Abbott pushes bail reform, warns Democrats not to back ‘dangerous criminals'
AUSTIN (Nexstar) — To get his bail reform priorities passed, Gov. Greg Abbott needs to convince at least 12 House Democrats to join all the House Republicans. On Wednesday, Abbott hinted he still needs those votes.
'There's progress, but not sufficient progress,' he said. Abbott also didn't shoot down the idea of going to special session over bail reform. 'We'll make decisions like that as they arise. My expectation is that no Democrat, no Republican, wants to have on their record that they supported dangerous criminals over the safety of their own constituents.'
An (even) stricter bail proposal
In February, the Texas Senate passed out State Sen. Joan Huffman's, R-Houston, bail reform package, including two proposed constitutional amendments. Constitutional amendments require a two-thirds vote from each chamber of the Texas legislature before needing a simple majority in a public vote.
Senate Joint Resolution 1 would require jails to hold those charged with felonies without bond if they're in the country illegally. Senate Joint Resolution 5 would give judges discretion to hold those accused of certain violent and sexual felonies without bond. However, Abbott appears to want SJR 5 to go further.
'We need to amend the [Texas] Constitution to do several things,' Abbott said. 'One, judges must automatically deny bail for violent crime. Crime like murder, rape and human trafficking — unless there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant will appear in court and not endanger the community. What this does [is] it changes the law to shift the burden for repeat violent criminals to prove that they are not a danger to the community.'
'I'll never see him again': Activists argue against Texas bail reform
Abbott acknowledged that most Democratic lawmakers have yet to see the updated version.
'I don't know how many Democrats have actually seen that yet, so they have not been put to the test,' Abbott said. 'They will be put to the test, though, here in a week or two.'
Getting bail reform passed
On Thursday, May 15, all House bills with a chance to pass will need to have been heard on the House floor. Both SJR 1 and SJR 5 had identical versions heard in the House Criminal Jurisprudence Committee in March. They've been sitting there ever since.
'We've got to get it this week out of committee,' House Criminal Jurisprudence Chair John Smithee, R-Amarillo, said. 'Hopefully it will be on the floor within a week or so.'
Advocates make the case against bail reform: 'Texas' pretrial system is broken'
If it gets to a floor vote, the 88 House Republicans will not be able to pass it without at least 12 Democrats jumping on board. However, Abbott said this as an issue Democrats should want to vote in favor of.
'It's a common sense issue, fixing the deadly and broken bail system that lets dangerous criminals right back onto our streets,' he said. 'This is and should not be a Republican or a Democrat issue. This is a public safety issue, plain and simple.'
Huffman took a stronger stance and said she's done enough negotiating.
'[House Democrats] constituents are being raped, murdered, threatened, terrorized [and] they should have a moral obligation to take this vote and to pass this on, so the Texas voters can make a decision,' she said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the latest news, weather, sports, and streaming video, head to KXAN Austin.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
32 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee promises ‘relentless effort' at community inauguration
Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee promised during a community inauguration Sunday to lead with 'openness, honesty and relentless effort' and invited the community to join her to make the city better. 'If we match hope with hard work, there's nothing that this city can't do, so let's do it,' Lee said on a stage at Jack London Square. 'Let's grab whatever you can grab — a paintbrush, a policy idea, a neighbor's hand, because the next chapter of Oakland starts now.' She added: 'All of you are co-authors of this next chapter.' Lee was elected in April and sworn in last month. The former congresswoman replaced former Mayor Sheng Thao, whom voters ousted in November in a recall fueled by a federal investigation that resulted in bribery charges against her. Thao pleaded not guilty to the charges. Lee takes over as the city confronts a historic budget deficit, public safety concerns, homelessness and illegal dumping, among other issues. By the end of this month, the city must balance its budget, which includes an annual deficit of about $140 million. Lee previously said the city will address the deficit through both short- and long-term solutions, though she did not provide specifics. During her remarks Sunday, after she again took the oath of office, Lee spoke of her work in the first few weeks of her administration. The goal from the start was to 'turn hope into action,' the Democrat told the crowd, which included faith leaders, business owners and other dignitaries, including California Attorney General Rob Bonta, California Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis and San Francisco Mayor Daniel Lurie. Already she's met with faith and business leaders to discuss public safety strategies. She acknowledged that despite violence prevention efforts and a decrease in homicides last year, some residents still don't feel safe. 'We've got to work to change this narrative in Oakland,' she said. Lee also said she traveled to the state Capitol to advocate for the city, 'because Oakland deserves its fair share of state resources,' she said. 'I made it clear: Investing in Oakland lifts the entire Bay Area.' State Sen. Jesse Arreguín, a Democrat whose district includes Oakland, said the city needs a 'proven leader with integrity and experience' to unite the city and region. 'That leader is Mayor Barbara Lee,' he said. Arreguín, who serves as chair of the public safety standing committee, said he's committed to working with Lee to curb crime in Oakland and make the city safer. He pledged to support the city's Ceasefire strategy and other violence-prevention programs. Oakland City Council President Kevin Jenkins called Sunday 'a beautiful day in Oakland.' He noted that Lee is the city's fourth mayor in two years. 'But I think we got it right this time,' he quipped. Jenkins described Lee as a mayor for all, especially Oakland residents 'who don't know where City Hall is.' 'The way she campaigned is the way she's going to govern: with integrity,' he added. Selena Wilson, CEO of the East Oakland Youth Development Center, urged the public to support Lee. 'We must continue to stand with her.' Barbara Leslie, president and CEO of the Oakland Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, picked by Lee as a co-chair of her transition team, said she can attest that Lee 'hit the ground running.' 'Frankly, my goal is just to keep up,' Leslie said, joined by members of the Rotary Club of Oakland #3 and Oakland Restaurant Collective. 'We are here to support you, as your success is Oakland's success,' Leslie said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
‘A colossal mistake': Abilene ISD superintendent criticizes Texas' new education voucher law
ABILENE, Texas () – Four days after Governor Greg Abbott signed House Bill 2 into law, allocating billions in public education funding and creating a new voucher-style program, Abilene ISD Superintendent Dr. John Kuhn is voicing serious concerns. Calling the move a 'colossal mistake,' Kuhn claims the new education savings account program threatens to weaken the state's public school system by diverting funds to private institutions and undermining decades of public education policy. 'I think it's really, really unfair to fund kids who go to private schools at $10,000 each out of the state treasury, while you're funding kids in public schools in Texas, $6,000 out of the state treasury. I think it doesn't pass the smell test,' Kuhn shared. 'The public school system was established to ensure that every kid in the state of Texas, no matter where they live, has access to free, appropriate public education, and that is the system that has traditionally educated 90 plus percent of the kids in Texas. It feels to me like the state is taking its eye off the ball, and rather than serving the majority of kids now, they've decided to spend a billion dollars covering the tuition costs that traditionally parents have covered when they chose private schools.' Lambert backs $7.7B school bill, explains why he voted for vouchers Kuhn pointed to other states that have adopted similar voucher programs, explaining that most recipients were already attending private schools prior to receiving state assistance. 'So the notion that these vouchers are going to be used to help public school kids escape failing schools, that's really not what pans out. I think it's Iowa, where only 13% of the voucher recipients ever attended a private school. So what it ends up being is a new entitlement. It's like reverse Robin Hood, where you're taking money away from the middle class to help offset expenses that traditionally, wealthy parents have covered for themselves,' Kuhn explained. As this legislation rolls out, alongside efforts to eliminate the STAAR test, Kuhn believes public schools must begin to rethink how they present themselves to their communities. 'I think for a lot of us in schools, we had the mentality that we have to make sure that our students are being successful, so that when they take the STAAR test, we're getting a good accountability rating. I think a lot of us traditionally have thought that's really our marker of success, that we can show parents, hey, we're a high-quality school,' Kuhn said. 'What I've seen, especially with large charter school chains, is that they have huge marketing budgets that public schools have traditionally not had. With this new bill coming, I think it's really going to be important that public schools start to really more aggressively market themselves and really kind of aggressively compete for public eyeballs and for positive public perception.' Kuhn noted that while public schools receive around $6,000 per student from the state, the $10,000 earmarked for voucher students is comprised of state funds, and there could potentially be more in federal funds soon. Programs like free and reduced lunch and Title I help bridge the gap in public school funding. 'The state is basically fronting these private schools' money that we get from the federal government, not from the state, right? ' Kuhn shared. 'There's a bill coming through the federal government right now that would add even more voucher dollars to students in the states that are in voucher programs. So ultimately, if and when that passes, which is pretty likely to pass at the federal level, voucher students will be getting more in state and federal voucher money than public schools get in state and federal money.' Abilene & Wylie ISD superintendents discuss potential negative impact of vouchers on Texas education As for how the new voucher program will impact enrollment in Abilene ISD, Kuhn anticipates only modest effects. 'I think this is just another choice in an already choice-rich environment. I don't expect a devastating impact on enrollment, but I'm also not going to say we won't have any students who opt for a voucher,' Kuhn explained. Still, he remains wary of how voucher programs will evolve in the future, especially as more private institutions become eligible to participate. 'To participate in the voucher system, a private school has to have been in existence for at least two years. The purpose of that part of the bill was to prevent, like fly-by-night operators, from just popping up a private school because they see an opportunity to make money,' Kuhn added. 'I don't disagree with the notion of parents having choices. I do completely disagree with the rhetoric that they didn't already have a lot of choices; they have had them, but I think for us in Abilene, we definitely have looked at our own system and kind of broken through some of those really old barriers of how things have always been done in public schools. And that's a good thing.' Kuhn also kept a close eye on another major education proposal this session: the potential elimination of the STAAR test. Though the Texas House voted to replace STAAR with a national norm-referenced alternative, the bill ultimately died due to disagreements between House and Senate leadership. 'Some of those national norm-referenced tests we already use in public schools as a kind of diagnostic tool to see how our students are progressing through the year, so that we know they're going to be ready when it's time to take the STAAR…The other good thing about using a national norm reference test is that the Texas Education Agency can't get its fingers in it and adjust the scoring metrics, and so it's like it's an objective measure. There's no subjectivity to it. Thirdly, you can compare how Texas students are doing versus students in several other states. With the STAAR test, you can't do that,' Kuhn said. FORUM: Exploring school choice in Texas with Big Country leaders He added that over time, STAAR has lost its credibility due to politically motivated adjustments and unclear metrics. 'They constantly tweak all of these metrics, and it has resulted in a system that really nobody has very much confidence in. In fact, there were representatives who said nobody trusts the STAAR test. Well, the reason nobody trusts the STAAR test is that it pretends to be a school accountability system, but it's really a political narrative machine. When we need schools to look good because somebody's running for office and wants to say we had a Texas miracle, then they make schools look good, and when they need them to look bad so they can get vouchers passed, then schools look bad, and that has happened over and over and over again. It's not a trustworthy system, because these aren't trustworthy people,' Kuhn expressed. 'When you let the politicians control the school accountability system, it has all the validity of the Soviet crop reports. You know what you hear about from the old days, right? It's a completely moral and ethically compromised system that misinforms Texans rather than informs them.' Even so, Kuhn sees value in using standardized testing as a tool when done properly. 'As soon as you take student test results and weaponize them, turning them into a battering ram to beat up teachers and beat up schools. Now there's a motivation to have those tests not be great… The first thing I would do is make it diagnostic,' Kuhn said. 'When we get our STAAR results back, I dig into them. I've maintained a spreadsheet going back to 2012, which is the first year STAAR was given. I did it for my last school district. I'm doing it for Abilene ISD, where I track trends, and have we improved year upon year? And then, how did we do in comparison to the state? Are we lagging behind the state? Are we doing better than the state? Are we catching up to the state? All of that is very useful information to me.' Kuhn said that the challenges he faced during his time at Mineral Wells ISD mirror many of those in Abilene. His solution: advocate loudly and consistently for his district and the people within it. 'I'm going to fight for the reputation of my district. I'm going to fight for the reputation of my teachers, my kids,' Kuhn expressed. 'We aren't just building up kids. We're building up a city, we're building up society, we're building up the state and the world by giving these kids a fighting chance. The accountability system is just one quality marker that matters. That's why I talked earlier about marketing, right, like I think public schools have put all of our eggs in the accountability system basket as the way we prove that we're good. But if you look at universities, look at ACU, they market themselves with logos everywhere. You look around, there's purple all over the place… I think we've been a little too passive in really being forward with the fact that we are a great school, and here are all the reasons why. I think part of the reason for that is we're very busy just trying to teach kids and trying to feed kids and trying to transport kids and trying to make sure that the hallways are safe. I mean, there's so much to be done just to have a school, that we've taken our eye off the ball when it comes to marketing ourselves as public schools. The big charter school chains haven't made that mistake. There are charter school chains that have worse academic scores than the public schools around them, but they still draw quite a few kids from the public schools because they market themselves extremely well.' What is school choice? Big Country officials explain the 'voucher' dilemma Still, Kuhn's primary concern remains the long-term fiscal impact of vouchers. 'The costs have exploded in the other states that have done universal vouchers. Currently, the bill they just passed is a billion cap over the next two years. The question is, are they going to remove that cap? When they do, there are states where it's now 10 times what they initially budgeted for it,' Kuhn explained. 'There's one state governor, Arizona, I think, who said, we're going to have to stop certain programs in our state just to pay for the voucher system. So I think that's what I would I would challenge people to watch over the next 5 to 10 years, what does this do to the state budget? Because I think they made a colossal mistake.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Bernie Sanders urges Democrats not to work with ‘right-wing extremist' Musk after Trump fallout
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., ruled out the idea that Democrats should work with Elon Musk after his explosive falling out with President Donald Trump, labeling the Tesla CEO a "right-wing extremist." Musk said that he "strongly supported Obama" but felt that the modern Democratic Party had been "hijacked by extremists" in an April 2022 post on X. "Musk has evolved over the years. My understanding is he actually voted for Obama in 2008. But over the years, he has developed into a right-wing extremist," Sanders told CNN "State of the Union" host Dana Bash after she asked if Democrats should work with the tech billionaire after his "breakup" with Trump. Timeline: Inside The Evolving Relationship Between Trump And Musk From First Term To This Week's Fallout Sanders dismissed the idea out of hand and said Trump and Musk's drama was further proof that the United States was devolving into an oligarchic society. The self-proclaimed democratic socialist dismissed the episode as a fight among oligarchs, and slammed it as an "embarrassment" to people who believe in democracy and the rule of law. "Musk said to Trump, 'hey listen, I spent $270 million to get you elected. I bought you the presidency because we have a corrupt campaign finance system and billionaires can do that.' And Trump said, 'well, I gave you the right to run the government for three or four months, but I don't like the guy you want to run NASA, and we're going to get rid of him' and Musk got upset," Sanders said. Read On The Fox News App Musk endorsed Trump after he survived his assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, and subsequently served as one of his top surrogates and spent hundreds of millions of dollars to get him elected. Trump selected Musk to serve as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and tasked him with cutting waste, fraud and abuse from the federal bureaucracy. Musk's tenure at DOGE was tumultuous. Although he found billions of dollars in spending cuts, his reductions in federal outlays fell far short of the trillion dollars he promised. Backlash to Musk's work within the administration caused his businesses to suffer. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Trump and Musk's relationship took a turn for the worse after the president withdrew Musk-ally Jared Isaacman's nomination to lead NASA. Musk proceeded to trash the "big beautiful bill" Trump is trying to get through Congress, claiming Trump only won because he donated $270 million to aid his campaign and alleging, without proof, that the president is featured in the so-called Epstein files in an X post he subsequently deleted. Trump warned that Musk will have to face "very serious consequences" if he funds Democratic candidates as a result of their rupture. When asked by Bash if he feels that Musk is correct in claiming that Trump only won because of Musk's money, Sanders responded article source: Bernie Sanders urges Democrats not to work with 'right-wing extremist' Musk after Trump fallout
