row rumbles on over his burial site, with some still wanting him to be interred at Heroes' Acre, where a mausoleum has now been completed for him. And loved ones rarely won such disputes. The relatives of Angola's José Eduardo dos Santos and various Ghanaian presidents have clashed with the government over post-death arrangements, but all eventually had to yield to the state. In Lungu's case, the government has the constitution - the supreme law of the land - behind it, but the PF has significant clout as the former leader's long-time political home. In an attempt to break the standoff, the government has sent envoys to South Africa to negotiate with Lungu's family, where a private memorial service was held at Pretoria's Sacred Heart Cathedral on Tuesday - organised by the PF. This was attended by his widow and daughter and where it was announced to the congregation that the former president's body would not be flown home on Wednesday as had been expected. So for those in Zambia, there is still no clear direction on how to send off the nation's sixth president. 'My son is a drug addict, please help' - the actor breaking a Zambian taboo An ancient writing system confounding myths about Africa Zambia president orders ministers to stop sleeping in cabinet Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica Africa Daily Focus on Africa
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Doctored image targets Lee Jae-myung's women supporters
"Even if the candidate is a criminal, dictator or thug, these people say they'll support Lee Jae-myung even if they're ripped apart," reads part of a Korean-language Facebook post shared on June 2, 2025. "Regardless of the martial law (declaration) or impeachment, we cannot hand over the country's fate to these kinds of people." The post includes an image of someone holding up a sign that reads, "Even if our genitals are ripped apart, we will support Lee Jae-myung." The language used on the purported sign appears to reference a controversy involving Lee, stemming from a leaked 2012 phone call in which he used explicit language while speaking with his sister-in-law (archived link). Lee says that while he regrets the comments, he had been quoting profanities used by his brother (archived link). The image was shared a day before South Korea's snap presidential election on June 3, which Lee won with 49.4 percent of the popular vote. According to the election results, he secured over 60 percent of the vote among women in their 20s and 30s (archived link). The same image was also repeatedly shared elsewhere in similar Facebook posts from conservative users as well as in forums, with commenters mocking Lee's women supporters. "They've really gone insane, haven't they? They'd really sacrifice their genitals for Lee?" read a comment on one of the posts. Another said: "This goes to show just how extreme his supporters are, they should be put in an asylum." The image, however, was doctored. A reverse image search on Google led to the original photo, showing a sign without any explicit language, published in an online report by labour-related news outlet Workers' Solidarity from April 12, 2022 (archived link). The sign reads, "Desperately Jae-myung". The outlet's photo editor Lee Mi-jin told AFP the image was taken from a Facebook post shared by former ruling Democratic Party lawmaker Kwon In-sook a day ahead of the previous presidential election on March 8, 2022 (archived link). Lee ran in the 2022 election as the Democratic Party's candidate, losing by a razor-thin margin to Yoon Suk Yeol (archived link). Kwon's post, which included various photos of a rally attended by Lee, called on his supporters to unite ahead of the vote. A keyword search on YouTube found Kwon's photos matched footage of a rally held at Yeouido in central Seoul on the same day (archived link). Similar signs matching those in Kwon's photos can be seen at the YouTube video's 13:38, 22:06 and 22:48 marks; no signs containing the explicit language seen in the misleading social media posts can be spotted. AFP previously debunked multiple false claims surrounding Lee's presidential campaign.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Newsom vs. President Trump: What happens next in LA protests?
Many wonder what happens next as California leaders push back against the Trump administration's actions in Los Angeles with ICE raids that sparked protests. Host Chris Cuomo speaks with former GOP New Hampshire Governor Chris Sununu and progressive YouTube influencer Brian Tyler Cohen as the trio discuss the conflict between Gov. Newsom and President Trump. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
