logo
Funeral row causes chaos for mourners of Zambia's ex-president

Funeral row causes chaos for mourners of Zambia's ex-president

Yahooa day ago

Arranging a funeral can be testing at the best of times - let alone for a former head of state. Amid that intense, initial stage of grief, loved ones must juggle cost, the wishes of the deceased and numerous other factors in order to throw a fitting send-off.
Add the clashing desires of a national government and its political opponents into the mix, and things become doubly complicated.
Edgar Lungu, who led Zambia from 2015 to 2021, died last Thursday. His death at the age of 68 has shocked Zambians - and there is genuine sense of grief with all radio stations playing gospel music for the man who had remained influential in Zambian politics despite being barred from contesting last year's election.
Zambia is officially a Christian country - and most people take their religion and periods of mourning seriously.
But a standoff between his family, the government and Lungu's political party, the Patriotic Front (PF), has left mourners confused about how exactly the former president should be honoured.
The government announced there would be a state funeral and declared that the official venue for mourning would be a lodge it owns in the capital, Lusaka, but the PF dismissed this plan, directing mourners to its headquarters instead.
As for Lungu's family, they have said they are not opposed to a state funeral, but have insisted on choosing who will preside over it, family lawyer Makebi Zulu has told the BBC.
Then there is the official book of condolence, in which mourners can pay tributes to Lungu. The government has set up an official book - at the lodge - but the PF has urged people to sign theirs instead - at their headquarters.
The government wanted to repatriate his body from South Africa last week - Lungu died there after receiving treatment for an undisclosed illness.
However, the PF and Lungu's family intervened, wanting to organise the safe passage of the ex-leader themselves.
"The state was saying, 'We are giving him full military honours, therefore we're taking over from here' - as if to say that 'you have no say over what happens,'" Mr Zulu said.
Plans for returning Lungu's remains are still unclear, though the family are now engaging with the government on this issue.
There has also been confusion over the "official" mourning period when all forms of entertainment like big football matches and concerts are stopped.
The government declared a seven-day national mourning period starting last Saturday, even though the PF announced one days earlier.
This chaos is, in short, a continuation of the tumultuous relationship between Lungu and his successor, President Hakainde Hichilema.
The pair are long-time rivals - in 2017, when Lungu was president, he had Hichilema locked up for over 100 days on treason charges after Hichilema's motorcade allegedly refused to give way for him.
It took the intervention of the Commonwealth for Hichilema to be released. Four years later, and after five attempts at the presidency, Hichilema defeated Lungu.
Now, the PF and the Lungu family's lawyer are accusing Hichilema's government of being partly responsible for the former president's death.
Lungu returned to frontline politics in 2023, frequently accusing Hichilema's government of victimising him and other PF members.
Now, after Lungu's death, his party allege that Lungu was banned from leaving the country for years and that if he had been allowed to travel to seek medical treatment sooner, he might still be alive.
The government has vehemently denied any responsibility for Lungu's death, with spokesperson Cornelius Mweetwa insisting that the ex-president was never prohibited from travelling.
Mr Mweetwa told the BBC that the PF was trying to use Lungu's death as a "springboard" for a "political comeback".
It is not the first time conflict has broken out following a Zambian leader's death.
In 2021, the family of Kenneth Kaunda, the country's first post-independence president, said he wanted to be laid to rest next to his wife and not at the site designated by the government.
Despite this, the government went ahead and buried Kaunda at Embassy Memorial Park in Lusaka.
"The High Court ruled that national interest takes precedence over individual or family preferences because there is a designated burial place for former presidents, and there is a designated set of protocol to handle those proceedings that are conducted by the state, not a political party," Mr Mweetwa said.
This argument - about the state's rights to a dead president's body - has played out numerous times across Africa.
In 2019, Robert Mugabe died almost two years after being unseated as Zimbabwe's president by his former right-hand man, Emmerson Mnangagwa.
Mugabe's family refused to allow him to be buried at the national Heroes' Acre, arguing that he had been betrayed by his former colleagues.
After a bitter feud, the man who had led Zimbabwe to independence was laid to rest after his state funeral in his home village.
But a legal row rumbles on over his burial site, with some still wanting him to be interred at Heroes' Acre, where a mausoleum has now been completed for him.
And loved ones rarely won such disputes. The relatives of Angola's José Eduardo dos Santos and various Ghanaian presidents have clashed with the government over post-death arrangements, but all eventually had to yield to the state.
In Lungu's case, the government has the constitution - the supreme law of the land - behind it, but the PF has significant clout as the former leader's long-time political home.
In an attempt to break the standoff, the government has sent envoys to South Africa to negotiate with Lungu's family, where a private memorial service was held at Pretoria's Sacred Heart Cathedral on Tuesday - organised by the PF.
This was attended by his widow and daughter and where it was announced to the congregation that the former president's body would not be flown home on Wednesday as had been expected.
So for those in Zambia, there is still no clear direction on how to send off the nation's sixth president.
'My son is a drug addict, please help' - the actor breaking a Zambian taboo
An ancient writing system confounding myths about Africa
Zambia president orders ministers to stop sleeping in cabinet
Go to BBCAfrica.com for more news from the African continent.
Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica
Africa Daily
Focus on Africa

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Traveling in the Trump era: No, you don't have to apologize for being American
Traveling in the Trump era: No, you don't have to apologize for being American

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Traveling in the Trump era: No, you don't have to apologize for being American

President Trump's return to the White House has revived a familiar media genre — columns lamenting how 'ashamed' Americans supposedly feel when traveling abroad. USA Today's recent headline blared, ''I didn't vote for him': How American tourists are navigating global perceptions.' It tells the story of how a couple actually canceled their overseas vacation out of fear they'd be mistaken for Trump supporters. The BBC followed with, ''People might treat us differently': Trump era leaves U.S. tourists in Paris feeling shame.' A Boston Globe columnist also chimed in: 'Trump's behavior makes me embarrassed to be an American.' To quantify the hand-wringing, a recent survey found that 72 percent of 'experienced' U.S. travelers worry they might feel unwelcome abroad. The underlying assumption is clear: Foreign distaste for Trump taints every U.S. passport holder. But that anxiety reveals more about the worldview of those making the claim — usually progressive, elite, Western — than it does about how Americans are actually received overseas. It also reveals how media narratives shape public expectations. Of course Americans fear being unwelcome — after all, the media keep telling them they will or should be. In the time since Trump won last November, I have spent significant time in Greenland, Vietnam, England, Panama and Mexico — countries that have all been in Trump's crosshairs in some way. Not once did I experience hostility. After traveling through dozens of countries on five continents under both Republican and Democratic presidents, I have found the fretting about being American abroad to be wildly overstated — a projection of domestic political angst, not a reflection of global reality. Yes, most foreigners know who our president is, especially when he is as headline-grabbing as Trump. And yes, they often have opinions — don't we all? But the idea that everyday Americans are routinely shunned, judged, or made to feel unwelcome abroad because of Trump is a fantasy born of our own political obsessions. In truth, Americans are generally welcomed abroad. And when we aren't, it has less to do with politics than with other things — for example, our cultural obliviousness, our sheer numbers traveling, or the pressure that affluent travelers inevitably place on their local housing markets. Sure, some people abroad dislike Trump and may judge Americans accordingly. But most are preoccupied with their own politics, lives, and problems and understand that a president doesn't define his entire population. Yes, Trump is a globally recognized figure — so are Lebron James and Taylor Swift. Recognition is not reverence, nor is it revulsion. If you include the entire population, about 23 percent of American citizens voted for Trump. The odds are good that any American you meet abroad did not. And more to the point, most foreigners — like most Americans and even most Trump supporters — hold nuanced views about Trump. Last month in Nuuk, Greenland, I met an EU bureaucrat who said she had been alarmed by Trump's 2016 election, since his 'rocket man' tweets about North Korea initially had her fearing nuclear war. But after watching his unexpectedly cordial summit with Kim Jong Un, she reconsidered. 'Don't just look to where Trump is hitting the ball,' she said of Trump's approach to foreign affairs. 'It will ricochet a couple of times and then perhaps fall in the pocket.' She, like others I have met abroad, holds a view of Trump that is simultaneously skeptical and strangely admiring — a nuance absent from the editorial pages of most American newspapers. In Greenland, I met some who despised Trump and some who genuinely admired him. Most responded to Trump's talk of purchasing Greenland with wry amusement. Some even gave a grinning, shrugging acknowledgment that at least he'd put their country on the map. All the while, a thousand think-pieces back home were insisting that everyone in Greenland loathed him. In Hanoi, a woman told me she initially admired Trump's unconventional approach to adversaries. She said she has grown more skeptical as his tariffs have hurt her country. That's not blind praise or a knee-jerk rejection — it's nuance, the kind many reporters fail to register even among Americans. Just as often, the response is indifference. When I asked a Peruvian friend in Lima what she thought of Trump voters, she replied flatly: 'I don't.' When I visited Peru, I didn't know the name of its president — why should she be consumed with ours? The U.S. wields outsized global influence, but it is narcissism to assume the world is constantly thinking about us. Maybe we should get over ourselves. Many liberals feel compelled to grovel, to disavow Trump the moment they leave U.S. soil. I never have, any more than I expected praise during earlier travels because global media darling Barack Obama was our president. I don't buy into reflected glory any more than I do reflected shame. Americans reluctant to travel while Trump is president should not let pundits and alarmists talk them out of seeing the world. A U.S. passport is one of the greatest privileges of being American, opening nearly every border, often visa-free. Yes, being American might at times make you a target. Far more often, though, you will find respect, curiosity, and kindness. Most people abroad aren't interested in judging strangers for their country's politics. They are more likely to judge you for how you behave. So, to my fellow Americans: Use that passport proudly. Be ambassadors for the best of American values: our openness, our generosity, our eagerness to learn. That is what people abroad will remember most — not our president, but us. Daniel Allott, the former opinion editor at The Hill, is the author of 'On the Road in Trump's America: A Journey into the Heart of a Divided Country.'

BBC News Journalists Lodge Ageism Complaint As They Face Being Fired Under Newsdesk Merger
BBC News Journalists Lodge Ageism Complaint As They Face Being Fired Under Newsdesk Merger

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

BBC News Journalists Lodge Ageism Complaint As They Face Being Fired Under Newsdesk Merger

EXCLUSIVE: A handful of seasoned BBC News journalists have complained that they are the victims of ageism as they face compulsory redundancy under plans to merge the corporation's Home and Foreign newsdesks. Several sources told Deadline that four senior journalists have lodged separate, but coordinated, age discrimination complaints after being shown the door. The BBC does not comment on individual employment matters, but said its redundancy processes are 'thorough and fair.' More from Deadline BBC Condemns Israel After IDF Soldiers Strip-Searched & Detained Journalists At Gunpoint BBC Chairman Urges Disgraced Former News Anchor: "Do The Right Thing And Return The Money" Leaked Emails Show BBC Chiefs' Concern Over Confidence In Bullying, Harassment & Whistleblowing Procedures The layoffs are part of savings plans announced by BBC News last October. The division said it would cut 130 roles and cancel interview series HARDtalk as part of BBC-wide efforts to save £700M ($943M). BBC News CEO Deborah Turness acknowledged at the time that the changes were 'not easy.' The aggrieved employees are all over the age of 50 and are thought to have more than 100 years of experience between them, including warzone reporting and coordinating output on major events, including terror attacks. They have raised an internal grievance as a first step in pursuing an employment tribunal against the BBC. A fifth employee is also at risk, but is not thought to have raised a grievance. The journalists were invited to apply for new roles on the merged newsdesk, going through a recruitment process that sources alleged was weighted in favor of less experienced candidates. Insiders said those involved were encouraged to focus on their experience from the past two years, rather than reflect on their body of work for the corporation. There is a view that younger journalists have been successful in being redeployed into new roles, despite not having the required experience. 'The whole thing stinks,' said a person familiar with the process. Another added: 'They're trying to employ people on the cheap.' A third person said the continued 'brain drain' in the BBC newsroom would lead to mistakes on air, adding that the closure of a standalone Foreign news desk potentially created more risk for staffers stationed overseas. Sources claimed that interviews for the merged newsdesk were designed in such a way that if journalists did not mention specific keywords, such as 'digital' or 'live page,' they were marked down. The process was mocked as an 'absurd' bit of BBC box-ticking. Multiple sources said one of the individuals facing redundancy is a National Union of Journalists (NUJ) representative. This person is thought to have raised separate concerns about victimization because of their association with the union. Compulsory redundancies are a red line for the NUJ. Paul Siegert, the union's broadcasting organizer, told Deadline: 'It is NUJ policy to ballot our BBC union members for strike action if any member at the BBC is facing compulsory redundancy. We always hope it doesn't come to that and work hard with the BBC to find redeployment opportunities for any member facing redundancy.' A BBC spokesperson said: 'Like all parts of the BBC, News needs to contribute to the savings announced last year. While we do not comment on individual staff issues, restructuring in BBC News is taking place according to established BBC policies; we conduct all processes in a thorough and fair manner, and we are committed to supporting our staff throughout, including through comprehensive redeployment assistance.' The age discrimination complaint follows similar concerns being raised by a group of BBC News presenters as part of an employment tribunal last year. Martine Croxall, Karin Giannone, Kasia Madera, and Annita McVeigh settled their three-year dispute in March. The terms of the settlement were not disclosed. Best of Deadline 'Stick' Release Guide: When Do New Episodes Come Out? 'Stick' Soundtrack: All The Songs You'll Hear In The Apple TV+ Golf Series 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery

What is a ‘supernatural church?' Five things to know about a growing Christian branch
What is a ‘supernatural church?' Five things to know about a growing Christian branch

Miami Herald

time3 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

What is a ‘supernatural church?' Five things to know about a growing Christian branch

'Miracles happen here.' That's the slogan of one megachurch in southwest Miami-Dade County at the forefront of the fast-growing Christian 'supernatural' movement. It's an Evangelical offshoot, rooted in Pentecostalism, that leans far more heavily into revelations and prophecy than mainstream Christian churches and wields out-sized powerful political influence. That was evident last week at King Jesus Ministry, a nondenominational megachurch where President Donald Trump's top spiritual advisor, pastor Paula White-Cain, has been a visitor over the years. The church hosted a three-day spiritual conference called the 'Supernatural School of the Spirit,' where White-Cain and other visiting pastors preached and instructed crowds of followers and local faith leaders on how to 'walk in the supernatural.' King Jesus is just one of the largest South Florida churches steeped in the movement. Another Miami megachurch with a prominent Haitian-American congregation, Tabernacle of Glory, has credited its large following with its emphasis on the supernatural. The nondenominational church opened its $60 million campus in northern Miami-Dade County last year. At these churches, it's not uncommon to hear pastors talking about 'dominion' theologies or 'cosmic spiritual warfare.' Sometimes, they may speak in tongues or even perform a 'deliverance' or what most people know as an exorcism, to cast out demonic forces. Religious scholars say the branch springs from a movement called 'Independent charismatic Christianity' that gained momentum in the 1960s. Its followers, estimated to be in the millions in America, hold supernatural beliefs and goals of transforming secular society. They've built increasing influence in American politics, supporting candidacies of conservative leaders like President Donald Trump. 'Independent Charismatic leaders, who 20 years ago would have been mocked by mainstream religious right leaders, are now front-line captains in the American culture wars,' writes religious scholar Matthew Taylor, in his book 'The Violent Take it By Force.' The Miami Herald spoke to Taylor to discuss some of the themes and ideologies that are found in these churches and how they intersect with American political circles. 1. What is a supernatural church? This term is popular in charismatic Christian circles and might refer to a church where supernatural experiences — some not defined by logic or reason — take place. But the charismatic Christian world also is a 'diffuse' space, where many terms are interchangeable or sometimes defined differently from church to church, said Taylor. 'Sometimes charismatics will call themselves charismatic. Sometimes they'll say they're spirit-filled ... sometimes they'll just say they're Christians. Sometimes they'll call themselves Evangelicals,' said Taylor, a senior Christian scholar at the Institute for Islamic, Christian, and Jewish Studies in Baltimore who spent 30 years of his life as an Evangelical Christian. 'To be charismatic is to seek after the more supernatural dimensions of Christianity ... and this is why they're constantly emphasizing prophecy, constantly emphasizing speaking in tongues and healings and miracles,' said Taylor. The term 'supernatural' is not new, and has been circulating for decades within the charismatic Christian movement. There's an entire Christian media network, for example, led by charismatic leader Sid Roth called 'It's Supernatural! that has been around for decades, said Taylor. Believers will appear on the network to tell stories about the miracles they've witnessed. READ MORE: Haitian American megachurch, 10 years in the making, opens $60 million campus in Miami 2. What are some of the main elements of a supernatural church? One belief that unifies this Christian subculture is the idea that God speaks through prophecy. Many of the leaders in this movement — like Pastor Guillermo Maldonado of King Jesus and White-Cain — are considered by the faithful to be modern-day Apostles or Prophets who can perform 'healings' or deliver prophecies during sermons. Since the movement often operates without a formal connection to more established denominations, leaders may have varying degrees of theological education but will lean on or cite mentors in the movement. The leaders often have ten or hundreds of thousands of followers, or a background in televangelism, and their success can sometimes depend on who they know in the charismatic world — similar, Taylor writes, to how Hollywood operates. Taylor, who has interviewed many charismatic Christian leaders, describes them as 'idiosyncratic' and 'incredibly compelling' people. 'They're very socially skilled,' he said. 'They're very good at reaching and teaching and providing people with these compelling experiences.' Many apostolic leaders believe the Christian church has languished for centuries, and that God has brought them in to reinvigorate the church through Holy Spirit-backed leadership. Common themes focus on 'End-times,' or the second coming of Jesus, and a the idea of 'dominion,' or Christians needing to conquer various aspects of society. There's also an emphasis, similar to Pentecostal churches, on promoting inner healing through living a more Christian lifestyle. The promise of a better, healthier life can appeal to those who are struggling with addiction problems, health — physical or mental — problems or financial hardship. Prosperity — achieving financial wealth — also is a key theme, one that goes hand-in-hand with financial giving to the church. This idea is common in many churches that ask members to 'tithe,' but this movement stresses that more giving can mean more rewards. 3. Why is this movement growing? Many followers find a sense of empowerment, contentment and community in the movement, Taylor says. 'There have been studies even on how Pentecostal and charismatic ministries around the world have done a great deal of lifting people out of a lower-class existence economically by empowering them and telling them 'Hey, you have agency.'' At the same time, Taylor points out, those experiences are 'being utilized in this broader political project,' to get more Christians on board with conservative political agendas. Another theory of why it's so popular: In a modern, industrialized world where knowledge is at the fingertips of everyone with a Smartphone, charismatic leaders could be 're-enchanting' the world for people who want more of a sense of mystery and wonder, said Taylor, referring to the concept of 'disenchantment' made popular by philosopher, Charles Taylor. 'People want a sense of a sublime and powerful force in the universe that's guiding and moving them around,' he said. According to Taylor, independent charismatics are the fastest-growing religious demographic in the United States and around world. The followers are well into the millions, or hundreds of millions worldwide by some estimates, but the actual number is hard to measure, since the group is not tied to a formal denomination. 'For people who are searching for an anchor in the world or searching for self-confidence or searching for a sense of what their purpose is in life, ... they're scratching where people itch,' Taylor said. 4. How is this different from the Pentecostal denomination? It's similar, but without the bylaws and bureaucratic oversight that comes with a denomination, or network of churches with an established hierarchy. 'They believe that 'We need the Holy Spirit to be unrestrained. We need the fires of revival prayer,' said Taylor. 'But that same lack of restraint makes it very susceptible to political co-optation, because .. there's not a lot of oversight.' Pentecostalism, a movement within Protestant Christianity, is a denomination that can be traced back as early as 1900's and emphasizes manifestations of the Holy Spirit — such as supernatural healing and speaking in tongues. In the early years of Pentecostalism, its followers were largely poor Angelo and African Americans, according to Pew Research, and women have always had a large role. In the late-1940s, various 'healing evangelists' began traveling around the country, filling tents and auditoriums that attracted tens of thousands of people, according to Taylor's book. Some of the preachers, like Oral Roberts, were Pentecostal preachers who found their way on television to bring the movement out of tents and into the mainstream world. In the 1950s, Roberts teamed up with preacher Kenneth Hagin and began teaching about an ideology called the 'Word of Faith' doctrine, which emphasized a form of faith that rewards devout Christians with healings and blessings. The ideas found in the doctrine gave rise to what is known today as the 'prosperity gospel.' 5. Does the movement have a broader mission? Some religious scholars, many who are Christians themselves, point out that the movement is also putting spiritual influence to other uses. Leaders aim to exert more influence over everything from popular culture and education to politics. It's that latter field where the supernatural movement and other Evangelicals have arguably had the most success. Last week at King Jesus Ministry, for instance, White-Cain outlined a vision of a society transformed by Christian ideology, urging believers to play a role in making it a reality. 'You didn't come to fit in, You came to take over. You came to move in your Kingdom calling. That threatens people who don't understand the word of God because their language, their understanding is not like yours. God birthed you to rule, to have dominion,' she said. White-Cain has been one of the most influential voices in charismatic Christianity, and is someone who was able to bring its ideology into the mainstream and now, as the head of the newly established White House Faith Office, into American politics. 'Very soon our Lord and savior Jesus Christ is going to split the sky and come back,' she said during her sermon. 'This is not your home, this is your assignment. And you and I have to reap the harvest.' This story was produced with financial support from Trish and Dan Bell and from donors comprising the South Florida Jewish and Muslim Communities, including Khalid and Diana Mirza, in partnership with Journalism Funding Partners. The Miami Herald maintains full editorial control of this work.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store