Virtual Support Enhances Healthcare for BC's Rural Patients
But more needs to be done to fully bridge healthcare gaps.
The Real-Time Virtual Support (RTVS) network is an integrated, hybrid-care model that delivers publicly funded virtual care. Staffed by BC-licensed providers, RTVS builds capacity to enhance — rather than replace — existing healthcare infrastructure. The network offers both direct patient care and clinical decision support for community health professionals. A shared electronic record documents all care activities, with structured communication protocols connecting primary and emergency care providers.
Kendall Ho, MD
'Virtual care boomed at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet there has been so far a lack of definitive evidence in the literature as to whether virtual care truly improves access, efficacy, safety, and cost effectiveness for patients and the health system,' lead author, Kendall Ho, MD, told Medscape Medical News.
Ho said he hopes his recent article, published online on July 28 in the Canadian Medical Association Journal , will contribute positive evidence of virtual care and how he and his team approach its coordinated delivery, encouraging further knowledge exchange between provinces and other virtual care programs.
Ho is a professor of emergency medicine at faculty of medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, and medical director of the BC Ministry of Health's HealthLink BC 8-1-1 virtual physicians program.
Addressing Healthcare Gaps
'With the right partnerships and coordination, virtual services can actually enhance and increase capacity for in-person services,' Ho noted. For example, the network's peer-to-peer services partner with rural providers to help maintain care services and to offer access to more specialized services in the community when needed.
'Our virtual, direct patient services help patients appropriately manage health concerns at home when emergency visits are not necessary and accelerate those needing urgent treatments to go to emergency rooms, thereby relieving pressure on our emergency service,' he added.
Nurses triage 8-1-1 callers using the Healthwise algorithm and their clinical judgment to a visit with a virtual physician — who provides assessment and advice via telephone or video conferencing — or to in-person primary or emergency care.
Since its founding in 2020, RTVS has had more than 20,000 encounters with peer-to-peer services in 129 rural, remote, and Indigenous communities; 12,000 appointments annually with First Nations primary and specialist services; and 176,000 patient calls to the 8-1-1 virtual physician service, the authors reported.
The urgent generalist service, Rural Urgent Doctor In-aid, mainly has supported
nurses at rural health centers (76% of encounters), according to the authors. Pediatric peer support (ie, Child Health Advice in Real-Time Electronically) was sought more often by physicians (78%), whereas obstetric peer support (ie, Maternity and Babies Advice Line) was almost evenly split between physicians and nurses.
The First Nations primary and specialist services, respectively, generally provide 11,000 and 2000 encounters annually, with clients primarily from the Northern, Interior, and Vancouver Island regions. In addition, clients have about 3-4 visits lasting 30-40 minutes annually, suggesting that these Indigenous-led services address an important healthcare gap for First Nations clients in BC.
However, the authors wrote, 'evidence is limited, and Indigenous-led evaluation will be prioritized to share learnings from these pathways.'
The authors also noted a potential 'harm' with RTVS — namely a deepening of the 'digital divide', as individuals who have digital access and skills may be offered better services, thereby marginalizing those without access.
'We envision a new normal when virtual care will be tightly integrated with in-person care for complementarity, and that conventionally underserved populations — in particular, rural, remote, First Nations, and Indigenous populations — will be able to access the care they need just in time, just for them, and with just-in-case availability,' Ho concluded.
'Rural Care Is Essential'
Shortly before the publication of the CMAJ article and in line with its messages, the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) released a statement highlighting the need for 'smart, sustainable networks of emergency care…especially in rural and remote communities.'
'Rural emergency care is not optional. It is essential,' according to the statement. For that to happen, emergency medicine needs 'networks, not silos.'
Michael Howlett, MD
CAEP Past President Michael Howlett, MD, adjunct associate professor of emergency medicine at Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, and associate professor at Dalhousie University, Halifax, commented on the RTVS article for Medscape Medical News , and its relevance for emergency physicians in BC and other regions.
'RTVS is doing an excellent job with what they're given,' he said. 'The biggest problem is the lack of boots on the ground — the lack of people actually present in person to deal with high-level emergencies.'
'Their service can facilitate patients' knowing where they need to go or what they need to do next, but they can't actually lay hands on someone to fix a problem,' he continued. 'If you have a broken leg and it needs to be set, you can't reach through the TV camera and do it. You can't reach through the screen and take out a foreign body. You can't do certain types of exams on people. You have to have someone do it.'
'My biggest worry is that when systems like this are successful, governments will see virtual care as fixing the entire capacity problem and miss the point that even though they don't happen as often, serious, life-threatening problems require a different sort of care than virtual care. They require someone there.'
Often, he said, 'We're doing virtual care because we have no choice not because it's the best way.'
Clinicians working in small communities also need to be aware that not everything can be delivered virtually, Howlett added. 'If you're going to work in these systems, you have to know the limitations and you have to know what resources you have to give people as alternatives. You also need to know that the system requires advancement and capacity, and we all should be advocating for that.'
No funding was reported. Ho reported leading the Digital Emergency Medicine Unit at The University of British Columbia. The BC Ministry of Health provided funding to Ho's unit, through an explicit arrangement with The University of British Columbia, for the unit to help organize and implement the BC Ministry of Health 8-1-1 Virtual Physicians line and to evaluate the RTVS network. Howlett reported no relevant financial relationships.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lung cancer survival rate has doubled, but it still causes the most cancer deaths: StatCan
TORONTO — Five-year survival rates for people with lung cancer have doubled since the 1990s, but the disease still kills more patients than any other type of cancer, a Statistics Canada report said on Wednesday. The report said the number of people living five years after they were diagnosed jumped from 13 per cent to 27 per cent between 1992 and 2021. Lung cancer is still responsible for almost a quarter of all cancer deaths in Canada, it said. The report attributed the increase in lung cancer survival to new treatments, including drugs that target specific molecules in cancer cells and immunotherapy that prompts the patient's immune system to attack cancerous cells. "Back in the 1990s, getting a lung cancer diagnosis, it truly was a bit of a death sentence," said Jessica Moffatt, vice-president of programs and advocacy at the Lung Health Foundation in an interview about the StatCan findings. "Cancer was detected very late, so usually around stage four, and the likelihood of survival was very low." Moffatt agreed that more effective treatments are part of the reason for increased lung cancer survival rates, but also said that better screening has been vital. "What we're seeing today is that we're able to detect cancer earlier, where treatment is more likely to be effective," she said. Moffatt expects to see five-year survival rates climb higher than StatCan's 2021 data show, following the introduction of organized lung cancer screening programs in Ontario, British Columbia and Nova Scotia in 2022. Those programs screen patients for risk factors such as age and smoking history and if they're deemed high-risk, they are told to get a referral for a low-dose CT scan from a family doctor or nurse practitioner. Depending on the results of that "baseline scan," Moffatt said, patients come back for regular screenings or are referred to diagnostic assessment if scan suggests lung cancer might be present. She expects to see the survival rate trend upward as more provinces fund lung cancer screening programs. "One of the common stories we hear is that somebody had a persistent cough, they would go to their family physician who had potentially prescribed antibiotics and they would go back home and that wouldn't work so they go to the ER (and) get more antibiotics and time was just passing when the lung cancer, the tumour was growing," Moffatt said. "Then when they finally got their diagnosis, it's at such an advanced stage. And that's where organized screening tries to reduce the likelihood of that story because the most at-risk people should be screened frequently enough to catch any cancer growth." The Statistics Canada report said that as of 2021, the cancers with a five-year survival rate of 90 per cent or higher include thyroid, testicular, prostate and breast cancers, as well as melanoma skin cancer. It says cancers with the lowest survival rates of under 10 per cent include mesothelioma — cancer in the membrane that surrounds most internal organs — as well as cancer in the bile ducts of the liver. The report says those cancers, along with pancreatic cancer, are often diagnosed at advanced stages when the cancer has already spread. StatCan gathered the data on cancer survival rates from its Canadian Cancer Registry as well as its Canadian Vital Statistics death database. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 13, 2025. Canadian Press health coverage receives support through a partnership with the Canadian Medical Association. CP is solely responsible for this content. Nicole Ireland, The Canadian Press
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
The hidden costs of cancer for young survivors is derailing their financial futures
Imagine being 25, fresh out of post-secondary education and full of optimism about starting your career, and then you hear the words: 'You have cancer.' You are suddenly faced with an unexpected health shock that not only threatens your physical health, but also your financial future. Most of your time is now spent feeling unwell and travelling to and from the hospital for treatment, while your friends and colleagues continue to build their careers. This is the reality for nearly 1.2 million adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer each year worldwide, a number that is projected to rise. Just over 9,000 Canadian adolescents and young adults are diagnosed with cancer annually, and 85 per cent of them will survive their illness. And while survival is the primary goal, many don't realize that it comes with a hidden price that extends far beyond immediate medical costs. It is estimated that the average Canadian affected by cancer faces $33,000 in lifetime costs related to their illness, totalling $7.5 billion each year for patients and their families. But we have recently discovered the true economic impact on adolescents and young adults with cancer is often far greater than the previous numbers show and lasts much longer than previously recognized. The financial penalty of survival We compared 93,325 Canadian adolescents and young adults diagnosed with cancer and 765,240 similar individuals who did not experience cancer, and found that surviving cancer leads to long-term reduced income, which may last a lifetime. On average, a cancer diagnosis results in a greater than five per cent reduction in earnings over a 10-year period after diagnosis. As expected, income loss is more pronounced right after diagnosis, with survivors earning 10 to 15 per cent less in the first five years. However, these hidden survival costs are not the same for everyone, and the financial toll varies greatly depending on the type of cancer. For instance, survivors of brain cancer see their average annual income drop by more than 25 per cent. This is a devastating financial burden — and one that endures. The true lifetime effects are unknown, but it is not difficult to imagine how a financial setback like this can completely derail a young person's financial future. Why cancer costs young survivors more Adolescents and young adults who are survivors of cancer experience 'financial toxicity,' which refers to the direct costs of cancer, such as treatment or medication costs, and indirect costs like reduced work ability, extended sick leave and job loss. Over one-third of young cancer patients report financial toxicity. Many cancer survivors experience lasting adverse physical and cognitive effects that limit everyday functioning. Even in the Canadian universal health-care system, which does not require payment for cancer treatment, many younger Canadians are unable to work and need to rely on family members for financial support. The impact on work capacity is significant for adolescents and young adults who are just beginning their careers, causing them to miss critical years of career development during treatment and recovery that can have cascading economic effects. These challenges can ultimately lead to financial instability and hardship. Paying the price Beyond the individual hardships, the issue of financial instability among young cancer survivors is becoming a broader societal challenge. In 2025, young Canadian cancer survivors are entering an economy with an unfavourable job market and rising youth unemployment, as well as a widening gap between wages and housing affordability. Rising inflation and general unaffordability are also compounding financial difficulties young Canadian cancer survivors face, ultimately making financial recovery more challenging. Income is a fundamental social determinant of health, and financial inequities can perpetuate health disparities in cancer survivors after treatment. Patients are forced into making devastating financial choices like depleting their savings and incurring debt. Policy A Canadian Cancer Society 2024 report highlights the urgency for support systems to address financial well-being after cancer. Based on our research, which assesses the financial life of adolescent and young adult survivors of cancer, we have some recommendations for Canadian policymakers, businesses and primary care providers. Policymakers should: Make employment insurance benefits that better support survivors post-treatment. Provide tax credits for groups of cancer survivors disproportionately affected by financial toxicity, such as those with brain cancer. Primary care providers should: Incorporate financial navigation counselling into their cancer care. Provide resources for navigating insurance and financial assistance programs. Routinely screen for financial toxicity as part of survivorship care. Employers should: Create a supportive work environment that accommodates the unique needs of cancer survivors. Recognize the physical and mental challenges faced by young survivors and provide flexible work arrangements. Young cancer survivors have already faced one of life's most difficult challenges. They shouldn't have to struggle with financial insecurity. By recognizing that survivorship starts at cancer diagnosis, we must broaden the conversation about cancer care beyond the clinical to the economic. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organisation bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Giancarlo Di Giuseppe, University of Toronto and Jason D. Pole, The University of Queensland Read more: Sun advice from a skin cancer researcher and physician Cancer is affecting more young people than ever before: How health care can learn to meet their needs Routine mammograms do save lives: The science Jason D. Pole does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointments. Giancarlo Di Giuseppe does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
This Weather Network anchor was 'shocked' to learn she had osteoporosis after fracturing her ankle: 'Why wasn't I warned?'
Kim MacDonald, 56, says she didn't know that menopause can lead to bone density issues. Now she's warning other women to take their bone health seriously. In March 2025, Kim MacDonald, 56, was outside of her home in Hamilton, Ont. when she stumbled over an uneven sidewalk and rolled her ankle. Since she didn't fall and could still walk, she treated it as a run-of-the-mill twisted ankle. Despite icing and elevating it, the ankle began to swell. 'I still thought at that point, OK, worst case scenario, I sprained my ankle,' MacDonald told Yahoo Canada. 'And best case scenario, I just twisted it, and the swelling will go down soon enough.' The next day, the Weather Network anchor's foot was still quite swollen. She "hobbled" to the emergency room where an X-ray revealed that MacDonald's ankle wasn't sprained — it was broken. 'I was actually in shock," she said. "I thought, 'I didn't even do anything. How could this be broken?'' This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Contact a qualified medical professional before engaging in any physical activity, or making any changes to your diet, medication or lifestyle. Because she injured herself in such a simple way, MacDonald's healthcare providers suggested a bone density test. Three weeks later, her general practitioner called her with some news: she had osteoporosis, a disease that causes bones to weaken and become porous. 'It was very upsetting,' she said. 'I thought that if I was to get osteoporosis, that would be something 20 years down the line. I didn't think I was going to get it at 56. I thought that's something you have when you're 76. So, I really didn't expect it. Why wasn't I warned?" Although commonly associated with advanced age, people can develop the disease at any point in their lifetime. According to Osteoporosis Canada, men and women begin to lose bone mass in their mid-30s, however, older women are more likely to be diagnosed with the disease. Of the more than two million people living with diagnosed osteoporosis, 80 per cent are women, according to Osteoporosis Canada, and at least one in three women will suffer from an osteoporotic fracture in their lifetime. Although hormones changes that impact bone health occur during perimenopause, post-menopausal women experience a significant drop in estrogen, which helps preserve bone density. Approximately 20 per cent of bone loss occurs during this phase of life. Back in 2017, MacDonald was diagnosed with breast cancer, and underwent chemotherapy and radiation. after her second round of treatment, the then-48-year-old was put into medical menopause. While MacDonald said she had an incredible health care team who saved her life, she was unaware of the impacts menopause would have on her bones. "Nobody said anything until after I broke my ankle, years later," she said. In June, MacDonald took to Instagram to share her osteoporosis diagnosis and help raise awareness for the realities of life after menopause. "Knowledge is power,' MacDonald said. 'And this is one of those things that you can stop from happening.' What is osteoporosis and why is it dangerous? In an interview with Yahoo Canada, Dr. Lindsay Sheriff, an obstetrician and gynecologist, said osteoporosis causes bones to become so "thin and brittle" that minor falls or simply performing everyday activities can result in a fracture. Like MacDonald, many women won't know they have the disease until a fracture occurs. Although commonly associated with advanced age, people can develop osteoporosis disease at any point in their lifetime. According to Osteoporosis Canada, men and women begin to lose bone mass in their mid-30s, however, older women are more likely to be diagnosed with the disease. Of the more than two million people living with diagnosed osteoporosis, 80 per cent are women, according to Osteoporosis Canada, and at least one in three women will suffer from an osteoporotic fracture in their lifetime. While most fractures can be treated, hip fractures in part hip fractures are a major concern, especially as you age. More than 20 per cent of women and 30 per cent of men who suffer a hip fracture will die within a year due to post-surgical complications like infection, blood clots and internal bleeding. What are the risk factors for osteoporosis? The steep decline in estrogen levels after menopause accelerate bone loss. 'This makes the perimenopausal and menopausal years a critical time for monitoring and protecting bone health,' Shirreff said. According to Osteoporosis Canada, 80 per cent of patients with a history of fractures are not given osteoporosis therapies. That means hundreds of thousands of Canadians suffer fractures every year due to undiagnosed, untreated osteoporosis. That's why it's important to be prepared and take precautionary measures. In Canada, routine bone density testing is recommended for all women and men aged 65 and older. However, Shirreff said younger people may be recommended for screening if they have various risk factors, including: Prolonged steroid use A history of fragility fractures (fractures that occur after a low-impact event like a fall from standing height) A family history of hip fractures Menopause before the age of 45 Smokers Have a high alcohol intake 'There are many circumstances where we would recommend earlier screening than the age of 65,' she said. 'It's important for you to individualize that discussion with your healthcare provider.' How to prevent and treat osteoporosis According to Shirreff, there are steps women can take in their 30s and 40s to help prevent osteoporosis. Opt for calcium and vitamin-D rich foods While calcium supplements can help prevent bone loss, you should be reaching for foods high in calcium and vitamin D like milk, cheese, yogurt beans, eggs salmon and tofu. Add weight-bearing and resistance-based exercises to your workout Weight-bearing exercises don't have to be complicated. Shireff said activities like walking, jogging or hiking, as well as stair climbing, tennis or pickleball can all benefit bone health as well as low-impact aerobics. Resistance training or strength training, like weight-lifting, squats, push-ups and lunges, is also important. 'Strength training is excellent for bone health, especially for the spine and the hip,' she said. Some women wear weighted vests while walking to strengthen muscles and improve endurance and cardio fitness. Formulate a plan with your doctor Women should also avoid smoking and consider limiting alcohol intake to help slow down bone loss. Shirreff said it's also a good idea to ask healthcare providers about a bone density tests, especially if you went into menopause at an early age. Together, you and your health provider can discuss whether hormone therapies, supplements or other medications would be beneficial. The good news is it's never too early to start incorporating these lifestyle and dietary habits. 'Estrogen levels go down the closer you get to menopause, so establishing healthy lifestyle and dietary habits early on — but especially during the perimenopausal time — can optimize bone health as you age,' Shirreff said.
