
17 Million Americans May Lose Health Coverage Under The One Big Beautiful Bill
Twelve million of those at risk are Medicaid enrollees. An additional 5 million people stand to lose coverage due to changes in the Affordable Care Act marketplace coverage.
Overall, these changes will lead to significant increases in out-of-pocket healthcare costs, lapses in coverage, and total losses for the most vulnerable Americans. Here are five things you need to know about key health care coverage provisions in the bill.
Women Will Lose Access To Trusted Reproductive Health Care Providers
Due to a prohibition on Medicaid funds to nonprofit organizations and community health centers that offer family planning and reproductive health care services, including abortion care with private or non-federal funds, underserved and hard-to-reach communities are likely to see gaps in access to vital health care.
Planned Parenthood, a trusted and long-standing reproductive health care provider, is targeted through this provision of the bill. However, the effects will have far-reaching impacts on additional providers and millions of patients.
This is just the latest target by Congressional Republicans and President Trump of reproductive health care providers. In March, the Trump administration withheld tens of millions in funding from Planned Parenthood and other front-line family planning clinics. More than 1 million Americans seeking care from Planned Parenthood alone could lose access to essential services such as sexually transmitted infections testing, cancer screenings, and contraception. Some Planned Parenthood clinics also provide prenatal care to expectant parents. Due to a decades-old federal restriction on abortion coverage under the Hyde Amendment, Medicaid enrollees are already prohibited from using their health care coverage for abortion (except in the cases of rape, endangerment to the life of the mother, and incest). On July 7, a judge temporarily barred the Trump administration from withholding Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood.TOPSHOT - Supporters of Planned Parenthood and pro-choice supporters rally outside the US Supreme ... More Court on April 2, 2025, in Washington, DC. The Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments in Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, which could decide if states can strip Planned Parenthood of Medicaid funds. The case addresses whether Medicaid beneficiaries can seek relief in federal court to enforce Medicaid's "free-choice of provider provision," which allows Medicaid beneficiaries to seek care from any provider that is qualified and willing to participate in the program. While the case focuses on this specific question, it has its origins in broader efforts by anti-abortion policymakers to exclude Planned Parenthood clinics from the Medicaid program and, ultimately, eliminate all federal payments to Planned Parenthood centers. (Photo by Drew ANGERER / AFP) (Photo by DREW ANGERER/AFP via Getty Images)The Bill Imposes Stringent Work Requirements On Medicaid Enrollees
The bill enacts new conditions on Medicaid eligibility, requiring individuals between the ages of 19 and 64 to work at least 80 hours per month and undertake onerous reporting requirements. The final version, as signed by President Trump, does include exemptions for Medicaid enrollees who are the parents of children under the age of 13.
KFF estimates that 64% of adults on Medicaid already work full time or part time. The remainder simply cannot work due to caregiving responsibilities (12%), illness or disability (10%), or because they are pursuing education (7%). The work requirement could knock people out of much-needed insurance coverage, especially low-income, vulnerable individuals. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that while work requirements could result in federal savings over the long term, policies such as this would greatly increase the number of uninsured Americans and do nothing to spark increases in employment rates.
Out-of-pocket Health Care Costs Are Expected To Rise
Medicaid enrollees who maintain coverage given the new changes can expect to feel it in their pocketbooks. The bill will require states to impose cost sharing of up to $35 per service for adults with incomes between 100% to 138% of the federal poverty line. It includes exemptions for primary care, substance use disorder treatment, and mental health care, and maintains limits on cost sharing for prescription drugs from the previous law, along with prior exemptions (i.e., long-term care, family planning, etc.). Those managing chronic health conditions could see the greatest burden in out-of-pocket costs over a year. The average annual expense for all Medicaid enrollees is about $542, and up to $1,248 for those managing three or more chronic conditions. For people with limited incomes, an increase in expenses of this magnitude could completely derail household budgets and cause families to forgo necessities.
The Bill Cuts Biden-Era Incentive For State Medicaid Expansion
The budget reconciliation bill eliminates the American Rescue Plan's temporary financial incentive for states opting to expand Medicaid. Forty-one states and the District of Columbia have expanded Medicaid, broadening the population of individuals and families with slightly higher household incomes eligible for Medicaid (up to 138% of the federal poverty line, or $21,597 for an individual, $44,367 for a family of four). Under the American Rescue Plan, 90% in federal matching funds had been awarded to state populations with Medicaid expansion.
Medicaid expansion has been key in increasing access to health coverage and essential care for millions of Americans, improving access to services such as long-term care, treatment of chronic conditions such as diabetes, behavioral health, pregnancy-related care (including in the vulnerable postpartum period), care for people with disabilities, and much more.
Certain Groups Of Immigrants Are No Longer Eligible For Subsidized Health Insurance Coverage
The bill eliminates subsidized health insurance coverage through the Affordable Care Act marketplace for all immigrants residing in the country lawfully with incomes under 100% of the federal poverty line. In 2025, this is just $15,650 annually for an individual and $32,150 annually for a family of four.
The new law places further limitations on subsidized coverage for immigrants with green cards, refugees, asylees, and people with Temporary Protected Status. It also severely or altogether limits Medicaid and State Children's Health Insurance Program coverage for many of these groups of immigrants.
Undocumented immigrants are already ineligible for subsidized health insurance coverage. Uninsured rates among immigrants tend to be high, especially among the undocumented. These groups are also most likely to delay much-needed healthcare or forgo it altogether. Despite high rates of employment within the immigrant population, it's uncommon for them to have access to employer-sponsored health insurance, making subsidized coverage critical to ensuring access to essential health care services.
Many of these provisions take effect in 2026, but the government is already beginning to implement them. In the meantime, the individuals and families affected by ensuing changes to their health care coverage must keep a close eye on not only their health plans but also their pocketbooks. While the health implications for the uninsured cannot be overstated, so too are the implications of those already experiencing economic hardship. The One Big Beautiful Bill will make it harder for already struggling individuals and families to make ends meet and stay healthy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump announces 'massive' trade deal with Japan
President Donald Trump says the US has agreed to a "massive" trade deal with Japan, one of the country's largest trading partners. The plan would result in Japan investing $550bn (£407bn) in the US and paying a 15% tariff, Trump said in a post on social media. He added that Japan would open its economy to US goods, including cars, trucks, rice and certain agricultural products. Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba welcomed the announcement, saying it was "the lowest figure to date among countries with trade surpluses with the US". "I just signed the largest trade deal in history, I think maybe the largest deal in history with Japan," Trump touted at a White House event on Tuesday evening. "They had their top people here, and we worked on it long and hard. And it's a great deal for everybody. I always say it has to be great for everybody. It's a great deal," he added. Speaking to reporters on Wednesday, Ishiba said the agreement would mean US tariffs on vehicles and parts would be cut to 15% from 25%. "We were the first in the world to reduce tariffs on cars and auto parts without any quantity restrictions," he said. "The agreement does not include any reduction of tariffs on the Japanese side," Ishiba added. The BBC has reached out to the White House and Japan's embassy in Washington for more details of the trade agreement. Bringing its main tariff rate down to 15% is Japan's "best compromise at this stage", Shigeto Nagai from research firm Oxford Economics told BBC News. The planned investment in the US by Japan included in the announcement "will be a huge boost to restore the US, fitting in with Trump's story of reviving US manufacturing with more jobs," he added. In a letter sent to Japan this month, Trump threatened a 25% tariff on the country's exports to the US if there wasn't a new trade deal struck before 1 August. That was one percentage point higher from the 24% rate announced during his so-called Liberation Day on 2 April. The April tariffs plan, which included duties on many US trading partners across the globe, were paused for 90 days following worldwide market turmoil. It allowed Tokyo's trade representatives time to negotiate with their counterparts in Washington. Japan's benchmark share index, the Nikkei 225, was more than 3% higher on Wednesday in Tokyo, with strong gains for shares in motor industry giants - including Toyota, Nissan and Honda. The apparent deal comes as Ishiba is under pressure to step down after his Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) lost its majority in the country's upper house in elections over the weekend. The LDP had already lost its majority in Japan's more powerful lower house last year.


CNBC
30 minutes ago
- CNBC
CCTV Script 23/07/2025
As the August 1st deadline approaches, the U.S. government is intensifying efforts to reach trade agreements with various countries. On Tuesday local time, progress was made in trade negotiations between the U.S. and Southeast Asian nations. According to the joint statement released by the White House, U.S. tariffs on Indonesia have been reduced from the previously threatened 32% in April to 19%. In return, Indonesia will lower tariffs to 0% on 99% of U.S. exports to Indonesia, covering sectors such as agricultural products, healthcare products, aquatic products, as well as communications technology, automobiles, and chemicals. In terms of tariff rates, the Special Adviser to the Indonesian President on International Trade said in an interview with CNBC that while the original 32% tariff level would have significantly impacted Indonesia's economy, the current 19% tariff is expected to shift the effect on GDP from a negative 0.6% to a positive growth of 0.5%. "We will be able to avoid, hopefully, the potential retrenchment in our labor intensive industries and exports, which have been the worst hit with the 32% tariff." It is worth noting that, according to the joint statement, Indonesia will comprehensively ease non-tariff barriers on U.S. industrial and agricultural products, including localization requirements, certification standards, import permits, and more. Specifically, Indonesia has agreed to exempt U.S.-invested companies and their products of origin from local content requirements. Previously, this policy was seen as a key measure to promote local employment in Indonesia, but it has now been relaxed. Secondly, Indonesia has agreed to adopt for American-made cars exported to Indonesia, which is also a positive development for U.S. automakers. Additionally, Indonesia will lift export restrictions on critical minerals. Moreover, overnight, Trump announced that the U.S. would impose a 19% tariff on the Philippines. This tariff adjustment follows a rise from 17% in April to 20% at the beginning of this month, and has now been reduced to 19%, matching the rate applied to Indonesia. According to U.S. government data, the U.S. trade deficit with the Philippines last year was $4.9 billion, with bilateral trade totaling $23.5 billion. In response to Trump's proposal for the Philippines to open its market to the U.S. and implement zero tariffs, the Philippines has yet to respond. Previously, the Philippines stated that it could not implement zero tariffs on U.S. goods like Vietnam and Indonesia, as it would harm the interests of domestic businesses. The president of the Philippine Exporters Confederation said in a CNBC interview that, based on a survey of local exporters, 10% of respondents reported their buyers were in a wait-and-see mode due to uncertainty about absorbing additional costs. However, most of these orders have already been successfully redirected to other markets. For Southeast Asian countries, they are closely monitoring the progress of trade negotiations between their neighbors and the U.S. This attention underscores the interconnected nature of regional trade dynamics and the potential ripple effects of bilateral agreements on neighboring economies. "We're really worried about the negotiations of our competitors. So sort of especially in the region. Because if what happens to Vietnam happens to the other countries here who have the same products with us, then we have a problem in the US, at least."


UPI
30 minutes ago
- UPI
Columbia disciplines dozens of pro-Palestine protesters
Pro Palestine protesters are arrested by NYPD Police officers on the campus of Columbia University on Wednesday, May 7, 2025, in New York City. Arrests were underway late Wednesday after about 100 pro-Palestinian protesters at Columbia University took over the campus' Butler Library just days before final exams. File Photo by Derek French/UPI | License Photo July 23 (UPI) -- Columbia University has disciplined dozens of pro-Palestine protesters amid pressure from the Trump administration, which has targeted the school amid its crackdown on left-leaning ideology. In a statement Tuesday, the school said the unspecified sanctions were administered after its University Judicial Board determined they were warranted concerning the disruption of Butler Library in May and the Spring 2024 encampment during Alumni Weekend. The number of students punished was not mentioned, but sources told CNN that it was more than 70. "While the University does not release individual disciplinary results of any student, the sanctions from Butler Library included probation, suspensions (ranging from one year to three years), degree revocations and expulsions," Columbia said in a statement. The announcement comes as the school faces pressure from the Trump administration, which has targeted universities -- in particular elite schools -- over left-leaning activism it describes as anti-Israel and anti-Semitic and diversity, equity and inclusion policies. The Trump administration has claimed protests that erupted across campuses nationwide demonstrating against Israel's war in Gaza were violent and anti-Semitic, and has used them to punish those institutions. At Columbia, pro-Palestine protesters on May 7 disrupted a portion of Butler, occupying rooms there and vandalizing property, resulting in two public safety officers sustaining injuries. In March, the Trump administration canceled some $400 million in federal grants and contracts to the university "due to the school's continued inaction in the face of persistent harassment of Jewish students." Columbia has said the halt in funding forced it to lay off 180 researchers. Columbia said since March it has responded to the Trump administration by instituting what it has called structural reforms and other improvements. "Our institution must focus on delivering on its academic mission for our community," Columbia said in the Tuesday statement. "And to create a thriving academic community, there must be respect for each other and the institution's fundamental work, policies and rules. Disruptions to academic activities are in violation of University policy and Rules, and such violations will necessarily generate consequences." Since returning to power in January, President Donald Trump has used his executive powers to go after the United States universities, in particular its Ivy League schools. In April, he signed an executive order to reform the university accreditation system to penalize those that employ DEI policies. Harvard University has taken the Trump administration to court over the president's freezing of more than $2.4 billion in what the school said was a pressure campaign "to force Harvard to submit to the government's control over its academic programs." This month, it has launched four federal investigations into George Mason University over its alleged DEI policies. The New York Chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations lambasted Columbia on Tuesday for its "grotesquely oppressive" decision to mass-punish its students. "The students sat in unity to urge ending complicity in an active genocide. Columbia, seemingly bowing to political pressure from the Trump administration, has done more than undermine free speech and higher education. The University has sold its morality, academic integrity and commitment to students," CAIR-NY executive Director Afaf Nasher said in a statement.