logo
Family of the Boulder attack suspect is facing deportation. What happens next?

Family of the Boulder attack suspect is facing deportation. What happens next?

CNNa day ago

ImmigrationFacebookTweetLink
Follow
While Mohamed Soliman occupies a cell in Boulder County Jail in Colorado, hundreds of miles away, his wife and five children are also in detention, at the hands of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Soliman, the man charged with attempted murder following an antisemitic firebombing attack Sunday, told detectives that 'no one' knew about his attack plans and 'he never talked to his wife or family about it,' according to the affidavit for his arrest.
But despite that admission from the Egyptian national, his family is now facing expedited removal from the United States.
Soliman, 45, was born in Egypt but lived in Kuwait for 17 years. He first tried to come to the US in 2005 but was denied a visa, law enforcement sources told CNN.
In 2022, he, his wife and their five children, entered the US as non-immigrant visitors and filed for asylum a month later in September 2022. His wife, a network engineer with a pending EB-2 visa, which is available to professionals with advanced degrees, and children were listed as dependents on the application filed in Denver, the Department of Homeland Security and court documents said.
In 2023, Soliman received a two-year work authorization that expired in March, according to DHS.
Soliman and his wife have two minor sons and three minor daughters ages 4, 4, 8, 15 and 17, family attorney Eric Lee told CNN. Lee is not representing Soliman.
Soliman was booked into the Boulder County Jail after his arrest. His family was initially held in Florence, Colorado, about an hour away from their home in Colorado Springs, before they were transferred to a detention facility in Texas.
Soliman's family was held 'incommunicado' and didn't have access to legal representation after they were in ICE custody on Tuesday, their lawyers said in court documents. At the time of their detention, their asylum application was still pending, and as a result, the Trump administration can't legally expedite their removal, the documents say.
Soliman's family members have not been charged in the attack and on Wednesday evening, a federal judge ordered a halt to the deportation plans made for the family.
'Punishing individuals – including children as young as four-years-old – for the purported actions of their relatives is a feature of medieval justice systems or police state dictatorships, not democracies,' Lee said in a statement to CNN on Wednesday.
The family's detention has experts questioning the legality of the family's detention and visa revocation, calling it unprecedented, even at a time where migrant detentions in courthouse hallways, college campuses, office buildings and during traffic stops across the country are increasing at an exponential rate under significant pressure from the Trump administration, which is tightening the reins on immigration.
'A permanent resident and a non-permanent resident, somebody on let's say an H-1B visa or some other type of temporary visa … has due process rights,' David Leopold, the former president and general counsel of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, said at a news briefing with immigrant rights advocates in mid-March. 'Everybody is covered by the United States Constitution. Everybody's protected by the United States Constitution inside the United States.'
However, immigrants' presence in the US is generally considered a 'privilege' rather than a right and can be revoked for certain reasons laid out in federal law, such as a serious crime.
Once an asylum application is submitted, it's not uncommon for processing to take years before reaching a decision, César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández, a law professor at Ohio State University told CNN, adding that Soliman and his family were within their rights to continue living in the US with a pending application.
It is common however, for ICE to begin investigating one person and realize their family, friends or roommates may also have a questionable immigration status, García Hernández said.
'It's another matter entirely, to take the conduct of one individual and then ascribe responsibility on the family, on their family members by immediately detaining them and publicly saying that the goal is to deport them,' he said.
Soliman's wife, who CNN is not naming at this time, was 'shocked' when she learned her husband had been arrested, her lawyers said in court records obtained by CNN.
She said she and their five children should not be held responsible for her husband's crimes.
'Arrest first, investigate later, that is not the way that responsible law enforcement officers work,' Ben Johnson, executive director of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, told CNN.
The burden of proof on ICE and DHS is to assess whether the family is a security risk or a threat to the community, Johnson said, and that should be done through meticulous investigation.
During the attack, Soliman shouted 'Free Palestine,' according to the FBI and later told authorities that 'he wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead,' an affidavit said.
'He's confessed to a horrible crime, and he is obviously a threat to public safety,' Johnson said. 'Taking action against him makes all the sense in the world.'
After his arrest, Soliman's wife brought an iPhone 14 she said belonged to him to the Colorado Springs police office, the affidavit said.
'I don't know where this allegation or belief that somehow this man's family is responsible or guilty of the crimes of their father or husband (comes from),' Johnson said. 'To arrest children without having done a thorough investigation, this feels much more like a publicity stunt than a law enforcement action.'
As Soliman's wife and children wait for more information about their future, their attorneys are fighting to keep the family in the US.
In his order, Judge Gordon P. Gallagher of the US District Court in Colorado wrote, 'Defendants SHALL NOT REMOVE,' Soliman's wife and her children from the District of Colorado or the United States 'unless or until this Court or the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit vacates this order.'
Soliman appeared in state court Monday and is expected to appear in state court again Thursday and in federal court Friday. CNN has reached out to his attorney for comment.
Aside from investigating Soliman for any potential mental health issues, investigators are reviewing a notebook he left behind that contains a manifesto written in English with certain lines written in Arabic, according to a law enforcement source, noting police recovered the notebook after Soliman told them where to find it.
Investigators are also reviewing videos Soliman recorded of himself on his phone, both in English and Arabic, the source said.
On the heels of Soliman's actions, the White House announced a new travel ban on citizens from a dozen nations as part of the first Trump administration's promise to clamp down on entries from certain countries and visa overstays — which have garnered renewed scrutiny in the attack's aftermath.
President Donald Trump made the final call after the antisemitic attack, according to a White House official.
The president said in a video posted Wednesday that new countries could be added to the travel ban as 'threats emerge around the world,' although Egypt, where the Soliman family is from, was not on the list.
CNN's Priscilla Alvarez, Eric Levenson and Danya Gainor contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Your Daily FoodScope for June 07, 2025
Your Daily FoodScope for June 07, 2025

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Your Daily FoodScope for June 07, 2025

Do you often find yourself wondering what food to cook, how to cook it, and even that dreaded question—how much of it? It's a daily struggle for all of us, but need not be with our food horoscope. Satisfaction is only a click away! You could be tempted to do as little as possible. But that will be difficult as work demands suck you back in. But the day will be over before you know it and you can finally relax. Let someone else do the cooking tonight. Sushi and miso soup will be a mellow way to end the workweek. It'll behoove you to keep the company of those who share your goals today. This will be particularly true if you're trying to lose weight. A support group will keep you focused so arrange to meet for lunch. You can share each other's salads, although you may want to pass on the one with the anchovies. Things will seem blurry today, and comprehension will be hard to come by. You could be experiencing fallout from skipping breakfast. Making amends at lunch could save the day. Turkey breast on rye with a big green salad could have you seeing things clearer, or at least a lot less fuzzy. You may want to bond with your watery roots today. So get in a swim at the local pool. You'll feel right at home in the water and the subsequent workout will do you good. Follow that with a healthy dinner. Hmmm, grilled salmon with a bowl of Manhattan clam chowder suddenly comes to mind. Emotions will run high at work today, but strive to be the embodiment of Zen. This may be tough as you sit in the middle of the swirling vortex. But a cup of organic chamomile tea with a lemon slice and a sprig of mint may prompt you to chant your mantra, much to the chagrin of those around you. What does your karmic journey hold? Discover your destiny with our Karma Report. ✨ Don't expect a lot to get done on this last day of the week. Fortunately you won't have much on your plate, so it'll be easy to relax. But avoid skipping out early to get a head start on happy hour. Those Buffalo wings and nachos can wait until at least five o'clock, but not a minute later. It won't make sense to start new projects today. So milk the work you've already got on your plate. But you'll want to knock off a little early. There's a seat with your name on it at the sushi bar and a boatload of sashimi that's just daring you to dive in. You'll think your imagination is playing tricks on you today. But you'll soon realize that you're staring at the real deal. So pull up a chair and a fork and dig into a delicious crab casserole made with crab fresh from the bay. It'll be so good you'll think you're dreaming. You'll have a hard time getting the engine started today. So put the appropriate fuel into the tank before leaving home. Buttermilk pancakes with turkey sausage smothered in maple syrup will give you something to burn straight through lunch and beyond. Compassion will fuel you with a desire to help the less fortunate today. So buy cans of tuna, soup and fruit as well as boxes of cereal and donate them to your local food bank. It's important to remember those who don't have much to celebrate. You deserve to pamper yourself as the week draws to a close. A massage or facial sound tempting but they will ultimately be unsatisfying. Treat yourself to dinner instead. A surf and turf meal will give you contentment, especially if the surf in question is a plump Maine lobster tail. You may not have funds to lavish yourself with jewelry and trendy new clothes. But you can still pamper yourself and remain within budget. Buy the ingredients needed to make an obscenely cheesy lasagna. You'll get tremendous self-satisfaction and it won't break your bank. Need guidance? Your Numerology Reading is a mystic cheat-sheet to living your full potential.

Utah judge rules a convicted killer with dementia is competent to be executed
Utah judge rules a convicted killer with dementia is competent to be executed

CNN

time12 minutes ago

  • CNN

Utah judge rules a convicted killer with dementia is competent to be executed

A convicted killer in Utah who developed dementia while on death row for 37 years is competent enough to be executed, a state judge ruled late Friday. Ralph Leroy Menzies, 67, was sentenced to die in 1988 for killing Utah mother of three Maurine Hunsaker. Despite his recent cognitive decline, Menzies 'consistently and rationally understands' what is happening and why he is facing execution, Judge Matthew Bates wrote in a court order. 'Menzies has not shown by a preponderance of the evidence that his understanding of his specific crime and punishment has fluctuated or declined in a way that offends the Eighth Amendment,' which prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, Bates said. Menzies had previously selected a firing squad as his method of execution. He would become only the sixth U.S. prisoner executed by firing squad since 1977. The Utah Attorney General's Office is expected to file a death warrant soon. Menzies' lawyers, who had argued his dementia was so severe that he could not understand why he was being put to death, said they plan to appeal the ruling to the state Supreme Court. 'Ralph Menzies is a severely brain-damaged, wheelchair-bound, 67-year-old man with dementia and significant memory problems,' his attorney, Lindsey Layer, said in a statement. 'It is deeply troubling that Utah plans to remove Mr. Menzies from his wheelchair and oxygen tank to strap him into an execution chair and shoot him to death.' The U.S. Supreme Court has spared others prisoners with dementia from execution, including an Alabama man in 2019 who had killed a police officer. Over nearly four decades, attorneys for Menzies filed multiple appeals that delayed his death sentence, which had been scheduled at least twice before it was pushed back. Hunsaker, a 26-year-old married mother of three, was abducted by Menzies from the convenience store where she worked. She was later found strangled and her throat cut at a picnic area in the Wasatch Mountains of northern Utah. Menzies had Hunsaker's wallet and several other belongings when he was jailed on unrelated matters. He was convicted of first-degree murder and other crimes. Matt Hunsaker, who was 10 years old when his mother was killed, said Friday that the family was overwhelmed with emotion to know that justice would finally be served.

Recap of ‘Diddy' trial: ‘Jane' says Sean Combs threatened to cut her off financially over sexual ‘hotel nights'
Recap of ‘Diddy' trial: ‘Jane' says Sean Combs threatened to cut her off financially over sexual ‘hotel nights'

CNN

time12 minutes ago

  • CNN

Recap of ‘Diddy' trial: ‘Jane' says Sean Combs threatened to cut her off financially over sexual ‘hotel nights'

A woman using the pseudonym 'Jane' took the stand for a second day of salacious testimony at the end of the fourth week of Sean 'Diddy' Combs' federal criminal trial. Jane's testimony comes as the prosecution seeks to show Combs and his inner circle used violence, lies, drugs, and other means to coerce Jane and Cassie Ventura into having sex with other men as part of drug-fueled sexual performances known as 'hotel nights' or 'Freak Offs.' Combs has pleaded not guilty to charges of racketeering conspiracy, sex trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. His defense has acknowledged Combs was violent but has questioned the motives of those testifying and said the women consented to the sexual activity. Jane began testifying Thursday afternoon and is expected to return to the stand next week to continue her testimony and cross-examination. Here's what we learned in testimony Friday. Jane, who dated Combs from 2021 to 2024, testified that Combs falsely promised he'd spend quality time alone with her and dismissed her repeated requests to stop participating in his sexual 'hotel nights.' Jane said that Combs promised her the things she wanted, like date nights and quality time, but said he wanted to have 'hotel nights' first. She would agree, but then afterward they'd be too exhausted and 'spent the rest of our free time sleeping,' she testified. 'I need a breather and a break from you,' she wrote in a text message, read aloud in court Friday, from November 2021 after seeing Combs spend quality time with another woman shortly after Jane had a 'hotel night' with him. 'This doesn't make me feel good at all. Your true intentions with me are in plain sight.' Jane testified that they had a 'hotel night' on her birthday in 2022 in which she had sex with another man at Combs' direction. Soon after, she saw on social media that Combs had a 'big grandiose birthday' for another woman he was dating, and the contrast was 'heartbreaking,' Jane said. 'I don't ever want to do another hotel night,' she texted Combs around that time. 'I didn't want to do those things with you on my birthday but I wanted to make sure we had a good time.' In 2023, Combs suggested she fly to New York to visit him, but she was hesitant because she figured he'd want to have a 'hotel night' while she was there, she testified. He promised her they would have a romantic time just the two of them, so she agreed to go, she said. But when she was mid-air, Combs texted her about getting 'entertainment' for them, and she felt 'really disappointed,' she testified. Jane said they bickered 'about just how I was done with this and I didn't want to do this and like why every time I see you this is happening.' They ended up having a 'hotel night' that night, she testified. Jane also recounted two times when the man brought in for the 'hotel night' was someone she was not attracted to, and how Combs kept pushing for her to try and engage with him regardless. Regarding one of those times, in 2023, Jane testified Combs said to her, 'Are you sure? Maybe just a little bit' even though she said she knew that 'this was definitely not something that I could fake doing.' She said they eventually excused the man because she was 'repulsed by him,' and then another man came to the hotel after. Jane said she and Combs entered into a 'love contract' in 2023 in which he agreed to pay her $10,000-per-month rent as an allowance. He is still paying for her rent, even now, she testified on Friday. She also testified he threatened to cut her off financially if she stopped participating in 'hotel nights.' In text messages from August 2023 that were read aloud in court, amid a discussion about a 'hotel night,' Combs told her he put $15,000 on credit for things in her new house. When Jane then expressed hesitation about having the 'hotel night,' in part because she was having her period, Combs became angry and accused her of using him for money, according to the texts. Days later, she expressed frustrations to Combs with how he treated her, and Combs sent her an audio message threatening to stop financially supporting her. 'I'm about to really disappear on you, you feel me?' Combs said in the audio message that was played aloud in court for the jury. He said she had a 'rude awakening' coming if she didn't stop fighting him. 'You better get on your job, that's all it is,' Combs said. 'Because you got me on my job.' Jane testified that she understood her 'job' was 'taking care of him, being good to him and making sure he was happy,' which included the sexual encounters. She said his 'job' was taking care of her financially. Jane also texted Combs that he had been 'making things feel completely transactional lately' and was 'threatening me any chance that you get.' She testified that Combs was constantly reminding her that he paid for her home. Around the time when she and Combs entered into their 'love contract,' Combs also paid for Jane to get veneers 'because he didn't like my teeth,' Jane testified. At one point thereafter when Jane texted him complaining that she hadn't seen him alone outside of a hotel room for the 'hotel nights,' Combs responded, 'Well get over it please. Look at the roof over your head and that pretty smile. I don't want to do anything if that's still an issue.' In late 2023, she sent him messages saying she didn't want to play this role in his life anymore. 'I feel it's the only reason you have me around and why you pay for the house,' she wrote. 'I don't want to feel obligated to perform these nights for you.' Combs responded to the text, 'Girl stop.' The jury heard audio from a 'hotel night' in which Combs was dismissive of a request from Jane to have her male sex partner wear a condom. The audio was an excerpt from a video recording of a 'hotel night' that captured a conversation between Jane, Combs and a man named Don. On the recording, Jane said, 'you promised' to Combs, who expressed his disapproval. Jane said on the stand that she and Combs had a conversation before that 'hotel night' in which he told her it would be okay if she wanted the man she would have sex with to wear a condom. He eventually gave the 'entertainer' a condom, Jane said. She said she asked Combs to allow the 'entertainers' to wear condoms several times, but Combs was typically dismissive. Jane was asked why she needed Combs' permission to have the man wear a condom, and Jane seemed to get emotional and said she was 'still trying to process' that. She said she didn't insist on the man wearing a condom because then Combs would be 'unhappy.' At another point in her testimony, the jury saw 15 photos that weren't released to the public (none of the exhibits were shown to the public in court). Jane testified that each of the photos showed her and another man during a 'hotel night' and that Combs was present for all of the nights pictured. One female juror placed her hand over her face as the sexually explicit photos were displayed on the screens in front of them. Jane testified that when Combs would run out of drugs during a 'hotel night,' he'd call an assistant, a butler or one of his security guards to bring more. She recalled a time in 2022 when Combs directed her to pick up drugs from security personnel at his Los Angeles home and fly with them to meet him in Miami. She communicated with Combs' aide Kristina Khorram about picking up the 'package' at Combs' home. Jane said she asked Khorram if this was 'safe and okay,' and Khorram said, 'It's fine I do it all the time.' Jane flew with the drugs to Miami and later took ecstasy with Combs that she said came from the package. Jane testified that Combs gave her drugs during the 'hotel nights' that kept her awake for longer and made it easier for her to participate in the 'fantasy.' Jane cried and was emotional as she detailed one 'hotel night' in which she had sex with three other men, at Combs' insistence, on her birthday. Jane said she flew to Miami in 2023 to celebrate her birthday with Combs and he told her they'd spend quality time together. When they went to dinner, Combs brought up plans for a 'hotel night,' and she reluctantly agreed to participate. Jane said the first man who showed up that she never met before felt like a stranger and it was upsetting. 'More of an invasive moment because it was my birthday and I didn't want to do this on my birthday,' she said, crying. After the man left, Jane and Combs moved to a different suite at the hotel and Combs 'shifted his energy' and became more loving. He had arranged for cake, flowers and balloons in the suite, and they had some alone time, she said. But then another man came to the room for sex, and then a third man. 'I acted like it was nothing, but inside I hated it,' she said, adding between tears that she acted that way because she loved Combs. On the stand, Jane grew very emotional while discussing the birthday. She heaved more than once as she cried, and prosecutor Maurene Comey asked her repeatedly if she needed a break. Each time Jane said no. At another point in her testimony, a box of tissues was passed to her in the witness box by the courtroom deputy. After that birthday, Combs left her in the room and went on a private vacation with another romantic interest, Jane testified. According to messages read aloud in court, she texted him, 'Why do you lie to me?' She wrote to him that she wanted to get off the 'hamster wheel' and said, 'I didn't want to do all of that on my birthday.' Jane said she and Combs were on a break for about a month after that, but got back together.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store