
Former Press Secretary Michael Forbes Told To Inform Employer Himself After Filming Allegations
Forbes, a former journalist, resigned after it emerged he recorded audio of multiple sessions with Wellington sex workers, and amassed a gallery of women working out at the gym, shopping and being filmed through a window getting ready to go out.
Police earlier said they got a complaint from a Wellington brothel last July after images were found on a client's phone, but decided the case did not meet the threshold for prosecution.
On Wednesday, a series of documents were released to RNZ under the Official Information Act, including a timeline of key events and executive notifications.
The incident at the Wellington brothel happened at 7pm on 11 July. Police Comms were notified the following day at 5.40pm. Ten minutes later the National Command and Coordination Centre (NCCC) was alerted and then the District Command Centre.
At 6.15pm on 12 July the NCCC emailed a large number of senior leaders in police including former Police Commissioner Andrew Coster, former Deputy Commissioner Jevon McSkimming and others.
"Police Comms have been called by an informant who works for an escort agency. The informant has found images on a client's phone of naked females, including one very intoxicated female that appear to have been taken with the consent of those photographed/filmed.
"The client is allegedly Michael FORBES who is the Senior Press Secretary for the Hon Louise Upston, the Minister for the Community and Voluntary Sector, Minister for Social Development and Employment, and Minister for Child Poverty Reduction.
"The alleged offender has left his personal and work cell phones with the informant. The file has been assigned to the Wellington District Crime Squad for attendance."
The police media team had been notified, the email said.
The email was recalled about 20 minutes later after now Deputy Commissioner Tania Kura asked for the recall as "the distribution list is too broad for this type of communication".
The staffer replied they had.
Kura said the case was "one of those ones that is a little more sensitive and didn't need such a wide audience".
Investigation summary
The documents included an investigation summary, which said on 12 July 2024, Wellington Police received a complaint that Forbes had covertly made an audio recording the previous day while engaging the services of a sex worker.
"The informant advised police that they had taken two mobile phones from Forbes, one believed to be a personal phone, the other a work device. The informant also reported finding other audio files, images and videos that caused concern."
The informant was spoken to by police and both phones were taken.
"Once it was established that Forbes was a senior press secretary at Parliament, procedural escalation notifications were made that evening.
"The Wellington District Command Centre was advised, as was the duty inspector."
On 13 July, a detective obtained search warrants to examine the two cell phones.
"The suspected offence was making an intimate visual recording, being an offence against section 216H of the Crimes Act 1961."
On 15 July, a detective visited Forbes and advised him of the police investigation. During that visit Forbes provided access codes for the phones.
On 18 July, a detective examined the phones.
"Located within both phones were numerous videos, screen shots and photos of unidentified females, some in various state of undress, and exposed breasts were visible in multiple videos.
"It was apparent to detectives that some images were taken in, and from, public places, including a gym. Some images were also taken through street facing windows of unidentified women, dressing (undressing) themselves, and who were visible from the waist up."
The summary says the examination of the phones did not identify evidence of criminal offending.
On 18 July Forbes met with a detective and the phones were returned to him.
"He was also provided copies of the search warrants that had been obtained.
"During the meeting it was suggested that Forbes should delete some of the images on his phones, and he began doing so. Police also stressed the onus was on him to inform his employer."
On 19 July Police provided an update to the complainant. On 6 August, Police also provided an update to another staff member at the brothel.
"They expressed frustration and disappointment with the outcome," the summary said.
In an earlier statement Wellington District Manager Criminal Investigations Detective Inspector John van den Heuvel earlier said that as part of the investigation, police obtained a search warrant to seize two of his phones.
On examining the phones, Police found a number of photos and videos of women in public spaces, and what appeared to be women in private addresses, taken from a distance away, van den Heuvel said.
"Police considered the available evidence and concluded it did not meet the requirements for criminality, and therefore charges could not be filed.
"The individual concerned voluntarily spoke with police and admitted to taking the images and recordings. He was reminded of the inappropriateness of his behaviour and encouraged to seek help."
Forbes also deleted the images in the presence of police.
"Police acknowledge this man's behaviour was extremely distressing for the women involved and would like to reassure them that any new information will be thoroughly considered.
"Based on the initial report and available evidence to date, police are unable to progress the matter further."
Van den Heuvel said that any new information regarding Forbes would be "thoroughly considered".
Forbes had 'obligation' to tell employers, prime minister says
When earlier asked why police did not alert the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) after executing a search warrant on a government-issued phone, the department said: "We are still gathering facts and will look into all of this as part of our deep dive."
The DIA said all Ministerial Services staff were subject to standard pre-employment checks when they were first employed. These included reference checks, serious misconduct checks and a criminal conviction check. In addition, security clearances were required for some positions in ministers' offices.
The department says these checks were completed when Forbes was first employed by Ministerial Services and were not required for the later temporary assignment to the prime minister's office.
"We acknowledge staff may be unsettled or feel their safety may have been compromised. We are committed to supporting our people and ensuring they feel, and are, safe at work."
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said the incidents that were investigated by police but did not lead to any charges occurred after Forbes was vetted to work for Social Development Minister Louise Upston.
"He has an obligation to actually declare those issues or those incidents to us, that didn't happen which is why his employment would have been terminated obviously," Luxon said in a media conference at Parliament in June.
"But there is a good question about making sure, and I have asked specifically for DIA (The Department of Internal Affairs) to look at vetting processes."
He added that the expectation was on Forbes to have raised the incidents with the prime minister's office "because it impacts the office and the reputation of the office, for obvious reasons, but that did not happen".
Forbes moved from Upston's office to the prime minister's in February this year and "had the vetting that he needed to come into the Beehive".
"We will look at that to make sure that there is anything else we could have done differently in that vetting."
Luxon would not discuss what level of security clearance Forbes had in the Beehive.
Luxon also had questions about whether the investigation should have been elevated by police to the Beehive.
'We have to take this incident and understand what has happened here and how it happened, and what more can we do about it.
"I think it is a legitimate question to say what can we look at between the inter-agency processes, between the different agencies, whether it is police, whether it is the SIS or whether it is ministerial services."
'I was in a downward spiral'
Forbes earlier offered an apology for the harm his actions caused to women.
"I want to offer my sincerest apologies to the women I have harmed," he said in a statement.
"In the past, I was in a downward spiral due to unresolved trauma and stress, and when confronted with the impacts of my behaviour a year ago, I sought professional help, which is something I wish I had done much earlier.
"What I failed to do then was make a genuine attempt to apologise. Instead, I tried to move on without offering those I had harmed the acknowledgement, accountability, or amends they deserved. I recognise how wrong that was."
Forbes said he spent the past year "reflecting on how I may have affected these women's sense of safety and ability to go about their lives and work".
"No one should ever feel violated, unsafe, or disrespected, especially in spaces where they should feel secure, and I am truly sorry for contributing to an environment where women may have felt otherwise," he said.
"The therapy I've received over the past year has helped me to understand the roots of my behaviour and begin addressing the patterns that led to it. This is a long-term commitment to change that I take very seriously.
"I understand that my past actions may have undermined the trust people place in me. So, I have resigned from my job to focus on the work I need to do."
Forbes declined to comment when approached by RNZ on Wednesday.
Police Commissioner Richard Chambers told RNZ it was "up to the commissioner of the day to decide what information is shared".
"I was not a member of the executive at the time and was not aware of the issue because I was working at Interpol in France.
"As I have said previously, in my view it should have been escalated. However, these are matters of judgement for the executive at the time.
"I note also that police dealing with the investigation had told Mr Forbes at the time that he should advise his employer."
A response on behalf of former police commissioner Andrew Coster to RNZ said police advised that the notification email was recalled shortly after it was sent.
"(Then) Commissioner Coster was off on leave at that point so it was handled by others. He will not be commenting further and you will need to direct any further queries to the NZ Police."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Northland's unprecendented crime surge
Photo: RNZ / REECE BAKER Once famed for its beaches, beauty and laid-back lifestyle, Northland is now back in the headlines - but for all the wrong reasons. There has been a surge in violent crime and homicides - nine to date already this year - which has triggered a police mayday call, with dozens of extra officers heading to the area to help. Officials are calling it a "targeted boost" to frontline policing, with crews in blue hitting the streets, patrolling hot spots, cracking down on gang activity, and sorting through the growing backlog of cases. More than 90 police staff - from as far afield as Southland - have already bolstered the region's special operation for five-week stints, with no end date in sight. New Zealand Herald senior investigative journalist Michael Morrah, who broke the story, tells The Detail that part of the problem is it appears police do not want to live and work up north. The increase in crime, fuelled by a toxic mix of poverty, drugs, unemployment, and organised gang presence, is perhaps too much to handle. "Getting police officers who are going to be working in those mid to far north areas has been a problem," says Morrah, who grew up in Northland. "I think it has been a problem for many, many years, and I think it's probably at its worst right now." He describes the latest crime wave as unprecedented and the move to deploy out-of-town police officers to deal with it as "a pretty unusual, unprecedented response in terms of the numbers of police who are going up there, in terms of the duration of the support operation". "This year, alone, we have had nine alleged homicides in Northland, that is a record even on last year, [when there were eight] and we are not even at the end of the year yet. "Police, obviously, when they are dealing with killings and investigating that, it takes a huge amount of manpower, a huge amount of hours, to get those cases to court. "And what's happened is police officers are being taken off other jobs. In the words of the District Commander [Superintendent] Matt Srhoj, it has left police with an inability to follow up on other crimes that are happening." Police told The Detail that the fourth rotation is about to commence, and they will continue to review the ongoing support. They could not provide any details on how much it is costing, but confirmed staff were not being back-filled due to the short stint of deployment. Morrah says while locals welcome the extra boots on the ground, they warn policing alone will not solve it. Mental health support, youth programmes, Māori wardens, and job opportunities - they argue - are just as vital. "Iwi want to be part of the solution," Morrah says. "They want to help police here. They are absolutely concerned about crimes not being followed up on, about slow response times, but they also want to be part of the solution." He says while Northland is "paradise" and "has a lot of offer", it's often forgotten about on a national level. "There is a view, and I think there is some validity to this, that over many, many years, Northland has been neglected by consecutive governments. And it is not a powerhouse, like Wellington and Auckland, and I think in many cases, Northland is sadly forgotten. "And I think that politicians could be doing more to assist in the development of places like Northland to make it a great place to live, go to school, and work." The coming months will be a crucial test - not just for the police tasked with turning the tide, but for a community desperate to take its streets back. Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here . You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook


NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Letters: Do those who manage rugby want to see a crowd? I have listened to RNZ with growing concern
What is wrong with the people responsible for such genuinely awful planning? Had they started the early fixture a bit later and ensured a wait between games of, say, just 15 minutes before a 4.35pm kickoff for the NPC game, the crowd of probably 12,000 or so people would likely have stayed and enjoyed both games. The vast majority of the significant crowd immediately left at the first game's final whistle and the remaining crowd by the time of the next kickoff, as seen on TV, was the proverbial 'two men and a dog'! This was the first time we had attended at Eden Park for many years. We won't be back. In retrospect, it was 'the smart move' to leave as soon as the schools game ended as, when I gave up in disgust and turned the telly off, Taranaki were giving Auckland a good old-fashioned thrashing. Roger Hawkins, Herne Bay. Covid inquiry I am wondering why the citizenry of New Zealand are surprised when some politicians will not attend the Royal Commission on the Covid response. We elect our leaders to act on our behalf. Normally, everything is transparent and follows due process. A pandemic is an interruption to the normal business of a country; it requires instant, sometimes repugnant outcomes for the people and makes the deliverer of the message very unpopular. Being told to isolate and how and when we may leave our homes is anathema to New Zealanders but in the instance of a pandemic of the severity of Covid, it was necessary. Decision-makers did do what they thought right at that time, with what expert information and scientific knowledge was available to them. Why is the 'rightness or wrongness' of those decisions now being queried? It was over and above the parameters of normal governance. It was a pandemic! Life-threatening. A once-in-a-lifetime event. Yes, money was spent. How much and for how long was those leaders' decision to make. It is not now the privilege of today's political cohort to question the minutiae of detail of the whys and wherefores. New Zealand did not have coffins lining the streets. Perhaps our island nation was saved by the unpopular isolation tactics returning citizens endured but they can be proud they contributed to the safety of all. Do not turn this to a dollar mentality when measuring outcomes. A democratic society pays what is necessary to house and feed its criminals; provides succour to the needy, cares for the elderly – why pillory the decision-makers for money spent saving the nation in the time of a pandemic? Robyn Tubb, Millwater. RNZ's decline As a former senior NZBC announcer, I've listened to RNZ National's decline with growing concern. Richard Sutherland's recent criticism (Media Insider, August 16) confirms what many listeners know: standards have slipped dramatically. Today's RNZ presenters gabble through scripts, mangle pronunciations ('flowan' for 'flown,' 'pardy' for 'party'), and rush through te reo Māori with obvious discomfort. This undermines both our official language's mana and RNZ's credibility as New Zealand's public broadcaster. The problem runs deeper than technical issues. RNZ has drifted toward commercial radio tactics. There is much gabbling and puerile banter, chasing ratings rather than serving its unique public mission. But public radio shouldn't sound like The Rock or ZM, it should offer something better. Excellence means clear, accurate presentation with proper pronunciation of both English and te reo Māori. It means substance over filler, cultural competence and an authentically New Zealand voice that maintains professional standards without stuffiness. The solution isn't complicated: establish clear broadcasting standards, provide ongoing professional development and create a culture valuing craft over ratings. Experienced broadcasters should mentor newcomers, passing on both technical skills and understanding of public radio's role. RNZ National should be the best of New Zealand broadcasting; thoughtful, substantial and respectful of audience intelligence. The talent exists; what's needed is leadership willing to set and maintain standards. Our public broadcaster should make us proud, not require excuses. James Gregory, Parnell.


Scoop
11 hours ago
- Scoop
Mediawatch: Palestinian Statehood Push Vexes Media
Article – RNZ An media debate over New Zealand recognising Palestinian statehood was partly overshadowed by party political rows and claims it would only be a gesture. , Mediawatch Presenter 'New Zealand is fast becoming one of the last Western democracies to recognise Palestine as a state,' Corin Dann told Morning Report listeners on RNZ National last Tuesday. While there was a bit of cognitive dissonance in fast becoming one of the last, the roll call of those who have been more decisive was comprehensive. 'Australia, Canada, the UK, France, and 147 other countries have made similar declarations as the world responds to the ongoing destruction and famine in Gaza,' he added. Just a couple of weeks ago, news organisations were prevaricating over whether they could say 'famine' was happening in Gaza or not, but not so much now. The previous evening, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Winston Peters, put out a statement that said the government would 'carefully weigh up its position … over the next month'. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told reporters recognition was 'not a race'. But back on Morning Report on Tuesday, former prime minister Helen Clark told Dann she thought it really was urgent. 'I've seen victims of the war in the hospital in a nearby town. I've seen the trucks turned around carrying food and medicines which were unable to enter Gaza. This is a catastrophic situation. And here we are in New Zealand somehow arguing some fine point about whether we should be adding our voice,' she said, after a trip to the Rafah border crossing. But in the media here, party political tensions were overshadowing debate about New Zealand's official response. When Green Party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick condemned what she saw as government's spinelessness in the House, it led the ZB news soon after – followed by points of order about MPs accessories from ACT leader David Seymour. And Swarbrick's eventual expulsion led TVNZ's 1News at Six soon after that. But on Newstalk ZB, the hosts overwhelmingly declared that declaring Palestinian statehood was just a gesture. 'Two groups determined to wipe each other off the face of the earth will never stop until one wins. Definitively recognising one as a state will not make a jot of difference,' Mike Hosking insisted on his breakfast show on Tuesday. Later on her ZB Drive show, Heather du Plessis-Allan reckoned it was just a distraction – one that had already distracted the media. 'For every minute and every column inch that we dedicate to talking about whether we should or should not support the state of Palestine in September, we are not spending … talking about getting aid into kids who need food,' she said. 'I'm sorry, but recognising Palestine right now while this war between Hamas and Israel is ongoing is rewarding Hamas for what they did on October 7th,' she added. Half an hour later, du Plessis-Allan's partner Barry Soper backed her up. 'Is that going to stop the war? Is Hamas going to finally put down the arms. They can see it as a badge of honour if they did do that.' Neither of them were convinced by Child Fund chief executive and politics pundit Josie Pagani. 'The only way that we're going to get any movement forward on this is to recognise a two state solution,' she said on the same show 24 hours earlier. 'The purpose of recognising Palestinian statehood is not to instantly magic up a happy ending to the misery in Gaza. It's to preserve the viability of a two-state solution,' The Herald's senior political correspondent Audrey Young wrote in response. Clark had also told Morning Report that she'd just been talking to Egypt's foreign minister about plans. 'There's elaborate plans which don't include Hamas. So I think it's all a bit of a red herring now to be talking about Hamas. There are credible plans for moving forward,' Clark said The same day University of Auckland international relations professor Maria Amoudian – on Jesse Mulligan's Afternoons show on RNZ National – said Palestinian statehood would not just be symbolic. 'It would mean they would get a seat at the United Nations. A better voice in UNESCO, diplomatic relations among countries which could evolve into economic support and trade. Also legal rights over territorial waters, airspace and sovereignty over their own territory,' she said. On RNZ's Midday Report the same day, Otago University professor Robert Patman said that our government's current position not only 'lacked moral clarity,' it was actually inconsistent with our own recent actions and statements. International law was being 'trashed on a daily basis by Israel,' Patman said. 'In Gaza, cameramen and journalists from Al Jazeera were assassinated by the Netanyahu government. It raises issues which go right to the heart of our identity as a country. I think most Kiwis are very clear. They want to see a world based on rules.' Meanwhile, political reporters here sensed that we were international laggards on this because partner parties in the Coalition were putting the handbrake on. In his online newsletter Politik, Richard Harman pointed out ACT MP Simon Court had said in Parliament there cannot be progress towards a Palestinian state until all Israeli hostages are returned and Hamas is dismantled. He said it was also the position of the foreign minister, though Peters himself had not actually said that. And Luxon had said on Monday Hamas held hostages that should be released. 'We are thinking carefully about all of the different sides … rather than trying to prove our own moral superiority over each other, which the likes of Chlöe Swarbrick have just been doing,' ACT's David Seymour told ZB when asked if ACT was holding up Cabinet support for recognition of Palestine. Seymour gave a similar response to the Parliamentary Press Gallery reporters. It was later posted to ACT's YouTube channel as 'David versus the media. David Seymour WARNS against rushing Palestine'. He repeated his worry that Hamas might benefit. But when a reporter pointed out a Palestinian state means more than just Gaza, and that Hamas doesn't control the West Bank, that episode of 'David versus the Media' came to an end. 'Right now everyone is focused on Gaza. And no one, if you recognise any kind of state – is going to think that this is about the West Bank. That's where the image of every country is going to be judged,' he said. 'Talk to you about domestic politics tomorrow,' Seymour said in closing. On TVNZ's 1News, Simon Mercep highlighted another practical problem. 'All five permanent members of the UN Security Council. – America, Russia, China, France and the UK – have to agree on statehood. 'Israel's major ally, the US, does not agree. It used its veto as recently as last year.' It wasn't much mentioned in the media this past week, but the veto right is something that New Zealand has long opposed. Back in 2012, foreign minister Murray McCully called on the five permanent members to give up their veto rights issues involving atrocities. He said the inability to act in Syria had 'cost the UN credibility in the eyes of fair-minded people around the world'. Three years later, he said that the Security Council was failing to prevent conflict – and during a stint chairing the Security Council later that year (when New Zealand was a non permanent member for two years) McCully criticised it again. The government paid for New Zealand journalists to travel to the UN at the time to watch sessions chaired by New Zealand. In late 2016, New Zealand co-sponsored a UN resolution that said Israeli settlements in the occupied territories had no legal validity – and were dangerously imperilling the viability of the two-state solution.' The resolution passed, Israel withdrew its ambassador here – and the incoming President Trump said 'things will be different in the UN' after his first inauguration. 'The position we adopted is totally in line with our long established policy on the Palestinian question,' McCully said at the time, stuck to his guns. Back then he also said he hoped the attitude of Israel would eventually soften. Eight years later, it's the attitude of New Zealand's government – and its clarity on two-state solution – that seems to have diluted.