Spring brings more Russian advances as Putin rejects a ceasefire in Ukraine
Vladyslav Voloshyn, a spokesman for Ukraine's southern forces, said Russian forces were increasing their mechanised attacks as spring weather firmed up soggy ground.
'The mud has disappeared … there is more vegetation, and there is less visibility. Therefore, the enemy is trying to improve its tactical position,' said Voloshyn.
Russian forces on Tuesday entered the village of Stepove in western Zaporizhia, a southern Ukrainian province Russian forces partly occupy.
The capture would complicate local Ukrainian logistics, said a Russian official.
'There is a road running from Orekhov to Kamenskoye through Stepove, which the enemy constantly used … They will have to move along longer routes. This brings about positive changes for us on the Zaporizhia front as a whole,' Vladimir Rogov told the Russian state news agency TASS.
There was also bad news for Ukrainian forces in the Russian province of Kursk, where they staged a counter-invasion last August, drawing much of Russia's firepower away from Ukrainian soil.
Russia recaptured its city of Sudzha on March 13, pushing Ukrainian forces almost to the border, and appeared intent on pressing into Ukrainian territory.
'Not only will we have liberated our own land, but we will also establish the buffer zone that [Putin] has tasked us with creating,' Apty Alaudinov, commander of the Chechen Akhmat special forces unit, told Rossiya-1 television network.
Putin called for the creation of a 'sanitary zone' inside Ukraine a year ago.
'It is crucial that this zone be no less than 20 kilometres wide [10 miles], and preferably 30 kilometres [20 miles], extending deep into Ukrainian territory,' a battalion deputy commander, Oleg Ivanov, told state news service TASS.
Putin seeks selective ceasefire
Buoyed by these successes, Putin rejected a United States-Ukrainian proposal for a complete ceasefire on the day Sudzha fell to him.
'Who will determine where and who has violated a potential ceasefire agreement along 2,000km [1,240 miles]? And who will then blame who for violating that agreement?' Putin said, referring to the length of the entire Russian-Ukrainian border.
'The situation on the ground … is rapidly changing,' he told reporters.
Putin also claimed Ukrainian forces in Kursk were encircled.
Ukraine's general staff denied the claim, saying, 'Reports of the alleged 'encirclement' … are false and fabricated by the Russians for political manipulation and to exert pressure on Ukraine and its partners.'
That did not stop US President Donald Trump from believing them.
'[Russians] have encircled about 2,500 soldiers, they're nicely encircled,' Trump said in a televised interview.
There was no subsequent indication they had been captured.
Trump's envoy, Steve Witkoff, told reporters on Tuesday that instead of a full ceasefire, Putin agreed to a ceasefire on long-range aerial attacks against power stations and general infrastructure, as well as long-range naval attacks in the Black Sea.
The agreement was sealed after two meetings between Witkoff and Putin lasting almost eight hours, followed by a two-hour phone call between Putin and Trump.
'Up until recently, we really didn't have consensus around these two aspects, the energy and infrastructure ceasefire and the Black Sea moratorium on firing. And today, we got to that place, and I think it's a relatively short distance to a full ceasefire from there,' Witkoff said.
The Kremlin's version of events suggested a Black Sea moratorium was still not there.
Putin 'reacted constructively' to the idea, a Kremlin press statement said, and 'agreed to start negotiations to further study the specific details', whereas on energy and general infrastructure, Putin 'immediately gave the Russian military the appropriate command'.
Witkoff said details remained to be worked out on Sunday when US and Russian delegations were to meet in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said he would consider the partial ceasefire after speaking with Trump, 'so that we could understand the details', he was quoted as saying by Ukrainian news portal, Obshchestvennoye Novosti on March 19.
But the deal between Trump and Putin puts him in a difficult position.
The full ceasefire would have stopped a slow but relentless yearlong Russian advance, while a simultaneous long-range ceasefire would have protected Russian energy infrastructure and the Russian Black Sea fleet from attacks by Ukrainian unmanned vehicles, which have been highly successful.
On Wednesday, for example, Ukrainian-made drones struck a refinery in Russia's Krasnodar region. Last Friday, they destroyed four Pantsir-1 surface-to-air missile systems on Russian soil; while the day before, three drones reached Moscow.
Zelenskyy said a Ukrainian-made drone had passed the 3,000km (1,860-mile) test on Tuesday, suggesting Ukraine was aiming for ever-deeper strikes against weapons factories and refineries in enemy territory.
The absence of such symmetry in a partial ceasefire gives Ukraine no respite or retribution for ongoing Russian attacks on its soil.
The direct talks between Russia and the US have also frustrated Zelenskyy, who enjoyed unqualified support from former US President Joe Biden.
In a virtual meeting with NATO and European Union allies on Saturday, Zelenskyy expressed frustration that Trump was discussing European security guarantees with Putin.
'This is a very bad signal – taking the Russians' opinion into account,' regarding a European-led peacekeeping force in Ukraine, he said. 'It is not [Putin's] business to decide anything about Ukraine's and Europe's security,' he said.
Putin, on the other hand, sounded bullish when addressing the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs, whose leaders he told to get used to Western sanctions.
'Only those countries that can ensure real, full-scale sovereignty and remain resilient, both generally and to external pressures in particular, are capable of dynamic, progressive development in the interests of their peoples,' he said.
Any ceasefire would be designed to lead to negotiations for long-term peace, but neither Russia nor Ukraine have budged from their fundamental positions.
Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Alexander Grushko told an interviewer on Monday that Ukraine had to agree never to become part of NATO. Russia has also demanded that Ukraine withdraw from its four provinces that Russia has formally annexed and partly controls – Luhansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhia and Kherson.
Ukraine would never recognise its occupied territories as Russian, said Andriy Yermak, the head of Zelenskyy's office, days after being appointed to lead Ukraine's negotiating team on Friday.
The EU, too, has taken a grim view of Putin's intentions.
'Those conditions that they are presenting show that Russia doesn't really want peace because they are presenting as conditions all the ultimate goals that they want to achieve from the war,' EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said at the start of Monday's meeting of the bloc's foreign ministers.
Trump's national security adviser, Mike Waltz, said territorial concessions would be part of a deal, while NATO membership for Ukraine was 'extremely unlikely'.
'We can talk about what's right and wrong, and we can also talk about the reality of the situation on the ground,' said Waltz in an interview with ABC News on Sunday.
Granting Russia the territories it holds would cripple Ukraine's future defence, according to the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a Washington-based think tank.
'The current front lines do not provide the strategic depth that Ukraine will need to reliably defend against renewed Russian aggression,' wrote the ISW.
'Russian forces are just across the Dnipro River from Kherson City, roughly 25 kilometres [15 miles] from Zaporizhzhia City, and 30 kilometres [20 miles] from Kharkiv City. Russian troops on the Dnipro River could use a ceasefire to prepare for the extremely difficult task of conducting an opposed river crossing undisturbed.'
It concluded, 'Ukraine would likely need an even larger military with greater capabilities to play its critical role in deterring and, if necessary, defeating future aggression,' while 'the US and Europe would likely need to provide military aid to Ukraine more rapidly, in much larger volumes, and at higher cost'.
There was some good news for Ukraine during the past week.
Germany's Christian Democrats and Social Democrats passed a resolution in the Bundestag on Tuesday to create a 500bn euros ($546bn) fund for defence and infrastructure spending, overcoming a political tradition against high deficits.
It still has to pass the upper house of Parliament.
Germany on Monday announced a new weapons and ammunition package for Ukraine, which included missiles for the Iris-T.
Also on Monday, the European Council said Ukraine will soon receive approximately 3.5bn euros ($3.8bn) after the Council approved a third payment of non-repayable grants and loans to Kyiv under the Ukraine Facility, which supports reconstruction and modernisation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
38 minutes ago
- Al Jazeera
Afghans in US mark Taliban Kabul takeover amid Trump immigration crackdown
Four years have passed since Hanifa Girowal fled Afghanistan on a US evacuation flight. But every August, her mind returns to the same place. Like many Afghans evacuated amid the August 15 Taliban takeover of Kabul, Girowal, who worked in human rights under the former Afghan government, still remains stuck in 'legal limbo' in the United States. She is steadfastly pursuing a more stable status in the US, even as the political landscape surrounding her, and thousands of other Afghans in similar situations, shifts. 'I somehow feel like I'm still stuck in August 2021 and all the other Augusts in between, I can't remember anything about them,' Girowal told Al Jazeera. She often recalls the mad dash amid a crush of bodies at the crowded Kabul International Airport: people shot in front of her, a week of hiding, a flight to Qatar, then Germany and then finally, the US state of Virginia. Followed by the early days of trying to begin a new life from the fragments of the old. 'Everything just comes up again to the surface, and it's like reliving that trauma we went through, and we have been trying to heal from since that day,' she said. The struggle may have become familiar, but her disquiet has been heightened since US President Donald Trump took office on January 20. His hardline immigration policies have touched nearly every immigrant community in the US, underscoring vulnerabilities for anyone on a precarious legal status. There is a feeling that anything could happen, from one day to the next. 'I have an approved asylum case, which gives a certain level of protection, but we still don't know the future of certain policies on immigration,' Girowal said. 'I am very much fearful that I can be subjected to deportation at any time.' Unheeded warnings Four years after the US withdrawal, much remains unclear about how Trump's policies will affect Afghans who are already in the US, estimated to total about 180,000. They arrived through a tangle of different avenues, including 75,000 flown in on evacuation flights in the immediate aftermath of the withdrawal, as the administration of US President Joe Biden undertook what it dubbed 'Operation Allies Welcome'. Thousands more have since sought asylum by making treacherous journeys across the world to traverse the US southern border. Some have relocated via so-called Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs), reserved for individuals who worked directly with the US military in Afghanistan, under a notoriously backlogged programme. Others have been resettled through a special State Department programme, known as Priority 1 (P1) and Priority 2 (P2), launched by the administration of President Biden, meant for Afghans who face persecution for having worked in various capacities on behalf of the US government or with a US-based organisation in Afghanistan. Adam Bates, a supervisory policy counsel at the International Refugee Assistance Programme, explained that some of those pathways, most notably the SIV and refugee programmes, provide a clear course towards US residency and, eventually, citizenship. But, he clarified, others do not – a fact that advocates have warned leaves members of the population subject to perpetual uncertainty and political whims. 'A lot of the advocacy to the Biden administration officials was about finding more permanent legal pathways for Afghans,' Bates told Al Jazeera. 'That was with one eye towards the potential of giving the Trump administration this opportunity to really double down and target this community.' Pressure on Afghans in the US During Trump's new term, his administration has taken several concrete – and at times contradictory – moves that affect Afghans living in the US. It ended 'temporary protected status' (TPS) for Afghans already in the country at the time of the Taliban takeover, arguing the country shows 'an improved security situation' and 'stabilising economy', a claim contradicted by several human rights reports. At the same time, the Trump administration added Afghanistan to a new travel ban list, restricting visas for Afghans, saying such admissions broadly run counter to US 'foreign policy, national security, and counterterrorism'. These actions underscore that 'the situation in Afghanistan seems to be whatever it needs to be, from the Trump administration's perspective,' according to Bates. Trump has offered his contradictory messaging, criticising the Biden administration on the campaign trail for its handling of the withdrawal, and as recently as July, pledging to 'save' evacuated Afghans subject to deportation from the United Arab Emirates. Meanwhile, the administration terminated a special status for those who entered the US via the CBP One app in April, potentially affecting thousands of Afghans who entered via the southern border. Advocates warn that many more Afghans may soon be facing another legal cliff. After being evacuated in 2021, tens of thousands of Afghans were granted humanitarian parole, a temporary status that allowed them to legally live and work in the US for two years, with an extension granted in 2023. That programme is soon set to end. While many granted the status have since sought other legal avenues, most often applying for asylum or SIVs, an unknown number could be rendered undocumented and subject to deportation when the extension ends. Legislation creating a clearer pathway to citizenship has languished in Congress for years. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has not publicly released how many evacuated Afghans remain in the US on humanitarian parole, and did not respond to Al Jazeera's request for the data. Evacuated Afghans' unease has been compounded by Trump's aggressive approach to immigration enforcement, which has increasingly seen those without criminal histories targeted for deportations and permanent residents targeted for their political advocacy. 'It's just an escalation across the board and a compounding of fear and instability in this community,' Bates said. 'It's hard to make life decisions if you aren't sure what's going to happen tomorrow or next week or in a year'. 'Pulled the rug out' Meanwhile, for the thousands of Afghans continuing to seek safety in the US from abroad, pathways have been severely constricted or have become completely blocked. The Trump administration has paused asylum claims at the US southern border, citing a national emergency. It has almost completely suspended the US Refugee Program (USRAP), allowing only a trickle of new refugees in amid an ongoing legal challenge by rights groups. Advocates say the special P1 and P2 programme created for Afghan refugees appears to have been completely halted under Trump. The administration has not published refugee admission numbers since taking office, and did not reply to Al Jazeera's request for data. 'It feels as if we have pulled the rug out from many of our Afghan allies through these policy changes that strip legal protection for many Afghans in the US and limit pathways for Afghans who are still abroad to come to the US safely,' Kristyn Peck, the chief executive officer of the Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area, told Al Jazeera. She noted that the SIV pipeline has continued to operate under Trump, although there have been some limitations, including requiring those approved for relocation to pay for their own travel. Meanwhile, resettlement agencies like Lutheran have been forced to seriously curtail their operations following a stop-work order from the administration on January 24. As of March, Peck said, the organisation has been forced to let go of about 120 of its staff. Susan Antolin, the executive director of Women for Afghan Women, a non-profit organisation that offers mental health, legal and social support to Afghans in the US, said organisations like hers are also bracing for sustained uncertainty. 'We are diversifying our funding and trying very hard, as so many other organisations are, to find other avenues to bring in that funding to continue to support our programmes,' she told Al Jazeera. 'As organisations that deal with this kind of work, we have to step up. We have to do 10 times more, or 100 times more, of the work.' 'No more a priority for the world' The unstable situation in the US reflects a broader global trend. The Taliban government, despite promising reforms in a push for international recognition, has continued to be accused of widespread human rights abuses and revenge killings. Still, it has upgraded diplomatic ties with several governments in recent years, and in July, Russia became the first country to formally recognise the group as the legitimate government of Afghanistan. At the same time, the governments of Pakistan and Iran have accelerated expulsions of Afghans back to Afghanistan, with more than 1.4 million Afghans either being expelled or leaving Iran alone from January to July of 2025, according to UNHCR. The Reuters news agency also reported in July that the UAE had notified Washington that it had begun returning evacuated Afghans. Germany, too, has begun deporting Afghans back to Afghanistan, in July, it conducted its second deportation flight since the Taliban came to power, despite continuing not to recognise or maintain diplomatic ties with the group. The collective moves send a clear message, evacuee Girowal said: 'We know that Afghanistan is no more a priority for the world.' Still, she said she has not abandoned hope that the US under Trump's leadership will 'not forget its allies'. 'I know the resilience of our own Afghan community. We are trained to be resilient wherever we are and fight back as much as we can,' she said. 'That's one thing that gives me hope.'
Al Jazeera
2 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Taliban marks fourth anniversary of return to power with internal threats
The Taliban's leader has warned that Afghans ungrateful for its hardline rule will be severely punished by God in a statement marking the fourth anniversary of the group's return to power. The statement from Haibatullah Akhunzada was made in a social media post on Friday to commemorate 'Victory Day', four years on from the chaotic United States and NATO withdrawal from the country after more than 20 years of war as the Taliban retook the capital, Kabul. The threat was a stark reminder of the sweeping restrictions and repression of rights, especially of women and girls, that has taken place under the Taliban's rule, which is based on its strict interpretation of Islamic law. In his statement, Akhunzada said Afghans had faced hardships for decades in the name of establishing religious law in the country, which he said had saved citizens from 'corruption, oppression, usurpation, drugs, theft, robbery and plunder'. 'These are great divine blessings that our people should not forget and, during the commemoration of Victory Day, express great gratitude to Allah Almighty so that the blessings will increase,' his statement said. 'If, against God's will, we fail to express gratitude for blessings and are ungrateful for them, we will be subjected to the severe punishment of Allah Almighty.' He also advised government ministers to remove the word 'acting' from their job titles, signalling the consolidation of his administration's rule in the country amid a lack of internal opposition. Victory Day Four years on from its return to power, the Taliban government remains largely isolated in the international arena over the severe rights restrictions imposed under its rule although Russia became the first country to officially recognise the Taliban administration in early July. It also has close ties with China, the United Arab Emirates and a number of Central Asian states although none of these officially recognises the Taliban administration. Victory Day parades were planned in several Afghan cities on Friday, and in Kabul, helicopters were scheduled to drop flowers across the city. Photographs of an official ceremony in Kabul to open the commemorations showed a hall filled exclusively with male delegates. 'An open wound of history' Rather than celebrating, members of the activist group United Afghan Women's Movement for Freedom staged an indoor protest in the northeastern province of Takhar against the Taliban's oppressive rule, The Associated Press news agency reported. 'This day marked the beginning of a black domination that excluded women from work, education and social life,' the group said in a statement to the agency. 'We, the protesting women, remember this day not as a memory, but as an open wound of history, a wound that has not yet healed. The fall of Afghanistan was not the fall of our will. We stand, even in the darkness.' Afghan women also held an indoor protest in the Pakistani capital, Islamabad, the agency reported. Repression and death threats The United Nations, foreign governments and human rights groups have condemned the Taliban for their treatment of women and girls, who are banned from most education and work, as well as parks, gyms and travelling without a male guardian. Inspectors from the Vice and Virtue Ministry require women to wear a chador, a full-body cloak covering the head, while a law announced a year ago ordered women not to sing or recite poetry in public and for their voices and bodies to be 'concealed' outside the home. Last month, the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants against Akhunzada and the country's chief justice on charges of committing gender-based persecution against women and girls. ICC judges said the Taliban had 'severely deprived' girls and women of the rights to education, privacy, family life and the freedoms of movement, expression, thought, conscience and religion. At least 1.4 million girls have been 'deliberately deprived' of their right to an education by the Taliban government, a UN report from August 2024 found. Among the restrictions imposed on women is a ban on working for nongovernmental groups, among other jobs. A UN report this month revealed that dozens of Afghan women working for the organisation in the country had received direct death threats. The report said the Taliban had told the UN mission that its cadres were not responsible for the threats and a Ministry of Interior Affairs investigation is under way. An Interior Ministry spokesman, Abdul Mateen Qani, later told The Associated Press news agency that no threats had been made. In the meantime, Iran, Pakistan and the US have been sending Afghan refugees back to Taliban rule, where they risk persecution.
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump's takeover of DC police department faces new lawsuit amid crackdown
The United States capital, Washington, DC, has challenged President Donald Trump's takeover of its police department in court, hours after his administration stepped up its crackdown on policing by naming the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) chief, a federal official, as the new emergency head of the department, with all the powers of a police chief. District of Columbia Attorney General Brian Schwalb said on Friday in a new lawsuit that Trump is exceeding his power under the law. Schwalb urged a judge to rule that control of the department remains in the city's hands, and he has also sought an emergency restraining order. 'The administration's unlawful actions are an affront to the dignity and autonomy of the 700,000 Americans who call D.C. home. This is the gravest threat to Home Rule that the District has ever faced, and we are fighting to stop it,' Schwalb said. Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser also pushed back, writing on social media that 'there is no statute that conveys the District's personnel authority to a federal official.' Let us be clear about what the law requires during a Presidential declared emergency: it requires the mayor of Washington, DC to provide the services of the Metropolitan Police Department for federal purposes at the request of the President. We have followed the law. In… — Mayor Muriel Bowser (@MayorBowser) August 15, 2025 The lawsuit comes after Trump's Attorney General Pam Bondi said on Thursday night that DEA boss Terry Cole will assume 'powers and duties vested in the District of Columbia Chief of Police'. The Metropolitan Police Department 'must receive approval from Commissioner Cole' before issuing any orders, Bondi said. Earlier this week, Trump announced that the federal government would take control of the District of Columbia (DC) Metropolitan Police Department to address surging crime. 'I'm announcing a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse,' Trump said during the news conference, in which he was joined by Bondi, who was initially set to oversee the city's police force while it is under federal control. 'This is Liberation Day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back. We're taking it back,' Trump said. He also announced the deployment of the National Guard. 'I'm deploying the National Guard to help re-establish law, order and public safety in Washington, DC, and they're going to be allowed to do their job properly,' he said. Trump also said that he intends to remove the capital's homeless population, but did not provide details on how the plan would be carried out. Residents wary of escalated show of force A Washington population already on edge from days of Trump administration ramp-ups has begun witnessing more significant shows of force across the city. National Guard troops watched over some of the country's most renowned landmarks and Humvees took position in front of the busy main train hub, Union Station. Volunteers have helped homeless people leave longstanding encampments, but where they were relocating to was often unclear. Department of Homeland Security police stood outside Nationals Park during a baseball game on Thursday. DEA agents patrolled The Wharf, a popular nightlife area, while Secret Service officers were seen in the Foggy Bottom neighbourhood. The sudden spike in high visibility of federal forces around the city, including in many busy traffic areas, has struck residents going about their day-to-day lives. Trump has the power to take over federal law enforcement for 30 days before his actions must be reviewed by Congress, though he has said he will re-evaluate as that deadline approaches. National Guard troops are usually less of a heavy presence in Washington's metropolitan area, typically being used during mass public events like the annual July 4 celebration. They have regularly been used in the past for crowd control in and around Metro stations.
