
Shifting sands: Why our defence future lies in East, not in West
We have seen, for instance, in the context of the Ukraine conflict, how the political will of supplying governments can dictate the terms of use, the types of targets permissible, and even the timely delivery of crucial armaments.
This raises a profound concern: Can we truly depend on weapons systems whose operational deployment might be constrained by the strategic preferences of their Western government benefactors, especially if our national interests diverge from theirs, particularly concerning Israel?
It is time for us to fundamentally reassess our defence strategy and look eastward, drawing lessons from nations like Iran in developing indigenous capabilities, particularly in advanced drone and rocket technology.
For decades, the West has positioned itself as the primary provider of advanced weaponry and security partnerships.
Yet, the unfolding crises demonstrate a clear pattern: When push comes to shove, the deep-rooted alliances between Western powers and Israel supersede any commitments to other regional partners. We have witnessed a consistent siding with Israel, often at the expense of regional stability and justice, regardless of the humanitarian consequences.
This bias is not merely a matter of policy but is intrinsically linked to the very nature of their strategic relationships and arms industries.
This predicament leaves us vulnerable. To truly safeguard our sovereignty and security, we must cultivate self-reliance.
And in this pursuit, Iran, despite its own complex geopolitical standing, offers invaluable insights, particularly in the realm of asymmetric warfare capabilities.
Sanctions and isolation have forced Iran to become a formidable innovator in drone and missile technology.
Their consistent development and deployment of increasingly sophisticated drones and precision-guided missiles, from the 'War of the Cities' to recent advancements in loitering munitions and air defense systems, demonstrate a remarkable capacity for indigenous military industrial growth.
They have not waited for external suppliers, but rather have invested heavily in reverse-engineering, research, and domestic production. This includes a robust ballistic missile programme, and advancements in systems like the Majid air defense system, designed to counter modern aerial threats.
Imagine the strength of our air defence if we were to emulate this strategic independence. By investing in our own scientific and engineering talent, establishing dedicated research and development centrrs, and fostering local manufacturing, we can build a defence apparatus tailored to our specific needs and threats, free from external influence.
This does not mean isolating ourselves, but rather diversifying our partnerships and prioritising self-sufficiency.
Going East for our defence needs also offers opportunities for more equitable partnerships.
Nations in the East, many of whom have also faced the challenges of developing independent defence capabilities, may offer more favourable terms, facilitate technology transfer, and respect our strategic autonomy.
Such collaborations would allow us to acquire necessary hardware while simultaneously building the expertise to maintain, adapt, and eventually produce our own.
Crucially, this eastward shift also opens avenues for broader strategic alignment and cooperation with nations like Iran, China, Pakistan and Russia. As these powers increasingly advocate for a multi-polar world order, their strategic interests often converge on resisting singular global hegemony and fostering a more balanced international system. For our region, aligning with these nations offers a robust counterbalance to established biases and strengthens our collective voice and security when it comes to shared regional and global challenges.
The current geopolitical climate is a wake-up call. We cannot afford to be passive recipients of security dictated by the priorities of others. The time has come to forge a new path, one that prioritizes national resilience and independent defense. By learning from the experiences of nations like Iran in developing sophisticated, homegrown drone and rocket capabilities, and by looking to the East for strategic partnerships and broader geopolitical alignment, we can secure a truly independent and robust defense for our future.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times of Oman
2 days ago
- Times of Oman
RNO commences process to recruit officer cadets
Muscat: The Royal Navy of Oman (RNO), in coordination with the Ministry of Labour, has begun the assessment and admission procedures for Omani citizens to join military service as officer cadets (university graduates - executives). Applicants will undergo several assessment stages according to the RNO's recruitment procedures, leading to the final admission stages. The RNO is leveraging its administrative and technical capabilities to facilitate the procedures for joining military service and enlisting in the fields of honor and national duty. These strenuous efforts by the Ministry of Defense and the Sultan's Armed Forces to employ Omani citizens are in line with the plans and programs established to recruit citizens and provide the branches of the Sultan's Armed Forces and other departments within the Ministry of Defence with national manpower.


Times of Oman
4 days ago
- Times of Oman
Israel announces plan to move Palestinians to southern Gaza
Israel's military announced on Saturday that it would move Palestinians to the southern Gaza Strip ahead of a renewed offensive. Gaza: The announcement comes days after Israel said it would launch an offensive to take control of northern Gaza City. The Israeli military agency in charge of civilian affairs in the Palestinian territories, known as COGAT, said that the the supply of tents to Gaza would resume on Sunday. It said that the shelter equipment would be transported via the Kerem Shalom crossing by the United Nations and international aid organizations after inspection by Israeli Defense Ministry personnel. What else do we know about Israel's plan? Israel's military did not specify when the movement of Palestinians would begin. Defense Minister Israel Katz said that "we are now in the stage of discussions to finalize the plan to defeat Hamas in Gaza." Israeli forces have increased operations on the outskirts of Gaza City, including in the Zeitoun and Shejaiya neighborhoods. On Sunday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that Palestinians would be moved into what he described as "safe zones." He also described Gaza City as the final stronghold of the Hamas militant group. Gaza City was the most populous urban center in the Palestinian enclave until most of its population was displaced in Israel's offensive. Hostage families call for protests Meanwhile, a group representing the families of hostages held in Gaza urged Israelis to take to the streets on Sunday and call for an agreement leading to an end to the war and the release of all remaining hostages. Some 251 people were taken hostage in Hamas' attacks on southern Israel on October 7, 2023. According to Israeli authorities, 20 of the remaining 50 hostages in Gaza are still alive. Around 1,200 people, most of them civilians, were killed in the attacks.


Times of Oman
5 days ago
- Times of Oman
Sayyid Badr, other leaders condemn 'Greater Israel'.plan of Netanyahu
Muscat: Sayyid Badr Hamad Al Busaidi, Foreign Minister of, in a joint statement issued by the foreign ministers of 30 Arab and Islamic countries and the secretaries-general of the Arab League, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), condemned in the strongest terms the statements made by Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel for the creation of so-called 'Greater Israel'. These statements represent a gross disregard and a blatant and dangerous violation of the rules of international law and the foundations of stable international relations, and constitute a direct threat to Arab national security, the sovereignty of states, and regional and international security and peace. They emphasised that while Arab and Islamic countries affirm their respect for international legitimacy and the United Nations Charter, particularly the article prohibiting the use or threat of force, Arab and Islamic countries will adopt all policies and measures to consolidate peace, and realise the interests of all countries and peoples in terms of security, stability, and development of the region. They condemned in the strongest terms the approval given by Israeli Minister Bezalel Smotrich of the settlement plan in the E1 area, and his statements rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state. This constitutes a flagrant violation of international law and a blatant assault on the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people to establish their independent, sovereign state on the June 4, 1967 lines, with occupied Jerusalem as its capital. They stressed that Israel has no sovereignty over the occupied Palestinian territory. They affirmed their absolute rejection and condemnation of this settlement plan and all illegal Israeli measures, which constitute a flagrant violation of international law and Security Council resolutions, particularly Resolution 2334, which condemns all Israeli settlement activities aimed at changing the demographic composition, character, and legal status of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, the capital of the State of Palestine. They also emphasised the advisory issued by the International Court of Justice, which emphasised the illegality of the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory and the need to end it immediately, eliminate its effects, and provide compensation for its damages. They warned of the danger of Israeli intentions and policies aimed at annexing Palestinian territories, and the Israeli government's continued expansionist settlement approach in the occupied West Bank, including attempts to harm Islamic and Christian holy sites, foremost among them the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque/Al-Haram Al-Sharif, daily incursions into Palestinian cities, villages and camps, the systematic destruction of Palestinian refugee camps and the displacement of Palestinians from their homes, which directly contributes to fuelling cycles of violence and conflict and undermines the chances of achieving a just and comprehensive peace in the region. They also warned against relying on ideological and racist illusions, which threaten to fuel conflict, making it difficult to control its course or predict its outcomes, and threatening both regional and international security and stability. In a related context, the foreign ministers of Arab and Islamic countries, the League of Arab States, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation reiterated their rejection and condemnation of the crimes of Israeli aggression, genocide, and ethnic cleansing. They also affirmed the need for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, while ensuring unconditional access to humanitarian aid to halt the systematic starvation policy used by Israel as a weapon of genocide. This requires an immediate end to the deadly Israeli blockade of the Strip, the opening of Israeli crossings with the Gaza Strip, and holding Israel, the "occupying power," fully responsible for the consequences of its crimes in the Gaza Strip, including the collapse of the health and relief systems. They reaffirmed their complete and absolute rejection of the displacement of the Palestinian people in any form and under any pretext, and called on the international community to pressure Israel to halt its aggression and fully withdraw from the Gaza Strip, in preparation for the creation of appropriate conditions for the implementation of the Arab-Islamic plan for early recovery and reconstruction efforts in the Strip. They emphasised that the Gaza Strip is an integral part of the occupied Palestinian territory, and the necessity for the State of Palestine to assume governance responsibilities in the Strip, as in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, with Arab and international support, within the framework of the political programme of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, and the policy of one system, one law, and one legitimate weapon. In this context, they called on the international community, especially the permanent members of the Security Council, particularly the United States of America, to assume their legal and moral responsibilities and take immediate action to compel Israel to halt its ongoing aggression against the Gaza Strip and its dangerous escalation in the occupied West Bank. They also called on Israel to provide international protection to the Palestinian people and enable them to realise their legitimate rights, foremost among which is their right to establish an independent, sovereign state on their national soil, and to hold accountable those who commit crimes and violations against the Palestinian people.