logo
Warrant issued for Viking hoard thief

Warrant issued for Viking hoard thief

Yahoo27-01-2025
A warrant has been issued for the arrest of a man found guilty of stealing a Viking hoard of gold worth £3 million.
Metal detectorist George Powell, from Newport, failed to appear at Birmingham Magistrates Court on 8 January.
He was due to have been sentenced for failing to repay £600,000, the money a judge had earlier decided was his share of the missing coins and jewellery.
His fellow detectorist, Layton Davies, from Pontypridd, is serving an extra five years and three months in prison for failing to pay his share.
In 2015, George Powell and Layton Davies uncovered 300 coins and gold jewellery in a field in Eye, near Leominster, Herefordshire.
Instead of declaring the treasure, as required by law, they sold the valuables to dealers.
In 2019, they were both found guilty of theft, conspiring to conceal criminal property, and converting criminal property by selling it.
George Powell was sentenced to 10 years in prison, later reduced to six and a half years on appeal.
Layton Davies was sentenced to eight and a half years in prison, later reduced to five years on appeal.
At the time of the trial, just 31 of the estimated 300 coins that they found had been recovered.
Experts believed the coins were Anglo-Saxon and to have been hidden by a Viking.
One of them was a double-headed coin, showing two rulers of England. Alfred the Great, who ruled Wessex, and Ceolwulf II of Mercia.
Historians said this showed there was an alliance previously not thought to exist between the kings, changing what we know about the unification of England.
The hoard also included a 9th-century gold ring, a crystal rock pendant, a dragon's head bracelet and an ingot.
At the trial, the judge told the men they were guilty of stealing the nation's history.
In 2022, both George Powell and Layton Davies appeared at Worcester Crown Court.
Judge Nicholas Cartwright told the men he believed about 270 coins were still being deliberately hidden by them.
They were given a confiscation order and each told to repay £600,000 or go back to jail.
George Powell appealed against that order, but his attempts to stay out of prison were rejected twice by an appeal judge and also the Court of Appeal in London.
He was due to be sentenced at Birmingham Magistrates Court in January, but he failed to appear, so a warrant was issued for his arrest.
Hereford Museum raised £776,250 to buy the jewellery, the ingot, and 29 coins from the owner of the field where they were found.
The Museum and Art Gallery is undergoing a £22 million refurbishment and is due to reopen with a purpose-built space where the coins and jewellery will be on permanent display.
In May 2023, two further men, Craig Best, from County Durham, and Roger Pilling, from Lancashire, were each jailed for five years and two months after trying to sell 44 rare Anglo-Saxon coins worth £766,000.
The coins were thought to be part of the hoard uncovered in Herefordshire by George Powell and Layton Davies.
The rest of the hoard is still missing.
Hunt continues for missing Viking hoard artefacts
Judge rejects Viking hoard thief's appeal bid
Viking hoard thieves must pay £600k each
Detectorists jailed for stealing £3m Viking hoard
Men jailed for £766k Anglo-Saxon coin sale plot
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Teenage killer of Bhim Kohli keeps seven-year sentence at Court of Appeal
Teenage killer of Bhim Kohli keeps seven-year sentence at Court of Appeal

Yahoo

time7 days ago

  • Yahoo

Teenage killer of Bhim Kohli keeps seven-year sentence at Court of Appeal

A teenage boy who killed elderly dog walker Bhim Kohli in a Leicestershire park will not have his sentence for manslaughter changed, the Court of Appeal has ruled. Mr Kohli, 80, was punched and kicked, slapped in the face with a shoe and racially abused in an attack in Franklin Park, Braunstone Town, near Leicester, on September 1 last year, and died the next day. The 15-year-old, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to seven years' custody in June. The Solicitor General (SG), Lucy Rigby, referred the sentence to the Court of Appeal under the unduly lenient sentence scheme. At a hearing on Wednesday, Lady Justice Macur, sitting alongside Mrs Justice Cutts and Mr Justice Murray, ruled that the boy's sentence was neither unduly lenient nor manifestly excessive. She said: 'We consider that the judge conscientiously executed the necessary sentencing exercise and conveyed his remarks to offender and co-defendant with great skill. 'We do not find that the sentence was unduly lenient.' Of the attempt to reduce the sentence, she said: 'The sentence was a very significant sentence and necessarily so. 'It is entirely warranted by the seriousness of the offence. It is unarguable that the sentence was manifestly excessive.' Paul Jarvis KC, for the SG, said that although the sentencing judge did not identify a high risk of death, he did say there was a high risk of very serious harm. He added: 'We say, if not unduly lenient, most certainly not manifestly excessive.' Balraj Bhatia KC, for the boy, told the court that Mr Kohli's frailty meant 'little or no force was required' to kill him. He said: 'Sadly, the vulnerability of the deceased's neck was such that had he spent a day on his beloved allotment and fallen accidentally, the result would have been the same.' The boy was convicted after a six-week trial in June at Leicester Crown Court, alongside a 13-year-old girl who also cannot be named. She encouraged the attack by filming parts of it while laughing, with video clips showing the balaclava-clad boy hitting Mr Kohli with a shoe. Another clip showed Mr Kohli lying on the ground motionless. The girl took a photograph of Mr Kohli on her phone the week before the alleged incident, but denied she used this to 'target' him, the trial heard. Police also recovered a video from her phone of a group of children 'confronting' an unknown man on a separate occasion, who was hit to the back of the head and called a 'Paki bastard' while she was heard laughing. The girl was sentenced to a three-year youth rehabilitation order by Mr Justice Turner, and her sentence was not referred to the Court of Appeal. Mr Kohli's children found him lying on the ground in agony, and he told his daughter he had been called a 'Paki' during the attack, the court heard during the trial. Jurors also heard the boy say in his evidence that he had a 'tussle' with Mr Kohli over his slider shoe before he slapped the elderly man with it out of 'instinct', which caused the pensioner to fall to his knees, but he denied kicking or punching him. In a letter written by the boy to a woman who had worked with him at the residential unit where he was being looked after, he wrote: 'I f****** hate what I did. I regret it so much. 'I have flashbacks of that day and it just upsets me. I kinda just needed anger etc releasing.'

Britain begins detaining 'small boat' migrants to send back to France
Britain begins detaining 'small boat' migrants to send back to France

UPI

time07-08-2025

  • UPI

Britain begins detaining 'small boat' migrants to send back to France

Britain began detaining migrants arriving on small boats from France under a deal in which one migrant who arrives without permission is returned for each migrant with an asylum claim or visa application legally lodged in France that Britain accepts. File photo by Andy Rain/EPA-EFE Aug. 7 (UPI) -- A landmark Anglo-French "one-in, one-out" migrant agreement saw the first small boat arrivals on the British coast taken into custody in preparation for being returned to France, the government said Thursday. The detentions got underway on Wednesday with migrants who had crossed the Channel "illegally" held in secure immigration centers pending their removal to France, which was expected to take place in a matter of weeks, according to a Home Office news release. It pledged full transparency, saying detainees would be briefed on the process for returning them to France and kept updated on their progress through the system on an individual basis. For each migrant sent back, Britain will take in one pre-approved to claim asylum who has not previously attempted to enter the country and who has completed a formal application and security clearance process in France that is only open to those with a passport or identity document. Pre-checked individuals, or family groups, will then journey safely from France via scheduled rail, ferry or airline services. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper declined to say how many migrants had been detained but vowed to fight any challenge launched in the courts in an attempt to block them from being sent back to France. "The transfers to immigration removal centers are underway as we speak, so we won't provide operational details at this point that criminal gangs can simply use and exploit. But no one should be in any doubt: anyone who arrives from now on is eligible for immediate detention and return," she said. Cooper added that it was the very early stages of a pilot that would take time to scale up, but stressed, given that France was a safe country for all, including migrants, the government would "robustly defend against any legal challenge that people try." However, Home Office sources told The Guardian that the scheme inked last month during a state visit to Britain by French President Emmanuel Macron would initially only involve about 50 asylum seekers. Immigration lawyers warned that the ambiguous terms of the treaty left it open to legal challenge by individuals trying to prevent their removal from the country. At least one charity cautioned that the scheme shut out people fleeing war or famine in countries including Eritrea or Sudan because they were unlikely to meet the criteria for official identification. "This week in Calais, we spoke with many people from Eritrea and almost none of them have copies of their Eritrean passports because they were never able to obtain one," said a spokesperson for Refugee Legal Support. The spokesperson said the largest group making the journey across the Channel so far this year were Eritreans, 86% of whom had their refugee claims upheld once they reached Britain -- but virtually all of them would never get that chance under the scheme. The deal, marking the first time Britain has been able to return migrants who arrive from France, came as the number of people crossing the Channel in small boats in the first seven months of 2025 topped a record 25,436. Under the treaty, Britain is responsible for the costs of transporting migrants in both directions, and France is entitled to refuse to accept returnees it believes pose "a threat to public policy, internal security, public health or the international relations of any of the Schengen states." Schengen states refer to the borderless, free travel area comprising 25 of 27 member countries of the European Union plus Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland.

Irish court rejects Conor McGregor appeal in sexual assault case
Irish court rejects Conor McGregor appeal in sexual assault case

CNN

time31-07-2025

  • CNN

Irish court rejects Conor McGregor appeal in sexual assault case

Mixed martial arts fighter Conor McGregor on Thursday lost his attempt to overturn a jury's order that he compensate a woman who accused him of raping her, with Ireland's Court of Appeal rejecting the appeal in its entirety. The plaintiff, Nikita Hand, alleged that McGregor sexually assaulted her on December 9, 2018. A jury last year ordered McGregor to pay her nearly 250,000 euros ($285,250) in damages. McGregor, 36, denied the allegation and said he had 'fully consensual sex' with Hand. He also denied causing bruising to the plaintiff. In the appeal heard earlier this month, lawyers for McGregor said the judge erred in directing the jury to decide whether he 'assaulted' rather than 'sexually assaulted' the victim. Judge Brian O'Moore said on Thursday that the appeal court had no doubt the overall effect of the trial judge's charge was to tell them the central allegation by Hand against McGregor was that he had raped her. McGregor's legal team had also argued that the judge should not have allowed a line of questioning during cross-examination regarding McGregor's 'no comment' responses in a police interview. That ground was also rejected. Hand embraced a number of people beside her after the appeal court ruling. 'To every survivor out there, I know how hard it is, but please don't be silenced. … You deserve to be heard, you also deserve justice. Today, I can finally move on and try to heal,' Hand said in a statement outside the court. Hand told the high court in November that she and a friend made contact with McGregor, whom she knew, after a work Christmas party. She said they were driven by McGregor to a party in a penthouse room of a Dublin hotel where drugs and alcohol were consumed. She said McGregor, who was not in court on Thursday, took her to a bedroom in the penthouse and sexually assaulted her. Hand's lawyer told the jury that when she was referred to a sexual assault treatment unit the day after the alleged assault, a doctor was so concerned that he directed that photographs be taken of her injuries.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store