
Iran deports over 88,000 afghans in one week amid rising humanitarian crisis
Kabul: More than 88,000 undocumented Afghan migrants were deported from Iran in a single week, Khaama Press reported, citing International Organisation for Migration (IOM), raising alarm over urgent humanitarian and funding needs.
Between June 18 and June 26, a total of 88,308 undocumented Afghan nationals were forcibly returned from Iran to Afghanistan, according to the IOM's June 28 update. The organisation stated that only 11 per cent of these returnees received any humanitarian assistance due to critical resource limitations, calling for urgent international funding to meet the basic needs of the most vulnerable.
The report further highlighted that 55 per cent of the returnees during this period were forcibly deported, and 64 per cent were travelling as families--underscoring the disproportionate impact on women and children. This figure marked a steep rise from the previous week, when 32,844 individuals were returned between June 10 and June 17.
Earlier data from the World Health Organisation (WHO) showed that over 71,000 migrants were returned from both Iran and Pakistan between June 1 and June 15, underscoring the scale and continuity of expulsions. Both agencies warned of the dire health and protection challenges that await returnees in overcrowded and under-resourced border areas, Khaama Press reported.
In Iran, the crackdown on undocumented Afghan nationals has intensified. Authorities have issued new orders invalidating all lease agreements with Afghan refugees and warning landlords against offering them shelter. According to Khaama Press, police have reportedly detained Afghan migrants across several provinces, with arrests increasing notably after the recent 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel.
Meanwhile, Pakistan has also resumed strict enforcement against Afghan refugees, particularly in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan. Identity checks, detentions, and deportations have increased, often targeting families with little to no warning or legal recourse. Human rights groups have expressed concern over the ongoing mass arrests and forced returns.
Both IOM and WHO have appealed for immediate international support to address the escalating refugee crisis. With deportations surging and border services overstretched, Afghan returnees face rising threats of homelessness, poverty, and deteriorating health conditions, Khaama Press reported.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times of Oman
10 hours ago
- Times of Oman
"I am not offering Iran anything": Trump denies nuclear deal talks
Washington: US President Donald Trump has denied engaging in any talks with Iran or offering them concessions. In a late-night post on Truth Social, Trump stated, "I am not offering Iran ANYTHING, unlike Obama, who paid them $Billions under the stupid 'road to a nuclear weapon JCPOA (which would now be expired!), nor am I even talking to them since we totally OBLITERATED their Nuclear Facilities." On Friday, Trump also refuted media reports suggesting that his administration had explored the possibility of allowing Iran access to up to $30 billion for a civilian nuclear energy programme. In response to the ongoing tensions, Iranian Foreign Minister Seyed Abbas Araghchi said on Saturday that President Donald Trump should put aside the "disrespectful tone" towards Iran's Supreme Leader Khamenei if the US wants to have a deal with Iran. Underscoring that Iran does not take it kindly to threats and insults, Aragchi said that Iran would not hesitate to unveil its real capabilities. "The complexity and tenacity of Iranians are famously known in our magnificent carpets, woven through countless hours of hard work and patience. But as a people, our basic premise is very simple and straightforward: we know our worth, value our independence, and never allow anyone else to decide our destiny," Iranian Foreign Minister wrote on X. He added, "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers." "The Great and Powerful Iranian People, who showed the world that the Israeli regime had NO CHOICE but to RUN to "Daddy" to avoid being flattened by our Missiles, do not take kindly to Threats and Insults. If Illusions lead to worse mistakes, Iran will not hesitate to unveil its Real Capabilities, which will certainly END any Delusion about the Power of Iran", the post further mentioned. He concluded his remarks by saying, "Good will begets good will, and respect begets respect." The remarks by the Iranian Foreign Minister come amid the backdrop of the US hinting towards talks with Iran. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on Thursday (US local time) had said the Trump administration is focused on diplomacy and peace, adding that the US continues to remain in close communication with the Iranians. Addressing a press briefing, Leavitt said, "I spoke to our special envoy Witkoff at length this morning and I can assure all of you we continue to be in close communication with the Iranians and through our intermediaries as well, namely the Qataris, who have been an incredible ally and partner throughout this entire effort. As I said, this administration is always focused on diplomacy and peace, and we want to ensure we can get to a place where Iran agrees to a non-enrichment civil nuclear program." Her remarks follow after the US had conducted precision strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites under Operation 'Midnight Hammer'.


Times of Oman
16 hours ago
- Times of Oman
IAEA Chief says Iran may restart Uranium enrichment "in months"
Washington DC: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi said that US strikes on Iran fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear programme and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium "in a matter of months," contradicting US President Donald Trump's claims the US set Tehran's ambitions back by "decades", CNN reported. Grossi's comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency, which suggests the United States' strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear programme, and likely only set it back by months. While the final military and intelligence assessment has yet to come, Trump has repeatedly claimed to have "completely and totally obliterated" Tehran's nuclear programme. The 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran began earlier this month when Israel launched an unprecedented attack it said aimed at preventing Tehran from developing a nuclear bomb. Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. The US then struck three key Iranian nuclear sites before a ceasefire began. The extent of the damage to Tehran's nuclear programme has been hotly debated ever since. US military officials have in recent days provided some new information about the planning of the strikes, but offered no new evidence of their effectiveness against Iran's nuclear programme. Following classified briefings this week, Republican lawmakers acknowledged the US strikes may not have eliminated all of Iran's nuclear materials - but argued that this was never part of the military's mission, CNN reported. Meanwhile, The Washington Post reported on Sunday that the US had obtained intercepted messages in which senior Iranian officials discussing the attacks said they were not as destructive as they anticipated. Asked about the different assessments, Grossi, Director General of IAEA, said, "This hourglass approach in weapons of mass destruction is not a good idea." "The capacities they have are there. They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that. But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there," CNN reported, quoting Grossi. "It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage," Grossi went on to say. "Iran has the capacities there; industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again."


Times of Oman
a day ago
- Times of Oman
Shifting sands: Why our defence future lies in East, not in West
The recent escalating conflicts in Palestine and the wider Iran-Israel tensions have laid bare a stark reality for nations in our region: Reliance on Western arms suppliers and alliances comes with significant geopolitical strings attached, strings that consistently pull in favour of Israel. We have seen, for instance, in the context of the Ukraine conflict, how the political will of supplying governments can dictate the terms of use, the types of targets permissible, and even the timely delivery of crucial armaments. This raises a profound concern: Can we truly depend on weapons systems whose operational deployment might be constrained by the strategic preferences of their Western government benefactors, especially if our national interests diverge from theirs, particularly concerning Israel? It is time for us to fundamentally reassess our defence strategy and look eastward, drawing lessons from nations like Iran in developing indigenous capabilities, particularly in advanced drone and rocket technology. For decades, the West has positioned itself as the primary provider of advanced weaponry and security partnerships. Yet, the unfolding crises demonstrate a clear pattern: When push comes to shove, the deep-rooted alliances between Western powers and Israel supersede any commitments to other regional partners. We have witnessed a consistent siding with Israel, often at the expense of regional stability and justice, regardless of the humanitarian consequences. This bias is not merely a matter of policy but is intrinsically linked to the very nature of their strategic relationships and arms industries. This predicament leaves us vulnerable. To truly safeguard our sovereignty and security, we must cultivate self-reliance. And in this pursuit, Iran, despite its own complex geopolitical standing, offers invaluable insights, particularly in the realm of asymmetric warfare capabilities. Sanctions and isolation have forced Iran to become a formidable innovator in drone and missile technology. Their consistent development and deployment of increasingly sophisticated drones and precision-guided missiles, from the 'War of the Cities' to recent advancements in loitering munitions and air defense systems, demonstrate a remarkable capacity for indigenous military industrial growth. They have not waited for external suppliers, but rather have invested heavily in reverse-engineering, research, and domestic production. This includes a robust ballistic missile programme, and advancements in systems like the Majid air defense system, designed to counter modern aerial threats. Imagine the strength of our air defence if we were to emulate this strategic independence. By investing in our own scientific and engineering talent, establishing dedicated research and development centrrs, and fostering local manufacturing, we can build a defence apparatus tailored to our specific needs and threats, free from external influence. This does not mean isolating ourselves, but rather diversifying our partnerships and prioritising self-sufficiency. Going East for our defence needs also offers opportunities for more equitable partnerships. Nations in the East, many of whom have also faced the challenges of developing independent defence capabilities, may offer more favourable terms, facilitate technology transfer, and respect our strategic autonomy. Such collaborations would allow us to acquire necessary hardware while simultaneously building the expertise to maintain, adapt, and eventually produce our own. Crucially, this eastward shift also opens avenues for broader strategic alignment and cooperation with nations like Iran, China, Pakistan and Russia. As these powers increasingly advocate for a multi-polar world order, their strategic interests often converge on resisting singular global hegemony and fostering a more balanced international system. For our region, aligning with these nations offers a robust counterbalance to established biases and strengthens our collective voice and security when it comes to shared regional and global challenges. The current geopolitical climate is a wake-up call. We cannot afford to be passive recipients of security dictated by the priorities of others. The time has come to forge a new path, one that prioritizes national resilience and independent defense. By learning from the experiences of nations like Iran in developing sophisticated, homegrown drone and rocket capabilities, and by looking to the East for strategic partnerships and broader geopolitical alignment, we can secure a truly independent and robust defense for our future.