
SF schools to replace ethnic studies curriculum amid backlash
Why it matters: San Francisco high schools' ethnic studies classes, which started as an elective in 2010, became the target of controversy in recent months as some parents accused the district of peddling division and promoting antisemitism, among other concerns.
Driving the news: SFUSD will opt for an off-the-shelf package instead of its home-grown curriculum starting this August.
There will be an audit of current materials, and the school board will have to sign off before the district officially adopts another curriculum.
The year-long ethnic studies course requirement for freshmen, first implemented last year, will remain in place, though students can choose to waive it.
What they're saying: "There is general consensus that ethnic studies as a course is really important," but the district's curriculum has evolved to include lessons that don't reflect its "true tenets," Su told the San Francisco Chronicle Monday.
She did not cite specifics but said generally that parents have complained the curriculum "has flaws."
"We want to ensure that all of our educators are adopting the curriculum in a consistent manner," she said. "I'm putting in more guardrails."
Su did not immediately return a request for comment, while SFUSD directed Axios to its press release on the announcement.
Between the lines: Controversy surrounding ethnic studies has largely centered on how to approach the subject — whether it should focus on appreciating cultures other than your own or systemic racism and white supremacy.
In one case, a unit on social movements included references to the Chinese Red Guards as a push for "change and justice" despite their use of murder, torture and public humiliation to crack down on dissent against Mao Zedong, the San Francisco Standard reports.
Some parents have also argued that lessons perpetrate discrimination against white students, pointing to a reading about white male privilege from 2012.
The big picture: California became the first state to establish a one-semester ethnic studies course as a graduation requirement for public high school students when AB101 was signed into law in 2021.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
Russia's New Deadly Glide Bomb Revealed
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Russia has introduced a new guided glide bomb into its full-scale invasion, which marks Moscow's push to develop aerial weapons to bombard Ukraine's infrastructure. Ukrainian authorities said that Russia's new UMPB-5 guided aerial bombs had been dropped by Sukhoi Su-34 fighter jets on two regions in the last two months amid testing of the new weapon. Analysis shared with Newsweek by the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), a Washington, D.C., think tank, said that the glide bomb was part of Russia's growing efforts to develop cheap standoff guided munitions. Newsweek has contacted the Russian Defense Ministry via email for comment. File photo: Ukrainian rescue workers survey the rubble of a residential building hit during a Russian overnight drone and missile strike in Kyiv, Ukraine on June 23, 2025. File photo: Ukrainian rescue workers survey the rubble of a residential building hit during a Russian overnight drone and missile strike in Kyiv, Ukraine on June 23, It Matters Before Vladimir Putin's full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Moscow underestimated how many glide bombs and other guided munitions it would need. Russia's glide bombs before the war were relatively expensive and so used sparingly. The FDD's John Hardie said Russia's failure to destroy most of Ukraine's air defenses at the invasion's start pushed Moscow to swiftly develop cheap glide bombs with standoff range that will allow its air force to play a greater role. What To Know Ukrainian authorities said the UMPB-5 was first used in Ukraine's Sumy region and then on two consecutive days of strikes on the city of Kharkiv on July 24 and 25; one attack hit a hospital. In the second instance, a Su-34 released the bomb about 65 miles away from Russia's neighboring Belgorod region; this is according to Spartak Borysenko from the Kharkiv Prosecutor's Office, which investigates such attacks as war crimes. Borysenko said Russia is still testing the weapon and that its exact characteristics are not yet known. But the name of the UMPB-5 glide bomb suggests it is a derivative of the UMPB D-30SN, which was first seen in spring 2024, the FDD said. The latter model has a longer range than the 50 miles of its predecessor and has warhead that weighs 2.5 times more, at around 550 pounds. Cheap glide bombs are playing a greater role in Russia's aggression with Moscow; an average of 160 were dropped each day in July 2025, according to President Volodymyr Zelensky—eight times more than spring 2023. The main one used is the UMPK, or "Universal Gliding and Correction Module," first seen in January 2023. It is designed to fit on dumb bombs and was initially employed with the FAB-500 M-62, a 1,100-pound-class high-explosive bomb, but since adapted for bombs of various sizes. Borysenko said that Moscow started using a modified UMPK with larger wings and a range of at least 60 miles in the Sumy and Kharkiv regions in May. With further testing, this range could increase, as suggested by a Russian Telegram channel. Russia is also developing low-cost air-launched cruise missiles, such as the recently unveiled S8000 BanderoL, which can be launched via remotely piloted aircraft. What People Are Saying John Hardie, deputy director of FDD's Russia Program, said Moscow is using a new UMPB-5 guided glide bomb, which: "appears to be a more-powerful derivative of a bomb introduced last year, reflecting the Russian Air Force's efforts to develop a growing variety of cheap standoff guided munitions." Spartak Borysenko, from the Kharkiv Regional Prosecutor's Office, said: "UMPB-5 is a new ammunition that the Russians began using about two months ago … they are currently testing it, and the exact characteristics are not known for certain." What Happens Next Hardie said that details about these new munitions remain scarce, but Russia's Air Force and Naval Aviation are focused on producing large quantities of inexpensive standoff munitions. Whether Russia will address its shortcomings in destroying enemy air defenses is a problem "that will be much harder to solve," Hardie added.


San Francisco Chronicle
2 days ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
S.F. schools are cutting extracurricular programs. It could hurt these kids the most
Among the many items in the San Francisco school district's annual budget is a line item for student internships, a popular program for 500 high school students in health, culinary arts, education and other career pathway courses providing real-life experience in companies across the city. For this upcoming school year, there is a big fat zero next to it. The program has been eliminated. Like many so-called 'extras,' it felt more like a critical necessity, said Superintendent Maria Su. But amid crushing budget deficits across the state's public school system and the Trump Administration's cuts to a wide range of support for low-income children and families, there is little money left of public funds to pay for anything beyond the basics, education experts say, likely leaving disadvantaged children further behind, education leaders say. Activities like internships, sports and clubs, the so-called extracurriculars, have long been linked to higher grades in schools, refined social skills, determination, grit, as well as stronger college applications filled with examples of leadership and community involvement. But children from wealthier families are twice as likely to be in sports, clubs or lessons than those living in poverty, according to Census data. That disparity starts as early as kindergarten, when many 5 year olds start running around soccer fields or take their first piano lesson, while most of their less-advantaged peers are sidelined. In the past, public schools could backfill some of those experiences, providing opportunities for sports, music, clubs, theater, field trips and after-school enrichment programs, giving students the social and academic benefits of extracurricular pursuits. In San Francisco, the school district's $114 million in cuts this year have hit classrooms hard, forcing officials to reconsider every staffing position and every dollar spent. 'I grew up poor and I know that access to education and (extracurricular) programming is truly the key to a better future,' Su said. 'All of that together really does create a really well-rounded young person who is prepared for whatever life throws at them.' Internships and all the extras really do matter, Su said. 'Through exposure you get experience,' she added. 'Through experience you get confidence.' While the public schools across the state are forced to focus, for the time being, on the necessities of instruction and learning, cities and community organizations often ensure low-income families have access to some extracurricular activities, whether free days at museums, discounted swim lessons or summer camps. In San Francisco, the Boys and Girls Club is a significant part of that, with after-school and summer programs, including a financial literacy camp, which might sound dreary, but as the final day played out in a second-floor conference room at the UC San Francisco Law School this past week, it was anything but boring. The culmination of the camp was a team product pitch to judges, similar to the television show 'Shark Tank,' re-dubbed Fish Tank. The teams came up with inventions, price points based on produce costs and slogans. The pitches included a tennis shoe that expanded as a child grew, an all-in-one beauty product and the winner: a dissolving chewing gum called DisGum. 'We thought about problems with gum,' one of the members, Euan, a sixth grader in the fall, told the Chronicle after their victory. 'We made gum that dissolves after a certain time,' whether it's in someone's mouth or on the underside of a school desk, he added. The camp was a partnership between the University of San Francisco and the Boys and Girls Club, with funding from the Silk Family Investment Institute. It provided the campers a foundation in budgeting, banking and entrepreneurship while integrating creative thinking and team work — 'the kind of push kids with more opportunities get,' said Brian Sauer, Boys and Girls Club of San Francisco citywide director of education. 'This is just one of so many programs we do in the summer.' The kids even wanted to talk about tariffs, given the increased costs businesses need to pay on imported materials for their products, said Carl Levy III, a marketing student at University of San Francisco and one of the camp's instructors. 'They weren't gifted with the opportunity of 401K parents or of being trust fund babies, the kids who have piano lessons,' he added. 'But these kids had the opportunity to be here.' Beyond the Boys and Girls Club, the city also offers a wide range of programs for youth from low-income families, a commitment made to keep working families in the city and one that backstops a public education system reliant on state and federal funding, said Su, the former director of the Department of Children, Youth and Families. The Recreation and Parks Department, for example, offers many free activities, including swim and tennis lessons, boating, camps, drop-in sports and more. The city also provides scholarships for low-income families for the wildly popular summer camps, which would otherwise cost $204 a week for a basic day camp and up to $583 for five days learning 'The Art of Skateboarding.' But it's a bit of a mixed bag for the have-nots. Of the 4,000 kids attending the camps this summer, about 1,200 are getting financial help, but that's a fraction of the 27,000 students in San Francisco public schools who qualify for the support. Perhaps the biggest disparity in the city's experiential opportunity is Camp Mather, a popular Recreation and Parks family camp near Yosemite National Park, which costs about $2,200 per week for a family of four, including two children. There are 'camperships' to cover half the cost of lodging and food, but of the 1,205 cabin reservations so far this summer, just 46 have been subsidized, or 4% of the total. This is despite city efforts to triple those numbers over the past several years based on a belief that 'access to nature should never be a luxury,' said Phil Ginsburg, executive director of Recreation and Parks, in a 2020 announcement of increased funding for the low-income families. In addition to family income, the racial demographics also reflect a disparity in which kids get to experience the camp's s'mores, singing, hikes and talent shows. Camp Mather guests last year were 53.9% white, 12.4% Asian American, 12.4% Latino, 1.5% Black and 24.6% multiracial/decline to state. City officials said transportation is the biggest issue for many families, given the camp's location near Yosemite. Any public efforts in San Francisco or elsewhere to address gaps in extracurricular access would not only have to tackle the many issues confronting families, but it would also have to start when children are just starting school. An Ohio State University study of 401 kindergartners from 2022 found that if their mothers had a high school education or less, 47% of their children participated in sports, compared to 96% of the kids whose moms had a graduate or professional degree. Closing the extracurricular gap isn't easy, Michael Petrilli, president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, an education think tank. It requires funding, but also addressing policies, like pay-to-play sports in high schools that limit access to low-income families. As for the money part, the fiscal conservative, who has long supported school vouchers for poor and working-class families, said he would like to see the idea spread to enrichment activities like tutoring and other extras. It's a way to get more money into parents' pockets, even if their kids are in public schools, Petrilli said. He noted the Trump Administration's Big Beautiful Bill includes a provision aligned with that by giving a tax credit to donors who fund scholarships, which can be used not just for private school tuition, but also tutoring for public and private school students. 'It's always going to be the case that wealthy people are always going to spend more money on their kids,' Petrilli told the Chronicle. 'We could be doing a whole lot more so kids have positive experiences after-school and during the summer and we need to figure out how as a society to support that.'


Newsweek
3 days ago
- Newsweek
What America's Most and Least Popular Mayors Can Teach About Governing
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. San Francisco and Chicago are delivering a split-screen lesson in urban Democratic leadership in 2025. In one city, a new mayor is riding a wave of optimism. In the other, a sitting mayor faces historically low approval ratings. Together, they show how public perception can define a politician's fate long before policy results arrive. A July San Francisco Chronicle poll put Mayor Daniel Lurie's approval at 73 percent just six months into his term — a figure almost unheard of in the city's rough-and-tumble political climate. "I am just focused on delivering results for the people of San Francisco. That's why they elected me," Lurie told reporters when the poll was released. Lurie's political strength lies in focusing relentlessly on the quality-of-life issues that residents see every day: litter, drugs, street safety and visible disorder. A self-styled technocrat and heir to the Levi's fortune, Lurie took office and immediately declared the fentanyl crisis an emergency, set up a 24/7 drop-off center for people in crisis, and created a dedicated police unit for Union Square and the rest of the city's downtown core. He also pledged to add 1,500 shelter and treatment beds by September and already had 420 funded or opened by May. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie (left) and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson (right) are seeing opposite fortunes in 2025, with one riding high approval ratings while the other faces historic lows. San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie (left) and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson (right) are seeing opposite fortunes in 2025, with one riding high approval ratings while the other faces historic lows. AP "This is just the start... a really important moment in our city's trajectory," he said at a ribbon-cutting for a new recovery center. Chicago's story is the reverse. A February poll by M3 Strategies found Mayor Brandon Johnson's approval at just 6.6 percent, with nearly 80 percent of voters holding an unfavorable view. It's the lowest rating for a Chicago mayor in modern history, according to the Illinois Policy Institute, and among the lowest approval ratings ever measured in U.S. politics. On paper, Johnson can point to some progress: homicides down 15 percent in his first year, shootings and violent crime trending downward in mid-2025, and a unified shelter system with over 7,000 beds that stabilized a chaotic migrant influx. But perception hasn't followed. San Francisco: A Honeymoon Built on Visibility For the City by the Bay, the story so far is one of momentum built on optics and early action. Lurie's first months in office have been defined by highly visible moves that signaled urgency — crackdowns on street-level drug markets, cleanup campaigns in the city's tourist core and a promise to rapidly expand shelter capacity. Lurie has been walking the streets, talking to residents, throwing out first pitches, cutting ribbons and keeping his constituents up to speed with a deft use of social media. For San Franciscans, the mayor is seemingly everywhere all at once. California State Senator Scott Wiener said the shift in the city's demeanor from the depths of the pandemic has been palpable. "Over the last year, we've started turning a corner. Homeless encampments are down, drug use is declining, and more people are returning downtown," Wiener told Newsweek. "Progress is visible." Mayor Daniel Lurie of the San Francisco Giants throws the ceremonial first pitch on Opening Day at Oracle Park on April 4, 2025 in San Francisco, California. Mayor Daniel Lurie of the San Francisco Giants throws the ceremonial first pitch on Opening Day at Oracle Park on April 4, 2025 in San Francisco, California. Getty Images Yet the same Chronicle poll that delivered Lurie's high marks exposed the vulnerabilities familiar to other big-city mayors. Only 36 percent approved of his handling of housing affordability, and less than half were satisfied with progress on homelessness and the opioid crisis. Those are the very issues that define San Francisco's image nationwide. A failure to show more tangible results could quickly erode his early goodwill. Lurie also faces a looming $876 million two-year budget deficit and political friction over where new shelters will go. A proposal requiring every district to host one sparked neighborhood pushback and exposed early tensions with the city's powerful Board of Supervisors. His heavy reliance on the Bay Area's tech and business elite to shape downtown recovery has drawn praise for pragmatism — as well as questions about corporate influence inside City Hall. Chicago: A Mayor Trapped by Perception Where San Francisco's story is one of early optimism, Chicago's illustrates how quickly a narrative can harden against a mayor. Despite measurable drops in violent crime and the stabilization of a migrant crisis that consumed the city's resources, Brandon Johnson has struggled to convince residents their city is on the right track. "His low approval ratings are less about his general goals than the challenges the city faces," said Dick Simpson, a University of Illinois Chicago professor emeritus and former alderman. "He has done less well in handling crises and government generally than [his past three predecessors] Mayors Daley, Emanuel or Lightfoot." Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson at Robert Healy Elementary School on April 4, 2023 in Chicago, Illinois. Johnson is suffering one of the lowest approval ratings seen in modern U.S. politics. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson at Robert Healy Elementary School on April 4, 2023 in Chicago, Illinois. Johnson is suffering one of the lowest approval ratings seen in modern U.S. said Johnson's sluggish start hurt him. "He was very slow to get his team together. The transition team report was months late and it took most of his first year in office to make appointments," Simpson told Newsweek. "Many of his staff were unfamiliar with city government and had difficulty making the change from teacher, labor union leader, or community leader. They made many mistakes." Johnson's progressive governing philosophy — shifting resources from punitive policing to addressing root causes of crime and a focus on identity politics — was always politically risky, and has become even more so. Early critics amplified that risk: the police union's president warned of "blood in the streets" if he won. Even as crime dipped, the narrative of a city adrift stuck. Adding to the challenge, his "Bring Chicago Home" housing initiative was defeated by voters in 2024, straining ties with the business community and depriving his administration of dedicated funding for homeless services. The migrant crisis consumed more than $600 million in combined city, state and federal spending, sparking resentment in some long-neglected Black neighborhoods as resources flowed to new arrivals. Experts: Perception Trumps Policy in City Hall Together, the diverging leadership of two great American cities highlight what political analysts say is a recurring truth: public approval is often driven more by visible action and messaging than by raw statistics. "Mayor Johnson's record low approval is all his own doing," said Thomas Bowen, a Democratic strategist who advised former Chicago mayors Rahm Emanuel and Lori Lightfoot, in an interview with Newsweek. "Voters just don't trust him anymore to look out for their pocketbooks, improve their schools, or get the City of Chicago back on track," he added. That dynamic is also a reminder that data doesn't always drive perception. While violent crime is declining in Chicago, San Francisco's challenges remain tied to perceptions of disorder. Yet one mayor is being rewarded and the other punished in the court of public opinion. "It's less about data tables and more about whether people believe their mayor is visibly in control of the situation," said Simpson, the former Chicago alderman. The contrast underscores how fragile political capital can be in America's largest cities. In San Francisco, visible urgency has translated into trust and a sense of momentum. Lurie has leaned into that visibility, walking the long-troubled Tenderloin district with police, cutting ribbons at treatment centers and projecting a constant state of optimism across social media. However, in Chicago, even measurable progress has struggled to cut through when residents don't feel it in their daily lives — a gap that can define a mayor's legacy as much as any policy win or loss, Simpson said.