logo
US House Speaker Johnson says it is not time to consider war powers resolution

US House Speaker Johnson says it is not time to consider war powers resolution

Reuters5 hours ago

June 23 (Reuters) - U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson dismissed efforts on Monday by lawmakers to advance a measure to check President Donald Trump's use of military force against Iran, after Tehran said it carried out a missile attack on the Al Udeid U.S. airbase in Qatar.
Asked whether he would allow the House of Representatives to vote on a bipartisan resolution, Johnson told reporters: "I don't think this is an appropriate time for war powers resolution, and I don't think it's necessary."
Republican Representative Thomas Massie and Democratic Representative Ro Khanna introduced their resolution days before Trump ordered U.S. strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities on Saturday and have since claimed that the president's actions require congressional authorization.
Iran's military said on Monday that it carried out a missile attack on U.S. forces in Qatar, where explosions were heard across the capital.
Democratic Senator Tim Kaine has introduced a similar resolution in the Senate that he said lawmakers could vote on as early as this week.
"Our War Powers Resolution has 57 cosponsors. Whether you like it or not, Congress will be voting on U.S. hostilities in Iran," Massie said in a post on the social media platform X earlier on Monday.
Johnson and other Republicans insist that Trump had the authority to take unilateral action against Iran to eliminate a potential nuclear threat to the United States and other countries.
"The President made an evaluation that the danger was imminent enough to take his authority as commander in chief and make that happen," the speaker said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour STILL can't bring themselves to back Donald Trump's strikes after Iran retaliated by launching missile barrage at US airbase in Qatar
Labour STILL can't bring themselves to back Donald Trump's strikes after Iran retaliated by launching missile barrage at US airbase in Qatar

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Labour STILL can't bring themselves to back Donald Trump's strikes after Iran retaliated by launching missile barrage at US airbase in Qatar

Keir Starmer risked being marginalised on the world stage last night after failing to back Donald Trump 's strikes against Iran. As Tehran launched revenge attacks on US bases in the Middle East, the Prime Minister was last night accused of a 'lack of moral clarity' as he refused to take sides in the deepening conflict. British citizens in Qatar were warned to 'shelter in place' last night as Iran fired missiles at America's giant Al Udeid Air Base. Iranian state media said the country's 'mighty and victorious' response to the American assault on its nuclear facilities had begun. Tehran vowed to inflict 'serious, unpredictable consequences' on the US, but, in a sign that it fears further provoking President Trump, it is reported to have warned the Qataris in advance of the attack and focused on a base from which military aircraft had already been removed. Sir Keir was last night facing growing questions about his refusal to support the action taken by America in striking Tehran's nuclear facilities. Yesterday he insisted the UK was 'absolutely focused on de-escalation in the Middle East'. Critics warned that ministers had been left 'paralysed' over the issue after Attorney General Lord Hermer advised that joining Israel 's attacks on Iran, which began 11 days ago, would break international law. Labour's agonies intensified at the weekend following the audacious US assault on the Fordow facility at the heart of Iran's nuclear programme. Foreign Secretary David Lammy told MPs the issue of whether or not Britain supported the attack is not a 'binary question'. And the PM risked diplomatic marginalisation after Nato and Germany backed President Trump's dramatic intervention. Nato chief Mark Rutte said the US bombing raid did not break international law – and said that his 'biggest fear' was that Iran's murderous regime would acquire a nuclear weapon. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said there was 'no reason to criticise what America did at the weekend,' adding: 'Yes, it is not without risk. But leaving things as they were was not an option either.' Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds yesterday acknowledged that the PM's influence on the escalating crisis in the Middle East is now 'not great' with the UK left on the sidelines of the 'special relationship'. Sir Keir emerged from talks with the US President last week to declare Mr Trump would not attack Iran – only to find himself proved wrong days later. Chancellor Rachel Reeves also dodged the question as to whether she backed Washington yesterday. Kemi Badenoch said it was 'quite extraordinary' that ministers were unable to side with the United States against a regime which MI5 says has attempted 20 plots on British soil in the past three years. Mrs Badenoch said Labour's attempt to sit on the fence showed 'a complete absence of moral clarity and, in fact, moral courage'. The Tory leader said she was clear that the US bombing raid was legal, after the shadow attorney general Lord Wolfson advised that aiding Israel was in line with international law because a key ally was facing a 'genocidal threat' from Iran's nuclear programme. During a BBC interview yesterday, Mr Lammy refused eight times to endorse Mr Trump's actions, saying repeatedly that the UK was 'not involved'. In a separate interview with LBC, armed forces minister Luke Pollard failed on seven occasions to back the military action by the US, saying: 'That's not one for me to comment on.' A spokesman for the PM said preventing Iran gaining a nuclear weapon would be a 'good thing'. But he added: 'Our focus is on diplomacy. That is the priority and that is what every member of this government is working towards and that's been the focus of the calls with international partners over the weekend. Iran should take the opportunity presented by the US to re-enter talks.' Sir Keir raised eyebrows yesterday by leaving Mr Lammy to update MPs on the crisis. He missed his weekly session of Prime Minister's Questions last week because of the G7 summit in Canada and is likely to miss it again tomorrow when he is due at the Nato summit. Before and after pictures of Fordow underground complex, taken on June 20 and June 22 'The strikes were a spectacular military success,' Trump said in a late-night address from the White House No 10 insisted the PM was 'not avoiding Parliament'. Sir Julian Lewis, former chairman of Parliament's intelligence and security committee, said Israel and its allies had a right to defend the country from Iran. He asked Mr Lammy: 'How many times must a terrorist-funding, fanatical regime threaten to wipe another country from the face of the earth before a Government advised by Lord Hermer of Chagos acknowledge that military action to delay and degrade its nuclear weapons programme is both ethically and legally justifiable?' Mr Lammy acknowledged that Iran's uranium enrichment programme goes far beyond what is needed for civilian energy purposes. 'Britain has long had concerns about Iran's nuclear programme,' he said. 'A nuclear-armed Iran would endanger the immediate region and threaten the global community.' Conservative MP Sir Bernard Jenkin said that Lord Hermer's advice had left ministers 'paralysed and divided'. Former security minister Tom Tugendhat said: 'Labour and the Lib Dems agree they don't want a nuclear Iran and demand only diplomacy – as though no one had thought of that for the past 20 years. 'It's bad enough to look weak. It's worse to advertise irrelevance but the Government has just achieved it.' Human rights lawyer Phillipe Sands, a friend of Lord Hermer and Sir Keir, last night said Israel's attacks on Iran went 'way beyond' what could be justified under international law and that the US was 'not directly threatened at all by Iran'.

US Senator Cassidy urges delay of US vaccine discussion
US Senator Cassidy urges delay of US vaccine discussion

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

US Senator Cassidy urges delay of US vaccine discussion

June 23 (Reuters) - U.S. Senator Bill Cassidy, chair of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions called for U.S. vaccine advisers to delay a Wednesday meeting to discuss recommendations for vaccines. "Wednesday's meeting should not proceed with a relatively small panel, and no CDC Director in place to approve the panel's recommendations," Cassidy said in a post on X, referring to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The CDC panel, known as the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, is scheduled to meet on June 25 and 26.

Donald Trump announces Israel and Iran have agreed to ceasefire after US bombing raids
Donald Trump announces Israel and Iran have agreed to ceasefire after US bombing raids

Daily Record

timean hour ago

  • Daily Record

Donald Trump announces Israel and Iran have agreed to ceasefire after US bombing raids

US President Donald Trump has announced that Israel and Iran have agreed to a ceasefire after US bombing raids on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend US President Donald Trump declared on Monday evening that a ceasefire between Israel and Iran had been agreed, expressing hope for enduring peace. "It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a Complete and Total CEASEFIRE (in approximately 6 hours from now, when Israel and Iran have wound down and completed their in-progress, final missions! ), for 12 hours, at which point the War will be considered, ENDED," Mr Trump posted on social media. ‌ This historic announcement follows Iran's barrage of missile attacks on US airbases across the Middle East on Monday, a fiery retaliation to America's weekend strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. ‌ Targets in Qatar, Bahrain and Iraq were struck in the onslaught. US President Donald Trump responded defiantly, asserting the devastation caused by America's earlier action was catastrophic, reports the Express. Iran retaliated to unexpected attacks labelled as "gamechanging" by experts, carried out by the US over the weekend, which "obliterated" the three key nuclear facilities of Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. Israel had pressed the United States to use its formidable 30,000lb "bunker buster" bomb against Iran's heavily fortified nuclear sites - a move that led to last night's B-2 stealth bomber operation known as Operation Midnight Hammer. ‌ Shocking images from the aftermath show six craters at the attacked site, correlating with the sextet of bombs deployed in the dead of night. ‌ In his address, Donald Trump lauded the successful US operation and proclaimed Iran had been significantly weakened. Addressing Tehran, he warned: "Remember, there are many targets left," suggesting that any further military actions would be less challenging for American forces than the previous incursion. Later that day, US Air Force General Dan Caine, the Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman, announced: "The goal of the operation - destroying nuclear sites at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan - has been achieved." Evaluations so far confirmed that each of the three sites sustained considerable damage. In an impassioned message on Truth Social, Trump declared: "We have completed our very successful attack on Iran's nuclear programme. All US aircraft are now outside of Iranian airspace." He menacingly suggested the possibility of more strikes should Iran remain defiant, cautioning that any subsequent assault would be "easier than last night." With a 12-hour ceasefire presently in effect, global attention is fixated on Iran's reaction and whether this pause in aggression might extend into a lasting peace.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store