82 people face trespassing charges for crossing into New Mexico military zone
Dozens were charged for unauthorized entry in New Mexico's new military zone along the southern border, officials said.
A total of 82 people received Title 50 charges as of Thursday, May 1, for crossing into military defense property, a 170-square-mile strip along the base of New Mexico, also known as the Roosevelt Reservation, according to a news release by the United States Attorney for the District of New Mexico.
The corridor was recently transferred from the Department of the Interior to the Department of Defense and is now being treated as an extension of U.S. Army Garrison Fort Huachuca, the news release said.
The land is subject to military patrols and surveillance, with "U.S. troops authorized to temporarily detain and transfer individuals to federal law enforcement for prosecution."
Title 50 charges carry potential penalties of up to one year in prison, in addition to any other immigration-related offenses, the release noted.
'Trespassers into the National Defense Area will be Federally prosecuted—no exceptions,' U.S. Attorney Ryan Ellison said in the news release.
The charges in New Mexico came as a second military zone created in the El Paso area, which will be part of the Fort Bliss Army base. The area stretches about 53 miles east to the border community of Fort Hancock.
Natassia Paloma may be reached at npaloma@gannett.com, @NatassiaPaloma on Twitter; natassia_paloma on Instagram, and Natassia Paloma Thompson on Facebook.
More: El Pasoan residents march to demand respect for border community's dignity and rights
This article originally appeared on El Paso Times: 82 people face charges for crossing into New Mexico military zone
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Teen driving 132 mph told officers he was going to a job interview, police say
A Connecticut man who was caught by police driving at 132 miles per hour told officials his speeding was not due to a joyride, but instead, because he was running late to a job interview, police said. In a press release from the Connecticut State Police, officials said 19-year-old Azmir Djurkovic was caught speeding while state troopers were conducting 'motor vehicle enforcement' in the town of Cromwell. During their shift, police saw a Mercedes E300 traveling "faster than the flow of traffic," the release said. A speed radar detected the car going at 132 miles per hour, more than two times the Connecticut default speed limit on interstates, which is 65 miles per hour. But the driver was not caught immediately. Police said when a trooper tried to execute a traffic stop with lights and sirens, the driver sped off and made 'unsafe lane changes.' Instead of chasing after Djurkovic, state police contacted the registered owner of the vehicle, who said Djurkovic was driving at the time. "Troopers obtained a phone number for Djurkovic, who admitted to driving and stated he did not stop because he was late for a job interview," state police said. Djurkovic turned himself in to officials, where he was arrested and now faces multiple charges, including reckless driving, engaging police in a pursuit and reckless endangerment. According to the press release, Djurkovic was released on a $2,500 bond and set to make his next court appearance on June 17. USA TODAY was not able to immediately find an attorney representing Djurkovic at this time. Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Englishtown police chief pleads guilty, barred from public employment
ENGLISHTOWN -- Police chief Peter S. Cooke has resigned after pleading guilty to illegally accessing a law enforcement database for non-law enforcement purposes. He will enter the state's Pretrial Intervention Program, which provides first-time offenders a path to dismiss all charges if the offenders complete a list of conditions set by the court. Cooke was arrested on November 1, 2024, according to the complaint. On May 19, Cooke submitted his resignation through his attorney. It came after a 'Public Employment Forfeiture Order' by Judge Natalie Watson, according to the May 28 Englishtown resolution. Christopher Swendeman, Monmouth County Public Information Officer, wrote that as part of the order, Cooke is 'forever disqualified from holding any other office or position of honor, trust, or profit under this State or any of its administrative or political subdivisions.' Howell: SWAT operation turns into a death investigation Neither Cooke nor his attorney responded to requests for comment. According to the accusation, Cooke was charged with 'one count of third-degree Computer Criminal Activity.' On August 24, 2023, he accessed the Spillman Flex Law Enforcement Database 'for a non-law enforcement purpose, contrary to the provisions of N.J.S.A. 2C:20-25(a),' a state law that prohibits such actions. According to the complaint, Cooke looked up individuals by the initials of 'M.M. and/or M.A.' between February 14, 2019 and August 24, 2023. In April 2024, Cooke was placed on paid administrative leave. Between August and September 2024, Cooke agreed to help another person 'M.M.' shoplift in Marlboro, according to the complaint. Stolen groceries were found during the investigation. Cooke was arrested in November 2024 and Englishtown suspended him without pay. Point Pleasant Beach: Municipal judge suspended for 2 months over 'biased' Facebook posts In May, he pleaded guilty to the computer crimes. When asked if the shoplifting charges were dropped, the Monmouth County Prosecutor's Office did not address those charges, pointing only to the charge of computer crime activity. Cooke has been involved in a lawsuit filed by former borough clerk Gretchen McCarthy. According to that lawsuit, McCarthy claimed she was fired for raising questions about borough activity – in particular, the police department's finances. In a response to the complaint, Cooke denied the allegations of unlawful conduct and retaliation. Olivia Liu is a reporter covering transportation, Red Bank and western Monmouth County. She can be reached at oliu@ This article originally appeared on Asbury Park Press: New Jersey town's police chief pleads guilty, resigns from office
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jury rejects border military trespassing charge
Jun. 5—In two words, an El Paso jury on Thursday rendered a blow to the Trump administration's new attempt to charge migrants with additional crimes for crossing illegally into the U.S. at the Texas and New Mexico international borders. The "not guilty" verdict in U.S. Magistrate Court in El Paso came in the case of a Peruvian woman charged with the petty misdemeanor of entering restricted military property when she crossed into the U.S. on May 12 west of Tornillo, Texas. The jury did convict Adely Vanessa De La Cruz-Alvarez of the charge of illegal entry, and U.S. Magistrate Judge Laura Enriquez dismissed the third charge of violation of a security regulation. It was one of the first times, if not the first, that average citizens have weighed in on the new "novel" approach to immigration enforcement at the U.S. border with Mexico. The Department of Defense, at the behest of the White House, established temporary military zones in April adjacent to the international border. The defense areas stretch about 180 miles in New Mexico and 63 miles in western Texas, and signs are posted about every 100 feet warning of the restricted zones. "This is a victory," said Veronica Lerma, one of the El Paso defense attorneys in the case. "We hope this sends a message that there are attorneys willing to set these case-for-jury trials and let the community decide." The jury deliberated for more than five hours after a two-day trial. Efforts to reach the U.S. Attorney's Office in El Paso for comment weren't successful Thursday. Lerma said her 21-year-old client, captured after she walked across the Rio Grande riverbed from Mexico, will likely be deported back to her home in Peru. She was sentenced to time served on the illegal entry conviction. "She was crying and hugged us (upon hearing she was acquitted of the trespass charge)," said another defense attorney, Shane McMahon. Conviction on the petty misdemeanor would have carried a prison term of up to six months. The violation of a security regulation charge carries up to a year in prison. The new regulations are part of the Trump administration's push to deter undocumented immigrants from entering the country illegally. The potentially stiffer penalties, coupled with threats of mass deportations — for some immigrants to El Salvadoran prisons — are all part of a larger plan to reduce unlawful crossings to zero. "Many of these aliens unlawfully within the United States present significant threats to national security and public safety, committing vile and heinous acts against innocent Americans," reads an executive order, "Protecting the American People from Invasion," signed on President Donald Trump's first day in office. "Others are engaged in hostile activities, including espionage, economic espionage, and preparations for terror-related activities. Many have abused the generosity of the American people, and their presence in the United States has cost taxpayers billions of dollars at the Federal, State, and local levels." Before this new militarized zone, those convicted of illegal entry, typically charged for first time offenders, are deported after serving a brief stint in jail awaiting resolution of their cases. Defense attorneys argued that there was no evidence that De La Cruz knew the border area she entered was military property. Federal prosecutors contended that there was no need to prove she saw the signs or had specific knowledge because she intended to willfully violate the law by crossing illegally into the U.S. No such jury trials have occurred in New Mexico, according to court records. An estimated 700 cases involving military trespass violations at the New Mexico National Defense Area have been filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office, but the prosecutions have been rocky. Earlier this week, the U.S. Attorney's Office in New Mexico struck out when attempting to reinstate dozens of the military trespass charges dismissed by the state's chief U.S. Magistrate judge in Las Cruces on May 19. U.S. District Judge Sarah M. Davenport of New Mexico ruled Monday that there was no legal avenue to appeal because of the way the cases were charged. The judge didn't address the primary argument being raised in such cases: that the defendants didn't know that the border area they entered was a military property. Davenport wrote that the charges dismissed by Chief U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory Wormuth pertained to his ruling on a criminal complaint. Wormuth found the government lacked probable cause to bring military trespassing-related charges against a woman from Uzbekistan arrested in southern New Mexico in May. Davenport concluded that because a criminal complaint was the mechanism by which the charges were filed, the government had no legal right to appeal. Asked about the ruling, U.S. Attorney Ryan Ellison of New Mexico told the Journal through a spokeswoman on Thursday, "We remain committed to the commonsense principle that border security is national security. Every nation has the right and obligation to know exactly who and what is coming across its borders. While we respectfully disagree with the adverse rulings from the Court, the United States Attorney's Office is considering all available next steps — including various avenues of appeal — and will act with confidence in the merits of our position. Together with our military and Border Patrol partners, we have already made tremendous strides towards achieving operational control of our southern border." Davenport stated that the U.S. Attorney's Office can simply file what is known as a criminal information and continue such prosecutions. And, in recent weeks, that's what federal prosecutors have done in hundreds of cases. By filing criminal charges via an information, "it takes it out of a magistrate's hands," said McMahon on Thursday. But that could lead to the cases going to trial, as happened in El Paso.
