For Iraqi Christians, pope's visit was a rare moment of hope
His 2021 visit to Iraq, the first ever by a pope, came after years of conflict and displacement. Just a few years before that, many Iraqi Christians had fled their homes as Daesh militants swept across the country.
Christian communities in Iraq, once numbering over a million, had already been reduced to a fraction of their former number by decades of conflict and mass emigration.
In Mosul, the site of some of the fiercest battles between Iraqi security forces and Daesh, Chaldean Archbishop Najeeb Moussa Michaeel recalled the pope's visit to the battle-scarred city at a time when many visitors were still afraid to come as a moment of joy, 'like a wedding for the people of Mosul.'
'He broke this barrier and stood firm in the devastated city of Mosul, proclaiming a message of love, brotherhood, and peaceful coexistence,' Michaeel said.
As Francis delivered a speech in the city's Al-Midan area, which had been almost completely reduced to rubble, the archbishop said, he saw tears falling from the pope's eyes.
Sa'dullah Rassam, who was among the Christians who fled from Mosul in 2014 in the face of the Daesh offensive, was also crying as he watched the pope leave the church in Midan that day.
Rassam had spent years displaced in Irbil, the seat of northern Iraq's semiautonomous Kurdish region, but was among the first Christians to return to Mosul, where he lives in a small house next to the church that Francis had visited.
As the pope's convoy was leaving the church, Rassam stood outside watching.
'It was the best day of my life,' Rassam said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
Iraq starts work on Daesh mass grave thought to contain thousands
BAGHDAD: Iraqi authorities have begun excavating the site of a mass grave believed to contain thousands of victims of the Daesh group near Mosul city, the project's director said on Sunday. The first phase, which was launched on August 10, includes surface-level excavation at the Khasfa site, director Ahmed Assadi said. An AFP correspondent visiting the site in northern Iraq on Sunday said the team unearthed human skulls buried in the sand. Khasfa is located near Mosul, where Daesh had established the capital of their self-declared 'caliphate' before being defeated in Iraq in late 2017. Assadi said that there were no precise figures for the numbers of victims buried there – one of dozens of mass graves Daesh left behind in Iraq – but a UN report from 2018 said Khasfa was likely the country's largest. Official estimates put the number of bodies buried at the site at least 4,000, with the possibility of thousands more. The project director said the victims buried there include 'soldiers executed by Daesh,' members of the Yazidi minority and residents of Mosul. Exhuming the bodies from Khasfa is particularly difficult, Assadi said, as underground sulfur water makes the earth very porous. The water may have also eroded the human remains, complicating DNA identification of victims, he added. Assadi said further studies will be required before his team can dig deeper and exhume bodies at the site – a sinkhole about 150-meter (nearly 500-foot) deep and 110-meter wide. Iraqi authorities said it was the site of 'one of the worst massacres' committed by Daesh militants, executing 280 in a single day in 2016, many of them interior ministry employees. In a lightning advance that began in 2014, Daesh had seized large swathes Iraq and neighboring Syria, enforcing a strict interpretation of Islamic law and committing widespread abuses. The United Nations estimates the militants left behind more than 200 mass graves which might contain as many as 12,000 bodies. In addition to Daesh-era mass graves, Iraqi authorities continue to unearth such sites dating to the rule of Saddam Hussein, who was toppled in a US-led invasion in 2003.
Arab News
3 days ago
- Arab News
Right-wing culture warfare comes to Germany
Something just broke in Germany. A highly respected jurist whom the governing Social Democratic Party nominated to sit on the country's constitutional court has withdrawn herself from consideration after a relentless smear campaign by right-wing journalists and politicians. Worse, it was the party's own coalition partner, the center-right Christian Democratic Union, that suddenly shifted from supporting Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf's candidacy to deeming her unacceptable. This sabotage of a hitherto consensual procedure is a test run for bringing US-style culture war politics to Germany. The goal is to peel away ever more members of the center right that former Chancellor Angela Merkel once led and to move toward an arrangement that has already been put in place in some other European democracies: an alliance of the center right and the populist far right. True, Germany's constitutional court, though one of the world's most respected and influential, has not always been above controversy. In the mid-1990s, it drew conservatives' ire when it ruled that Bavarian nondenominational schools may not display crucifixes on their walls. But the process of appointing judges has always been spared from the spectacle that is all too familiar from the US. Rather than holding highly publicized, televised and reliably polarizing hearings, parties meet behind closed doors to propose a balanced ticket of nominees, each of whom then must win supermajority support in the lower house. As with so much else in European politics, this process has been complicated by the success of far-right populists. The Alternative for Germany, now the second-largest group in parliament, has been demanding its 'own judge,' objecting to the fact that smaller German parties — the pro-market Free Democrats and the Greens — hold the right to nominate members of the court. In one federal state, Thuringia, where the Alternative for Germany won the last elections, the party has effectively blocked the appointment of new judges as a protest against what it sees as its unjustified exclusion. As with so much else in European politics, this process has been complicated by the success of far-right populists. Jan-Werner Mueller But it was not primarily the far right that brought down Brosius-Gersdorf. Rather, she faced a wider campaign of criticism that sought to paint her as a left-wing radical who supposedly wants to liberalize abortion completely and introduce mandatory COVID-19 vaccinations. Not only did a fellow law professor alter her Wikipedia entry to make her look like an 'activist,' but the archbishop of Bamberg attacked her in a sermon — only to admit, after a personal conversation with the candidate, that he had been 'misinformed.' Germany has never had the equivalent of Fox News (whereas France now has CNews, one of whose leading journalists even stood as a prominent candidate for the French presidency in 2022). However, relatively small far-right startups — claiming to be 'the voice of the majority' — have increasingly gained influence within the CDU. One CDU member recently declared, in effect, that anyone not subscribing to natural law doctrines cannot serve as a judge. Suddenly, the supposed mainstream is echoing the populist talking point that courts should primarily 'represent the people' (as opposed to upholding the constitution). The CDU has been in an intellectual crisis for some time. Hardly anyone can today articulate the party's core principles. True, like the Conservatives in the UK, German Christian Democrats long prided themselves on their pragmatism, cultivating an image as the competent default party of government. Moreover, natural law thinking was indeed prominent among Christian Democrats in the postwar period. But precisely because they were interested in power, Christian Democrats — like British Tories — carefully adapted to a changing society. The ironic result is that they are now maligning as 'radical' a jurist who actually does seem to represent 'the people' — insofar as she generally holds views that command majority support. The CDU has been in an intellectual crisis for some time. Hardly anyone can today articulate the party's core principles. Jan-Werner Mueller Christian Democrats traditionally pursued a political strategy of seeking to mediate among different groups and interests, pursuing what Catholic social doctrine had long held out as a vision of social harmony. In this sense, Merkel — always eager to balance and compromise — was still practicing the traditional model. But today's right-wing culture warriors are polarization entrepreneurs. Often armed with disinformation, they seek to sharpen conflicts and divide constituencies into friends and enemies, and this has led them to target the center right's weak point. Feeling pressure from the far right, Christian Democrats think they must prove to their constituencies that they are still genuinely conservative — unlike the supposedly uber-liberal Merkel. While the archbishop of Bamberg was willing to speak with the nominee directly, CDU members of parliament apparently refused to do so. Such behavior represents a stark deviation from the culture of compromise and moderation that has prevented the US-style politicization of Germany's highest court. The CDU's norm-breaking is analogous to US Republicans' refusal to even consider Barack Obama's Supreme Court nominee in 2016. Despite CDU leaders' claims to be democracy's last defense against the rising far right, the party is falling into the culture war traps the far right has set for them. It is not inevitable that the last major country with a firewall to contain the far right will go the way so many other European democracies have gone already. But that scenario is becoming more realistic. • Jan-Werner Mueller, professor of politics at Princeton University, is the author, most recently, of 'Democracy Rules' (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2021). ©Project Syndicate
Saudi Gazette
12-08-2025
- Saudi Gazette
Spain orders town to drop ban on Muslim religious gatherings
MADRID — The Spanish government has ordered a town to drop a ban on religious gatherings in public sports facilities, with ministers criticising the measure as discriminatory towards the local Muslim community and arguing that it violates the constitution. The ban was approved last week by the conservative local government of Jumilla, a town of 27,000 in Spain's southeast region of Murcia. The measure was initially proposed by the far-right Vox party and then amended and approved by the centre-right Popular Party (PP), to which the mayor of Jumilla belongs. It prohibits municipal sports facilities from being used for "cultural, social or religious activities foreign to the City Council". The ban will mainly affect the town's Muslim community, which has for years used the spaces to celebrate Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha. Spain's socialist government swiftly denounced the ban, with Migration Minister Elma Saiz last week calling it "shameful" while urging the town's leaders to "take a step back" and apologise to local residents. On Monday, Territorial Policy Minister Ángel Victor Torres said on X that Madrid had formally instructed Jumilla to cancel the ban. "There can be no half-measures when it comes to intolerance," he said. "PP and Vox cannot decide who has freedom of worship and who does not. It is a constitutional right." Conservative officials in Jumilla — an agriculture-based economy of vineyards, olive and almond trees — last week defended the ban. Mayor Seve González told El País newspaper that it did not single out any one group and that her government wanted to "promote cultural campaigns that defend our identity". Vox's branch in the Murcia region celebrated the measure on Friday, saying on X that 'Spain is and always will be a land of Christian roots'. "We must protect public spaces from practices foreign to our culture and our way of life," Vox leader Santiago Abascal said, adding that "Spain is not Al Andalus," referencing the historic name for Muslim-ruled Spain. Mohamed El Ghaidouni, secretary of the Union of Islamic Communities of Spain, criticised the local government's justification for the motion and said it amounted to "institutionalised Islamophobia". Separately, the UN Special Envoy to Combat Islamophobia, Miguel Moratinos, said last week that he was "shocked" by the decision and voiced "deep concern about the rise in xenophobic rhetoric and Islamophobic sentiments in some regions in Spain". The ban is the latest controversy involving immigration and multiculturalism in Spain. It follows clashes last month in Murcia between far-right groups and local residents and immigrants. The violence erupted after an elderly resident in the town of Torre-Pacheco was beaten up by assailants believed to be of Moroccan origin, which prompted far-right groups to call for retribution on the region's large immigrant population. For centuries, Spain was ruled by Muslims, whose influence is present both in the Spanish language and in many of the country's most celebrated landmarks, including Granada's famed Moorish Alhambra Palace. Islamic rule ended in 1492 when the last Arab kingdom in Spain fell to the Catholics. Right-wing governments elsewhere in Europe have passed measures similar to the ban in Jumilla, striking at the heart of ongoing debates across the continent about nationalism and religious and cultural pluralism. Last year in Monfalcone — a large industrial port city in northeastern Italy with a significant Bangladeshi immigrant population — its far-right mayor, Anna Maria Cisint, banned prayers in a cultural centre. The measure led to protests involving some 8,000 people, and the city's Muslim community is appealing it in a regional court. — Euronews
