logo
Snapshots of N.Y.C. Mayoral Candidates on the Campaign Trail

Snapshots of N.Y.C. Mayoral Candidates on the Campaign Trail

New York Times4 hours ago

New York City's Democratic mayoral primary field is crowded, diverse and tenacious, like the city itself. It includes candidates who would be the first woman, the first Muslim and the oldest person elected to lead City Hall. As the race has heated up, the contenders have traversed the five boroughs in an effort to gain support from millions of voters who hold competing interests and visions of New York.
Running for citywide office, like much of American politics, is a contact sport. Candidates seeking to raise money and boost their name recognition have had to take their message directly to voters — meeting them everywhere from the seats of the G train to the steps outside an N.B.A. playoff game at Madison Square Garden. And that was just before the first debate.
Candidates often campaigned in places where they had personal connections, or sought out New York City icons like the Cyclone roller coaster and the Staten Island Ferry.
Yet the dark political mood has cast a shadow over the contest. All the Democrats running have made big promises to bring the city they love back. Rising costs of living, threats from President Trump and enduring concerns over public safety have captured New Yorkers' attention and are driving their votes. This atmosphere has prompted some of the candidates who currently hold public office to leverage their positions to make waves and force tough policy conversations.
The race coincides with continuing tensions within the Democratic Party, which is still forging a path forward after bruising losses in last year's presidential election. And as the candidates seek to galvanize voters and make a name for themselves, they have also sought to paint themselves as fighters for their city, and against Mr. Trump. Here are some moments captured by New York Times photojournalists of the leading candidates on the campaign trail.
Adrienne Adams
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Senate parliamentarian rejects offshore oil, gas drilling provisions in GOP megabill
Senate parliamentarian rejects offshore oil, gas drilling provisions in GOP megabill

The Hill

time23 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Senate parliamentarian rejects offshore oil, gas drilling provisions in GOP megabill

Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough has ruled against provisions in the GOP megabill to enact President Trump's agenda that would dramatically accelerate the approval of offshore oil and gas projects, handing Senate Republican Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) a setback and Democrats another procedural victory. The parliamentarian ruled against a provision in the legislation that would deem offshore oil and gas projects as automatically compliant with the National Environmental Policy Act, essentially nullifying the environmental review process for these projects. And MacDonough advised against a subsection of the bill that requires offshore oil and gas leases to be issued to successful bidders within 90 days after the lease sale. The parliamentarian rejected a section of the bill requiring the Interior secretary to permit the construction of Ambler Road, a 211-mile access road that would facilitate the development of four large mines in Northern Alaska and hundreds of smaller mines in the region. She also ruled against language in the bill to mandate the sale of millions of acres of federal public land by the Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Forest Service. MacDonough said these provisions do not comply with the Senate's Byrd Rule and therefore are not eligible to pass the upper chamber with a simple-majority vote. Sections of the bill found to violate the Byrd Rule need 60 votes to overcome a point-of-order objection. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the ranking member on the Senate Budget Committee, hailed the rulings as another important procedural victory. 'Democrats continue to show up and fight every provision of this Big, Beautiful Betrayal of a bill, because this bill is an attack on workers and families everywhere,' Merkley said in a statement. 'Democrats will not stand idly by while Republicans attempt to circumvent the rules of reconciliation in order to sell off public lands to fund tax breaks for billionaires.' he continued. 'We will make sure the Byrd Rule is followed and review any changes Republicans attempt to make to the bill.' The parliamentarian also rejected a subsection of the bill that removes the secretary of the Interior's discretion to reduce fees for wind and solar projects on federal land as well as sections that would require the Interior Department to hold yearly geothermal lease sales and change how geothermal royalties are calculated. MacDonough is still reviewing several Alaska-related environmental provisions in the bill and considering a section of the bill that would require 90 percent of the revenue from oil and gas leases in Cook Inlet to be handed over to the Last Frontier State starting in 2035. She is also expected to weigh in on language to require oil and gas lease sales in the National Petroleum Reserve in Alaska.

Trump's CFPB rollback has cost Americans $18 billion, consumer groups say
Trump's CFPB rollback has cost Americans $18 billion, consumer groups say

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's CFPB rollback has cost Americans $18 billion, consumer groups say

By Douglas Gillison (Reuters) -President Donald Trump's rapid pullback of the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has cost Americans at least $18 billion in higher fees and lost compensation for consumers allegedly cheated by major companies, according to an analysis released Tuesday by two organizations. The increased consumer costs from the CFPB's rollback of regulations on bank fees, wholesale dismissal of cases against banks and other lenders and the apparent failure to disburse funds intended for harmed borrowers run counter to Trump's campaign pledges to ease the cost of living, according to the Student Borrower Protection Center and the Consumer Federation of America. Representatives for the White House and CFPB did not immediately respond to requests for comment outside regular business hours. Since Trump took control of the CFPB in February, calling for its elimination, administration officials have sought to reduce the workforce by about 90% and sharply curtail its industry oversight. Administration officials accuse the agency and its former leadership of exceeding their legal powers, burdening free enterprise and engaging in politicized enforcement of consumer laws. However, in a statement on Tuesday, the two organizations listed actions Trump's team had taken that they said shifted costs onto consumers. Under former President Joe Biden, the agency had sought to cap credit card late fees at $8 and overdraft fees at $5. The Trump administration's move to end those policies should together cost consumers $15 billion a year, according to the statement. The dismissal of 22 enforcement cases that were pending when Biden left office in January -- including actions against JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Capital One -- involved more than $3 billion in alleged harm to consumers. The CFPB has also scrapped or revised settlements it had already concluded with Toyota and a payments processor, meaning about $50 million in redress payments will never be made, the statement said. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store