logo
Potato price surge fuels inflation pain for Russia's poorest

Potato price surge fuels inflation pain for Russia's poorest

Reutersa day ago

By Gleb Bryansk and Evgeniy Matveev
SERGIEVSKIY, Russia, June 10 (Reuters) - At a farm near Moscow, newly arrived guest workers from India are planting potatoes and cabbages - work closely monitored by central bank analysts as they prepare for board meetings to set interest rates.
While in developed economies such as the United States food accounts for about 14% of the basket used to calculate inflation, in Russia it makes up a hefty 40% or so, and surging prices for potatoes and other staples have been a major reason for its tight monetary policy.
The central bank trimmed its benchmark rate to 20% on June 6 but even that is around the highest since 2003. More worryingly, people's inflationary expectations - a driver for price pressures - remain high despite actual inflation slowing down.
Potato prices, which have tripled since last year when the crop fell by 12%, are not helping matters.
"It is crazy. Potatoes have always been very cheap. At this price, I will not buy them - I think few people will," said Tamara, a 67-year-old pensioner outside a Pyaterochka discount store in Moscow.
Central bank governor Elvira Nabiullina acknowledged the problem in her press conference after the rate cut.
"On a daily basis, people are not buying smartphones and television sets," she said. "They are buying food. If prices there are growing faster, it forms high inflationary expectations."
Russian households spent almost 35% of income on food in April, a record in five years of data and up from 29% last April, a study by the Romir think tank showed.
Pyaterochka sells Russian old crop potatoes for 84 roubles ($1.06) per kilo and new crop potatoes for 120 ($1.53) per kilo, compared with an average 43 roubles per kilo in retail stores this time last year. That is even higher than the roughly $0.92 per kilo charged in Britain's biggest supermarket chain Tesco.
Prices for onions, cabbage, beets, carrots and other ingredients of beetroot soup, a popular dish across Eastern Europe often used to gauge food inflation, have also surged.
The crisis even caught out President Vladimir Putin, who has been touting Russia's agricultural development and growing exports despite Western sanctions as a success story, despite similar spikes in butter and egg prices earlier this year.
The government has responded by boosting imports. Egypt has tripled potato supplies to Russia, while Belarus, Russia's backup potato supplier, said it had run out of stocks.
Farmers blame poor weather last year for the lower crop but also point to rising costs for machinery, fuel, fertilizers and labour, as well as high interest rates as factors behind the price surge.
"Last year, at first it was very cold, then came drought," said Yaroslav Ivanov, head of the Sovkhoz Sergiyevsky farm.
"There was a shortage of potatoes, their quality was worse than average. The good quality potatoes sold out quickly, and the situation began to worsen."
He added that high prices this year compensated for some of the losses suffered by potato farmers after a bumper harvest in 2023, when retail prices slumped. This year, the harvest is expected to be better.
"We will see a decrease in price, a stabilization starting from July," said Agriculture Minister Oksana Lut.
The TsMAKP think tank, which advises the government, estimated inflation for the poor - calculated using basic food, utilities and medicine costs - exceeded 20% in April, ten percentage points above the official rate.
"The continued rapid increase in food prices has led to a significant divergence between the price index for the consumption basket of low-income populations and the overall inflation rate," TsMAKP said.
Pensioners make up more than a quarter of the population and the average monthly pension was 23,448 roubles ($298) in April. In real terms, it fell throughout last year before rising 1.4% since the start of 2025.
"Low-income individuals are hit much harder by inflation," said Sergei Aleksashenko, a former central bank official and opposition economist living in exile in the U.S., pointing to pensioners and public sector workers.
($1 = 78.5000 roubles)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inflation likely ticked higher last month, though Americans may be spending less to travel
Inflation likely ticked higher last month, though Americans may be spending less to travel

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Inflation likely ticked higher last month, though Americans may be spending less to travel

U.S. inflation likely picked up a bit last month as President Donald Trump 's tariffs start to bite, but lower prices for gas and possibly for air fares and used cars may limit the overall increase. The government's inflation report, to be released Wednesday, is forecast to show that consumer prices rose 2.5% in May compared with a year ago, according to economists surveyed by data provider FactSet. That would be the first increase in four months and up from 2.3% in April. Excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core prices are projected to have risen 2.9% in May from a year earlier, up from 2.8% in April. Trump's tariffs are expected to contribute to the uptick by raising the cost of some imports, including clothes, furniture, appliances, and possibly new cars. Many retailers and some consumer products companies have said they have plans to raise prices or have already done so to cover the cost of the import duties. On a monthly basis, prices are expected to have moved up 0.2% from April to May, while core prices are forecast to have increased 0.3%. At that pace, core prices would rise much faster than the Federal Reserve's 2% target. Economists and the inflation-fighters at the Fed focus on core inflation because it often provides a better sense of where inflation is headed. Inflation has cooled in the past year and, excluding the impact of tariffs, economists say it would be on track to return to the Fed's target, which would allow the central bank to cut its key interest rates. Yet core prices have been more stubborn and were stuck between 3.2% and 3.4% for nearly a year until February, when they started to decline a bit. Last week, the Labor Department's Bureau of Labor Statistics, which compiles the inflation data, said it is reducing the amount of data it collects for each inflation report. Economists have expressed concern about the cutback, and while it isn't clear how sharp the reduction is, most analysts say it is likely to have a minor impact. Still, any reduction in data collection could make the figures more volatile. Nearly all economists expect Trump's duties will make many things more expensive in the second half of this year, including cars and groceries, though by how much is still uncertain. Trump has slapped 30% tariffs on all imports from China, plus a 10% baseline tariff on imported goods from every other country, and 50% import taxes on steel and aluminum. Given the potential for higher prices in the coming months, Fed Chair Jerome Powell and other Fed officials have made clear they will keep their key rate unchanged until they have a better sense of how tariffs will affect the economy. The full impact of the tariffs likely won't be felt until the second half of the year, analysts say, even though many tariffs have been in place, in one form or another, since March and April. There are several reasons it can take months for the duties to fully pass through into retail prices. To begin with, many companies tried to beat the clock by bringing in foreign goods before Trump's tariffs took effect, producing a flood of imports in March. As a result, they have stockpiled goods in warehouses that weren't hit by tariffs and so don't have to raise prices yet. Many companies also held off on hiking prices during the chaos of April and May, when Trump announced sweeping tariffs on imports from nearly 60 countries, only to put them on hold a week later. He also ramped up duties on China to 145%, essentially cutting off trade with the United States' third-largest trading partner. Imports fell sharply in April as a result. The U.S. and China last month agreed to lower duties, with the U.S. now taxing Chinese imports 30%. For many firms, it wasn't worth it to raise prices until they had a better sense of where tariffs would settle. It's possible some duties could fall further if the Trump administration is able to reach trade deals in negotiations with China, the European Union, Japan and other countries. Still, Bryan Eshelman, a partner and managing director at consulting firm AlixPartners, said higher prices 'are coming.' Eshelman expects that shoppers will start feeling the impact in July, and predicts prices for back-to-school items like clothing and backpacks could go up anywhere from 5% to 15%. Retailers may add surcharges tied to higher tariffs costs at the cash register starting in September, he said. 'I think that that's something that retailers are going to be loathe to pull out and do. And so I think they will wait to see how things unfold, ' he said. Most imported goods are actually parts or raw materials for larger products, such as the steel and aluminum goods now facing 50% duties. It will take time for those costs to filter through the supply chain and affect prices. Some stores, however, have already said they will implement higher prices, including Best Buy, Walmart and Lululemon. It was only last month when Trump ripped into Walmart after the nation's largest retailer boldly warned that prices are already starting to go up on items like bananas. Walmart's chief financial officer John David Rainey told The Associated Press that a car seat that currently sells for $350 at Walmart will likely cost customers another $100. Rainey also told analysts at an Oppenheimer investor conference on Monday that for some items, Walmart will reduce inventory by as much as 20% because it expects higher prices will reduce demand, and it doesn't want to be stuck with leftover inventory.

US stock futures dip on lack of details from China trade talk, CPI in focus
US stock futures dip on lack of details from China trade talk, CPI in focus

Reuters

timean hour ago

  • Reuters

US stock futures dip on lack of details from China trade talk, CPI in focus

June 11 (Reuters) - U.S. stock index futures edged lower on Wednesday after U.S.-China trade talks offered little sign of a durable resolution to their longstanding trade tensions, while investors turned their focus to a key inflation reading. The May consumer prices report (CPI) is due at 8:30 a.m. ET, with economists polled by Reuters expecting a 0.2% rise month-over-month and a 2.5% increase on an annual basis, slightly higher compared with April as tariffs potentially raised underlying price pressures. "Markets appear to be shifting their focus - at least temporarily - away from headline-driven tariff risk and back to the macro data that really matters," said Jeff O'Connor, head of market structure at Liquidnet in emailed comments. "Investors are bracing for the first hard evidence of how recent trade policies may be filtering into inflation." Traders are pricing in 44 basis points of rate cuts by year-end, penciling in a 50% chance of a 25 bps cut in September, according to the CMEGroup's FedWatch tool. Policymakers are widely expected to keep rates unchanged next week. U.S. and Chinese officials agreed on a framework to put their trade truce back on track and resolve China's export restrictions on rare earth minerals and magnets, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Tuesday at the conclusion of two days of intense negotiations in London. The negotiations, which are pending reviews from President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, were aimed at mitigating tit-for-tat tariffs between the two superpowers that have roiled global markets for much of the year. But the talks did little to lift sentiment among investors, who had priced the deal in to some extent. The U.S. stock market has rallied in recent weeks, recovering from a slump in April sparked by Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs. The S&P 500 remains about 1.7% below all-time highs touched in February, while the Nasdaq is 2.3% below its record peaks reached in December. At 06:01 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 88 points, or 0.21%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 12.5 points, or 0.21%, and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 44.25 points, or 0.2%. Among stocks, Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab advanced 1.8% premarket after CEO Elon Musk also said he regrets some of the posts he made last week about Trump, opening the way to a healing of an abrupt rift that has roiled its shares. Software development platform provider GitLab (GTLB.O), opens new tab fell 13% after it reported quarterly results. Shares of videogame retailer GameStop (GME.N), opens new tab fell 4.7% after it reported a decline in first-quarter revenue.

Russian court postpones hearing in $2.9 billion Rosatom-Fortum dispute until March
Russian court postpones hearing in $2.9 billion Rosatom-Fortum dispute until March

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

Russian court postpones hearing in $2.9 billion Rosatom-Fortum dispute until March

MOSCOW, June 11 (Reuters) - A Russian court on Wednesday postponed legal proceedings by more than nine months in a $2.9 billion lawsuit filed by Russia's Rosatom against Finland's Fortum ( opens new tab and Outokumpu ( opens new tab, court filings showed. State-controlled nuclear energy firm Rosatom is seeking 227.8 billion roubles ($2.9 billion) in compensation for losses over the termination of a contract for the Hanhikivi-1 nuclear power plant in Finland, court documents and a Rosatom statement showed in May. A hearing scheduled at the Moscow City Arbitration Court for Wednesday morning was postponed until March 16, 2026, court filings showed, without giving further details. Rosatom, Fortum and Outokumpu had no immediate comment. Rosatom and its former Finnish partners have been locked in dispute over the cancelled contract since May 2022. The Finnish side terminated the project soon after Moscow launched the conflict in Ukraine, citing significant delays and political risks. Rosatom in May said it was seeking compensation for losses caused by what it called the unlawful termination of the EPC contract to build the plant, violations of the shareholder agreement and other contractual disputes. Outokumpu has said it was never a direct party to the EPC agreement or any other agreement with any Rosatom company related to the Hanhikivi-1 project. Fortum said in May that the International Chamber of Commerce's decision that Rosatom's subsidiary could not make Fortum a party to proceedings was final. The contract to build the 1.2 gigawatt plant with investments estimated at 6.5-7 billion euros was signed in 2013 with Fennovoima, a joint consortium in which Finnish stakeholders including Fortum, Outokumpu and SSAB originally controlled two thirds through a joint venture, and the Russian side held one third. After the project's termination, Fennovoima ceased all its operations and is only engaged in legal disputes. ($1 = 78.6000 roubles)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store